What non-white nation should a newly est. White Nation vaporize with "the cleansing fire of nuclear warfare" to show the non-white world we fucking mean business?

I didn't include israel being that israel would in all likelihood already be glassed over by the time we begin to flex our muscle, plus its the option that EVERYONE would vote for, including myself.

But is that the end objective of a white nationalist America - to wipe out non-whites with nuclear weapons?

For myself, I believe that cutting off ALL foreign aid to non-white nations will do the job for us in a more "humane" way, especially in Africa. Mass starvation can work wonders on swarms of negroid savages, and best of all, it's radiation free! I would do that, and also militarize the US/Mexican border. In addition, I propose that we punish the Mexican government for their complicity in encouraging their surplus hordes to cross the US border by pushing our boundary line 200 miles south into Mexico (it's mostly worthles desert) along with every Mexican in it. Then, along the line of our newly-drawn border, we would build an east to west wall, heavily mined and heavily guarded by new WN troops. A side benefit of all that extra desert would be plenty of extra real estate for "sunny retirement communities" for old white folks. And maybe an extra Las Vegas or two thrown in, so they'll have something to do until they die.

Sound okay?

Forget nukes, I say we should just bomb the shit out of Meyheeco and get rid of the mestizo pests.

Zimbabewe IQ :67

Iran : 85

Saudi Arabia: 84

Vietnam : 97

Pakistan : 83

Haiti : 72

Puerto Rico: 84

Mexico:87

Cambodia: 89

Sudan: 72


I'd usually say start the lowest and work upwards, but uh, I just voted for Mexico anyways.

Of course, I hesistate to take this thread seriously. Nuclear destruction of other countries? Good luck peddling that....



...

[QUOTE=Johnny McRacist]But is that the end objective of a white nationalist America - to wipe out non-whites with nuclear weapons?

For myself, I believe that cutting off ALL foreign aid to non-white nations will do the job for us in a more "humane" way, especially in Africa. Mass starvation can work wonders on swarms of negroid savages, and best of all, it's radiation free! I would do that, and also militarize the US/Mexican border. In addition, I propose that we punish the Mexican government for their complicity in encouraging their surplus hordes to cross the US border by pushing our boundary line 200 miles south into Mexico (it's mostly worthles desert) along with every Mexican in it. Then, along the line of our newly-drawn border, we would build an east to west wall, heavily mined and heavily guarded by new WN troops. A side benefit of all that extra desert would be plenty of extra real estate for "sunny retirement communities" for old white folks. And maybe an extra Las Vegas or two thrown in, so they'll have something to do until they die.

Sound okay?[/QUOTE]

I voted for Zimbabwe. Reminds me of when I poured big pots of boiling water on an ant hill until it was exterminated.

But as for Mexico: I'm all for taking it over and expelling the pests, but I think we should go further south until we secure the Panama canal. Then clean out the Caribbean islands. Why should we have to share any kind of sustantial border with muds? Better to prevent future problems by occupying all of North America. We'll have lots of beautiful resort areas to ourselves that way as well as a big buffer zone between us and the sudacas.

[COLOR=Purple]Provided that it could be done in such a way that the wouldn't be affected by any fallout, I would definitely say Mexico. Its destruction would without a doubt bring a nice smile to my face.[/COLOR]

[color=#800080]Provided that it could be done in such a way that the wouldn't be affected by any fallout...[/color] It can't.

Nuking Mexico would insure that clouds of nuclear fallout would drift over the border into California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, at least. Entertaining such an attack also plays into the hands of our present enemies, who insist we're plotting mass genocide. Are we? Furthermore, I don't think it's a good idea for other reasons, but won't go into them here.

Anyway, a properly militarized, shoot-on-sight defense wall plunged 200 miles deep into Mexico would permanently keep the brown hordes at bay. And believe me, cutting off the billions upon billions of African, Asian, and Latin America aid would then free up billions of dollars to finance that very wall.

A win/win proposal.

[SIZE=3]Haiti has perhaps one of the most unsavory populations on Earth. And further, there still needs to be a "settling of accounts" since they annihilated most of the White people there over two centuries ago. Finally, there is nothing of value there that we would want nor would fallout from there hit the US mainland.[/SIZE]

[QUOTE=johnny yuma]Forget nukes, I say we should just bomb the shit out of Meyheeco and get rid of the mestizo pests.[/QUOTE]

[SIZE=3]Problem is, the Mexcrement would simply oooze elsewhere. Not that I oppose levelling Mexico City...[/SIZE]

Although I would like to burn the monkeys in Zimbabwe,it goes without saying that we would have to get the remaining whites out first.I would welcome them in Britain,ditto white South Africans,of whom we already have quite a lot.

It would be a mistake to nuke anybody if a white nation formed. It would be exactly what the Jews need to rally the entire world against us, demonize us, go to war with us and give us a "regime change" which would lead to a 2nd ZOG controlled melting pot situation. It would be best to have as many nukes as possible but only sabre rattle them at the world to keep them from attacking. It would be insurance to security of the nation but never use them.
For the hypothetical situation that we did nuke somebody I voted. At first I was going to say Mexico but changed my vote to Saudi Arabia. I wanted to say Israel!!!