You know that I believe the correct policy toward the jews is to exterminate them; I believe that is the only rational and effective response to their collective attempt to genocide our White race. My question here, though, is whether I am the first in European history to propose this solution. Answer the question if you can, and use quotations if possible



More... (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=7012)

Hunter Wallace:
2.) I’ve done my share of condemning people. In this case, I would rather persuade. If Linder is to be condemned for anything, it should be for advocating extermination of the Jews. However, that subject wasn’t raised in the interview.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/12/13/interview-alex-linder-iii/

Hunter Wallace:
2.) I’ve done my share of condemning people. In this case, I would rather persuade. If Linder is to be condemned for anything, it should be for advocating extermination of the Jews. However, that subject wasn’t raised in the interview.

http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2009/12/13/interview-alex-linder-iii/

Yeah, I've seen that. Condemnations don't interest me. The fact that neither Hunter nor anyone else even dare consider the option is the relevant point. There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...they'd arrive at the same conclusion, which would threaten their status or some other personal interest. On some level they know that, so they take refuge in tut-tuttery. I'm dead serious: Hunter and the rest acknowledge the jews are doing things that will lead, and are intended to lead, to our genocide, so there's no reason, a priori, to write off an equally strong response, and every reason to think counter-genocide is simply bringing a gun to a gunfight. Then you have history, which is replete with failed attempts to deal with jews. Which leads directly to my conclusion. The jews intend our genocide. No matter what measure we employ to stop them, they will call it genocidal - so what the heck? Exterminating the jew is pure Brimley oatmeal: the right thing to do.

It appears that this Wallace dude needs to get some stronger wrist.

MacDonald traces out a nice scenario in which Jewish participation in media and culture is limited to their share of the population. What struck me is if we had the power to impose that on them, we'd also have the power to kill them. MacDonald's idea is inherently unstable: there have been quotas on Jews before, and Jews managed to appeal to philo-Semites and get them undone. Expulsion has the same problem: there will always be a Jared Taylor among us who says it's not the Jews, it's the racial egalitarians, or a Sam Francis who says it's not the Jews, it's the managerial elite, and the "good Jews" will be let back in, and they'll be on their best behavior for a month or two, and then it all starts over. They can't come back from the dead.

MacDonald traces out a nice scenario in which Jewish participation in media and culture is limited to their share of the population. What struck me is if we had the power to impose that on them, we'd also have the power to kill them. MacDonald's idea is inherently unstable: there have been quotas on Jews before, and Jews managed to appeal to philo-Semites and get them undone. Expulsion has the same problem: there will always be a Jared Taylor among us who says it's not the Jews, it's the racial egalitarians, or a Sam Francis who says it's not the Jews, it's the managerial elite, and the "good Jews" will be let back in, and they'll be on their best behavior for a month or two, and then it all starts over. They can't come back from the dead.

You got it. MacDonald is going to receive some upbraiding in coming weeks. He chickened out of a debate on the Jim Giles show yesterday.

Mike, post a link to KM's scenario you mention, if you have it handy. I've only seen the OD thread on KM's interview w Giles.

I have a filling that these book worms don't get that if you are fighting for your life you don't fight back half assed. If you don't put your whole ass into it you will perrish.

Look at how Germany is ran now. They held back on the Kikes and now the Kikes rule that country.

Our forefathers played softball with the Yids in this country now look at the mess we are in.

Maybe us dummies are not so dumb after all, if we can figure it out and the book worms soon to be bird food can't.

I misstated it but that's what I thought he was getting at here:

The Culture Of Critique (http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf)

Conclusion: Whither Judaism and the West?

Thus the ideal situation of absolute equality in resource control and reproductive success would certainly require a great deal of monitoring and undoubtedly be characterized by a great deal of mutual suspicion. In the real world, however, even this rather grim ideal is highly unlikely. In the real world, ethnic groups differ in their talents and abilities; they differ in their numbers, fertility, and the extent to which they encourage parenting practices conducive to resource acquisition; they also differ in the resources held at any point in time and in their political power. Equality or proportionate equity would be extremely difficult to attain or to maintain after it has been achieved without extraordinary levels of monitoring and without extremely intense social controls to enforce ethnic quotas on the accumulation of wealth, admission to universities, access to high status jobs, and so on.

Because ethnic groups have differing talents and abilities and differing parenting styles, variable criteria for qualifying and retaining jobs would be required depending on ethnic group membership. Moreover, achieving parity between Jews and other ethnic groups would entail a high level of discrimination against individual Jews for admission to universities or access to employment opportunities and even entail a large taxation on Jews to counter the Jewish advantage in the possession of wealth, since at present Jews are vastly overrepresented among the wealthy and the successful in the United States. This would especially be the case if Jews were distinguished as a separate ethnic group from gentile European Americans.

this thread is retarded. firstly, the jewish people are a uniquely brilliant and energetic race which deserves to live. secondly, that you, an impotent outcast of mainstream society, are calling for their extermination.. it's like a mouse telling a cat to his face about his plans to exterminate all cats.

There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.


Innocent of what?

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

When did the jews become innocent? When they sicced the Niggers on us or when they told White girls that fucking Niggers is the coolest thing ever?

Gas them all

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.Morality...?:confused:
The elimination of kikenvermin is solely a matter of hygiene.

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Morality is for the in-group, not enemy vermin.

Morality...?:confused:
The elimination of kikenvermin is solely a matter of hygiene.

Bingo!, we have a winner.

Gas them all

Do you believe in the myth of the NS gas chambers, Zev?

When did the jews become innocent? When they sicced the Niggers on us or when they told White girls that fucking Niggers is the coolest thing ever?

The conservatives, trapped by their bogus G_odd concept, can't get past treating the team attacking them as individuals. Strangely enough, though, they have no problem treating as collectively guilty those who fight back as a group against those outsiders. Double standard, itz. Loser standard, itz.

In-group good.

Out-group(s) bad.

That's the survival morality.

If you want to discuss what's immoral, as Hunter does, then look at the beam in your own eye. Look at the practices allowed on your own site. On OD, you can call someone an infomer, a jew, with no evidence. At VNN, our moral standard for in-groupers is higher. You have to stand behind your words here. We don't let known liars, child molesters and undercover Canadian cops post at will. Nor do we defend homosexuals. Our critics should consider raising their standards.

Death is too kind of a punishment for the crime of having been born a Jew. The punishment must fit the crime. Only a lifetime of confinement in Israel surrounded by nothing but other Jews will atone for their birth. Of course, a massive ghetto wall will seal off the country. Zionism is the Final Solution to the Jewish Question.

Any other solution will be attacked as inhumane. The Jew lovers are disarmed when we Zionists want to send them home to get them away from anti-Semites and holocau$T Deniers. They have whined "Next year in Jerusalem" for 2,000 years . I say "This year in Jerusalem".

Do you believe in the myth of the NS gas chambers, Zev?

They are no myth. I was gassed my self at least six times.

I shouldn't have to tell you that murdering innocent people is immoral.

Look at it this way, Hunter. There are parasites among insects, plants, fish, and 4-legged mammals. Right ?? Who then, can say scientifically, parasites don't exist among bipeds ??

Jews can't help being parasites any more than dog ticks can. Therefore, the only questions for us to entertain, are do we want to (1) ignore the jew parasites, (2) treat the diseases they cause while those diseases wipe us out, or (3) Kill all the GD parasites so we can live and never again suffer their diseases ??

What's your choice ??

The strongest case for exterminating the jews can be made by pointing out what the jews did to the White nations after they were driven out of Germany by the Nazis. If the jews had been killed, if they hadn't fled to the United States, it's possible that jewry would have been just a little bit weaker here and Whites wouldn't be approaching minority status today.

The Nazi policy failed to neutralize the power of German jewry, which was able to attack Germany from exile.

Is extermination the only method that can prevent this? I can think of three approaches that would work at least as well.

1. External exile. Not to Israel, which is very dangerous having nuclear missiles and submarines, but to a protectorate of the new White nation, an island where their access to technology can be limited.

2. Internal exile. Create a jewish reservation within the White nation, a very large ghetto, again with limited access to technology.

3. Sterilization. Because jews can be expected to strongly resist this approach it would have to be combined with some form of exile, but it would be effective. Sterilizing all jews capable of reproducing would lead to their eventual elimination.

As a practical matter there's not much chance that jews can be exterminated all over the world. Even if every majority White nation became a Alex Linder inspired White state there would still be a couple of million jews and scattered around the world outside Israel and the White sphere of influence. With their trillions of dollars in stolen loot those jews would be able to make deals with their host countries to protect them.

In that world jews would probably be eliminated from the White nations for at least another thousand years. Maybe Alex could leave behind a time capsule with his instructions for future generations considering letting the plague back in the house.

Is extermination the only method that can prevent this? I can think of three approaches that would work at least as well.

1. External exile. Not to Israel, which is very dangerous having nuclear missiles and submarines, but to a protectorate of the new White nation, an island where their access to technology can be limited.

2. Internal exile. Create a jewish reservation within the White nation, a very large ghetto, again with limited access to technology.

3. Sterilization. Because jews can be expected to strongly resist this approach it would have to be combined with some form of exile, but it would be effective. Sterilizing all jews capable of reproducing would lead to their eventual elimination.

Some approaches can be combined, like a choice between exile and sterilization. Internal exile would only work with sterilization; without it you are just leaving the problem to a future generation.

The Warlord

They are no myth. I was gassed my self at least six times.

I don't know. That doesn't sound like very many. I'm catching a whiff of self-hating jew? Be warned. If there's one thing I don't tolerate here, it's anti-semitism.

In that world jews would probably be eliminated from the White nations for at least another thousand years. Maybe Alex could leave behind a time capsule with his instructions for future generations considering letting the plague back in the house.

The reason I put the idea out there is so that it begins to be considered. What I know is that at some point there will be a White man in power with the ability to carry it out. By that time, the tutting will have faded, and the clean, pure, undeniable logic of the conclusion will carry the day in that White man's mind.

All other options leave the risk of reinfection. Extermination is the only safe solution to the utter misery the jews have caused all other peoples.

the punishment must fit the crime. Only a lifetime of confinement in israel surrounded by nothing but other jews will atone for their birth.

they are no myth. I was gassed my self at least six times.

rofl .

The Nazi policy failed to neutralize the power of German jewry, which was able to attack Germany from exile.

The German policy didn't fail; the German policy was never carried to final completion because Germany and her allies were bombed back into the Stone Age.

[EDIT: I see now that I was missing your point, but I'll leave the comment up. Germany had no control over what happened outside of its borders and as far as I can tell, did everything it reasonably could to avoid war with Britain and the U.S.]

The German policy didn't fail; the German policy was never carried to final completion because Germany and her allies were bombed back into the Stone Age.

[EDIT: I see now that I was missing your point, but I'll leave the comment up. Germany had no control over what happened outside of its borders and as far as I can tell, did everything it reasonably could to avoid war with Britain and the U.S.]

His point is, rather than execute them, Hitler encouraged jews to emigrate. Even the rottenest jews were allowed, by Hitler, to escape punishment. He flushed them into America and other West spots, allowing them to refound their Frankfurt School and advocate and advance White genocide. Utterly insane. Hitler completely misplayed his hand, partly out of ignorance, partly because he was too much of a gentleman. That's the irony that no one will believe, in this day and age when Hitler/NS are misrepresented around the clock, but it is in fact the case.

There is no counter-case to physical extermination of the jews that doesn't fall apart in light of reason and historical evidence.

Not one person on here or on any of the WN blogs will even dare to approach the question.

Is Hunter Wallace Denzel Washington in disguise? One of those sci-fi ‘ah gotsta beez moral 'n' shit’ ‘hero’ niggers.

I've already expressed my views on extermination in other threads, so I won't belabor them here.

Just a recap: I don't care one way or the other if the yids get exterminated (if it happens, they will have richly deserved it); my objections are mainly of a practical and/or tactical nature.

1. Who is a jew? Can a jew be defined in strictly biological terms? I don't find it hard to define who a jew is, but I do once someone starts insisting that it all comes down to a DNA test. I would rather exterminate based on an individual's actions, his affiliations to jewish organizations, his family ties, etc., than solely on the results of DNA tests, which I don't believe are as reliable as some do.

2. How do we actually carry out this plan? How do we round them up? How do we get the ones that are outside of our borders? How do we deal with the fact that Israel has nukes?

3. All this talk about exterminating jews when we don't even have enough political power to end affirmative action or close our borders seems like a bunch of blowharding. And will we be able to gain political power on a platform of "let's exterminate the jews"? (Note that when I say "political power," I mean it in every sense of the word, not just in the sense of "obtaining votes").

His point is, rather than execute them, Hitler encouraged jews to emigrate. Even the rottenest jews were allowed, by Hitler, to escape punishment. He flushed them into America and other West spots, allowing them to refound their Frankfurt School and advocate and advance White genocide. Utterly insane. Hitler completely misplayed his hand, partly out of ignorance, partly because he was too much of a gentleman. That's the irony that no one will believe, in this day and age when Hitler/NS are misrepresented around the clock, but it is in fact the case.

Well, you do have a point. The worst ones should at least have been jailed/interned, if not executed.

Another thing with Hitler and the Germans is that I don't think they realized the extent to which the U.S. and the U.K. were under jewish control.

I've already expressed my views on extermination in other threads, so I won't belabor them here.

Just a recap: I don't care one way or the other if the yids get exterminated (if it happens, they will have richly deserved it); my objections are mainly of a practical and/or tactical nature.

1. Who is a jew? Can a jew be defined in strictly biological terms? I don't find it hard to define who a jew is, but I do once someone starts insisting that it all comes down to a DNA test. I would rather exterminate based on an individual's actions, his affiliations to jewish organizations, his family ties, etc., than solely on the results of DNA tests, which I don't believe are as reliable as some do.

I would, unless I see a better argument, define a jew, genetically, as the Nazis did and as the Israelis do today. Get rid of genetic jews. Get rid of all their cultural propagation vehicles - synagogues, etc. Anyone who tried to resuscitate the cultural-evil that was Judaism would be identified as a freak and eliminated. I don't think that would happen, of course. It was the genes that produced the culture in the first place.


2. How do we actually carry out this plan? How do we round them up? How do we get the ones that are outside of our borders? How do we deal with the fact that Israel has nukes?

All this talk about exterminating jews when we don't even have enough political power to end affirmative action or close our borders seems like a bunch of blowharding.

Blowharding is puffing about something one could do but has no real intention to do. Since Israel has one of the largest militaries in the world, and since we do not have even one White country for the time being, what we're doing here is discussing. We're investigating whether there is any case to be made against exterminating jews (once we have the power, it should go without saying). This is a forum. Exterminating all jews, once we have the power, is an idea. We're discussing the idea. Not pretending we can carry it out today. That should be obvious.

Acquiring the power to execute this or another plan is obviously a separate and very difficult problem. But that's not what we're discussing in this thread.

Well, you do have a point. The worst ones should at least have been jailed/interned, if not executed.

Another thing with Hitler and the Germans is that I don't think they realized the extent to which the U.S. and the U.K. were under jewish control.

Hard to say, but it certainly seems that Hitler would have acted differently if he had ever traveled to the UK, USSR or USA.

Had he, I think he would have realized the utter need to dispose of his German jews with great care. Probably, in hindsight, the best thing he could have done was forbidden any jews to emigrate, forced them all into various holding structures - some mix of prisons, camps and guarded ghettos - and made 'the international community' aware that to the extent they tried to mess with Germany, the jews would suffer. Hitler should have used Germany's jews as a pawn, and kept them completely isolated from their international brothers. As long as Germany was at war with nations controlled by jews, it had no interest in exterminating its home jews or allowing them to emigrate or even merely communicate with their relatives abroad.

It is clear the Jews don't want the White race to exist as anything greater than slaves, and life under their rule is going to continue to get worse. The Jews have a hatred for White people that is beyond approach, and that is that. You're not going to get them to back off by giving them money, power, etc.; that's been done and it failed.

Acquiring the power to execute this or another plan is obviously a separate and very difficult problem. But that's not what we're discussing in this thread.

OK, I getcha.

I'll have to give it some thought, but I'll probably end up agreeing with you, as I do on nearly everything.

On a personal level, I've known some jews that were alright (noble, even), and that's probably where the reluctance comes in. But collectively, what they've done and continue to do is undeniable, and if I could snap my fingers and make them all disappear, I would. Within 30 years, no one would miss them. So that's about the same as extermination, I suppose.

Looking at indians (American Indians), it's not that I dislike all or even most of them, but when I look at the types of problems they're causing today, I often wonder, "why didn't we exterminate them?" God knows we get accused of it often enough, so why didn't our ancestors just do it? And the problems indians cause are a drop in the bucket compared to those caused by jews. Hell, there probably wouldn't be an indian problem if it weren't for jews.

OK, I getcha.

I'll have to give it some thought, but I'll probably end up agreeing with you, as I do on nearly everything.

On a personal level, I've known some jews that were alright (noble, even), and that's probably where the reluctance comes in. But collectively, what they've done and continue to do is undeniable, and if I could snap my fingers and make them all disappear, I would. Within 30 years, no one would miss them. So that's about the same as extermination, I suppose.

Yes. The way I like to put it, which one of these who says extermination is immoral would lift a finger to prevent it? Pat Buchanan? Steve Sailer? Kevin MacDonald? Hunter Wallace? I don't see it happening. At least three of those four would probably, it is my guess, if they had a chance, press a button that made all jews disappear. Sailer might be the exception, depending on whether he really is a jew. He has advertised that he thinks he is partly jewish in descent, but I would say it's about fifty-fifty he's lying because he thinks it affords him some cover. None of these will say what they really think for fear of having their words used against them. But you can rest assured that the jews believe we are all out to get them anyway, simply by virtue of our being what we are. What smart-stupid guys like MacDonald don't get is that they aren't helping our cause by mixing their criticism of jews with praise and much-overrated fairness. You will also see that their fairness applies only to the enemy. KM will never say anything about jews that he can't document, because that wouldn't be fair. But he's perfectly willing to throw VNN under the bus the moment it no longer serves his purposes. This is weakness and foolishness masquerading as high morals.


Looking at indians (American Indians), it's not that I dislike all or even most of them, but when I look at the types of problems they're causing today, I often wonder, "why didn't we exterminate them?" God knows we get accused of it often enough, so why didn't our ancestors just do it? And the problems indians cause are a drop in the bucket compared to those caused by jews. Hell, there probably wouldn't be an indian problem if it weren't for jews.

The problems we face today are because our WASP cultural forebears were too muddled in their thinking and too concerned about respectability. They can never simply think their way to a solution and execute it. All non-aboriginals should have been cleared off at a minimum down through the isthmus tethering us to South America. We are paying the price for not doing that. I blame WASP culture and Christian religion for that failure.

What I'm saying is, the jews and I both know that Kevin MacDonald would sign off on exterminating all jews if he had the option. And he would be correct to do so. But if you ask him, he will say, I don't believe that and I have never written that. But he would do it. The point is that even these people who study jews formally cannot emotionally grasp the depth of the hatred jews have for us; the very, very real psychological and political fact that they believe exactly what is written in their hatecode book:

Even the best of the gentiles should be killed.

The jews really do believe - just ask anyone who has experience of them - that they are a superior species, with better morals minds and, well, not manners (ever seen a jew eating food?), but in all ways immeasurably superior to dirty shaigetz and shiksas. Jews believe, and all their actions prove they believe:

all goyim are animals fit for genocide.

It is tremendously liberating, if the academics dared the open breeze, to speak the truth: the jews want to genocide us - we must beat them to the punch.

It's us or them. That's how this is going to play out. The jews are currently in the process of wiping out our race via miscegination, open borders, promotion of homosexuality, feminism, individualism, etc etc. They know EXACTLY what they're doing, and they're proud of themselves.

Think about that when you start getting soft...

Us or them.

I say ship them all to Israel, take away all their nukes and any other White American tax payer supported stuff they have and then let the jews and the ragheads settle it once and for all. I figure after the a-rabs get done with them their won't be a jew left standing.

It is clear the Jews don't want the White race to exist as anything greater than slaves, and life under their rule is going to continue to get worse. The Jews have a hatred for White people that is beyond approach, and that is that. You're not going to get them to back off by giving them money, power, etc.; that's been done and it failed.

This is mostly true. We really really hate you.

This is mostly true. We really really hate you.Yes we know. Down through history we have been incredibly decent and tolerant of you jews.
It is disconcerting to us that you would repay our kindness and compassion with such utter contempt and loathing.T.J.B.
Is there a reason? Can you tell us why?:confused:

They're jealous. White men create forks and spoons. Jews create sporks.

Next they'll claim credit for the foon.

White man invents fork and spoon. Jew invents foon and wins Nobel Prize.

The reason I put the idea out there is so that it begins to be considered. What I know is that at some point there will be a White man in power with the ability to carry it out. By that time, the tutting will have faded, and the clean, pure, undeniable logic of the conclusion will carry the day in that White man's mind.

All other options leave the risk of reinfection. Extermination is the only safe solution to the utter misery the jews have caused all other peoples.

There will one day be a White man in power who will be able, if he wishes, to exterminate all the jews living in his nation. But when he's done there will still be jews living outside his nation, and outside all the majority White nations. So the risk of reinfection will remain.

Yes we know. Down through history we have been incredibly decent and tolerant of you jews.
It is disconcerting to us that you would repay our kindness and compassion with such utter contempt and loathing.T.J.B.
Is there a reason? Can you tell us why?:confused:

You already know the answer to this. You filthy goyim are our enemy and we enjoy watching you suffer.
Do not forget the fact that we ARE evil, and are of our father the devil.

Hard to say, but it certainly seems that Hitler would have acted differently if he had ever traveled to the UK, USSR or USA.

Had he, I think he would have realized the utter need to dispose of his German jews with great care. Probably, in hindsight, the best thing he could have done was forbidden any jews to emigrate, forced them all into various holding structures - some mix of prisons, camps and guarded ghettos - and made 'the international community' aware that to the extent they tried to mess with Germany, the jews would suffer. Hitler should have used Germany's jews as a pawn, and kept them completely isolated from their international brothers.


Jews have to be disposed of as carefully as nuclear waste.

What I'm saying is, the jews and I both know that Kevin MacDonald would sign off on exterminating all jews if he had the option. And he would be correct to do so. But if you ask him, he will say, I don't believe that and I have never written that. But he would do it. The point is that even these people who study jews formally cannot emotionally grasp the depth of the hatred jews have for us; the very, very real psychological and political fact that they believe exactly what is written in their hatecode book:

Even the best of the gentiles should be killed.


There's the problem. MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination. I don't know if he'd even endorse expulsion. He might predict it as the likely outcome of conflicting group interests, but that's not the same as advocating it.

What does the forum think of extermination of WN? If the jackboot comes down it much more likely that we will be on the receiving rather than the delivering end.

Another thing with Hitler and the Germans is that I don't think they realized the extent to which the U.S. and the U.K. were under jewish control.

My friend, you're kidding right?

Have you read Goebbels and Hitler at all? They knew EXACTLY how much influence Jews had over the Western Democrazies. They knew how those poisonous bastards controlled the Press. They knew what the unspeakable, child murdering monsters did to the Slavs in the USSR, how the Jews deliberately starved millions to death in Ukraine.

The mistake was believing they with a relatively small population of about 80 Million Germans, same in Japan, (forget Italy) they could defeat the combined forces of the British Empire, the USSR and the USA with more than twice the people and vastly more natural resources.

The other mistake was Hitler didn't have enough mongrel in him. He thought he could reason with an animal like Churchill. He thought letting 300,000 British Troops go home at Dunkirk would be enough to get Churchill to back off.

Wrong! He completely misread that syphilitic old bastard.

There will one day be a White man in power who will be able, if he wishes, to exterminate all the jews living in his nation. But when he's done there will still be jews living outside his nation, and outside all the majority White nations. So the risk of reinfection will remain.

Really? A white man with power today could go right into any country he wanted and exterminate jews. What are the Argentines, Brazilians or whoever going to do about it? All you have to do is threaten them behind the scenes, but most of them will probably be willing to go along with the plan in the first place. Jews are detested universally. That universal detestation has merely never been turned into an executed plan.

There's the problem. MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination. I don't know if he'd even endorse expulsion. He might predict it as the likely outcome of conflicting group interests, but that's not the same as advocating it.

I think you're wrong. If he had the choice, he absolutely would. The guy wrote a trilogy. In a lot of it you can practically hear him groaning at the strain of withholding his judgment of what a bunch of evil, destructive ratfucks the kikes he's writing about are. Absolutely he would press the button, no doubt about it.

MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination.

You're confusing unwillingness to say something with not believing in it. Personal and professional considerations would prevent him from saying it or writing it, but that by no means tells you what he actually, privately believes. That we can only surmise.

There's the problem. MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination. I don't know if he'd even endorse expulsion. He might predict it as the likely outcome of conflicting group interests, but that's not the same as advocating it.

Just to be clear: are you saying, and do you believe, that if KM believed exterminating jews were the right policy - he would advocate that in public?

You already know the answer to this. You filthy goyim are our enemy and we enjoy watching you suffer.
Do not forget the fact that we ARE evil, and are of our father the devil.

True - jews enjoy the slow-motion white genocide more than they would enjoy the quick extermination we would favor of them. They enjoy seeing neighborhood after neighborhood slowly, deliberately, painfully, messily, bloodily converted into little Africa. This is the part that no scholarly study of jews can ever capture, because it doesn't lend itself to statistics. All history, though, shows that top Whites have noted the hatred and loathing jews have for us in specific and non-jews in general. It is purely due to the decades and intensity of jewish control today that you don't see white scholars and leaders saying exactly the same things that Voltaire and Luther did. Rather, they say the same things in nuanced, footnoted, de-emotionalized form.

Jews have to be disposed of as carefully as nuclear waste.

I would say that live ones have to be handled as with as much and careful forethought as is required to dispose of nuclear waste. Once they're dead, I have a strong feeling they make good dogfood. Not as good as horseflesh, but good.

The mistake was believing they with a relatively small population of about 80 Million Germans, same in Japan, (forget Italy) they could defeat the combined forces of the British Empire, the USSR and the USA with more than twice the people and vastly more natural resources.

This was German arrogance. You can still see it today on the 'Net. Not all Germans, but a definite type, is always asserting things about America, de haut en bas. It's funny, as a cultural thing. But you can see where that type of false belief that one understood the situation could easily translate into downfall. Which is what happened. And what I think might have been alleviated if Goebbels and Hitler had seen and visited, not just intellectually understood, the USA.

We all know what must be done in order for the White race to survive, but how many of our fellow "White" people are willing to get their hands dirty? We have literally spent years connecting the dots for them and it still doesn't click. Perhaps when they are homeless and sitting in the dark with no niggerball to watch, then the light will finally click. Until then, I just cannot be real optimistic about a "great awakening".

There's the problem. MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination. I don't know if he'd even endorse expulsion. He might predict it as the likely outcome of conflicting group interests, but that's not the same as advocating it.

Only a nigger 'academic' or a jew would dare advocate extermination while attempting to hold a state job, even if tenured. MacDonald wouldn't do it in a million years, he's not the type. But I'd bet my life he would press the button if he had the chance. Any white who understood the evidence would, save for the religious-delusional.

We all know what must be done in order for the White race to survive, but how many of our fellow "White" people are willing to get their hands dirty? We have literally spent years connecting the dots for them and it still doesn't click. Perhaps when they are homeless and sitting in the dark with no niggerball to watch, then the light will finally click. Until then, I just cannot be real optimistic about a "great awakening".

Mass awakening long, long ago devolved into a strawman by which we pat ourselves on the back for seeing through things that, well, everybody sees through. Bottom line is we do what we can to teach as many as we can. What will motivate people to act depends partly on our efforts and partly on circumstances.

The most important question that can be asked by White Nationalists,
even though the answer itself is obvious,
despite the initial fear response so many White people are conditioned towards.
Conquering and killing ones enemies is a long-stranding tradition in the world,
jews themselves practice and celebrated it to the point of making it a 'religion'.

When jews brag about, "we jews..the destroyers" its a promise based on historic facts. T.J.B.
"Nazis" never followed a program of exterminating jewry in Europe,
neither did the Tzar and Cossacks, not the Romans nor Persians.

“But to permit the Jews, with their 3,000-year history of nation-wrecking,
from ancient Egypt to Russia,
to hold such power over us is race suicide.”
Dr. Pierce

Looking at the effect of jews as corrosive, destructive and inevitably genocidal presence in White society,
the only logical solution is creating a racially judenfrei-Welt.
Some folks may cringe at idea, some deny they have thought about it,
but its validity is certain and will not be ignored for friendlier alternatives and less scary sounding solutions
which won't threaten the bovine contentment goyim enjoy as it slowly kills them in return.

"Jews are able to enjoy the thought of the ruin of the goyim.
They embrace their role as destroyers of other peoples."

Pales of settlement or expulsions are suicidal folly which only makes a more aggressive enemy return.
Obviously there has to be massive changes in the social structure to allow such a program to be implemented and completed.
Mandatory Genetic testing is obvious,
since we never fall for that lie jews are "just another religion",
nor will nationality be of any worth at all,
since thanks to jews 'tikkun-olam' concept of nationality is kosher-approved K
where any shit-skin is European because kikes say so.

Itz not jews alone, there are plenty of shabbaz goyim who are just as guilty of crimes against White Humanity;
they many not be jews in a racial sense but they are jew-ish in every way that matters;
look at the politico-turds of the kwa, Europe or Down Under;
any of the media-celebs as well, who became kikes for fame and money and nonchalantly promote
every of anti-white kike idea.
So it not just genetics, but mental/spiritual qualities or lack off that have to be
weeded out of White society.
That basically means theres a lot of trash and polluted areas around it to dispose of.

Some details since we're on the subject:

Despite the eagerness some may have for 'wetwork',
none of us are child killers and never will be and we never celebrate passover,
there has to be a line on what's kept what discarded and jews set that line..
which is the bar-mitzvah or bat-mitzvah..
if any jew had one, itz disposable.
All jew adults have to go.

What of those jews a day or year away?
Mental and spiritual correction to Aryan approved standards for untermenschen,
with a sterilization process for safty concerns.

Think of it as correcting jews, to some limited degree,
fix jew-youngsters mind and spirit against all things jew,
for the evils it has done under the "light upon nations."

Why not simply follow a program of "positive eugenics" reg. jews?

That was explained by men knowledgeable on the subject
and they said "genetic integration" creates a lingering harm amongst Aryans to remain
susceptible to jewish lies and deceit, an inborn deformity which makes them willing shabbaz-goyim to jews,
even unto wars and racial suicide.

The reason I put the idea out there is so that it begins to be considered.
What I know is that at some point there will be a White man in power with the ability to carry it out. By that time, the tutting will have faded, and the clean, pure, undeniable logic of the conclusion will carry the day in that White man's mind.
All other options leave the risk of reinfection. Extermination is the only safe solution to the utter misery the jews have caused all other peoples.

Ghettos, exile etc. are tired old ideas that have repeatedly failed and should never be considered.

Remember that when it comes time to do this,
plenty of blood, pain and ruin will have already occurred to remove the jew from positions of power,
the jew will never surrender itz position over Whites,
nor be fooled by some clever usurpation of power by a racial vanguard the jews never see coming.
To get free of jews, its gonna be a long hard to get there White man.

"The truth is, indeed, as you once wrote:
one can only understand the Jew when one knows what his ultimate goal is.
And that goal is, beyond world domination, the annihilation of the world.
He must wear down all the rest of mankind, he persuades himself, in order to prepare a paradise on earth.
If a halt is not ordered, he will destroy all men."

I figure after the a-rabs get done with them their won't be a jew left standing.

Never send a boy to do a man's job.

Really? A white man with power today could go right into any country he wanted and exterminate jews. What are the Argentines, Brazilians or whoever going to do about it? All you have to do is threaten them behind the scenes, but most of them will probably be willing to go along with the plan in the first place. Jews are detested universally. That universal detestation has merely never been turned into an executed plan.

Rats are detested almost universally and we're no closer to exterminating them now than we were in the days when they were spreading the plague.

Invading any country that harbors jews is as impractical as the neoconservative plan to invade any country that harbors Muslim terrorists.

I think you're wrong. If he had the choice, he absolutely would. The guy wrote a trilogy. In a lot of it you can practically hear him groaning at the strain of withholding his judgment of what a bunch of evil, destructive ratfucks the kikes he's writing about are. Absolutely he would press the button, no doubt about it.

It's possible he hates the jewish leaders who are working against us, in fact I'm sure he does, but it's a long way from hating your enemies to hating every jew enough to want them all dead.

Just to be clear: are you saying, and do you believe, that if KM believed exterminating jews were the right policy - he would advocate that in public?

No, I'm saying I don't think he's the type of man who supports exterminating any race. He doesn't even want to deport blacks from a future White dominated America.

Only a nigger 'academic' or a jew would dare advocate extermination while attempting to hold a state job, even if tenured. MacDonald wouldn't do it in a million years, he's not the type. But I'd bet my life he would press the button if he had the chance. Any white who understood the evidence would, save for the religious-delusional.

I don't think so. The Nazis understood the evidence and, for all their talk about the racial struggle for survival, even they couldn't bring themselves to exterminate the jews living in Germany during the war.

There's something in the Aryan soul that's repulsed at the thought of killing someone who has committed no crime against us. Jews have been exploiting this White trait for thousands of years.

We should take the dna of the most brilliant of the jewish scientists and mathematicians and mix it in with the smartest whites to breed a new master race that combines the best of aryan and jew.

Bad idea.
They'd probably grow up to be fags.

Rats are detested almost universally and we're no closer to exterminating them now than we were in the days when they were spreading the plague.

I see some differences between rats and men.


Invading any country that harbors jews is as impractical as the neoconservative plan to invade any country that harbors Muslim terrorists.

So the project doesn't happen overnight. But it does happen.

Slow or fast, but methodical, thorough and complete. The beauty of it is, they claim it was already attempted, even though they know it wasn't. But they've reaped trillions in benefits for their lies. It is only just that they pay for it, and the price they should pay is complete extermination. No one will miss them. Everyone will benefit from their absence.

There's something in the Aryan soul that's repulsed at the thought of killing someone who has committed no crime against us. Jews have been exploiting this White trait for thousands of years.

The jews have committed crimes against us, far more than the Arabs their media blame. And white people have no trouble at all with mass killing of innocent Arabs.

The jews have committed crimes against us, far more than the Arabs their media blame. And white people have no trouble at all with mass killing of innocent Arabs.

It's easier to talk about killing women and children than it is to do it.

If Israel sent troops into the Gaza strip and began executing every Arab even the neocon gentiles at National Review would be horrified. They might even turn against Israel.

Holocaust propaganda works because White people have strong moral instincts. Jews resemble us enough that we can't just treat them as animals. Intellectually I know they're my enemies, but could I execute a jewish woman or child? No.

Exile (with or without sterilization) is the only psychologically practical solution available to Whites.

It's easier to talk about killing women and children than it is to do it.

If Israel sent troops into the Gaza strip and began executing every Arab even the neocon gentiles at National Review would be horrified. They might even turn against Israel.Israel has a right to defend itself, it's Hamas' fault for putting those terrorists next to that school/hospital/daycare center/apartment building, or it was an unfortunate accident to use lazar guided missiles to hit that UN ambulance and then machine gun the survivors. The story hasn't changed in decades and they still support israel.

Holocaust propaganda works because White people have strong moral instincts. Jews resemble us enough that we can't just treat them as animals. Intellectually I know they're my enemies, but could I execute a jewish woman or child? No.

Exile (with or without sterilization) is the only psychologically practical solution available to Whites.Exile has been done a million times already, they always come back.

You know that I believe the correct policy toward the jews is to exterminate them; I believe that is the only rational and effective response to their collective attempt to genocide our White race. My question here, though, is whether I am the first in European history to propose this solution. Answer the question if you can, and use quotations if possible



More... (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=7012)

I don't know if your the first but some jews and part jews are more innocent than others. I don't think they should all be treated the same. I think the more innocent behavior should be given more respect (on an individual basis) and the more guilty behavior should be given less respect (on an individual basis) whether they be Jews or Indo-Europeans or any mixture thereof. Besides, how can "jew" be defined? If I have a 2 jewish ancestors in Europe from the early 1500's does that make me jewish?

I don't know if your the first but some jews and part jews are more innocent than others. I don't think they should all be treated the same. I think the more innocent behavior should be given more respect (on an individual basis) and the more guilty behavior should be given less respect (on an individual basis) whether they be Jews or Indo-Europeans or any mixture thereof. Besides, how can "jew" be defined? If I have a 2 jewish ancestors in Europe from the early 1500's does that make me jewish?

it's safest just to go with the one drop rule. you need to be careful not to research your genealogical tree too far back, else if you hit a jew it's the end of the line for you and your kids.

as far as innocence and guilt, that is beside the point. the point is, a propensity for acting jewish or having a jewish spirit. catch my drift?

Great thread!

I would like to thank Mr Linder for finally putting this concept out there, it was long overdue.
Far too many people refuse to even discuss this matter which is of vital importance to European survival, and what is even worse, we have so called WN's attacking, mocking and spitting at VNN for having the vision and courage to discuss the matter.

VNN has once again shown that it is on the cutting edge and will continue to be as long as great visionaries like Alex Linder are in charge.

Of course I have no doubt that others will eventually come on board as conditions in the kwa and Europe continue to deteriorate and people begin to realize that it is all because of filthy criminal jews.

MacDonald doesn't believe that, consequently he would not endorse extermination.

I think that he would. Of course he can't openly admit it.

There is no way in hell that someone like MacDonald, with such in depth knowledge of destructive jews and their long history of criminal genocidal undertakings would not be in favour of complete extermination.

If Israel sent troops into the Gaza strip and began executing every Arab even the neocon gentiles at National Review would be horrified. They might even turn against Israel.



Utter rubbish

Did you have a look at all the neocon and patriotard Amerikwan forums during I$rael's Gaza massacre? These blood thirsty kwan fuckers were orgasmic in their praise of the kikes, masturbating over the carnage and calling for even harder strikes on Palestinian civilians. Most of them were not even kikes, just ordinary brainwashed kwans who support I$rael.

You know that I believe the correct policy toward the jews is to exterminate them; I believe that is the only rational and effective response to their collective attempt to genocide our White race. My question here, though, is whether I am the first in European history to propose this solution. Answer the question if you can, and use quotations if possible



More... (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=7012)
This might be close: "The solution to the Jewish problem must be accomplished through the elimination of Jews, the development of the productive powers of Romanians, and the protection of their enterprises"
--A.C. Cuza (1910)
For My Legionaries, pg.83

Utter rubbish

Did you have a look at all the neocon and patriotard Amerikwan forums during I$rael's Gaza massacre? These blood thirsty kwan fuckers were orgasmic in their praise of the kikes, masturbating over the carnage and calling for even harder strikes on Palestinian civilians. Most of them were not even kikes, just ordinary brainwashed kwans who support I$rael.

That's not the same thing as complete extermination. Under the right circumstances Whites would accept the nuking of Israeli cities. For example if Israel carried out their threat to nuke Europe millions of jews would die in the nuclear counterattack. Even short of a nuclear conflict Whites might accept a few massacres of jew civilians carried out in the heat of battle, especially if jews behaved as they usually do in war and committed atrocities against Whites first.

That doesn't mean Whites will accept the mass execution of jews. The sterilization proposal might be acceptable after a long reeducation campaign.

There still remains the practical problem of eliminating the jews outside the White nations.

That's not the same thing as complete extermination. Under the right circumstances Whites would accept the nuking of Israeli cities. For example if Israel carried out their threat to nuke Europe millions of jews would die in the nuclear counterattack. Even short of a nuclear conflict Whites might accept a few massacres of jew civilians carried out in the heat of battle, especially if jews behaved as they usually do in war and committed atrocities against Whites first.

That doesn't mean Whites will accept the mass execution of jews. The sterilization proposal might be acceptable after a long reeducation campaign.

There still remains the practical problem of eliminating the jews outside the White nations.




It all depends on what one means by complete extermination? How people wish to interpret it.:)

You may want to look at it this way

Simply denying jews the right to practice judaism and making that criminal philosophy/ideology illegal will lead to the death of jewish identity/culture/heritage and therefore jews themselves as a separate 'unique' and 'chosen' people. This of course will be interpreted as brutal genocide by them and their apologists like Fade/Hunter but that is their problem not ours. The end result of this WN government policy if properly implemented will be complete extermination of the jews, the ending of what is referred to as 'the jewish people,' so this thread is completely valid as it discusses a final solution to the jewish problem.

As for Israel all that is needed to turn whites agaisnt it and in favour of war against it is control of the media. You would be surprised at how quickly WN's could turn previously philosemite whites into hard core anti semites using the same media tactics that jews currently employ against their enemies. I will give you an example of the EU/US controlled Serbian media which has basically turned the entire nation into believing that they were murdering criminals, guilty of the worst possible crimes against humanity and that NATO/ZOG was 100% justified in its aggression. Those who control the media alwys run the show.

Jews outside of white nations will be the least of our concerns as non whites hate them even more than us and will be willing to take them out in a second. The major problem has always been jews in the west, especially Amerikwa.

Proud queers are among the most worthless of creatures. Certain whites are proud queers (going back even to ancient Greek and Roman times). Certain jews are not queers. Therefore, certain jews are more worthy than certain whites.

Everybody needs to read the book MIGHT IS RIGHT by Ragnar Redbeard, then they will know what Alex Linder says about this subject is correct. There is only one morality in life, and that is to survive, WHATEVER it takes. Shame on all the soft people, who say it would be immoral to do what Alex Linder suggests. I say, I WILL, MY RACE WILL, SURVIVE - WHATEVER IT TAKES! This is the ONLY honest position to take. The question is: Do you have the balls for it?

Its threads like this that cause everyone outside the sphere of white supremist thought to facepalm at your ideology and regard you as idiots.

White Supremacist- ''The holocaust didn't happen!... ...its a zionist lie to make everyone believe Hitler was evil!''

Non White Supremacist- ''So what is your solution to the world's problems?''

White Supremacist- ''Kill all the jews!''

Self defeating logic.
http://mmsbox.googlepages.com/smiley_rolleyes.gif

Its threads like this that cause everyone outside the sphere of white supremist thought to facepalm at your ideology and regard you as idiots.

White Supremacist- ''The holocaust didn't happen!... ...its a zionist lie to make everyone believe Hitler was evil!''

Non White Supremacist- ''So what is your solution to the world's problems?''

White Supremacist- ''Kill all the jews!''

Self defeating logic.
http://mmsbox.googlepages.com/smiley_rolleyes.gif

There isn't a single ideology here but several, if you actually had any powers of observation not to mention interest in anything other than talking rot you could discern that there is a disconnect between the Americans and Europeans who post here, for example.

Until you stop using antiquated terms like "white supremacist" (or was it "white supremist"? - pick one, dickhead) and ignoring the influence of the jews there is no point in answering your points. You are a dishonest partisan who refuses to acknowledge the role of the jews in any of the problems facing our societies.

Everybody needs to read the book MIGHT IS RIGHT by Ragnar Redbeard, then they will know what Alex Linder says about this subject is correct. There is only one morality in life, and that is to survive, WHATEVER it takes. Shame on all the soft people, who say it would be immoral to do what Alex Linder suggests. I say, I WILL, MY RACE WILL, SURVIVE - WHATEVER IT TAKES! This is the ONLY honest position to take. The question is: Do you have the balls for it?

If you don't like reading, just listen to the Charles Manson tapes, its all about survival and the guy is funny as hell.

There isn't a single ideology here but several, if you actually had any powers of observation not to mention interest in anything other than talking rot you could discern that there is a disconnect between the Americans and Europeans who post here, for example.
Both of which are avid holocaust deniers or revisionists. I've yet to encounter or view a white nationalist, national socialist or southern state inbred, red neck, Ron Paul supporting fucktard that likes to wear swastika t shirts for their shock value that doesnt either disbelieve the holocaust happened, or feel that the event itself was historically insignificant and something to be scoffed at (no, it wasnt only jews at the recieving end).

So VNN, Stormfront, et all. All I'm asking is for you to hold a consistent line on something that should be such a common denominator for you if you all hate jews so much. What is the sense in defending the German nazis from accusations of a deed that you only want to emulate anyway?

Shouldnt you be proud of the holocaust, or at least flattered that your ideological pin up boys were accused of such a great accomplishment for the aryan race?

It reeks of both stupidity and hypocrisy in equal measure.

So VNN, Stormfront, et all. All I'm asking is for you to hold a consistent line on something that should be such a common denominator for you if you all hate jews so much. What is the sense in defending the German nazis from accusations of a deed that you only want to emulate anyway?

The WN position on the Hollow Hoax is consistent. It may be encapsulated in bumper-sticker form:

"It didn't happen, but it should have."

Our position is Hitler was too nice. He didn't understand the full nature and danger of jews. Read David Irving's Hitler's War. Though Irving is not a "Holocaust denier," the fact is that his work proves that if there was a concrete extermination effort (which is doubtful, to say the least), Hitler did not instigate it and it was uncoordinated; that's the absolute best that can be said in favor of the Hollow Hoax tale.

Jews were always afraid someone would exterminate them, for good reason. They made the same claim of "six million jews killed" during World War ONE as well as in World War Two.

The idea comes from the jews themselves. It's a paranoid fantasy that became a shake-down tactic and Aryan-culture-destroying tactic. It is not our fault if it is also a superb idea.

If those very simple nuances are too abstract for you to graph, perhaps you should consider the very real possibility that you are not intelligent enough to be posting in this thread.

The WN position on the Hollow Hoax is consistent. It may be encapsulated in bumper-sticker form:

"It didn't happen, but it should have."

Our position is Hitler was too nice. He didn't understand the full nature and danger of jews. Read David Irving's Hitler's War. Though Irving is not a "Holocaust denier," the fact is that his work proves that if there was a concrete extermination effort (which is doubtful, to say the least), Hitler did not instigate it and it was uncoordinated; that's the absolute best that can be said in favor of the Hollow Hoax tale.

Jews were always afraid someone would exterminate them, for good reason. They made the same claim of "six million jews killed" during World War ONE as well as in World War Two.

The idea comes from the jews themselves. It's a paranoid fantasy that became a shake-down tactic and Aryan-culture-destroying tactic. It is not our fault if it is also a superb idea.

If those very simple nuances are too abstract for you to graph, perhaps you should consider the very real possibility that you are not intelligent enough to be posting in this thread.


i think its more you should consider the very real possibility that modern national socialists, WN's etc are very aware that the vast majority of the rationally minded population are uncomfortable with the idea of siding with an ideology whose leaders committed this deed and in order to win people over it becomes necessary to convince them it didn't happen.

i think its more you should consider the very real possibility that modern national socialists, WN's etc are very aware that the vast majority of the rationally minded population are uncomfortable with the idea of siding with an ideology whose leaders committed this deed and in order to win people over it becomes necessary to convince them it didn't happen.

Jim, why do you assume a priori that National Socialists (outside of the ones whose nuts were crushed by torturers at Nuremberg) are liars?

"They're only saying 2+2=4 because it gets people to follow them." That's all you've got?

Believing in Santa Claus is more rational than believing in "the Holocaust."

It's easier to talk about killing women and children than it is to do it.

Nineteen-year-old Americans do it every day.

And the country regards them as heroes for it. Support the troops!

How hard is it to drop a bomb on a ghetto? Any harder than dropping one on Dresden?

We're not talking about every White in the world going up against a jew in a mano-a-mano switchblade fight.

The actual percentage of people needed to get the job done would be comparable to the size of the military, probably much smaller than that. And the means wouldn't be dire. The first step (after gaining political control) would be to give mandatory DNA tests in more and more areas and then, based on the results, round up jews from those areas. This would be the bloodiest part of the job: it would require martial law and shooting resisters of any kind. The second step, after establishing ghettos or camps, are mass trials (with much sentencing in absentia, by necessity). The third step (roughly simultaneous with step two) would be to hold these jews hostage so that world jewry would hesitate in any efforts to go against us. Well, no need to go on - it's all speculation at this point, anyway.

So far, the case for why jews, uniquely among bipeds, should be exterminated has not been successfully made.

I've yet to encounter or view a white nationalist, national socialist or southern state inbred, red neck, Ron Paul supporting fucktard that likes to wear swastika t shirts for their shock value that doesnt either disbelieve the holocaust happened, or feel that the event itself was historically insignificant and something to be scoffed at (no, it wasnt only jews at the recieving end). That's a good bulk of people, I'm happy our numbers are such.

There is no need to exterminate them. They can be rendered harmless with laws prohibiting them from loaning money, creating stock markets, from participation in government, the media, and from teaching and doing childcare.

The Jews who got rich through usery ie the Rothschilds, should be arrested and their wealth confiscated. There should be no death penalty for the Rothschilds--killing them will make it too difficult to recover their stolen loot.

Jews control the drug trade. Legalization of all drugs will put them out of business and stop all the drug related warfare.

Jews should be prohibited from owning oil supplies. The Gulf mega-disaster may have been deliberate sabotage--to boost the future price of oil.

The state of Israel should be abolished. All the Jews in the ME should be removed to a remote region of the planet---someplace where they can't hurt anyone---uninhabited Islands maybe.

Jews did 9-11, not Muslims. Both David Duke and Glen Miller claim Muslims did 9-11.... they don't deserve your support---they may be working for the Jews?

The Skunk at judicial-inc would make a great president, but he's too afraid to let the public know who he is. If many people volunteer to be his armed security guards, he may survive a presidential campaign.

There is no need to exterminate them. They can be rendered harmless with laws prohibiting them from loaning money, creating stock markets, from participation in government, the media, and from teaching and doing childcare.

All those and other variations have been tried before and failed. They always, eventually, find their way back in, by bribing the corrupt.


The Skunk at judicial-inc would make a great president, but he's too afraid to let the public know who he is. If many people volunteer to be his armed security guards, he may survive a presidential campaign.

Skunk is a proven liar.

Definitely the jew must be exterminated. Though some try to make an effort to distinguish the good from the bad, they will always favor their own kind and create networks to accumulate wealth and political power.

Even the best constitutional system will eventually be cracked and infiltrated by the jew.

Expulsion though has been tried over and over thoughout history. Somehow these parasites always manage to claw their way back into the power centers of the West. All the centers of talmudic learning and data must be found out and eradicated, so that the few jews who do survive will go one without the knowledge or guidance of that evil cult.

Judaism must become an extinct religion if not race.

This endless hate toward the White race must be rationalized – among many other things.

Once the DNA tests are in they will show that this 10,000 year old known hysteria actually started 40,000 years ago when we forget to deal with the half-breeds the Neanderthals left behind… and we call them Jews today.

:) I'm 100% for exterminating the kikes to very last one, I personally would gladly put a bullet on every single one of them no exception, exterminating the kikeroaches is every white human's duty, though I personally think instant death is too soft a punishment.

though I personally think instant death is too soft a punishment.Our only goal should be to rid ourselves of the verminous pestilence like a bad case of body lice and crotch crabs.
Punishment should be reserved to man. Niggers & jews are worthy only of extermination and extinction purely as a matter of hygiene.

Our only goal should be to rid ourselves of the verminous pestilence like a bad case of body lice and crotch crabs.
Punishment should be reserved to man. Niggers & jews are worthy only of extermination and extinction purely as a matter of hygiene.



You are absolutely right.

Rep for you.

The state of Israel should be abolished. All the Jews in the ME should be removed to a remote region of the planet---someplace where they can't hurt anyone---uninhabited Islands maybe.




The current Jewish plan, should the state of Israel be abolished, is for the US to carve off a portion of the N.E. United States for the 'new Jewish state'....replete of course, with their own military etc on our borders and buffer zones around them. And tons of foreign aid to off set their suffering.

Our treasonous elected officials would fall over each other groveling to satisfy their Jewish masters.

You know that I believe the correct policy toward the jews is to exterminate them; I believe that is the only rational and effective response to their collective attempt to genocide our White race. My question here, though, is whether I am the first in European history to propose this solution. Answer the question if you can, and use quotations if possible



More... (http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=7012)

While exact quotes escape me at this moment, I do believe an Austrian comes to mind as one who proposed this very thing. He wanted to be a painter, but was discouraged. He then tried a very different profession. Oh, he wrote a book, too. In that book he proposed this very final solution.

Well, anyway, all sarcasm aside, I will be the latest to not only agree with you about the jews needing exterminating, but have made it very clear that ALL nonwhites and mixed race mongrels should be exterminated along with at least 95% of the White race. For now, however, we can focus on exterminating the kikes. Just call me Genocide Incorporated.

When it comes to morality, the only thing that matters is the fourteen words.

"We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White Children."

Christianity, 'racism' and 'the holocaust' are Jewish lies. Engineered to disarm us of the ability to love our own people, and destroy those who would bring pain and suffering to our White children.

Jews didn't just invent the 'holocaust' myth. They holocausted much of Eastern Europe. Then falsely accused the German people of doing it to them. Just as they falsely accuse others of hate and intolerance when Jews are the most vicious racists the world has ever known.

All you need to remember is the fourteen words. That is the only morality you must live by. Do what is best for your people.

Alex is correct on the Jewish question. We have to destroy them before they destroy us. There is no alternative.




The next question is how do we do it. WN of the calibre that can dispose of Judaism is a fantasy. There are no more White nations. We don't even have White organizations that can take back control of nations that were once ours.

We must rebuild WN from the ground up. Starting with firm principles such as the 14 words. And more imporantly, harsh consequences for those who break them. This is what has enabled the Jews to carry out their criminal enterprise across millenia, from one nation to the next. Not the moral compass that judges every deed by the merit of whether or not it is "good for the Jews. But disapproval, ostracism and violence directed at any Jew who doesn't live by the code. The Jews did not get power over us, until they got power over their own.




WN needs discipline. We allow our women to fornicate with negros. We allow our young people to indulge in liberal nonsense. We allow limp-wristed, effeminate liberals to pass judgement on us. We allow police and other government agencies to violate us. We even allow the right wing to betray us, without fear of consequences. All of that has to end. These people must not only be punished, they must be made an example of.

There are many books on the subject of the Jewish problem. They're out there for anyone who wants to read, and come to the same conclusion, that the Jews have to go. Most White people know all they need or want to know. That it's safer to keep your mouth shut, and you can get ahead in this world by betraying your race.

Re-educating these people is simple. There are new rules. People who betray their race are no longer going to be celebrated and worshipped in the media. They are going to be made an example of. If we can't get to the race traitors, we'll make their neighbors rue the day that liberal race-traitors moved in next door. No one escapes the law.

Discipline is the heart of organization. We can't organize our people, yet. So we go to plan B. We punish.



We need a strategy that adresses two issues. How to organize at the grass roots level. And how to restore discipline. By discipline I mean fear. We need to boil it down to concrete laws and principles, that are plain and uncomprising, and punishments for lawbreakers.



We allow limp-wristed, effeminate liberal weaklings to govern us. Because they have everything to gain from betraying us, and nothing to lose. We need to raise the stakes. Let no man speak unless he's prepared to suffer the consequences. Let's see how many White liberals are prepared to take a beating for their beliefs.

There is no solid argument against extermination, but if they undertook to try to make one...they'd arrive at the same conclusion, which would threaten their status or some other personal interest.

There is "no solid argument" because it would violate Darwin's Theory of Evolution. In his book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life Darwin repeatedly states that if two sub-species, or whatever terms he was using, try to occupy the same territory and compete for the same resources, one will be exterminated. And Darwin does use the word "exterminated". Darwin leaves no room for sharing or compromise. So, yes, to compete for the same resource is to "threaten" "their status" and "other personal interest". Either the Whites or the jew will adapt and gain an advantage in this battle for resources and the other will be exterminated.

Utopian Creationist (believers that all humans were "created" equal) would say that Darwin's Theories do not apply to "humans". Utopians Creationist would claim that "humans" are somehow beyond the forces of Evolutions.

The obvious response to the Utopians Creationist would be one like Darwin made to the Creationist critics of his time. "If the jew used or attempted to use its evolutionary advantages to slow or stop the measurable decline and observable approaching extermination of the White sub-species, my [Darwin's] theory would be proven false, or at least no apply to humans. But no one has been able to provide an example that I [Darwin] know of".

There is "no solid argument" because it would violate Darwin's Theory of Evolution. In his book, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life Darwin repeatedly states that if two sub-species, or whatever terms he was using, try to occupy the same territory and compete for the same resources, one will be exterminated. And Darwin does use the word "exterminated". Darwin leaves no room for sharing or compromise. So, yes, to compete for the same resource is to "threaten" "their status" and "other personal interest". Either the Whites or the jew will adapt and gain an advantage in this battle for resources and the other will be exterminated.

Utopian Creationist (believers that all humans were "created" equal) would say that Darwin's Theories do not apply to "humans". Utopians Creationist would claim that "humans" are somehow beyond the forces of Evolutions.

The obvious response to the Utopians Creationist would be one like Darwin made to the Creationist critics of his time. "If the jew used or attempted to use its evolutionary advantages to slow or stop the measurable decline and observable approaching extermination of the White sub-species, my [Darwin's] theory would be proven false, or at least no apply to humans. But no one has been able to provide an example that I [Darwin] know of".

There are also the racialist shabbat-goys, numerous in the so-called "HBD" and "Game" blogospheres, who think jews are white and part of our own community or just love jews (for whatever reason; ordinarily a bluntly incorrect one, such as "Jews gave us our moral code" or "Jews can be great scientists and inventors").

OneSTDV and Mangan used to be a great example of this, though my instinct tells me the first one became far more radical before closing his blog.

Ship all kikes to madagascar. Ship niggers to africa. After those tasks are completed we can figure out what to do next.

If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

Yeah well then the same applies to the Jews since they're so hell-bent on exterminating whites in our own nations; they're going to have to let us take back everything whites brought to the world as well: the harnessing of electricity, indoor plumbing, the automobile, the airplane, the submarine, the internet, space travel, the Latin alphabet, English, television, radio, etc., etc., etc., etc. Besides, the kikes owe us so much that even their annihilation wouldn't repay the damage they've done to us, but at least the Jewish problem would be no more.

Point proven. If the advance of humanity is a collective contribution - why would anyone, Jews or whites, be "hell-bent" on exterminating any particular group of people? What good would that bring? If you truly think the Jew is to blame for all the woes of the world, I suggest instead of telling it to this thread, you tell a doctor- though, perhaps not a Jewish one.

If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

He's not a paying guest. He lied his way into a residence, killed the husband, raped the wife, pimped out the kids--girl and boy--fleeced the bank accounts, documented Stockholm syndrome-induced shows of support from his victims, let the rooms to subhuman 'immigrants' and called it a hotel.

But he did water most of the plants and smiled smirked while he did it, so I guess it's all OK.

Jews can have their fecal cameras and shitty stores, scam websites, and crap propaganda. It's only fair. But be very, very careful what you demand. On the balance you promote, kikes have a feather to the good versus an anvil, and the feather is mostly ours anyway. The payment will not be made to jews, it will be extracted from them--in the true spirit of fairness, rather than its name, as you prefer.

1. Read my other post, "Point Proven." Curious to hear your thoughts...

2. You can take any initially inhabited forum, physical like a country or ideological like a movement and religion, and charge the newcomer as uninvited, and using their stay to exploit, destroy, rob, and desecrate it for their own personal agenda, depending on how close-minded you want to be. Monotheism was born out of Judaism; its an inherent ideology that as a Christian, I view as a fundamental aspect of life. Yet, I'm a student of history and any clear minded rational person understands that the "newcomers" to monotheism - those who established the pillars of the Christian faith - on a tenant founded by Judaism, used a sound ideological structure to exploit, murder, torture, mane, and prosecute across the human landscape throughout history (Crusades, Inquisition, the Dark Ages, WWII - yes, don't tell me Hitler was an atheist; he professes to G-d in Mein Kamf; the Nazi belt buckles en-signed scripts of Catholic doctrine).

So would you say Christianity "hijacked" and "desecrated" monotheism/actions in the name of religion just like the Jews "hijacked" and "desecrated" the values of this country? And if we are to hold the Jews as collectively responsible, should we do the same for Christians? Catholics? White Europeans?.

Point proven. If the advance of humanity is a collective contribution - why would anyone, Jews or whites, be "hell-bent" on exterminating any particular group of people? What good would that bring? If you truly think the Jew is to blame for all the woes of the world, I suggest instead of telling it to this thread, you tell a doctor- though, perhaps not a Jewish one.

No, your point's most definitely NOT "proven." Whites DON'T need kikes, but kikes need Whites [a parasite needs a host]. The advance of humanity has been a mostly White contribution - with a few kikes here and there, and some other non-whites - mostly which copied / stole from Whites. I will bet my life that, had those kikes not invented [using that term loosely] what they did, some White / Aryan would have done so in their stead.

I suppose that's a good question; yes "why" indeed would the kikes be so hell-bent on destroying the White race via miscegenation since it's been the White race that's been responsible for most of the advancements of humanity? It makes no sense, and in fact it's very stupid, but yet this is exactly what is happening to us, and [to] our culture and nations.

I don't blame the kikes for all the woes of the world; only for the ones they are responsible for. Your insults are pathetic - McGay - you're going to have to try, much, much, harder.

My insults might be pathetic, but your logic is even more so - seriously, Mexican drug mules don't pull this much shit out of their ass. In fact, that's what you are - an asshole - because all you're doing is just spewing out shit. If you're a Christian, you're an insult to kindhearted Christians everywhere; if not, well you're simply just an imbecilic fuck. A few last points, and then I have a life to get back to:

1. Curious to hear your thoughts on my second point regarding Christianity and monotheism.

2. Why do you use the term "Aryan" thinking it applies to you? "Aryan" originated from the socio-geographic context referring to any group or subgroup that originated from the Indo-Iranian plateau (that's why Iran, long before it was called that, was referred in texts as "Aryah." The Third Reich hijacked it, and with a flow-off-the-tongue cool sound like it has, why wouldn't you? Just call yourself a white European-American, because that's simply what you are (in addition to an asshole...)

3. Alright, if you're going to downplay the importance of non-white contributions to humanity in regards to whites having mostly contributed to humanity, you're going to have to balance that with white European detractions from humanity, just as you're doing with the Jews. Remember, white Christians invented the term "genocide," along with the concept of religious persecution. I can be a close-minded self-hating Christian and tell you we were also responsible for the black plague during the dark ages, the suppression of women's rights in this country, and the perpetuation of corrupt financial institutions (not saying Jews weren't a part of this), the drug trade, and much more. Point is, every group has it's kooks and visionaries. I think you fall into the former rather than the latter.

And if you're a true Christian, does Christ not say turn the other cheek against your enemies, if the Jewish people really are you're "enemies" (though, I can think of a lot of other better enemies to have). What about love thy neighbor, and return evil with good - if the Jews really are inherently "evil." If the angry people reading this thread are all Christians, yall are pretty bad at it...

And is calling me McGay supposed to be an epithet against homosexuals? Just come and say you hate everybody who isn't you...

Lastly, next time you choose to speak, please have mercy on the rest of humankind, because every word that comes out of your mouth subtracts from the subtotal of human knowledge.

- TM

My insults might be pathetic, but your logic is even more so - seriously, Mexican drug mules don't pull this much shit out of their ass. In fact, that's what you are - an asshole - because all you're doing is just spewing out shit. If you're a Christian, you're an insult to kindhearted Christians everywhere; if not, well you're simply just an imbecilic fuck. A few last points, and then I have a life to get back to:

1. Curious to hear your thoughts on my second point regarding Christianity and monotheism.

2. Why do you use the term "Aryan" thinking it applies to you? "Aryan" originated from the socio-geographic context referring to any group or subgroup that originated from the Indo-Iranian plateau (that's why Iran, long before it was called that, was referred in texts as "Aryah." The Third Reich hijacked it, and with a flow-off-the-tongue cool sound like it has, why wouldn't you? Just call yourself a white European-American, because that's simply what you are (in addition to an asshole...)

3. Alright, if you're going to downplay the importance of non-white contributions to humanity in regards to whites having mostly contributed to humanity, you're going to have to balance that with white European detractions from humanity, just as you're doing with the Jews. Remember, white Christians invented the term "genocide," along with the concept of religious persecution. I can be a close-minded self-hating Christian and tell you we were also responsible for the black plague during the dark ages, the suppression of women's rights in this country, and the perpetuation of corrupt financial institutions (not saying Jews weren't a part of this), the drug trade, and much more. Point is, every group has it's kooks and visionaries. I think you fall into the former rather than the latter.

And if you're a true Christian, does Christ not say turn the other cheek against your enemies, if the Jewish people really are you're "enemies" (though, I can think of a lot of other better enemies to have). What about love thy neighbor, and return evil with good - if the Jews really are inherently "evil." If the angry people reading this thread are all Christians, yall are pretty bad at it...

And is calling me McGay supposed to be an epithet against homosexuals? Just come and say you hate everybody who isn't you...

Lastly, next time you choose to speak, please have mercy on the rest of humankind, because every word that comes out of your mouth subtracts from the subtotal of human knowledge.

- TM


Unfortunately, I've neither the time nor the inclination to respond to all of your drivel. But I shall post this metaphorical video for all those who wonder why I, or any sane human being, hates the Jews. Unless you like being a slave, of course - then keep on being a Jew-fellator like McGayver:

Hypocrisy - Slave To The Parasites - YouTube

If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

First of all Einstein was a Jew plagiarist, a thief and a fraud.

As far as Facebook, Google, Dell Computers, Home Depot (AKA Homo Depot), those can die along with the Jews for all I care.

If that is the best you can come up with for Jew contributions to society, then the Jews are every bit as pathetic as the effort of your trolling.

Don't deflect from the argument I am making by ignoring my main points in order to build a straw man. It only shows weakness and a minor case of ADD on your part.

First of all Einstein was a Jew plagiarist, a thief and a fraud.

Again, I can play the self-hating Christian and say the same thing about Jesus Christ. Don't all your assholes hurt from the constant gripping you do to pull these statements out from them?

Again, I can play the self-hating Christian and say the same thing about Jesus Christ. Don't all your assholes hurt from the constant gripping you do to pull these statements out from them?

Actually, Tom, most posters here are unconcerned about what you or anyone else has to say about Jeboo. Discussion of the attributes of a largely fictitious character amounts to literary criticism at best.

Most of the claims made for the "great positive contributions" of the jews are old hat and very tired. Nobody cares...

Originally Posted by Tom McGray View Post
If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

Salk's polio vaccine was a screwed up mess that wound up giving a lot of people cancer...millions...it took a White person to straighten it out.

Cell phones create brain cancer. Another Jew money maker.

The Theory of Relativity? Anyone can conjure up and imagine stuff.

Facebook and Google? Spy tools. Home Depot? Bilking Americans to build settlements in Palestine. Dell? ACER is far better.

Economic game theory? How to fleece the goyim more efficiently.

Pill cameras? The government has their nose up our behinds so far they should know what's up there all the way.

Speaking of stealing....when hotel guest has stolen everything in the room, is raping staff, smearing feces on the walls, they are usually evicted, and may be sued for damages. There is not enough money in the world to repay the damages Jews have done to the world.

There is not enough money in the world to repay the damages Jews have done to the world.

Who said anything about money, the blood of the jewish vermin is just as good, if not better then cash.

Don't deflect from the argument I am making by ignoring my main points in order to build a straw man.

Take your own advice, McGay. I easily denutted your comical, strawman bullshit. Predictably, you ignore and re-bleat.

You can be a White man, or you can be a sycophantic goofball. You've chosen the latter. Don't blame us for your own poor decisions. Wanna take it up the ass, identify with your oppressors? Fine, but don't expect--and damned sure do not demand--company here.

Want explanations? The search function is your friend, you jeboo-addled jackass.

Want to be an ignorant heel biter? Fuck off.

If you're going to exterminate the Jews, you're going to have to let them take back everything they've brought to the world as well, even those who are already dead (Polio vaccine, cell phone technology, the Theory of Relativity, Facebook, Google, Dell computers, economic game theory, The Home Depot, Casablanca, gastrointestinal pill camera, plastic emitting drip irrigation, and the flash drive, to name a few) Otherwise, that would be stealing. When a guest comes to stay at a hotel, and you decide to kick him out, it's only fair that he gets to take his suitcase with him...

Hm............ so all you named here the jews invented seriously?

I think you confusing buying a company with inventing what the company produce. BUT........ you crawl back in the sewers you come out of and feel free to take all you mention here with you the price is worth it, getting rid of your ilk.

As for the relativity theory................ explain me how a clerk in a patent office who failed on maths and was rejected from entering higher education, could possibly think complex maths even if this maths was to support a theory. On the other hand copying obviously and stealing other people work he was a true jew at that.

Again, I can play the self-hating Christian and say the same thing about Jesus Christ. Don't all your assholes hurt from the constant gripping you do to pull these statements out from them?

Few people here give a fuck about a Jew-on-a-stick that died. If he even existed in the first place.

And to answer your previous question bluntly, I'd be content with getting rid of EVERY Jew, and they can take whatever they made/invented with them. As far as what happens to the Jews, I couldn't care less. If the Muslims want to round them up and roast them in red hot ovens, my only emotional response to that happening would be a smile.

Is this adequately offensive enough to get my point across?

http://s9.postimg.org/pib17nt33/Classic_e856b0_619059.jpg

looks like the only thing that would work to stop the white genocide nowadays. It's war, they are killing us, we should be ok with killing them