View Full Version : AE moved thread on my own initiative
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 10:11 AM
I am not going to see the tabloid project fail because of bickering. So I have moved this thread to the civil forum where there is a clear rule about relevance. I suggested this last night and this morning the same continues so I have unilaterally taken this action without consulting anybody.
Norcal's criticisms and issues about Rounder are reasonable inquiries but it is not reasonable to undermine every single discussion that is being had with endless repetition of the same.
Rounder needs to mind his temper. When somebody has the serious issues in his past that Rounder does, it is unseemly to respond to goading by getting pissed and say I'm going to take my marbles and walk. If you or anybody else wants to do that go right ahead. VNN has seen many helpers come, and many helpers go. I have complete confidence in Alex Linder that he will keep it going one way or one form or another so long as he is on this God's green Earth. Help is appreciated but I hope that everybody will regard themselves as collaborators and contractors as the case may be and not presume to dictate terms to Alex, because he deserves that level of respect.
Now put this aside and move on.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 10:15 AM
If anybody wants to criticize this action by me, criticize it here not at the other thread which is not about all this peripheral shit it's about the tabloid. Fire away.
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 10:44 AM
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
I am not going to see the tabloid project fail because of bickering.
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]You have such little confidence in the project that it will fail because Miller's race-mixing and informant work remains a major problem?[/SIZE]
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
So I have moved this thread to the civil forum where there is a clear rule about relevance.
[/quote]
OK, I EXPECT you will assure Miller will utterly and totally STOP his attacks on me on the thread, or I shall defend myself there. I will not accept one-sided enforcement of your interpretation of such a rule.
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
Norcal's criticisms and issues about Rounder are reasonable inquiries but it is not reasonable to undermine every single discussion that is being had with endless repetition of the same.
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]If an "anti-Zionist" Jew came along, and was willing to bankroll 1,000,000 copies of the VNN newspaper, with full editorial and production control under Alex Linder, would you accept this? Would you prevent criticism of such an obscene betrayal of our ideals? WHY then, do you protect a race-mixer and FBI informant?[/SIZE]
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
Rounder needs to mind his temper. When somebody has the serious issues in his past that Rounder does, it is unseemly to respond to goading by getting pissed and say I'm going to take my marbles and walk.
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]Miller is obsessed with spewing crap about me all over this Forum, and accuses me of "doing nothing for the White Race" pretty much every waking hour.
However, here, Miller reveals his real motivations. This isn't activism for him...it's a HOBBY, and it has to be FUN. If the facts I repeat were FALSE, he would just ignore them. He CAN'T.[/SIZE]
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
I have complete confidence in Alex Linder that he will keep it going one way or one form or another so long as he is on this God's green Earth.[/QUOTE]
[SIZE=3]Of course![/SIZE]
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 10:56 AM
I'm not assuring or protecting him. I'm trying to create some order on this board. Many months ago I criticized the format of this board in the dimension of relevance, and that has remained an issue here. Thread after thread is degraded and worsened by one digression after another. Every discussion ends up at the level of a watercooler style chat instead of a dialog, because of it. At least in the civil forum we have a clear rule about that. So it's not about you or Rounder in particular. I really hope you wont take it that way.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 10:58 AM
You've attacked Miller and he's attacked you back. Didnt you expect the guy to defend himself? But that bickering will not continue in the tabloid thread, in either direction be assured.
If Miller is a hobbyist, than we need more hobbyists. Even considering the negative impact of "rabang" or his testimony as a government witness, which you will have to admit was not convincing to the jury was it? His net contribution exceeds mine or yours.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 11:02 AM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971] You have such little confidence in the project that it will fail because Miller's race-mixing and informant work remains a major problem?
[/QUOTE]
LOL you better watch out norcal, you have been conversing with me too long and my "talmudic" debating techniques are rubbing off on you.
I object to you question and do not reply yes or no, because either reply would concede the false premise. Such as "have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 11:13 AM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971]
[SIZE=3]If an "anti-Zionist" Jew came along, and was willing to bankroll 1,000,000 copies of the VNN newspaper, with full editorial and production control under Alex Linder, would you accept this? Would you prevent criticism of such an obscene betrayal of our ideals? [/SIZE]
][/QUOTE]
Hold on a second: ineffectiveness and noble loserdom is not one of MY ideals. If Ariel Sharon himself wanted to give Linder $1M, pure gift, no strings attached and the jew walked away, I think that would be great. Really, I would only expect that out of Zionist Jew anyways, because they are the ones who have an interest in Diaspora Jews leaving the USA and Europe. LOL
Pure gift, no strings attached, is exactly that. But beyond your hypothetical, there is the fact that in reality, gifts tend to obligate the emotional senses of the recipient. Which is why when fugitive David Lane showed up, instead of telling him to shove off, Rounder helped hide him out. Big mistake.
I think Alex is fully capable of using help from people without compromising his ideals. I have seen him prove himself time and time again, and he has my complete confidence including in using assistance from Rounder. If you dont feel the same, I can understand why, but we all have to make our own judgments.
Johnny McRacist
10-07-2004, 02:51 PM
Norcal: OK, I EXPECT you will assure Miller will utterly and totally STOP his attacks on me on the thread, or I shall defend myself there. [color=darkred]I will not accept one-sided enforcement of your interpretation of such a rule. [/color]The VNN mods have consistently demonstrated that they DO apply only one-sided enforcement when it comes to one member slandering another, as in my case.
You've attacked Miller and he's attacked you back. Didnt you expect the guy to defend himself? Why do you ask such a hypocritical question? When I DEFENDED myself against "JohnAsswipeFlynn's" slanderous attacks, you expected me NOT to defend myself, and instead put me in moderation beyond what normally should have been. Based on your clearly double-standard, you obviously expect "some" to defend themselves, but not others.http://www.vnnforum.com/images/icons/icon13.gif
Demonica
10-07-2004, 03:09 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]The VNN mods have consistently demonstrated that they DO apply only one-sided enforcement when it comes to one member slandering another, as in my case.
[/QUOTE]
Why don't you just shut up? You're lucky you are even allowed to post here and haven't been banished to the Opposition ward. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHY. No one has censored your posts unless you posted profanity in the Civil Forum. Again- YOU KNOW WHY YOU ARE ON MODERATION. So stop acting like a victim.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 03:37 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist] [verbal flatulence] [/QUOTE]
...........
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 03:51 PM
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]
You've attacked Miller and he's attacked you back. Didnt you expect the guy to defend himself? But that bickering will not continue in the tabloid thread, in either direction be assured.
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]I said NOT ONE thing about Miller's past after I returned during my "vacation" until Miller attacked ME first.[/SIZE]
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]His net contribution exceeds mine or yours.[/QUOTE]
[SIZE=3]And what "contribution" is that?
Frank Collin's "contribution" exceeds yours or mine.[/SIZE]
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 03:56 PM
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]Hold on a second: ineffectiveness and noble loserdom is not one of MY ideals. If Ariel Sharon himself wanted to give Linder $1M, pure gift, no strings attached and the jew walked away, I think that would be great.
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]Would it?
This is an illustration of why I do everything I do. I operate on principle. Our Race, before being infected with Semitic thought, had always operated on principle. That's why our ancestors LOST the battle with Christinsanity. It's also why Hitler lost the war, when refused to ascribe to "the ends justify the means" tactics.
I would not accept one fucking cent from a Jew. It's the same reason I oppose Miller...I don't know him, obviously, but what he's admitted is of such a fundamentally serious nature, it cannot be overlooked or brushed aside.[/SIZE]
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 04:01 PM
[QUOTE=John Barleycorn]Unfortunately, such a notion was a pathetic fairy tale. But since the Order had so ignominious a collapse , there was no shortage of scapegoating going around to blame others for mistakes made by the Bruder Schwein themselves. Now, people will bring up David Lane vis-a-vis Miller. This is what I say, the 'David Lane' of the 80's was LOUIS BEAM. He was the man who coined the term "Leaderless Resistence". If Rounder was a turncout and a snitch, he would've sold Louis to the federal dogs at Fort Smith. But he didn't.
[/QUOTE]
[SIZE=3]Let's say, for sake of argument, that the Order members are INDEED no-good, informant, plea-bargaining SCUM.
Would that mean the Order members go down to Miller's level, or Miller goes above their level? Obviously, the rational position would be the former. The "mainstream" response here, though, is that Miller goes ABOVE their level. That's bullshit.
Nor is my "beef" with Miller only based on his informant work and the fact he was in the Witness Protection Program. Did ANY of the Order members ever have non-White children?[/SIZE]
Johnny McRacist
10-07-2004, 04:11 PM
Why don't you just shut up? You're lucky you are even allowed to post here and haven't been banished to the Opposition ward. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHY. No one has censored your posts unless you posted profanity in the Civil Forum. Again- YOU KNOW WHY YOU ARE ON MODERATION. So stop acting like a victim.I'm not going to "shut up", and if you demand that I do, then at least have the courage to call what you're doing censorship. As for being banished to the Opposition Forum, why don't you read ALL of my posts and see if I'm an "anti", instead of blowing me off with weasel words. In other words, BACK UP WHAT YOU SAY WITH FACTS.
No one has censored my posts? Prove it! I know for a FACT that perfectly innoculous posts of mine have NEVER been posted, so don't give me that lying crap. Stop acting like a victim? Sounds okay to me, but please define just what one would HAVE to be in order to be called a justifiable victim? You won't, of course, since you and your fellow mods have proved consistently that you will stand aside while vicious slandering of fellow members takes place - as well as actively contributing to it. And though you're a Moderator, that doesn't mean you have superior intelligence, fairness, or wisdom to non-moderators. And surely in your case Ms. Demon, you don't. You sound like one of those tin-god moderators over on Stormfront, the ones who censor, slander, and ban any WN who dares to question anything about the NA or Stormfront. Clearly, you would love moderating over there, just for the sheer pleasure of banning members for whatever arbitrary reason you wish. http://www.vnnforum.com/images/icons/icon13.gif
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 04:16 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]And though you're a Moderator, that doesn't mean you have superior intelligence, fairness, or wisdom to non-moderators. And surely in your case Ms. Demon, you don't. You sound like one of those tin-god moderators over on Stormfront, the ones who censor, slander, and ban any WN who dares to question anything about the NA or Stormfront. Clearly, you would love moderating over there, just for the sheer pleasure of banning members for whatever arbitrary reason you wish.[/QUOTE]
[SIZE=3]I personally would like to know your alleged crimes here at VNNF.
As you and many of us have seen, this forum is sliding ever more quickly into the Vortex of (don) Blackdom.[/SIZE]
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 04:18 PM
[QUOTE=Demonica]Why don't you just shut up? You're lucky you are even allowed to post here and haven't been banished to the Opposition ward. YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHY. No one has censored your posts unless you posted profanity in the Civil Forum. Again- YOU KNOW WHY YOU ARE ON MODERATION.[/QUOTE]
[SIZE=3]Please let all of us know, as well.[/SIZE]
Demonica
10-07-2004, 04:21 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist] And though you're a Moderator, that doesn't mean you have superior intelligence, fairness, or wisdom to non-moderators.[/QUOTE]
It does, however, mean I have access to IP logs and I know who you are.
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]And surely in your case Ms. Demon, you don't. You sound like one of those tin-god moderators over on Stormfront, the ones who censor, slander, and ban any WN who dares to question anything about the NA or Stormfront. Clearly, you would love moderating over there, just for the sheer pleasure of banning members for whatever arbitrary reason you wish. http://www.vnnforum.com/images/icons/icon13.gif[/QUOTE]
Whatever. Like I said you are lucky you haven't been banished to OPP given the overwhelming amount of evidence you are, in fact, someone who has been banned at least 5 times in the last month for outrageous posts that could cause trouble for this forum. So forgive me if your sensitive little feelings got hurt, but I value this forum more than them.
FYI I have never banned a VNN regular or censored anyone's posts, except in Civil Forum. So much for your SF fantasy.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 04:27 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971]
Frank Collin's "contribution" exceeds yours or mine.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Frank Collin was a clown, a jew, and a pederast. You probably know that or you wouldnt mention him. I really dont understand this comment at all.
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-07-2004, 04:32 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]Would it?
This is an illustration of why I do everything I do. I operate on principle. Our Race, before being infected with Semitic thought, had always operated on principle. That's why our ancestors LOST the battle with Christinsanity. It's also why Hitler lost the war, when refused to ascribe to "the ends justify the means" tactics.
I would not accept one fucking cent from a Jew. It's the same reason I oppose Miller...I don't know him, obviously, but what he's admitted is of such a fundamentally serious nature, it cannot be overlooked or brushed aside.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
No, most people would say that they lost the battle with Christianity, because they were overwhelmed by superior numbers and organization.
Some people might say, that the Saxon chiefs lost BECAUSE of principle, when they trusted Charlemagne to hold a parley, and he broke the diplomatic truce and cut their heads off instead.
Principles are ideas. Ideas, concepts that may or may not correspond to their referents in the world. Concepts that may be flawed in the formation, or the application.
When it comes to getting the job done, I dont worry too much about dogma. Your approach to many subject smacks of replacing one dogma with another. You are free to take that approach and I am free to do otherwise.
Johnny McRacist
10-07-2004, 04:38 PM
FYI I have never banned a VNN regular or censored anyone's posts, except in Civil Forum. So much for your SF fantasy. It isn't a "sci-fi fantasy", since several of my perfectly harmless, non-profanity posts have been deleted. For instance, I posted a photo of Aunt Jemima of pancake fame, and just a sentence or two with it. It NEVER appeared - and NO explanation was ever given as to why. Again, I'm a very reasonable person, but in the past week I've been relentlessly slandered as "a Jew" and an "ADL operative", totally substanceless accusations. Rounder, for instance, has been relentlessly attacked over the past week, and a mod on here said he was perfectly in the right to defend himself. Which begs the question - why am I not accorded the same right? Why should I stand by in meek silence while shit-slinging creeps like "JohnAFlynn" relentlessly smear me? Is that what YOU believe I should have done, Ms. Demon? Please, give me what no other moderator here has had the courage to give me - a simple yes or no ANSWER.
One last suggestion: Instead of believing some of the lies here about me, why don't you take the time to view ALL of my posts, and convince yourself as to whether or not the sum total of them constitute either:
1: Obvious "troll" or "Jew" postings.
2: An obvious supporter of the WN cause.
Really, what's so hard about that, other than you might have to do a little research on it.
And one other thing: Why not run an earlier suggestion of mine past Tom88. That suggestion is this:
1: Make a new guideline on VNN forum that states any member accusing another member of "being a Jew or ADL operative", "gay", "race-mixer", "informant" etc, should have to PROVE their accusations by providing links, photos, reliable sources, or other valid evidence that support said accusations?
Well, I fully expect you to reply to this, but when you do so, please address my last suggestion. I would like to hear your opinion on it.
Demonica
10-07-2004, 04:54 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]It isn't a "sci-fi fantasy", since several of my perfectly harmless, non-profanity posts have been deleted. For instance, I posted a photo of Aunt Jemima of pancake fame, and just a sentence or two with it. It NEVER appeared - and NO explanation was ever given as to why. [/QUOTE]
IF that is the case, it could have been an accident. We have just gotten used to the new controls. Believe me, the mods here have bigger problems than worrying about Aunt Fuckin Jemima.
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]Again, I'm a very reasonable person, but in the past week I've been relentlessly slandered as "a Jew" and an "ADL operative", totally substanceless accusations. [/QUOTE]
If you want to post here, get used to it. Everyone on this forum has been called a jew or worse many times over.
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]Rounder, for instance, has been relentlessly attacked over the past week, and a mod on here said he was perfectly in the right to defend himself. Which begs the question - why am I not accorded the same right? Why should I stand by in meek silence while shit-slinging creeps like "JohnAFlynn" relentlessly smear me? Is that what YOU believe I should have done, Ms. Demon? Please, give me what no other moderator here has had the courage to give me - a simple yes or no ANSWER.[/QUOTE]
I don't even know what you are referring to. Of course you have the right to defend yourself, and personally I don't give a damn what you say back to him and ONCE AGAIN I do not censor ANY posts outside of Civil Forum. There is a thread titled "Was your post unfairly deleted or edited" or something of the sort. Why aren't you posting about this there?
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]One last suggestion: Instead of believing some of the lies here about me, why don't you take the time to view ALL of my posts, and convince yourself as to whether or not the sum total of them constitute either:
1: Obvious "troll" or "Jew" postings.
2: An obvious supporter of the WN cause.
Really, what's so hard about that, other than you might have to do a little research on it.
And one other thing: Why not run an earlier suggestion of mine past Tom88. That suggestion is this:
1: Make a new guideline on VNN forum that states any member accusing another member of "being a Jew or ADL operative", "gay", "race-mixer", "informant" etc, should have to PROVE their accusations by providing links, photos, reliable sources, or other valid evidence that support said accusations?
Well, I fully expect you to reply to this, but when you do so, please address my last suggestion. I would like to hear your opinion on it.[/QUOTE]
You yourself admitted to posting like a madman to hit the magical 100th post, at which point you thought your moderation would be lifted. But see, it doesn't work that way. And the more you bitch and moan about it, the more suspicious you look.
Demonica
10-07-2004, 04:58 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]1: Make a new guideline on VNN forum that states any member accusing another member of "being a Jew or ADL operative", "gay", "race-mixer", "informant" etc, should have to PROVE their accusations by providing links, photos, reliable sources, or other valid evidence that support said accusations? [/QUOTE]
Are you serious? In case you didn't notice, this is the Internet. Anyone can claim to be someone else or mask their identity entirely. But then again you already know that, don't you. ;)
hitler goddess
10-07-2004, 04:59 PM
[QUOTE=Demonica]
If you want to post here, get used to it. Everyone on this forum has been called a jew or worse many times over.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly. If I was so easily offended by all the things that people have said about me, I would have been gone a long time ago. LOL
Johnny McRacist
10-07-2004, 07:07 PM
If you want to post here, get used to it. Everyone on this forum has been called a jew or worse many times over. Hey, hey, hey! I'm rearin' to "get over it"! Bring on the Jew accusations Mr. "JohnAFlynn". But the moment you let loose on me, oh baby! Some big-ass shit is coming back your way, you gay-looking creep.
Intrepid
10-07-2004, 07:49 PM
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]Hey, hey, hey! I'm rearin' to "get over it"! Bring on the Jew accusations Mr. "JohnAFlynn". But the moment you let loose on me, oh baby! Some big-ass shit is coming back your way, you gay-looking creep.[/QUOTE]
So ole' Steve B was right, you're the fruity beaner, Spicwarrior, eh? I'll make sure I'm even more pleasant to you, Pedro.
Johnny McRacist
10-07-2004, 08:01 PM
So ole' Steve B was right, you're the fruity beaner, Spicwarrior, eh?Just go on believin' that, cuz you don't know jack shit or jill shit.
norcalnative1971
10-07-2004, 08:03 PM
[QUOTE=John Barleycorn]We're speaking of mistakes, not being scum. I did not accuse Order members of being as such. If you speak of stooping down to this or that person's level - then what I say is: the men who set the tone in cooperating with the Feds was not Glenn Miller, but those who were arrested before or with him.
Let me break it down nice and supple.
David Lane and Glenn Miller are on the lamb but finally get arrested. David Lane begins to negotiate with the feds. Now, this is peculiar. Here's a man who was 'allegedly' the get-away driver during the Alan Berg murder. And yet, it is David Lane NOT Glenn Miller who was the first to blink while they sta in a federal jail cell. By my reckoning, David Lane is a little higher on the food chain in this business than was Miller. But here is David Lane entering into negotiations to win a plea-bargain.
So what happened to the 5 WORDS? I remember Tom Metzger stating that anyone who stayed more than 2 minutes on the grand jury chair should be excommunicated from the movement. His rationale went like this, you either have nothing to say or plean the 5th. If you do neither and actually speak to the Feds or any cops - you're a goner. Metzger even stated that Matt Hale should've lost his position as Pontificus Maximus for answering questions for two hours from the cops after the Ben Smith shootings. me-oh-my...!
As I said, apply the same principal of never talking to the enemy to David Lane?
[/quote]
[SIZE=3]Your complaints against the Order...and Miller's, too...are totally legitimate. The difference, though, is that Lane, et.al., are in cages. Miller is HERE, accepted into the ranks of the "White Nationalists." This latter fact is EXTREMELY disturbing, mainly because I agree with the spirit of what you quote Metzger as saying/believing.[/SIZE]
Steve B
10-07-2004, 10:35 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]Your complaints against the Order...and Miller's, too...are totally legitimate. The difference, though, is that Lane, et.al., are in cages. Miller is HERE, accepted into the ranks of the "White Nationalists." This latter fact is EXTREMELY disturbing, mainly because I agree with the spirit of what you quote Metzger as saying/believing.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Lets get down to brass tacks shall we, Spock?...er Norcal...er John!
Lane is in a "cage" because he robbed frickin armored cars and was probably the get away driver at the Berg murder! Also, Lane was said to be the one or ones that set off a bomb in a movie theater full of White people, as a diversion for one of those armored car heists! We 21st century beings call it SERIOUS CRIME!
Miller, on the other hand. Robbed no banks, set off no bombs, drove no getaway murder cars and counterfeit no money! What Miller did do was accept ill gotten Order gains and help David Lane escape. We 21st century beings call it, being stupid!
Thats why Lane is locked up and Miller isn't! (although he did get 3 years, courtesy of Order rat bastards)
Now I know, John...er Norcal, that you live in a bizarro world where right is wrong and up is down and murders and bank robbers should be roaming free while nukes rain down upon America cities but this isn't Remulak, John! This is the planet Earth and we do things a little different here, thankyou.
What I'm suggesting, John. Is go back to your Alt.Star-Trek google groups where you can wow the nerds and kiddies with your detailed and thorough knowledge of all thinks Kirk and leave serious issues to people who actually have a grasp of reality!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=johnskeller@hotmail.com&btnG=Search
torcher88
10-07-2004, 10:48 PM
Whatever you are drinking, I want some.
I'd have given you ANOTHER reputation point, but it says I have to spread some around to others first.
[QUOTE=Steve B]Lets get down to brass tacks shall we, Spock?...er Norcal...er John!
Lane is in a "cage" because he robbed frickin armored cars and was probably the get away driver at the Berg murder! Also, Lane was said to be the one or ones that set off a bomb in a movie theater full of White people, as a diversion for one of those armored car heists! We 21st century beings call it SERIOUS CRIME!
Miller, on the other hand. Robbed no banks, set off no bombs, drove no getaway murder cars and counterfeit no money! What Miller did do was accept ill gotten Order gains and help David Lane escape. We 21st century beings call it, being stupid!
Thats why Lane is locked up and Miller isn't! (although he did get 3 years, courtesy of Order rat bastards)
Now I know, John...er Norcal, that you live in a bizarro world where right is wrong and up is down and murders and bank robbers should be roaming free while nukes rain down upon America cities but this isn't Remulak, John! This is the planet Earth and we do things a little different here, thankyou.
What I'm suggesting, John. Is go back to your Alt.Star-Trek google groups where you can wow the nerds and kiddies with your detailed and thorough knowledge of all thinks Kirk and leave serious issues to people who actually have a grasp of reality!
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=johnskeller@hotmail.com&btnG=Search[/QUOTE]
torcher88
10-07-2004, 10:53 PM
It's not like Miller is here to organize an underground cell or something, or that he has hidden the facts. Actually, Miller is here to help with a tabloid, and has been 100% honest about his past. Thanks for hashing it out for the 5000th time, because you have been crucial in helping me to conclude there is nothing to be concerned about.
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]Your complaints against the Order...and Miller's, too...are totally legitimate. The difference, though, is that Lane, et.al., are in cages. Miller is HERE, accepted into the ranks of the "White Nationalists." This latter fact is EXTREMELY disturbing, mainly because I agree with the spirit of what you quote Metzger as saying/believing.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
sean(doc)martin
10-07-2004, 10:59 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]
Nor is my "beef" with Miller only based on his informant work and the fact he was in the Witness Protection Program.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
It is with the paper he is trying to help get off the ground. I don’t recall you having a problem with Miller until that.
If you hate organizations as much as you claim then you should be happy about this because according to you Miller brings anything down he touches.
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]
As you and many of us have seen, this forum is sliding ever more quickly into the Vortex of (don) Blackdom.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
If it was I would have been banned a long time ago. You would have as well.
[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]Frank Collin was a clown, a jew, and a pederast. You probably know that or you wouldnt mention him.[/QUOTE]
Of course he knew it, Collin is probably his hero.
[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]It isn't a "sci-fi fantasy", since several of my perfectly harmless, non-profanity posts have been deleted. For instance, I posted a photo of Aunt Jemima of pancake fame, and just a sentence or two with it. It NEVER appeared - and NO explanation was ever given as to why.[/QUOTE]
Dude if you just be cool and follow the rules you wouldn’t be on moderation much longer. If you had not complained you probably would be un moderated by now.
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]The difference, though, is that Lane, et.al., are in cages. Miller is HERE, accepted into the ranks of the "White Nationalists."[/SIZE][/QUOTE]
Yeah Miller is out making white babies, working on WN newspapers, and organizing meetings.
Lane is rotting in prison writing kiddy porn.
Who do you think is a better person to be associated with?
Alex Linder
10-08-2004, 06:08 AM
[QUOTE=torcher88]It's not like Miller is here to organize an underground cell or something, or that he has hidden the facts. Actually, Miller is here to help with a tabloid, and has been 100% honest about his past. Thanks for hashing it out for the 5000th time, because you have been crucial in helping me to conclude there is nothing to be concerned about.[/QUOTE]
meadowlark to barn owl:
the tabloid is at the printer
REPEAT
the tabloid is at the printer.
over and out.
BrightonWNP
10-08-2004, 06:10 AM
[QUOTE=Demonica]Are you serious? In case you didn't notice, this is the Internet. Anyone can claim to be someone else or mask their identity entirely. But then again you already know that, don't you. ;)[/QUOTE]
I think we are being very lenient with this arshole. What he fails to realise is any one of us could press flush, and he would be no more. And the way he is going, who would blame us?
Johnny McRacist
10-08-2004, 06:37 AM
I think we are being very lenient with this arshole.http://www.vnnforum.com/images/icons/icon2.gif Are you as uneducated and ignorant in person, as you are in your posts?
Rattle Head
10-08-2004, 10:01 AM
[QUOTE=BrightonWNP]I think we are being very lenient with this arshole. What he fails to realise is any one of us could press flush, and he would be no more. And the way he is going, who would blame us?[/QUOTE]When you press flush in the UK, does it swirl clockwise or counterclockwise?
Kind Lampshade Maker
10-08-2004, 10:29 AM
[QUOTE=Rattle Head]When you press flush in the UK, does it swirl clockwise or counterclockwise?[/QUOTE]
It swirls in the direction of an east-London traffic roundabout with most of the vehicle occupants sharing the same color as those nuggets in the swirl you are referring to
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-08-2004, 11:11 AM
[QUOTE=Alex Linder]meadowlark to barn owl:
the tabloid is at the printer
REPEAT
the tabloid is at the printer.
over and out.[/QUOTE]
YEEEEEEEEHAAAA!
Steve B
10-08-2004, 11:28 PM
[QUOTE=torcher88]Whatever you are drinking, I want some.[/QUOTE]
Thanks torcher! Usually before "lights-out" I down a few pints of Pruno to calm the nerves for the next days prison riots! Good fer what ails ya!
http://www.blacktable.com/gillin030901.htm
sean(doc)martin
10-08-2004, 11:49 PM
[QUOTE=Steve B]Thanks torcher! Usually before "lights-out" I down a few pints of Pruno to calm the nerves for the next days prison riots! Good fer what ails ya!
http://www.blacktable.com/gillin030901.htm[/QUOTE]
So can you use something other than Ketchup? Surely there is a way to make the stuff taste better.
This is the argument I use for drugs, if convicts can get drugs and booze in prison under watch 24 hours a day how do people expect cops to clean the streets completely of drugs?
Antiochus Epiphanes
10-09-2004, 12:01 AM
interesting website Steve
in this recipe for Jew matzo soup they forget that essential ingredient, the blood of a Christian!
http://www.blacktable.com/gillin040407.htm
vBulletin v3.0.6, Copyright ©2000-2005, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.