YouTube- Mel Gibson Calls Reporter An Asshole

Is that interviewer a kike? What about the producer of the show?

Not that I feel sorry for Mel. He's one of the biggest pussies to walk the face of the planet.

Is that interviewer a kike? What about the producer of the show?

Not that I feel sorry for Mel. He's one of the biggest pussies to walk the face of the planet.

Mel makes good movies: Braveheart; Apocalypto; and you gotta love mad max.

I liked Braveheart. Mad Max didn't do anything for me; the only one of those kinds of movies that ever made an impression on me was a low-budget Canadian affair called Def-Con 4 (I haven't seen it since the 80s and I bet I would find it pretty silly now).

I don't know how I feel about Apocalypto, but I respect it for its political incorrectness. Even though it was nominally about the Mayans, I bet the Aztlan folks detested it.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087130/board/thread/20231113?d=38015517&p=1#38015517

Re: 'The worst sci-fi films ever' TOP TEN LIST
by nick_jenny4976 (Thu Mar 9 2006 05:25:06)

Hey now, i remember "Def-Con 4" as being one hell of a movie. I rented it from my local video store because i had always noticed that cool videotape box cover (w/ the skeleton in an astronaut suit) and figured i would see what it was all about.
And from what i remembered that was a really good movie.

Of course that was about 12 years ago, and i drank almost a full fifth of scotch while i was watching it. I was also ingesting alot of hallucinagenic drugs at the time. Plus i had suffered a concussion that morning. I also may or may not have soiled myself about one third of the way into the movie.

*But it was a good movie from what i remember

* = all i remember is they're up in space, then they had a crash landing, and someone gets their hand chewed off.

Wow! With an endorsement like that, how can you go wrong? I might have to hunt down a copy of this forgotten Canadian classic.

I love bad movies. :D

Mel makes good movies: Braveheart; Apocalypto; and you gotta love mad max.


you mean Road Warrior.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087130/usercomments

3 out of 3 people found the following review useful:
It was the best of films, it was the worst of films..., 20 February 2001
Author: jessewillis from Canada

It was the best of films, it was the worst of films... two words: "Engrossingly Mind-numbing". Def-Con 4 is truly an oddball. The script is incomprehensibly senseless. There is no story arc at all, it is simply a collection of characters improvising scenes. It is a great example of what I like to call "plotless development" or "one damn thing after another". The acting is uniformly bad with the exception of Maury Chaykin who is hilarious as a Canadian survivalist. I particularly love one scene in this film in which we see the detail of a mechanism of a booby trap. The booby trap has as its trigger a Canadian social insurance card. What kind of symbolism are we supposed to find in this? Either this is the deepest film I've ever seen or the it is the shallowest. Either it deserves a 10 or it deserves a 1, I'll split the difference and give it 5.

ROFL.

3 out of 4 people found the following review useful:
Get off your high horse and enjoy it, eh?, 10 March 2003
Author: Fenrir-5 from California, USA

Perhaps my enjoyment of this movie largely stems from my not being Canadian. It seems that the Canadian reviewers have a grudge against the film. I can only imagine that they are getting some inside jokes that I am not.

I have liked this film since I was a kid. I rank it up there with "The Day After" as one of the better post-apocalyptic movies made. A lot of people give that honor to "Mad Max", but I found "Mad Max" boring and far too campy.

"Def Con 4" takes a serious tone, which is occasionally undermined by poor acting and special effects. But the overall impression is quite good. Sure it's fun to make fun of, but this is largely because we no longer live with the fear of nuclear war on a daily basis.

I found the writing to be quite good, with an effective and interesting opening drawing the viewer into the life of the astronauts as they waited to return to Earth. The movie is actually quite solid until it is necessary for a new conflict to be introduced - when the surviving astronauts meet the teenage, post-apocalyptic Hitler, the downhill slide begins. But even then it's not terrible. It's actually fun seeing how seriously everyone is treating the subject matter. And how can you not love a movie that begins with "It is the day after tomorrow"? The movie also has quite possibly the best tractor-immobilization sequence ever committed to celluloid.

On the downside, the action sequences are rather ineptly filmed, and the acting can be a bit wooden. But, hey, it's a low-budget sci-fi film. I recommend it for a fun evening.

A man after my own heart!

I'm done now. Back to Mel Gibson.

you mean Road Warrior.Actually "The Road Warrior" (1982) was the sequel to "Mad Max" (1980).

"We Were Soldiers" and "The Patriot" are also excellent btw.

Not that I feel sorry for Mel. He's one of the biggest pussies to walk the face of the planet.Oh, how so?

We're all aware that Gibson's an antisemite and -- unfortunately for the sake of his career -- that he has to remain somewhat closeted; at least for the time being anyway. He's grudgingly apologized in the media for his sacrilegious DUI outburst and knows all too well what becomes of anyone foolish enough to tell the truth regarding jew dominance of the West. When Marlon Brando cut loose about jew dominance of televitz and the silver(berg) screen on "Larry King Live" way back when, jew orgs swore -- publicly swore in print -- that he'd never work in Hymiewood again; and as big a name as Brando was at the time, he began to shit. Rumor has it that, unable to deal with the pressure, he made an appointment with a rabbi at the Simon Wiesenthal Institute in LA, dropped to his knees crying liking a newborn baby, and begged forgiveness. After he had rammed his tongue as far back as his tonsils up the rabbi's rancid asshole, he was absolved of his sins and "permitted" to carry on with what was left of his career, which was in decline by that point irregardless of his supposedly antisemitic remarks on King's show. But, he'd set a precedent -- and a warning -- for all who would dare even think about questioning our de facto masters.

I remember Gibson being interrogated on televitz soon after the incident with the jew cop. The female Torquemada (I forget the shiska whore's actual name) asked him how he felt about the Holocaust conference that was going on in Iran at the time. Mel responded, "I didn't know there was a conference." The inquisitor decided not to press the issue and dropped the subject. Now, you can call him a pussy for not publicly voicing his skepticism on the subject of the Holohoax or, you can see him as being cagey and at the same time principled by not falling into the obvious trap set for him. If he had truly repented of his "sins" against God's Precious Darlings, he would've acknowledged the conference in Tehran (which I'm sure he was aware of) and expressed his utter disgust at the proceedings and its participants, but he didn't; he refused to kowtow to the kike.

Eventhough Mel sold his soul to the devils, his quip to the tard reporter is timeless. :D More and more jew-loving reporters need to be called this! :D

I liked Braveheart. Mad Max didn't do anything for me; the only one of those kinds of movies that ever made an impression on me was a low-budget Canadian affair called Def-Con 4 (I haven't seen it since the 80s and I bet I would find it pretty silly now).

I don't know how I feel about Apocalypto, but I respect it for its political incorrectness. Even though it was nominally about the Mayans, I bet the Aztlan folks detested it.

Don't think the spics detested it, most of them are too stupid. They see themselves on screen and I'm sure they're happy. I thought it was a superb movie about killing everyone that gets between you and your family.

Oh, how so?

Don't be disingenuous. You know exactly what I'm talking about.

He's grudgingly apologized

"Grudgingly"? He offered one of his organs to any jew who asked for it! (I'm surprised he didn't get a taker, considering the jewish predilection for organ harvesting.)

Look, we all know how Gibson really feels (as do the jews). But he's obviously not made of the stern stuff his dad was.

Am I really supposed to feel sorry for a guy who became extremely wealthy making virulently anti-white films like Lethal Weapon 2, made the Hymiewood studios tons of money in the process, and is too much of a pussy to stand by a true statement?

You think he recanted because he had to? Why did he have to? Because he doesn't have enough money in the bank already? Because the jews might otherwise be on to him?

As long as people like you keep making excuses for gutless dirtbags like Gibson, we're not going to make any progress.

I remember Gibson being interrogated on televitz soon after the incident with the jew cop. The female Torquemada (I forget the shiska whore's actual name) asked him how he felt about the Holocaust conference that was going on in Iran at the time. Mel responded, "I didn't know there was a conference." The inquisitor decided not to press the issue and dropped the subject. Now, you can call him a pussy for not publicly voicing his skepticism on the subject of the Holohoax or, you can see him as being cagey and at the same time principled by not falling into the obvious trap set for him.

Was this around the same time he was making a TV mini-series for the jews about the holocaust? Poor Mel. His outburst cost him that gig. I hope he didn't have to sell one of his summer palaces to make up for the loss in income.

I thought it was a superb movie about killing everyone that gets between you and your family.

I think I'm just tired of seeing non-whites on screen, even if it is a decent movie.

When Marlon Brando cut loose about jew dominance of televitz and the silver(berg) screen on "Larry King Live" way back when, jew orgs swore -- publicly swore in print -- that he'd never work in Hymiewood again; and as big a name as Brando was at the time, he began to shit.

Brando's problem with the kikes mostly stemmed from the fact that he didn't like the way Hymiewood (used to) portray non-whites in films. Brando was big on "native rights" and so forth; he was a self-hating white* who felt the white man "stole" America from the red man, though curiously, I never saw him offer to give away any of his California mansions to these oppressed injuns so he could go back to Europe where he belongs. Maybe he was too busy sucking cocks and impregnating mud women to really ponder the finer points of his position.

He didn't say anything in that Larry King interview that he hadn't said 17 years earlier in Playboy.

Oh yeah, and I just loved him as George Lincoln Rockwell in Roots. It was such an accurate portrayal. :rolleyes:

Nothing good ever comes out of Hymiewood. Anyone who makes it in Hollywood has either sold his soul to the jews or is one of them.

* I'm assuming he was white. Who the hell knows.

YouTube- Marlon Brando as George Lincoln Rockwell in "ROOTS"