http://jameshartforcongress.com/ (Poll on Main Page)

What role should eugenics play in human affairs?


Government should enforce eugenic standards

Doctors should be involved in eugenics

I should judge the genetic suitability of spouse

Government should not encourage dysgenics

Only god should be concerned with eugenics

There is no proper role for eugenics

I have no idea



As of this post "There is no proper role for eugenics" is winning by 70%...

[size=4]WE CAN CHANGE THAT![/size]

I went with the spouse angle but I see that we only need just over 5000 votes at this point to change the tide.

[QUOTE=Cracker oftheWhip]I went with the spouse angle but I see that we only need just over 5000 votes at this point to change the tide.[/QUOTE]

It's the only poll he's had on that site. If we copy and post this to other message boards, we could change the tide.

I can't believe people are so...whatever, that they don't even think they can choose the genetic suitability of their spouse. :rolleyes:


So if I meet a man who is kind but has three eyes and a tail, should I feel bad because I am

A) simply not attracted to him sexually

and

B) don't want freaky babies

?

Isn't every love/lust relationship about eugenics? You choose to mate with someone that you feel betters you. Isn't that why you are attracted to them in the first place? It is only because of societal sickness that we have whites going for the dark races, jews, whiggers, etc.

[QUOTE=Screaming Peacock]

Isn't every love/lust relationship about eugenics? You choose to mate with someone that you feel betters you. Isn't that why you are attracted to them in the first place? It is only because of societal sickness that we have whites going for the dark races, jews, whiggers, etc.[/QUOTE]


I think this is a good point, but alot of it is subjective. I see alot of couples where one clearly and definitivately outranked the other in looks. All this, somewhat paradoxically, coming from my own subjective opinion.

But you're right, people generally chase after those above them in the "ladder". It's like that old drawing with the bigger fish is eating the smaller fish who is eating the smaller fish.... (The average girls likes you,
you like the pretty girl, who likes the better looking guy, who likes the super model girl...)

...

[QUOTE=Anima Eternae] I see alot of couples where one clearly and definitivately outranked the other in looks.
...[/QUOTE]

That's just it, to you, one partner seemed much more attractive, but the lesser partner may have fit right in with what they just so happen to like. Of course, there are also other factors unrelated to looks.

A marriage with two people unequally blessed in the looks department can live a long and happy life together. I can tell you from experience however, that it is intelligence equality that means so much more in a marriage.

[QUOTE=Cracker oftheWhip]I went with the spouse angle but I see that we only need just over 5000 votes at this point to change the tide.[/QUOTE]

Now down to 69%! :D

if this government were enforcing eugenic standards according to jewish whims, even more white babies would end up dead and there would be a "marriage penalty" tax on whites marrying whites-