Alex Linder
September 21st, 2009, 09:44 AM
All please consider entering The Occidental Quarterly (http://www.toqonline.com/essay-contest/) Essay Competition $1,000 prize For an Essay on the Topic: Libertarianism & Racial Nationalism.
$1,000 prize For an Essay on the Topic: Libertarianism & Racial Nationalism
In terms of fundamental moral principles, libertarian individualism and racial nationalist collectivism could not be more opposed. Yet many racial nationalists are former libertarians.
? I can't think of a single WN who used to be a libertarian. I can think of a few writers fired by LRC for more or less admitting in print that only Whites are capable of creating a context in which libertarian ideas are workable, but they are not true WN.
The purpose of this contest is to encourage the exploration of the connections between libertarianism and racial nationalism, including but not limited to: racial nationalist critiques of libertarian individualism, racial nationalist examinations of specific libertarian thinkers (such as Ayn Rand), accounts of awakenings from libertarianism to racial nationalism, and the question of whether libertarianism is a Jewish intellectual movement as defined by Kevin MacDonald in The Culture of Critique.
Again, Johnson has put the question the wrong way, guaranteeing that he will end up with loads of blather against the evil jewy philosophy of libertarianism, which is not the point, altho it may be his intent.
The real questions are:
1) What is a white man? Is it a man, a child, a ward, or an ant? Does it need to be told what to do by an Erich Gliebe? Or is it fundamentally capable of free association and independent problem solving? Is the White man in a White state to be treated as an adult or as a child, as ZOG does today?
2) What is the proper form of an all-White state? Dominated out of a single capital, ie, what we have now, except with White rulers instead of jews? Or decentralized, following the principle of subsidiarity?
3) Is there any body of discovered laws and facts that cannot be put into practice save in an all-White nation? Are the libertarians correct in saying that there is, essentially, nothing government does well, and no function it performs that cannot be more efficiently and delightfully and freely handled by voluntary private associations? Why has WN been hung up for decades on whining about black crime and low IQ and "loving your race" rather than the possibilities inherent in a state without jews and muds - but also without the endless licensing, regulation and taxation that prevent White men from accumulating assets and free time in which to culture themselves?
4) Is religious faith in regulation and the power of the state characteristic of the white race at its best, its average, or its worst? Have the libertarians, through their researches and their lives, inadvertently revealed to racialists that while they have successfully resisted state brainwashing on race, they are still susceptible to its lies about its necessity and efficacy in every other quarter?
$1,000 prize For an Essay on the Topic: Libertarianism & Racial Nationalism
In terms of fundamental moral principles, libertarian individualism and racial nationalist collectivism could not be more opposed. Yet many racial nationalists are former libertarians.
? I can't think of a single WN who used to be a libertarian. I can think of a few writers fired by LRC for more or less admitting in print that only Whites are capable of creating a context in which libertarian ideas are workable, but they are not true WN.
The purpose of this contest is to encourage the exploration of the connections between libertarianism and racial nationalism, including but not limited to: racial nationalist critiques of libertarian individualism, racial nationalist examinations of specific libertarian thinkers (such as Ayn Rand), accounts of awakenings from libertarianism to racial nationalism, and the question of whether libertarianism is a Jewish intellectual movement as defined by Kevin MacDonald in The Culture of Critique.
Again, Johnson has put the question the wrong way, guaranteeing that he will end up with loads of blather against the evil jewy philosophy of libertarianism, which is not the point, altho it may be his intent.
The real questions are:
1) What is a white man? Is it a man, a child, a ward, or an ant? Does it need to be told what to do by an Erich Gliebe? Or is it fundamentally capable of free association and independent problem solving? Is the White man in a White state to be treated as an adult or as a child, as ZOG does today?
2) What is the proper form of an all-White state? Dominated out of a single capital, ie, what we have now, except with White rulers instead of jews? Or decentralized, following the principle of subsidiarity?
3) Is there any body of discovered laws and facts that cannot be put into practice save in an all-White nation? Are the libertarians correct in saying that there is, essentially, nothing government does well, and no function it performs that cannot be more efficiently and delightfully and freely handled by voluntary private associations? Why has WN been hung up for decades on whining about black crime and low IQ and "loving your race" rather than the possibilities inherent in a state without jews and muds - but also without the endless licensing, regulation and taxation that prevent White men from accumulating assets and free time in which to culture themselves?
4) Is religious faith in regulation and the power of the state characteristic of the white race at its best, its average, or its worst? Have the libertarians, through their researches and their lives, inadvertently revealed to racialists that while they have successfully resisted state brainwashing on race, they are still susceptible to its lies about its necessity and efficacy in every other quarter?