Log in

View Full Version : Srebrenica fall linked to gay soldiers


Serbian
March 19th, 2010, 07:57 AM
You couldn't make this shit up.

Srebrenica fall linked to gay soldiers

A RETIRED US general today said Dutch UN troops defending Srebrenica in the Bosnian war failed to prevent the 1995 genocide partly because their ranks included openly gay soldiers.
John Sheehan, a former NATO commander and senior Marine officer, made the remarks at a senate hearing where he argued against plans by US President Barack Obama to end a ban on allowing gays to serve openly in the US military.

Gen Sheehan said that after the end of the Cold War, European militaries changed and concluded "there was no longer a need for an active combat capability".

He said this "socialiSation" process "included open homosexuality" and led to "a focus on peacekeeping operations because they did not believe the Germans were going to attack again or the Soviets were coming back".

"The case in point that I'm referring to is when the Dutch were required to defend Srebrenica against the Serbs," he said, referring to the UN peacekeeping force deployed to protect Bosnian Muslim civilians.

"The battalion was understrength, poorly led, and the Serbs came into town, handcuffed the soldiers to the telephone poles, marched the Muslims off and executed them."

The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Carl Levin, pressed him to clarify his comments about Srebrenica.

"Did the Dutch leaders tell you it (the fall of Srebrenica) was because there were gay soldiers there?" asked an incredulous Senator Levin.

"Yes," Gen Sheehan said and added: "They included that as part of the problem."

Gen Sheehan, who retired from the military in 1997, said he had been told that by the former chief of staff of the Dutch army.

Senator Levin vehemently rejected Gen Sheehan's allegation, saying that drawing a connection between the massacre at Srebrenica and gays in the Dutch military was "totally off-target".

The failure of the Dutch UN troops to fend off an attack by Bosnian Serb forces had "nothing to do with sexual orientation" but was related to "their training and the rules of engagement", Senator Levin said.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/srebrenica-fall-linked-to-gay-soldiers/story-e6frf7jx-1225842615953

George Witzgall
March 19th, 2010, 09:10 AM
You couldn't make this shit up.



http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/breaking-news/srebrenica-fall-linked-to-gay-soldiers/story-e6frf7jx-1225842615953

they were too busy fucking to bother with fighting. they didn't notice the serbs until it was too late, and they were handcuffed to telephone poles.

that's when they learned the serb army had its own homosexual contingent...

MikeTodd
March 19th, 2010, 09:40 AM
I thought some of you bull fruits were supposed to be mean bitches.:confused:

bmwbiker
March 20th, 2010, 01:10 AM
Gay soliders???

What a joke...

More necrofile UNPROFOR..with senator LevinT.J.B.

"Did the Dutch leaders tell you it (the fall of Srebrenica) was because there were gay soldiers there?" asked an incredulous Senator Levin.

"Yes," Gen Sheehan said and added: "They included that as part of the problem."

Serbian
March 20th, 2010, 08:14 PM
they were too busy fucking to bother with fighting. they didn't notice the serbs until it was too late, and they were handcuffed to telephone poles.

that's when they learned the serb army had its own homosexual contingent...



No one was handcuffed to telephone poles. The Dutch soldiers were happy to see the BSA liberate Srebrenica. They couldn't stand the muslim scum that they were forced to protect. A few of them were even killed by these pigs so it was a relief for them to finally get to go home, and it must be said that they left Srebrenica on very good terms with the Serbs. Of course you will not hear any of this in the media as the Dutch soldiers were prevented from speaking by their government.

This POS Amerikwan ZOG general wanted the Dutch to fight the BSA in order to protect Bosnian muslim criminals and murderers, well thanfully the Dutch soldiers on the ground were not stupid kwanbots, who most probably would have attempted to prevent a Serbian victory in Srebrenica.


Serbian and Dutch commanders together, toasting the liberation of Srebrenica:)

http://iconicphotos.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/bb2c0a6c3747bb5857142956ca8c92c5_image_document_large_featured_borderless.jpg?w=550&h=375

Dale VanderMeer
March 20th, 2010, 09:50 PM
It was a retarded move to send in U.N. Dutch troops into an internal conflict in the Balkans. Maybe Levin should be asked of his associations with Barney Frank, Wesley Clark and Madeleine Albright.T.J.B.

Serbian
March 21st, 2010, 12:32 AM
It was a retarded move to send in U.N. Dutch troops into an internal conflict in the Balkans.

Of course it was, they never belonged there in the first place.
Coming to Serbian lands to 'protect' {fight,spy for} muslims, while their own country fills up with them. Only a jew run government could order the use of a nation's military for such things.

George Witzgall
March 21st, 2010, 12:38 AM
Of course it was, they never belonged there in the first place.
Coming to Serbian lands to 'protect' {fight,spy for} muslims, while their own country fills up with them. Only a jew run government could order the use of a nation's military for such things.

the dutch need serbia to send troops into holland to liberate their own country.

Serbian
March 21st, 2010, 12:55 AM
the dutch need serbia to send troops into holland to liberate their own country.

I am sure the Dutch can take care of their own problems, once they remove the jew. We can give them moral support.

T.Garrett
March 21st, 2010, 03:57 AM
People from the Nederlands don't want any part of killing or oppressing their white Euro cousins. Most Dutch people (their government be damned) were disgusted by NATO's bullying of Serbia in 1999 and the sham 'war crimes' trials of their leaders in Den Haag.

Every time I hear someone on this site whining about the work of British psychopath "Bomber Harris" at Dresden, I think of this

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Rotterdam.jpg
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Rotterdam.jpg)

Rotterdam in 1940 after the 'blitz'

The Dutch wanted no part of WWII, same as in WWI they told all warring parties to fuck off who approached them to make alliances. But the Germans had other plans for the small but wealthy country. When the Dutch military (which only had one tank and a joke of an air force) handed the Wehrmacht it's first real ass-kicking of WWII (Battle for The Hague) after they invaded the Nederlands in May 1940, the Reich decided to get 'tough' with 'em. One of the main objectives of the invasion was to seize the port at Rotterdam (largest in Europe) so as to use it to mount a seaborne invasion of the British Isles.

The 9th Panzer Division and the elite SS motorized regiment 'Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler' (AH's personal bodyguards) under a Gen. Schmidt operating with German airborne troops commanded by the storied paratrooper Gen. Kurt Student (a Skorzeny protege who was accidentally shot in the head by one of his own troops after this battle and lived) were having a problem taking Rotterdam from the city garrison and a handful of Dutch Marines. The stalemate obviously pissed the Fuhrer off and on the morning of 14 May he issued his 'infamous' Weisung Nr.11 concerning German military operations in the Nederlands

"The resistance capability of the Dutch army has proved to be stronger than expected. Political as well as military reasons demand that this resistance is broken as soon as possible. It is the task of the army to capture the Fortress Holland by committing enough forces from the south, combined with an attack on the east front. In addition to that the air force must, while weakening the forces that up till now have supported the 6th Army, facilitate the rapid fall of the Fortress Holland.""Fortress Holland" my ass Uncle Wolf.

Schmidt planned a combined assault by the Panzers and SS facilitated by combat engineers directly across the Maas after a heavy artillery barrage of Dutch positions, aided by an amphibious landing a short way upriver by Student's airborne who they hoped would be able to outflank the defenders and help motivate them to throw in the towel. As the Generals made preparations for the ground engagement, they contacted the Luftwaffe (Luftflotte 2 in Berlin) for air support ...a Gruppe of 25 Stukas for precision ground attacks to add to the mix.

These were some of the Third Reich's best soldiers facing what were basically Dutch civilians who were recently conscripted into the army (with the exception of the Marines ... Korps Mariniers :D) ...there was no reason to believe their battle plan would end in anything but a German victory and the capture of the strategic seaport ...so why did Berlin send in addition to the 25 Stukas a sortie of 90 Heinkel He 111 heavies (1/8 of their air force at that time) that carpet bombed the center of the ancient city, deliberately bypassing the defending Dutchmen's positions and igniting a firestorm that consumed Old Rotterdam killing a thousand (some say more) civilians?

According to eyewitnesses (including German troops) the Heinkels were flying in so low on their bombing runs (about 2200 ft asl) that the aircrews had to be aware of what they were doing ...the only thing that saved the remainder of the city from being utterly flattened was Kurt Student and his paratroopers firing off red flares (used during WWII to mark German positions to the Luftwaffe) that fortunately deterred the last wave of bombers from dropping their bombs on the burning city. Gen. Schmidt had used the threat of destroying the city in negotiations with the Dutch the day before in an attempt to get them to surrender Rotterdam without a fight, but he was surely bluffing.

What's worse is that after the Luftwaffe destroyed Rotterdam, Berlin threatened to do same to other cities in the Nederlands and Belgium one by one if the Dutch didnt surrender post haste. Of course they did, this was the 1940 equivalent of the ultimatum the US gave the Japanese a few years later after nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And what was Berlin's excuse for this shameful act ...they blamed the Dutch for 'turning Rotterdam into a fortress' ...LOL! That's rich. The Reich propagandists even went as far as to insinuate that Rotterdammers helped burn their own city just to embarrass Germany ...and then to add insult to injury, the USAAF bombed the harbor facilities on the west side of Rotterdam and set a large part of it on fire in 1943 attempting to put a hurting on the occupying Germans!

Germanic chivalry for the most part died back in the middle ages dude, when I read some of the shit posted on this website about the prevalence of 'Aryan Honor' in the Third Reich it makes me laugh. The only honorable folks in this 1940 Rotterdam fiasco were the Dutch defenders, and on the German side Generaloberst Student and his Fallschirmjäger who were as shocked as their opponents by the calling card Berlin sent to the Nederlands that day 70 years ago. Sadly, Kurt Student's reputation was tarnished when he was indicted after WWII for ordering the reprisal killings by a subordinate of over 100 Greek civilians in 1941 post-invasion Crete for partisan actions against German paratroops. War is hell.

I dont even want to get started on what the Brits did to the stubborn Boers in South Africa ...well, I've heard some say the Dutch are responsible for enabling the jewish ascendancy in the West, African slavery, the centuries long rape of slanty-eyed Asia with the VOC, the drug trade in Europe, inflicting New York City (New Amsterdam) on the world (which was stupidly traded for Surinam with the British), infecting Europe with fags and liberalism ...ey, some pretty heavy stuff for a little country with a population roughly equivalent to what the NYC/metro area has today.

Aye, the Dutch are likely responsible for the disappearance of the dinosaurs as well!

Cheers!

George Witzgall
March 21st, 2010, 04:49 AM
People from the Nederlands don't want any part of killing or oppressing their white Euro cousins. Most Dutch people (their government be damned) were disgusted by NATO's bullying of Serbia in 1999 and the sham 'war crimes' trials of their leaders in Den Haag.

Every time I hear someone on this site whining about the work of British psychopath "Bomber Harris" at Dresden, I think of this

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Rotterdam.jpg
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Rotterdam.jpg)

Rotterdam in 1940 after the 'blitz'

The Dutch wanted no part of WWII, same as in WWI they told all warring parties to fuck off who approached them to make alliances. But the Germans had other plans for the small but wealthy country. When the Dutch military (which only had one tank and a joke of an air force) handed the Wehrmacht it's first real ass-kicking of WWII (Battle for The Hague) after they invaded the Nederlands in May 1940, the Reich decided to get 'tough' with 'em. One of the main objectives of the invasion was to seize the port at Rotterdam (largest in Europe) so as to use it to mount a seaborne invasion of the British Isles.

The 9th Panzer Division and the elite SS motorized regiment 'Leibstandarte Adolf Hitler' (AH's personal bodyguards) under a Gen. Schmidt operating with German airborne troops commanded by the storied paratrooper Gen. Kurt Student (a Skorzeny protege who was accidentally shot in the head by one of his own troops after this battle and lived) were having a problem taking Rotterdam from the city garrison and a handful of Dutch Marines. The stalemate obviously pissed the Fuhrer off and on the morning of 14 May he issued his 'infamous' Weisung Nr.11 concerning German military operations in the Nederlands

"Fortress Holland" my ass Uncle Wolf.

Schmidt planned a combined assault by the Panzers and SS facilitated by combat engineers directly across the Maas after a heavy artillery barrage of Dutch positions, aided by an amphibious landing a short way upriver by Student's airborne who they hoped would be able to outflank the defenders and help motivate them to throw in the towel. As the Generals made preparations for the ground engagement, they contacted the Luftwaffe (Luftflotte 2 in Berlin) for air support ...a Gruppe of 25 Stukas for precision ground attacks to add to the mix.

These were some of the Third Reich's best soldiers facing what were basically Dutch civilians who were recently conscripted into the army (with the exception of the Marines ... Korps Mariniers :D) ...there was no reason to believe their battle plan would end in anything but a German victory and the capture of the strategic seaport ...so why did Berlin send in addition to the 25 Stukas a sortie of 90 Heinkel He 111 heavies (1/8 of their air force at that time) that carpet bombed the center of the ancient city, deliberately bypassing the defending Dutchmen's positions and igniting a firestorm that consumed Old Rotterdam killing a thousand (some say more) civilians?

According to eyewitnesses (including German troops) the Heinkels were flying in so low on their bombing runs (about 2200 ft asl) that the aircrews had to be aware of what they were doing ...the only thing that saved the remainder of the city from being utterly flattened was Kurt Student and his paratroopers firing off red flares (used during WWII to mark German positions to the Luftwaffe) that fortunately deterred the last wave of bombers from dropping their bombs on the burning city. Gen. Schmidt had used the threat of destroying the city in negotiations with the Dutch the day before in an attempt to get them to surrender Rotterdam without a fight, but he was surely bluffing.

What's worse is that after the Luftwaffe destroyed Rotterdam, Berlin threatened to do same to other cities in the Nederlands and Belgium one by one if the Dutch didnt surrender post haste. Of course they did, this was the 1940 equivalent of the ultimatum the US gave the Japanese a few years later after nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki. And what was Berlin's excuse for this shameful act ...they blamed the Dutch for 'turning Rotterdam into a fortress' ...LOL! That's rich. The Reich propagandists even went as far as to insinuate that Rotterdammers helped burn their own city just to embarrass Germany ...and then to add insult to injury, the USAAF bombed the harbor facilities on the west side of Rotterdam and set a large part of it on fire in 1943 attempting to put a hurting on the occupying Germans!

Germanic chivalry for the most part died back in the middle ages dude, when I read some of the shit posted on this website about the prevalence of 'Aryan Honor' in the Third Reich it makes me laugh. The only honorable folks in this 1940 Rotterdam fiasco were the Dutch defenders, and on the German side Generaloberst Student and his Fallschirmjäger who were as shocked as their opponents by the calling card Berlin sent to the Nederlands that day 70 years ago. Sadly, Kurt Student's reputation was tarnished when he was indicted after WWII for ordering the reprisal killings by a subordinate of over 100 Greek civilians in 1941 post-invasion Crete for partisan actions against German paratroops. War is hell.

I dont even want to get started on what the Brits did to the stubborn Boers in South Africa ...well, I've heard some say the Dutch are responsible for enabling the jewish ascendancy in the West, African slavery, the centuries long rape of slanty-eyed Asia with the VOC, the drug trade in Europe, inflicting New York City (New Amsterdam) on the world (which was stupidly traded for Surinam with the British), infecting Europe with fags and liberalism ...ey, some pretty heavy stuff for a little country with a population roughly equivalent to what the NYC/metro area has today.

Aye, the Dutch are likely responsible for the disappearance of the dinosaurs as well!

Cheers!


I don't like to read any of that.

I know if the German people had had their say it wouldn't have happened like that. That is the problem with concentrating power in the hands of a few, they make Machiavellian pacts with the devil, and the innocents get slaughtered.

Serbian
March 22nd, 2010, 12:15 AM
I don't like to read any of that.

I know if the German people had had their say it wouldn't have happened like that. That is the problem with concentrating power in the hands of a few, they make Machiavellian pacts with the devil, and the innocents get slaughtered.

War is tragic and no one is pro war, however the blame for WW2 {and all the carnage, death and destruction} needs to be put on the jew because International kikery had declared war on NS Germany. Of course once war started it was going to get ugly, and atrocities were committed by all sides, but we must never forget the fact that Germany was fighting to liberate Europe from the kikes.