View Full Version : VNN Tabloid
Abzug Hoffman
October 15th, 2004, 09:35 PM
Is it a collection of Alex Linder's articles that have appeared on his web site?
SuperTapir
October 15th, 2004, 10:22 PM
Most of the contents havce appeared on VNN, along with some cartoons and graphics from VNN and elsewhere. Includes Wolzek on South Park and Survivor, Paul Weir on his relatives' dispossession at hands of nigger Mudgabe in Zimbabwe. Collection of quotes from jews establishing the dishonest pretext on which the attack on Iraq was founded. Brooks's review of Final J'udgment about Israeli connection to JFK assassination. My own reviews of fFahrenheit 451 & 9/11.
SkinnyMonkey
October 17th, 2004, 12:32 AM
Rounder,
Feel free to double my order if you don't have enough takers on the freebies. The check is in the mail. Bear in mind that I will likely just toss them all on driveways/porches all over northwest AR.
SkinnyMonkey
October 17th, 2004, 12:41 AM
200 a week, eh? You know, David Pringle talked about doing a sustained flyering campaign a while back. The concept goes like this: instead of one flyer in their lifetime that the uninitiated can easily crumble up and ignore, send em' a weekly WN newspaper. After a few weeks or more, folks might get used to reading our ideas. Eventually they will begin expecting their weekly fix. Maybe flyering driveways works better than we realize. It's just that we've been doing it ineffectively for too long. Anyway, if you can keep the printed material fresh with bi-monthly editions or better, I would definitely try a sustained approach. Think of it as a sustained bombing campaign as opposed to the random scatter gun approach.
Abzug Hoffman
October 17th, 2004, 08:32 AM
Rounder,
Feel free to double my order if you don't have enough takers on the freebies. The check is in the mail. Bear in mind that I will likely just toss them all on driveways/porches all over northwest AR.
I'm sure the ADL will be happy to pick up your tab.
kabinger
October 17th, 2004, 10:58 AM
200 a week, eh? You know, David Pringle talked about doing a sustained flyering campaign a while back. The concept goes like this: instead of one flyer in their lifetime that the uninitiated can easily crumble up and ignore, send em' a weekly WN newspaper. After a few weeks or more, folks might get used to reading our ideas. Eventually they will begin expecting their weekly fix. Maybe flyering driveways works better than we realize. It's just that we've been doing it ineffectively for too long. Anyway, if you can keep the printed material fresh with bi-monthly editions or better, I would definitely try a sustained approach. Think of it as a sustained bombing campaign as opposed to the random scatter gun approach.
You may be on to something. Flyers are just that: flyers. They look, "act", and feel like junk mail. I think if people get something substantive, they're more willing to page thru it in their places of residence. Maybe I'm dead wrong, but it will be worth a shot.
JB112
October 17th, 2004, 12:29 PM
Again, I think 100,000 people need to see tabloid 1 before we even begin to think tabloid 2.
SkinnyMonkey
October 17th, 2004, 02:06 PM
[But he says he's former NA and was once a close associate of William Pierce, who called him "pure of spirit".]
I think you have me confused with the "elite warrior prince," Will Williams. Actually I am currently an NA supporter and I had never met Dr. Pierce. I think Alex is a great writer/commentator and I support him fully. I would like to see less shit slinging and more activism, but I guess we'll always have these anti-activist/anti-NA types around. For all the shit that's been launched at you, Glenn, you certainly haven't allowed it to impair your activism. You sure make us young'ns look like a bunch of slothful groidz. For the record I don't care if you snitched on the Order. I don't care if you're a pole smoking hermaphrodite; if you are doing something to help gather the folks we need to make a move against the jews, you're alright by me. Of course, I am not "pure in spirit" or any other such nonsense, I am only intersted in the survival and expansion of the Aryan race.
Joe
JB112
October 17th, 2004, 03:58 PM
JB112, as I understand it, Alex will make some minor changes in tabloid #1, correct a few errors in grammar, change tabloid positioning of cartoons, replace coupla cartoons, and maybe even replace one or two of the articles for ones he thinks are even more effective. But one thing for sure, we're gonna have to have a second printing soon. They're going like hotcakes
BTW, Rich Brooks of White Alert, and his WN friends distributed 250-300 VNN tabloids in the Columbia, MO area yesterday. Afterwards, they were thrown out of a German restaurant for wearing WN "stuff" on their clothing. Rich had on a WN T-shirt. Rich is kinda old like me, but he's still a hard-charging WN.
Definitely a second printing, with whatever improvements. This issue should go through 9 more printings, totaling 100,000 printed/distributed. That should be our distribution goal, I think. We've got what, 30 people signed on or thereabouts? It'll only take a few months for each of us to distribute the 3,300 or so avg. necessary to make nearly 100,000 distributed. And we need more time to produce fresh material for issue two. Second issue should come once we've reached distribution goals for the first. By then, who knows how many more distributors we'll have.
Yea, Rich is quite a fellow.
MOMUS
October 17th, 2004, 08:05 PM
I am surprised not to see the renowned Doc Martin's far-famed moniker writ in bold above all the others. Why has that hero of the hills been so silent on the subject of the tabloid?
yousuck
October 18th, 2004, 04:13 AM
I KNOW THAT YOU WERE A PAID ZOG INFORMANT/SNITCH. THAT YOU WERE A RAT AND THAT YOU ACCEPTED PAYMENT FROM ZOG. THATS ALL ANYONE REALLY NEEDS TO KNOW. ONCE A PAID ZOG WHORE ALWAYS A PAID ZOG WHORE.
YES, I'VE SEEN YOUR "1985 SHOES" POST. IT WAS NOT CONVINCING.
LETS FACE IT. NO MATTER IF THE VNN TABLOID WAS GOLD OR TRASH. IT HAS THE STIGMA OF HAVING YOUR NAME ASSOCIATED WITH IT. IT WILL ALWAYS BE A THREE LEGGED DOG.
Now tell the folks what you've have done in my summer 1985 shoes. Betcha don't even know what my summer 1985 shoes means. Proves you don't really know much about Glenn Miller, huh?
Abzug Hoffman
October 18th, 2004, 09:48 PM
Care to elaborate Abzug? Skinny Monkey is new on this forum...etc...Skinny Money, I'd like to know a little more about you before I send you tabloids. No disrespect intented. Just trying to be cautious.
I'm just thinking that this tabloid is exactly the kind of project the jews themselves put out (as they did in Germany in the 19th C.) when they want to stir things up and kindle an anti semitic incident - like a burned down synagogue...
Abzug Hoffman
October 18th, 2004, 10:38 PM
That's like saying slaves who tell other slaves they are all slaves should keep their mouths shut about their slavery, because Massa might hurt them if they don't.
All White gentiles are slaves to ZOG, and I want the whole freakin world to know it. Don't you? Why not? Are you a contented slave?
It's got nothing to do with me, it's got to do with jews and they way the milk "antisemitism", which they have been doing since the time of Bismarck.
Something from jewishtribalreview :
Even the German, Wilhelm Marr, the self-proclaimed "Father of anti-Semitism," the man who is credited with the creation of the word "anti-Semitism" in the 1870's, and who wrote a book called The Victory of Judaism Over Germany, is often described as being at least partially Jewish. (The respected Jewish historian Simon Dubnow calls him so, and The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia lists his father, Heinrich, as a Jew of considerable theatrical accomplishment. [UJE, v. 7, p. 366] True or not, (a biographer, Moshe Zimmerman, doubts the claim) there were definitely "self-hating" Jews in Marr's close proximity. He married four times in his life -- two of his wives were "half-Jewesses" and a third a "full Jewess," whose mother's maiden name was Israel. [ZIMMERMAN, p. 36, 70]
Among prominent nineteenth century anti-Semites, says Albert Lindemann, "an astonishing number of them had at some point in their lives not only extensive contact with Jews but also remarkably positive experiences with them -- close friends, respected teachers, even lovers and spouses!" [LINDEMANN, Antisem, p. 188] "A major facet of the new anti-Semitism [in the late 1800s]," notes Jay Pilzer, "was that many of its spokesmen were very well-respected intellectuals." [PILZER, J., 1981, p. 10]
JB112
October 18th, 2004, 10:43 PM
I'm just thinking that this tabloid is exactly the kind of project the jews themselves put out (as they did in Germany in the 19th C.) when they want to stir things up and kindle an anti semitic incident - like a burned down synagogue...
Maybe you can give an example of that. Oh.. and have you read the tabloid? If not, how do you know what kind of "thing" it is?
Abzug Hoffman
October 20th, 2004, 11:41 AM
Maybe you can give an example of that. Oh.. and have you read the tabloid? If not, how do you know what kind of "thing" it is?
Example- I read about this in the 1902 Encyc. Britannica article on "Anti Semitism" - I haven't been able to find the article on line, but it needs to be online because it includes information about jews publishing anti semite material. I think the article was written by a jew, not sure.
Tabloid - I haven't read it, but I have read Alex. Does he blame the jews for a thing or two in the tabloid? That would be the kind of "thing" I meant.
Antiochus Epiphanes
October 20th, 2004, 12:03 PM
sure, some Jews always benefit from "antisemitism." It makes the scared little ones run to the rabbis to intervene with the mountain god. It reminds them they are separate etc. So what. Fact is, jews do own the media, operate it to their unjust ends, fill the chokepoints of power with themselves and their lackeys, etc etc etc. And people need to know about it. Dont they? Its the truth.
JB112
October 20th, 2004, 12:09 PM
Example- I read about this in the 1902 Encyc. Britannica article on "Anti Semitism" - I haven't been able to find the article on line, but it needs to be online because it includes information about jews publishing anti semite material. I think the article was written by a jew, not sure.
Tabloid - I haven't read it, but I have read Alex. Does he blame the jews for a thing or two in the tabloid? That would be the kind of "thing" I meant.
That's not an example, it's a vague reference in an old, old encyclopedia. It doesn't refer to anything specific, and so cannot be compared to anything specific, such as a tabloid that you haven't even seen.
You said that you're thinking this tabloid (which you haven't seen) is exactly the kind of project put out by jews (which you have no example of). And that's a bad idea, since it.. kindles anti-Semitism?
Sorry, Ab, I don't get it. What are you trying to express? That since jews play with fire, we shouldn't burn them? Fire is their friend? Anti-Semitism is 'good for jews'? Political propaganda against them is bad?
Alex Linder
October 20th, 2004, 02:54 PM
Dear Mr. Messenger,
I am writing to protest your totally bigoted and libelous attack on Alex Linder of Vanguard News Network in your recent Columbia Tribune column. As with most anti-racists and believers in the false doctrine of racial equality, you never confront the substance of pro-White arguments but instead engage in smear tactics. However, when you called Linder a "terrorist" and a "thug" you went completely over the top, making actionable charges even the Jewish ADL and SPLC wouldn't dare to make.
As a factual matter, Mr. Linder did not distribute copies of VNNs The Aryan Alternative in Columbia last Saturday night. I was myself personally responsible for this exercise of First Amendment free-speech rights you labeled "cowardly" and "ignorant." This was definitely not a "hit and run" operation, because those of us who write for this new publication intend to continue our efforts. Indeed, in the coming days we plan to distribute many more copies of this first issue in the Columbia area so more of your readers may see our paper and judge its content for themselves rather than rely on the extremely biased opinions you express.
If you look objectively at The Aryan Alternative, you will find that -- far from being the "trash" you describe -- it is literate and written with a wit that apparently goes over your head. It also contains uncensored factual information one would be hard pressed to read about in the Columbia Tribune. For example, I doubt if your paper has ever run an article on the slaughter and expulsion of White farmers in Zimbabwe like that by Paul Weir in our publication. I could cite countless other examples of instances where the mainstream media cover up crimes against Whites. This is why it is vital to the survival of our people that we have alternative sources of information,
and VNN intends to provide this in some small way.
Since your column fails to quote even a single line from our paper, I must assume you tacitly agree with us but are afraid to go against the wishes of your publisher. Otherwise -- if our content were as patently ignorant as you claim -- you would have no hesitation to disclose it to your readers.
Sincerely yours,
Rich Brooks, J.D.
www.whitealert.com
Antiochus Epiphanes
October 20th, 2004, 03:05 PM
excellent reply from Rich!
Alex Linder
October 20th, 2004, 03:07 PM
Example- I read about this in the 1902 Encyc. Britannica article on "Anti Semitism" - I haven't been able to find the article on line, but it needs to be online because it includes information about jews publishing anti semite material. I think the article was written by a jew, not sure.
Tabloid - I haven't read it, but I have read Alex. Does he blame the jews for a thing or two in the tabloid? That would be the kind of "thing" I meant.
Jews do a lot of things to strengthen their position. They send out scouts to all parties across the spectrums. People like Aaron Zelman and Paul Gottfried become "gun rights" defenders and "paleoconservatives." Entrenched in their positions they work with their "left-wing" brethren to deflect any attention given to jews as the causative agent. For example, whenever Fred Reed or another LRC writer approaches the issue of jewish causation of the cultural ills the right discusses, or whenver a White discusses Schumer and Feinstein and the jews pushing gun control, the Zelmans and Gottfried helpfully guide their camps back to the no-see-'em position.
Another thing jews do is indoctrinate the federal police and the local police. They pay informants. They join forums and try anonymously or pseudonymously to discourage and discredit any man or publication that appears that refuses to be deflected in naming the jew.
As Rich Brooks's letter above demonstrates, the jew and his Messenger can't argue with us openly, for the majority of their Aryan readers agrees with what we write. The majority has no problem reading about black-on-white crimes, whether in Wichita or Zimbabwe, and the majority has absolutely no problem reading the facts about jew causation of open borders, the war in Iraq, and more.
Messenger, in his libelous opinion, did not quote our publication once. That in itself is proof of the powerful truths contained in the first issue of our tabloid.
If there are any Missouri lawyers out there looking for business, feel free to approach me about a lawsuit for libel against Messenger and the Columbia Tribune.
Abzug Hoffman
October 20th, 2004, 03:38 PM
That's not an example, it's a vague reference in an old, old encyclopedia. It doesn't refer to anything specific, and so cannot be compared to anything specific, such as a tabloid that you haven't even seen.
You said that you're thinking this tabloid (which you haven't seen) is exactly the kind of project put out by jews (which you have no example of). And that's a bad idea, since it.. kindles anti-Semitism?
Sorry, Ab, I don't get it. What are you trying to express? That since jews play with fire, we shouldn't burn them? Fire is their friend? Anti-Semitism is 'good for jews'? Political propaganda against them is bad?
Okay, I'm going to put my check in the mail today for one batch of the tabloid.
Yes, my point is anti semitism is good for the jews and always has been since the word was invented.
If Wilhelm Marr was a jew, he counts as one example of jews agitating against themselves for whatever reason. Actually, the known jews mentioned in that 1902 article were unnamed muck raking journalists who exposed jewish scandals. I read it wrong the first time, sorry.
But have you read the article?? One thing to be learned from this old, old book is that there is nothing new in the field of anti semitism. Here is some of it online:
http://www.archipelago.org/vol1-2/string.htm
"One of the many q.v.’s attached to this long piece is the article on “Anti-Semitism,” written ninety years ago by Lucien Wolf, Vice President of the Jewish Historical Society of England. Immediately, I find it terribly interesting:
In the political struggles of the concluding quarter of the 19th century an important part was played by a religious, political and social agitation against the Jews, known as ‘Anti-Semitism’. The origins of this remarkable movement already threaten to become obscured by legend. The Jews contend that anti-Semitism is a mere atavistic revival of the Jew-hatred of the middle ages. The extreme section of the anti-Semites, who have given the movement its quasi-scientific name, declare that it is a racial struggle -- an incidence of the eternal conflict between Europe and Asia.... Religious prejudices reaching back before the dawn of history have been reawakened.
Anti-Semitism was then considered “exclusively a question of European politics,” its origin to be found “in the social conditions resulting from the emancipation of the Jews in the middle of the 19th century.” The author continues:
If the emancipated Jews were European in virtue of the antiquity of their western settlements...they none the less presented the appearance of a strange people to their Gentile fellow-countrymen. They had been secluded in their ghettos for centuries, and had consequently acquired a physical and moral physiognomy differentiating them in a measure from their former oppressors. This...was...not essentially Jewish or even Semitic. It was an advanced development of the main attributes of civilized life.... The ghetto, which had been designed as a sort of quarantine to safeguard Christendom against the Jewish heresy, had in fact proved a storage chamber for a portion of the political and social forces which were destined to sweep away the last traces of feudalism from central Europe. In the ghetto, the pastoral Semite, who had been made a wanderer by the destruction of his nationality, was steadily trained, through the centuries, to become an urban European.... Excluded from the army, the land, the trade corporations and the artisan guilds, this quondam oriental peasant was gradually transformed into a commercial middleman.... Finally, this former bucolic victim of Phoenician exploitation had his wits preternaturally sharpened ...by the subtle dialectics of the Talmudists. Thus, the Jew who emerged from the ghetto was no longer a Palestinian Semite, but an essentially modern European, and that his physical type had become sharply defined through a slightly more rigid exclusiveness in the matter of marriages.... He differed from his Christian fellow-countrymen only in the circumstances that his religion was of the older Semitic form.
Unfortunately, these distinctive elements, though not very serious in themselves, became strongly accentuated by concentration. Had it been possible to distribute the emancipated Jews uniformly through Christian society, as was the case with other emancipated religious denominations, there would have been no revival of the Jewish question. The Jews, however, through no fault of their own, belonged to only one class in European society -- the industrial bourgeoisie. Into that class all their strength was thrown and owing to their ghetto preparation, they rapidly took a leading place in it, politically and socially.... It was the exaggeration of this apparent domination, not by the bourgeoisie itself, but by its enemies among the vanquished reactionaries on the one hand, and by the extreme Radicals on the other, which created modern anti-Semitism as a political force."
Abzug Hoffman
October 20th, 2004, 03:43 PM
I am not saying that jew Wolf's account is true, it's obviously jewish apologetics.
JB112
October 20th, 2004, 05:27 PM
Ab,
Jews certainly know how to use anti-Semitism, to raise jewish group consciousness and cohesion, but there's nothing we can do about that. They've got full-time organizations with million dollar budgets keeping the jewish herd frightened and alert, and endless examples of anti-Semitic reaction to point to all over the world. Got nothing to do with us.
Our job is just to expose the jews effectively and organize against them by showing our people who they are, the situation they're in, and who their enemies are. That means showing them what the jews are up to, in the most effective way possible, regardless of jewish reaction.
To speak a little more to your point... Jews recognize that their presence and activity in a gentile society, in pursuit of power and influence, results in hostility and opposition; as long as this stays at a tolerable level it's good for them, since it can be exploited to their benefit. Anti-Semitism insures jewish group cohesion, jewish suspicion and fear of the outsider, and therefore jewish group continuance; it facilitates the jewish persecution myth, the myth of the genocidal goy, and the jewish group mission of neutralizing and ruling the dangerous goy.
So a limited, controllable level of anti-Semitism that jews can point to, like random anti-Semitic acts in France by Arabs, or by skinheads or others in America, or by jews themselves, scrawling swastikas, etc., is good for them. Widescale effective exposure of them by an organized group of persuasive writers on a political mission is not good for them, and they do all they can to prevent that and suppress and persecute their opponents. Jews have never put out anything like that in the VNN tab, and never would.
So then, since there will always be anti-Semitism, and since anti-Semitism is in fact the correct reaction to jewishness, to Semitism, and since there will always be leader-jews to exploit that anti-Semitism, it's not relevant to us. We have our own mission, and that's to free our people from the jews, and we must design our propaganda upon considerations of our own people's reponse, not on the jews'.
Glad you're ordering a batch. I know you'll enjoy raising the level of anti-Semitism. Maybe we can cause a pogrom by Halloween.
Abzug Hoffman
October 20th, 2004, 07:01 PM
Glad you're ordering a batch. I know you'll enjoy raising the level of anti-Semitism. Maybe we can cause a pogrom by Halloween.
A pogrom, is that the goal VNN is working towards?
The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.
pogrom
(p´grm, pgrm´) (KEY) , Russian term, originally meaning “riot,” that came to be applied to a series of violent attacks on Jews in Russia in the late 19th and early 20th cent. Pogroms were few before the assassination of Alexander II in 1881; after that, with the connivance of, or at least without hindrance from, the government, there were many pogroms throughout Russia. Soldiers and police often looked on without interfering. These pogroms encouraged the first emigration of Russian Jews to the United States. After 1882 there were few pogroms until 1903, when there was an extremely violent three-day pogrom at Chisinau resulting in the death of 45 Jews. Although it has not been conclusively proved that the czarist government organized pogroms, the government’s anti-Semitic policies certainly encouraged them. After the abortive revolution of 1905, pogroms increased in number and violence. With the success of the Bolshevik Revolution, pogroms ceased in the Soviet Union; they were revived in Germany and Poland after Adolf Hitler attained power.
1
See E. H. Judge, Easter in Kishinev: Anatomy of a Pogrom (1992).
JB112
October 20th, 2004, 07:27 PM
It's a joke, Ab.
brutus
October 21st, 2004, 02:18 AM
This tabloid is an excellent first edition.
It is brilliantly composed and it will send shockwaves throughout America...........I will go further then that and say that this tabloid will be the spark that will set this nation on fire.
The masses are not intellectuals.............The jew knows this all to well and that’s why he gears his political media messages to the lowest common denominator. This tabloid will hit the common man right between the eyes and command his attention.
Those who are turned-off by this presentation of our message will never be swayed by anything anyway, except by the re-education camps that they will be sent to after the WN coup d‘etat. I say this with the utmost lucid conviction.
The superior White intellectual will have the wherewithal to appreciate the material because there is substance to the tabloid beyond the shock pieces and they will have empathy and recognize the validity of the truths contained therein and thus be encouraged to investigate further.
Bravo......Alex & Glenn
Anima Eternae
October 21st, 2004, 02:55 AM
Jews never like being named. That's a straight fact.
But implying that neocon and paleocon jews are really fronting for their leftist brothers is silly. They believe every word that comes out of their own mouth. They may both despise being "named", but it's not an act.
...
Antiochus Epiphanes
October 21st, 2004, 09:17 AM
I remember the first time I ever picked up a "racist flyer." It was at the Lake county gun show in Illinois. Posse Comitatus type thing, had bunch of CI stuff mixed in with antigovernment mishmash. I read it and tossed it, but what do you think I did a week later?
Looked up "posse comitatus" in newspaper archives. Just out of curiosity, you know.........
The day is late. It will offend and disjar ingrained stereotypes. It is a mass outreach medium and so it must be widely distributed. Frankly it matters little whether Joe Six Pack is offended, what matters is that VNN and WN pick up that one in a hundred new supporters.
Joe Sixpack is offended by the picture of the Syphylytic negro? Why then isnt Joe Six Pack offended by MTV which openly promotes miscegenation with Negroes, who are infected with STDs at dramatically higher rates than Whites? The Negro with tertiary stage syphylis is related to the "handsome" rap star on MTV displaying ostentatious wealth as surely as a mosquito is related to malaria. It's factual; sometimes facts are ugly and offensive. But a failure to regard facts as such can be fatal.
So consider this business of offending people a necessary discomfort.
WhiteAlert
October 21st, 2004, 09:22 AM
Here is the totally non-responsive reply I received last night from that journalistic hack in Columbia:
Rich,
Thanks for the note. How many newspapers did you distribute in Columbia and surrounding areas?
Where are you from?
Thanks,
Tony
Here's my reply to him:
Since you were totally unresponsive to my letter to you and your editor, I don't feel obligated in any way to respond to your queries. You have still not quoted a single line from our tabloid and stated why you disagree with it, I'm not playing games with you. regards, rich
No doubt this a..hole (civil forum) would love to blame the whole thing on "outside agitators from California." :)
Antiochus Epiphanes
October 21st, 2004, 09:53 AM
Exactly Rich. You must be a "foreign fighter!"
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.