Been pondering this lately. Although sycophancy seems the most pronounced characteristic of our goyish opining class, it's probably tactically better to mirror them by describing them as 'appeasers' and 'collaborators.'

As in,

Joe Farah collaborates with the Zionist regime. Joe Farah is a ZOG collaborator.

Or,

Ann Coulter is a jew-appeaser.

In her continual attacks on the French and Germans and Arabs and anyone else who refuses to toe the jewline, Ann Coulter shows herself an anti-American jew-appeaser.

These are all good: jew-appeaser, jew-collaborator, Israel-Firster, sycophant, suckpoop, lackey, possible paid agent, America-hating jew-appeaser.

Any thoughts?

If our government truly is occupied, as the term ZOG indicates, and if these occupiers are aliens with anti-American values, then the people who help them are truly collaborators and appeasers. Ann Coulter sells out her own people to curry favor with our Jewish Occupyers. I don't think she will look so good with spit running down her face and her peroxide cut off. Do you?

Did you know that Coulter is short for Collaborateur?

No kidding?
So I guess Coulter is the French form of collaberateur?

Yes, using these terms to identify the many White jew lackeys can be quite productive.
I myself have been using the term "Biological competitor" when referring to the many nonwhite invaders that invade our Aryan lands.
It actually has kind of taken off amongst some people I know who snicker at first when using this term but seem to get what the term is trying to convey - the nature aspect of the mud peoples and how their nature is the antithesis of our nature (physically, culturally and emotionally).

Chris Hitchens is a jew appeaser.....that does the job.

I propose using these terms for writers on the VNN frontpage and the VNN Aryan Alternative tabloid paper.

The smart ones will understand the point and it will put the named offenders on the defensive.....I really like this idea.
Most of the collaberators and appeasers are such pussies that you have to turn the tables on them and turn up the heat on them as THEY are so used to being on the psychological offensive towards others.
Racialists receive much of their jew friendly propoganda.
Thus, it is high time we turn the tables on these collaberators and appeasers and show the people how truly UnAmerican these jew lackeys are.

Unpatriotic could also work but it would be lost on most people since they are so conditioned by the lackeys in general.

Great idea SuperTapir.

If our government truly is occupied, as the term ZOG indicates, and if these occupiers are aliens with anti-American values, then the people who help them are truly collaborators and appeasers. Ann Coulter sells out her own people to curry favor with our Jewish Occupyers. I don't think she will look so good with spit running down her face and her peroxide cut off. Do you?

The debate structured in the mass media is always between jew-lib and jew-neo con. This sets up an irrelevant conflict that keeps the masses busy while the real power brokers go about their business. I can't count how many lemmings I come across that worship the democratic party while despising the republican party, as if there is any difference between the two.

Someone like a Pat Buchanan, who sometimes shows some characteristics of a non-bootlicker, has moderated his tone a bit to stay in the media circuit.

They all know from whom the bread is buttered, so they all play the game.

Your points are good ones, DB. I was joking abouty Coulter, but as she likes to attack the French, who correctly advised us to stay out of Iraq, I think the point is appropriate. She wrote an entire book about commies in the U.S., while completely exonerating the jews for their responsibility for the phenomenon, while taking a cowardly ethnic crack at the WASP.

like Coulter, Hannity, Limbaugh, Paul Roberts and Buchanan (most of the time) are often just as bad if not worse than the jews.
Hey, you've read CofC...what can we honestly expect from the jews?
Let us not be naive....the jews HATE us.
You see, I have come to expect this from the jews and often they do it in such a manipulating, backstabbing, hypocritical way.
That is the jew in a nutshell.
Damn, those sneaky pests.....too many of us (Whites) are too gullible and we easily fall prey to the jew's schemes.
It is in the WAY the jews' play us that took me awhile to comprehend.

The jews know us Aryan often better than we know ourselves. That is why they are not only the greatest liars of all time, but it is also why very few actually fully comprehend the jews for what they truly are.
It is an inverse relation - the jew is so clever and cunning that only few, often the elite thinkers truly get what the jews are really up to.

It is always an ongoing education when studying the jews.
Often, their 'jewyness' lies within the WASP elite. Read the words of simpletons masquerading like sophisticate thinkers. Folks like Coulter, Hannity and Roberts.
Roberts like Buchanan knows the score I have no doubt. Yet, due to cowardice and personal material gain, they will not name the jew for all to see.
When I see the skinny neck of Coulter I feel like slapping this bitch into next week.
She is such a gimmick - plays the card of good looking (I think she's ugly), conservative tough talking 21st century politically minded woman.
No wonder men order Russian wives in a box when there are Coulters running amok.
The gimmick works too.
Blame this not on the jews who promote her, but on the Aryan Whites who gobble down her shit and beg for seconds.


Whites should know better by now.
Why they do not? This is the question that I can not answer at this time.

The bleached-blonde horse-faced Coulter is likely part-jew herself, she thinks like one and writes like one.

Your points are good ones, DB. I was joking abouty Coulter, but as she likes to attack the French, who correctly advised us to stay out of Iraq, I think the point is appropriate. She wrote an entire book about commies in the U.S., while completely exonerating the jews for their responsibility for the phenomenon, while taking a cowardly ethnic crack at the WASP.

I kind of like her. I like her boldness. But I dont like her failure to acknowledge the Jewish role in affairs especially where Joe McCarthy was concerned. That is a glaring error in her defense of Tailgunner Joe.

Here Patsy Buch defends Coulter and predictably fails to point out here omission about the Jews.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33588

Patsy Buch, the alleged "antisemite" who always fights with one eye closed and half his brain tied behind his back, voluntarily!

She is boldly confident of her approved status with the Inner Party.
Nobody can continue to completely ignore the damage done by the zionist elephant in the global living room like she does, and not be one of them.
She is part of the crowd that still eat "freedom-fries" and eagerly exchange emails condemning the French as cowards because they didn't endorse ZOG invasion policy.
Screw the jew bitch.

Been pondering this lately. Although sycophancy seems the most pronounced characteristic of our goyish opining class, it's probably tactically better to mirror them by describing them as 'appeasers' and 'collaborators.'


Any thoughts?

?

As a former 'capitalist running dog', and now a born-again Nazi I have a thought to interject;

Make better use of the power of the English Language by the use of select descriptive words that reinforces the impact of the noun;

Examples of how it benefits the argument are to describe the Goyim sycophants as supine appeasers, spineless collaborators and describe their rhetoric as wooden rhetoric all dry and dusty reeking of terminal moral redundancy.

The success of Cartesian dynamics in defining Man's superiority over lesser beings is summed up by the e-version of Rene Descartes maxim Cogito ergo spam; "I think therefore I spam ".

:cool: