Name: Terry Blackham
From: National Activities Organiser/National Front
Sent: 23:56 GMT on 29 September

I would like to put it to our supporters on this guest book that if the only out come on Saturday is arrests, do we still attend?

The fact is that we have now exposed the police for what they are and also all the councillors, including Steve Batkin. They all bow to the needs of immigrants and there threats of violence, they might but we in the NF have got more balls than that lot put together.

The fightback in Stoke has only just begun and you can trust us to remove every non white from Stoke if it’s the last thing we do, if the election battle ground is to be Stoke then so be it.

The NF has been contacted by Reading fans and Millwall fans who all want to help us in our campaign, they will do this on the 16th and 30th October. The disgust of people around the country about our ban and the people who called for it is gaining momentum; we have had more calls about this Saturday than any other march we have held.

Over the next few weeks the NF have a number of decisions to make and we hope that all of you will work with us to make sure we prevail, the police are trying to break us and also trying to make the white British people look like mugs to the local Asians.

As far as we see it the police have lost the respect of all sections of white British society due to there continued effort to criminalise the British people, this Saturday Asians have threatened to riot against the NF and whom do the police clamp down on? Us!

I would call on all of you reading this guest book to join our organisation now, we need to become more organised and be able to put as many people as possible into an area with a moments notice.

See you all Saturday!

This post was totally uncalled for.

For those that don't believe us or didn't believe us, the current BNP leadership are on a wrecking spree for the Establishment and have been for years. They have caused division at every turn. This was all advertised only one week before Nick Griffin got himself elected to the BNP leadership in the DAILY EXPRESS by Cmdr. John Grieve of Scotland Yard. He bragged that the BNP would be 'ripped up' from within. Wasn't he right ?

===============================
From BNP main website;


BNP success in Hartlepool

1st October 2004
An eye-catching headline especially as the BNP did not contest the Hartlepool by-election, but in every way it was a victory for Britain's fastest growing patriotic party and the disastrous fourth-place showing of the Tories in Hartlepool represents another small but valuable success for the leadership of the British National Party.

In the run-up to the by-election, caused by the appointment of Blair crony and best friend Peter Mandelson to his stunningly overpaid job in Brussels, a number of well-meaning individuals expressed the belief that the BNP should contest it.

The matter was debated between key members of the leadership, both nationally and locally, before party chairman Nick Griffin and National Elections Officer Eddy Butler decided that the BNP would not fight Hartlepool.

UKIP factor

The key reasoning was that the good showing of UKIP in the area back in June meant that, in a by-election especially, their money and favoured media status would make them the favoured party of patriotic voters, thereby squeezing the BNP vote however much work our local activists put in on the ground. More important still, the BNP would still secure a solid vote, which it was felt would come far more at the expense of UKIP than from the Tories. The likely result of our standing, therefore, would be to save Michael Howard from the shocking blow of having the Tory come fourth, behind UKIP.

As a major article on our electoral strategy by Mr Griffin, starting in October's Identity magazine, makes clear, the BNP regards the Conservative Party as the biggest single obstacle by far, in the way of building a power-winning nationalist alternative in Britain. Anything which damages the Tories - including the short-term advance of UKIP - is therefore a good thing for the country and for the BNP. It was also believed that UKIP's internal wranglings would stop them putting up the high-profile candidate who could quite conceivably win the seat - Kilroy-Silk - so it would be better to leave them to fail to win the seat on their own account rather than try to get in their way.

Lib-Dem advance

The end result showed how the BNP tactic worked like a dream. A dismal night for Labour, a good one for the LibDems - who we want to see overtake the Tories at the General Election, a disappointing night for UKIP (who only narrowly missed beating Labour in the same seat back in June and whose vote slumped, leading to further internal unrest about the Farage/Titford block on Kilroy-Silk) and a truly shocking night for Michael Howard's Dead Men Walking. Oh, and less than 1% of the vote for the English Democrats and National Front combined - time for them to leave elections to the ones with the ability to know when and where to fight.

Resources deployed elsewhere

We, meanwhile, saved ourselves a couple of thousand pounds, and were able to concentrate our most experienced election fighters where their efforts really made a difference - in Keighley and Dagenham.

Result? Two more BNP councillors.

At last the British National Party - after all these years, a patriotic party with brains!

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/2004_oct/news_oct3.htm

Eddy Butler has some very strange views on race. I must apologise, as he came 'through the ranks' when I was the Regional Organiser in the North West of England, and he is the most boring speaker ever.

Butlers views on race matches Griffins. We British have no chance with these two comedians.

National Alliance censor the below story on BNP main website re; Hartlepool by-election.

http://www.nationalvanguard.org/

They have taken out the cheap jibes against the National Front from 'their' version of the BNP story. Are they embarassed or what ?
This post was totally uncalled for.

For those that don't believe us or didn't believe us, the current BNP leadership are on a wrecking spree for the Establishment and have been for years. They have caused division at every turn. This was all advertised only one week before Nick Griffin got himself elected to the BNP leadership in the DAILY EXPRESS by Cmdr. John Grieve of Scotland Yard. He bragged that the BNP would be 'ripped up' from within. Wasn't he right ?

===============================
From BNP main website;


BNP success in Hartlepool

1st October 2004
An eye-catching headline especially as the BNP did not contest the Hartlepool by-election, but in every way it was a victory for Britain's fastest growing patriotic party and the disastrous fourth-place showing of the Tories in Hartlepool represents another small but valuable success for the leadership of the British National Party.

In the run-up to the by-election, caused by the appointment of Blair crony and best friend Peter Mandelson to his stunningly overpaid job in Brussels, a number of well-meaning individuals expressed the belief that the BNP should contest it.

The matter was debated between key members of the leadership, both nationally and locally, before party chairman Nick Griffin and National Elections Officer Eddy Butler decided that the BNP would not fight Hartlepool.

UKIP factor

The key reasoning was that the good showing of UKIP in the area back in June meant that, in a by-election especially, their money and favoured media status would make them the favoured party of patriotic voters, thereby squeezing the BNP vote however much work our local activists put in on the ground. More important still, the BNP would still secure a solid vote, which it was felt would come far more at the expense of UKIP than from the Tories. The likely result of our standing, therefore, would be to save Michael Howard from the shocking blow of having the Tory come fourth, behind UKIP.

As a major article on our electoral strategy by Mr Griffin, starting in October's Identity magazine, makes clear, the BNP regards the Conservative Party as the biggest single obstacle by far, in the way of building a power-winning nationalist alternative in Britain. Anything which damages the Tories - including the short-term advance of UKIP - is therefore a good thing for the country and for the BNP. It was also believed that UKIP's internal wranglings would stop them putting up the high-profile candidate who could quite conceivably win the seat - Kilroy-Silk - so it would be better to leave them to fail to win the seat on their own account rather than try to get in their way.

Lib-Dem advance

The end result showed how the BNP tactic worked like a dream. A dismal night for Labour, a good one for the LibDems - who we want to see overtake the Tories at the General Election, a disappointing night for UKIP (who only narrowly missed beating Labour in the same seat back in June and whose vote slumped, leading to further internal unrest about the Farage/Titford block on Kilroy-Silk) and a truly shocking night for Michael Howard's Dead Men Walking. Oh, and less than 1% of the vote for the English Democrats and National Front combined - time for them to leave elections to the ones with the ability to know when and where to fight.

Resources deployed elsewhere

We, meanwhile, saved ourselves a couple of thousand pounds, and were able to concentrate our most experienced election fighters where their efforts really made a difference - in Keighley and Dagenham.

Result? Two more BNP councillors.

At last the British National Party - after all these years, a patriotic party with brains!

http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/2004_oct/news_oct3.htm