I would be interested to hear the explanations. For me, the BNP has the role of protecting my ethnicity (White British - or basically northern European). I love my race and am not motivated by hatred for other races.

But many members of the BNP are men with non-white wives and have even had children with them. So these men cannot be motivated by love of their race. It seems they are more motivated by hate, since clearly love of their own kind is lacking for them. And how ironic is it that these men motivated by hate are married to non-whites? It makes absolutely no sense!

I would be interested to hear the explanations. For me, the BNP has the role of protecting my ethnicity (White British - or basically northern European). I love my race and am not motivated by hatred for other races.

But many members of the BNP are men with non-white wives and have even had children with them. So these men cannot be motivated by love of their race. It seems they are more motivated by hate, since clearly love of their own kind is lacking for them. And how ironic is it that these men motivated by hate are married to non-whites? It makes absolutely no sense!

Simple - they are civic nationalists that don't want to see the "British way of life" change too drastically. They don't want Sharia law but don't mind a bit of black/chink etc. I say use them why we can.

Simple - they are civic nationalists that don't want to see the "British way of life" change too drastically. They don't want Sharia law but don't mind a bit of black/chink etc. I say use them why we can.

Is that Inspector Chisholm from Minder as your avatar ?

Simple - they are civic nationalists that don't want to see the "British way of life" change too drastically. They don't want Sharia law but don't mind a bit of black/chink etc. I say use them why we can.

There is a real danger of them not only using us, but overwhelming us. Also the fact is that all the other mainstream parties are already civic nationalist parties. Even folk voting for Gordon Brown felt that he was trying to do what was best by Britain and using all the rhetoric to go with that.
The Tories are the obvious choice for the conservative-minded civic nationalist. The BNP is an insane choice since if the party were to copy the Conservatives or any of the other civic nationalist parties it would just be utterly pointless and never be able to compete either.

I am going to have to confront some of these miscegenists and simply ask them what they are thinking! No way should they be allowed to be candidates at parliamentary level or hold office in the party.

I would be interested to hear the explanations. For me, the BNP has the role of protecting my ethnicity (White British - or basically northern European). I love my race and am not motivated by hatred for other races.

But many members of the BNP are men with non-white wives and have even had children with them. So these men cannot be motivated by love of their race. It seems they are more motivated by hate, since clearly love of their own kind is lacking for them. And how ironic is it that these men motivated by hate are married to non-whites? It makes absolutely no sense!

Of course it makes sense. They realize that the BNP is no longer an ethnic - let alone racial - nationalist organization. Its policies reflect civic nationalism and no longer seek to forcibly expel non-Whites; on the contrary, the party envisages embracing ethnic minorities that choose to remain on these isles by demanding assimilation into the indigenous culture. While the official line may be indifference towards race-mixing and the belief that people should do so if they wish, miscegenation is, naturally, one way of the ways in which the process of full integration and acceptance into the mainstream can be pushed on more quickly. Why would BNP members fed up of multiculturalism and racial ghettoisation not do it?

The only homes for racial and ethnic nationalists are the British People's Party, the National Front, or the England First Party.

Of course it makes sense. They realize that the BNP is no longer an ethnic - let alone racial - nationalist organization. Its policies reflect civic nationalism and no longer seek to forcibly expel non-Whites; on the contrary, the party envisages embracing ethnic minorities that choose to remain on these isles by demanding assimilation into the indigenous culture. While the official line may be indifference towards race-mixing and the belief that people should do so if they wish, miscegenation is, naturally, one way of the ways in which the process of full integration and acceptance into the mainstream can be pushed on more quickly. Why would BNP members fed up of multiculturalism and racial ghettoisation not do it?

The only homes for racial and ethnic nationalists are the British People's Party, the National Front, or the England First Party.

They joined the party BEFORE the State forced the changed constitution to allow non-white members. The most prominent of those non-white members, the Sikh, has verbally expressed his understanding that the BNP is still all about protecting the INDIGENOUS BRITISH of which he can never be one.

The BNP cannot survive as a civic nationalist party because it would just be another version of the liblabcon parties but without the financial backing. It would be ridiculous and pointless. I have heard Nick and Arthur Kemp state this, more or less, quite recently.

Nick feels that those who wish to push the party toward civic nationalism are a danger and must be kept down.

It has been stated publicly that if voluntary repatriation fails to remove alien races as a threat to our indigenous gene pool then we will have to look at alternative methods, because they cannot be allowed to change the ethnic make-up our people under any circumstances.

It is fear of "ghettoisation" that would make us stand up for preserving the white race, not desire to get out of "ghettoisation". Please define this "ghetoisation" to which you refer.

you need to dump state agents Kemp and Griffin. The hopeless naivety of these UK nationalists baffles. The real leaders are in jail www.heretical.com but people still fawn over obvious traitors such as Griffin. The state did not force any such change Griffin and Kemp have been bringing in the fag jew nig nog lovers for years. The idea is to have a pressure release valve for the system. All the Muzzie talk out of the BNP just confuses the public as to the real threat , serving the Jews.
Zog is developing the right wing of PC. Civic Nationalism is another way of saying right-wiggerism. Just as much enemies of the race as left-wiggers.

Zero tolerance for BNP scum. You yankie VNN people don't know the damage these vermin do in the UK scene and the confusion they cause.
I spend way too much of my time trying to clean up the thinking of real nationalists who have been confused by these people.

The BNP is an anti-racist fag jew party. Just look at their sites and the shit they come out with.
It is another Jew front.

you need to dump state agents Kemp and Griffin. The hopeless naivety of these UK nationalists baffles. The real leaders are in jail www.heretical.com but people still fawn over obvious traitors such as Griffin. The state did not force any such change Griffin and Kemp have been bringing in the fag jew nig nog lovers for years. The idea is to have a pressure release valve for the system. All the Muzzie talk out of the BNP just confuses the public as to the real threat , serving the Jews.
Zog is developing the right wing of PC. Civic Nationalism is another way of saying right-wiggerism. Just as much enemies of the race as left-wiggers.

Zero tolerance for BNP scum. You yankie VNN people don't know the damage these vermin do in the UK scene and the confusion they cause.
I spend way too much of my time trying to clean up the thinking of real nationalists who have been confused by these people.

The BNP is an anti-racist fag jew party. Just look at their sites and the shit they come out with.
It is another Jew front.

How would you know? You're not in Britain nor a British citizen. Spend much of your time cleaning up the thinking? Do you spend as much time doing that as you do setting up meetings in Ireland for patriots and inviting journalists to them and forgetting to turn up yourself? Or does trying to sneak back on VNN in new names after being banned take up more of your time?

Or is it more time consuming trying to avoid the question that everyone keeps asking you? The one that goes "do you accept that many revisionists believe zyklon b was not used as a weapon of mass killing?" and, if so "why did you threaten to use it on VNN BNP members who you called jews?"

Or is it more time consuming outing patriots on VNN Ireland? I suggest you go and edit that.

The reason you're annoyed about the BNP letting in racemixers is because you're frightened your mother will join, eh Arafat?

The real leaders are in jail www.heretical.com

Again showing just how little you actually know about Britain. Steve is out and has been for some time. I've heard that he has no intention of returning to politics or writing - can't say I blame him after his experience, but it does make it hard for him to be your leader. reo.

barnbrook was fine with the fact that his ex-fiance had a mixed race kid. :mad:

Barnbrook was quoted as saying, apropos her relationship with Yat-Sen Chang and their daughter, Olivia, "I'm not opposed to mixed marriages but their children are washing out the identity of this country's indigenous people." He later said that, should he and Clarke get married, "her child will be my child."

Simple - they are civic nationalists that don't want to see the "British way of life" change too drastically. They don't want Sharia law but don't mind a bit of black/chink etc. I say use them why we can.

Exactly.

It's Amren's rhetoric converted into a party.

you need to dump state agents Kemp and Griffin. The hopeless naivety of these UK nationalists baffles. The real leaders are in jail www.heretical.com but people still fawn over obvious traitors such as Griffin. The state did not force any such change Griffin and Kemp have been bringing in the fag jew nig nog lovers for years. The idea is to have a pressure release valve for the system. All the Muzzie talk out of the BNP just confuses the public as to the real threat , serving the Jews.
Zog is developing the right wing of PC. Civic Nationalism is another way of saying right-wiggerism. Just as much enemies of the race as left-wiggers.

Zero tolerance for BNP scum. You yankie VNN people don't know the damage these vermin do in the UK scene and the confusion they cause.
I spend way too much of my time trying to clean up the thinking of real nationalists who have been confused by these people.

The BNP is an anti-racist fag jew party. Just look at their sites and the shit they come out with.
It is another Jew front.

and this none white dog comes out with yet more crap about a party he knows nothing about.

They joined the party BEFORE the State forced the changed constitution to allow non-white members. The most prominent of those non-white members, the Sikh, has verbally expressed his understanding that the BNP is still all about protecting the INDIGENOUS BRITISH of which he can never be one.

But the BNP abandoned it's policy of enforced repatriation long before its Constitution was amended to allow non-White members. Analogously, the party expressed its preference that ethnic minorities choosing to stay in Britain integrate into the mainstream indigenous population as much as possible in order for social divisions and 'harm' to the White British majority to be averted. It is only natural that such a policy change will attract a new - namely more moderate - type of BNP supporter. In its most liberal, as it were, extension, the party has gained support from exasperated anti-immigration voters who have no issue or interest in race at all.

You shouldn't be surprised that race-mixers are in the BNP; I'm not.

But the BNP abandoned it's policy of enforced repatriation long before its Constitution was amended to allow non-White members. Analogously, the party expressed its preference that ethnic minorities choosing to stay in Britain integrate into the mainstream indigenous population as much as possible in order for social divisions and 'harm' to the White British majority to be averted. It is only natural that such a policy change will attract a new - namely more moderate - type of BNP supporter. In its most liberal, as it were, extension, the party has gained support from exasperated anti-immigration voters who have no issue or interest in race at all.

You shouldn't be surprised that race-mixers are in the BNP; I'm not.

You are wrong. Also, think of it this way: how does a race empower itself by disempowering itself?

It is illegal and impractical to campaign on the basis of simply saying all non-whites would be exiled and also wrong because a great many whites must also be exiled imo!

If the policy was the above it would be like wading through treacle with the incessant "who exactly should be sent back? What about quarter/fifth breeds", etc. I agree entirely that the BNP should sideline this issue by saying there are no plans to forcibly repatriate non whites unless they are criminals. But you see, how many can fail to be criminals? In our society right now it is virtually A CRIME TO BE WHITE. So we can learn something from that.

A senior speaker I heard recently said very clearly that once all the illegals have been dealt with and the people who agree to take money to leave, if there are still a substantial number remaining who are a threat to our gene pool or our ethnicity then we will resort to "any means necessary" to remove them.

So your belief that the BNP is happily accepting full mongrelisation could not be more mistaken. :)

You are wrong. Also, think of it this way: how does a race empower itself by disempowering itself?

It is illegal and impractical to campaign on the basis of simply saying all non-whites would be exiled and also wrong because a great many whites must also be exiled imo!

If the policy was the above it would be like wading through treacle with the incessant "who exactly should be sent back? What about quarter/fifth breeds", etc. I agree entirely that the BNP should sideline this issue by saying there are no plans to forcibly repatriate non whites unless they are criminals. But you see, how many can fail to be criminals? In our society right now it is virtually A CRIME TO BE WHITE. So we can learn something from that.

A senior speaker I heard recently said very clearly that once all the illegals have been dealt with and the people who agree to take money to leave, if there are still a substantial number remaining who are a threat to our gene pool or our ethnicity then we will resort to "any means necessary" to remove them.

So your belief that the BNP is happily accepting full mongrelisation could not be more mistaken. :)

Isn't it party policy that all 'race relations' legislation will be repealed under a BNP government and that there will be a major crackdown on crime? If such policies were introduced then the non-Whites would be queueing to leave.

Imagine if the police dealt with acts of violence by Whites on non-Whites in the same way as they do with acts of violence by non-Whites on Whites today - very little or nothing. Imagine if the only people entitled to claim social security benefits, family allowance, etc. were those who could prove at least two great grandparents were born in the UK. Imagine a State-run broadcasting service run by and for White people with no Blacks or Asians shown on TV except in the role of criminals. Imagine non-Whites always at the bottom of the list for everything - healthcare, houses, jobs, the lot. Imagine laws to protect our Christian faith that outlawed the building of mosques and temples and those already built were demolished on the pretext they broke planning laws. Imagine pubs and clubs with signs on the door saying NO BLACKS OR ASIANS ALLOWED or businesses that wouldn't employ anyone but Whites. Imagine non-White rapists, drug-dealers, armed robbers, etc. given the choice of death on the gallows or a one-way ticket for them and their family back to warmth and sunshine. The list is endless but we could easily get rid of the vast majority of the UK's non-White population in a few years without forcing them at gunpoint onto leaky boats.

The list is endless but we could easily get rid of the vast majority of the UK's non-White population in a few years without forcing them at gunpoint onto leaky boats.

Exactly.

Imagine a Britain where it was illegal to sell, produce or eat halal/kosher meat.

Imagine a Britain where the mosque's "call to prayer" was treated just the same as any other antisocial twat blaring out music at silly o'clock and getting their stereo equipment confiscated, with subsequent offences leading to harsher and harsher punishments.

Imagine a Britain where you had to vote by electronic fingerprint (or other foolproof method), not by whichever of the scammed polling cards you fancied.

Imagine a Britain where the burkha and other islamic dress was illegal.

Imagine a Britain where British people come first.

Apologies for sounding like John Lennon. :o

But it's like people complaining about mice in their kitchen - remove the source of food, stop making it so comfy for them and so easy to get in and they'll eventually sod off somewhere else.

Is that Inspector Chisholm from Minder as your avatar ?

Well spotted!

But it's like people complaining about mice in their kitchen - remove the source of food, stop making it so comfy for them and so easy to get in and they'll eventually sod off somewhere else.

And get a cat:

http://www.fakepilot.com/blog/wp-content/hitlercat.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1121868@N22/

And get a cat:

http://www.fakepilot.com/blog/wp-content/hitlercat.jpg

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1121868@N22/

Hahahahahaha! Rep coming if it lets me!

You are wrong. Also, think of it this way: how does a race empower itself by disempowering itself?

It is illegal and impractical to campaign on the basis of simply saying all non-whites would be exiled and also wrong because a great many whites must also be exiled imo!

If the policy was the above it would be like wading through treacle with the incessant "who exactly should be sent back? What about quarter/fifth breeds", etc. I agree entirely that the BNP should sideline this issue by saying there are no plans to forcibly repatriate non whites unless they are criminals. But you see, how many can fail to be criminals? In our society right now it is virtually A CRIME TO BE WHITE. So we can learn something from that.

A senior speaker I heard recently said very clearly that once all the illegals have been dealt with and the people who agree to take money to leave, if there are still a substantial number remaining who are a threat to our gene pool or our ethnicity then we will resort to "any means necessary" to remove them.

So your belief that the BNP is happily accepting full mongrelisation could not be more mistaken. :)

I didn't say that the BNP is happily accepting "full mongrelisation", as you put it, but that certain members of the party will interpret race-mixing as congruous with the replacement of the forced repatriation policy with an esprit of pro-integration. That's why there are miscegenators in the BNP. "I'm not racist, I just think immigration needs to be stopped!" and "I don't mind them if they abide by our rules in our country" are common shibboleths of the new type of BNP voter. If you believe that 'racial awareness' is what motivates most of them you are mistaken at best and deluded at worst.

I have previously debated with a gay BNP member who supports the legalization of same-sex marriage and opposes the banning of the burqa. Granted, he is in a minority there, but the party previously would never have even attracted such a character. There are people even in UKIP who would disagree with him!

The party leadership condemns miscegenation with palpable uneasiness. That's why they end of repeating the rather diluted, neutralized "We may not agree with it in principle, but people should be free to marry and procreate with whomever they choose, so we won't legislate against it". The BNP is not a White nationalist party.

I party leadership condemns miscegenation with palpable uneasiness. That's why they end of repeating the rather diluted, neutralized "We may not agree with it in principle, but people should be free to marry and procreate with whomever they choose, so we won't legislate against it". The BNP is not a White nationalist party.

I like to think "We are all on the same side" indicates a commitment to ruthless Darwinism.In practicle terms it means that the weak and feeble minded genetic rubbish of the Aryan race will by "Natural selction" find its way to the coloured races.Thereby cleansing the Aryan race of its most contentious and dangerous elements:Namely the imbeciles and inadequates the Aryan race will be strengthened and the coloured races weakened.They get our genetic rubbish we refine our race.Sure the chandala will outnumber us but then they have done that since the begining of time.Yet still it is Aryans that have created anything worthwhile in this world.
Rubbish is rubbish no matter how high you pile it. If misceginators want to strike a pose or assuage their conscience by supporting the Bnp then by all means do so.Ultimately however they or more correctly their descendents will pick up the tab for their stupidity and egocentric life choices.
The Bnp is not supposed to be a white nationalist political party.It is a legally registered political party for British Nationalists.It follows that such a party has to comply with all existing and future laws to continue to function within the parameters laid down by the government.I think the Bnp should have an open membership to all races it allows jews I do not see why the bantu should be excluded.The success or failure of the Bnp will be measured by the future existence of the indigenous population within the British isles 100 years from now

With random mating there will be no more Whites in Britain by the end of the century. What will happen is that the last Whites in the world will be very racially aware and indeed so discriminating that they quite probably will not accept anyone with even dark brown hair or brown eyes to marry their offspring, or risk sliding mudwards. (It goes without saying that all other clear indications of racial contamination will be taken instinctive notice of.)

Effectively without a decision to ring-fence the genepool, history shows that nations just become fully mongrelised and that well before this they become unable to produce any people of creative genius or great leadership ability.

The BNP is our big chance to do this ring-fencing now before all is lost.

With random mating there will be no more Whites in Britain by the end of the century. What will happen is that the last Whites in the world will be very racially aware and indeed so discriminating that they quite probably will not accept anyone with even dark brown hair or brown eyes to marry their offspring, or risk sliding mudwards. (It goes without saying that all other clear indications of racial contamination will be taken instinctive notice of.)

Effectively without a decision to ring-fence the genepool, history shows that nations just become fully mongrelised and that well before this they become unable to produce any people of creative genius or great leadership ability.
I don't think i need to go on.



The BNP is our big chance to do this ring-fencing now before all is lost.
If you didn't include people with dark brown hair then that would rule out over 50% of the whites around today.

If you only allowed blonds then you would have about 5% of the white population at most.

And frankly most of the heroes, leaders and inventors of the white european people's history have had brown hair so why it's claimed that blond nordics are superior to other whites i have no idea.


http://www.adolfthegreat.com/site/fileadmin/Image_Archive/Personalities/Hitler-A/Solo/hitlerblueeyesji6.jpghttp://www.solarnavigator.net/history/explorers_history/Napoleon_Bonaparte_young_officer.jpg

Simple - they are civic nationalists that don't want to see the "British way of life" change too drastically. They don't want Sharia law but don't mind a bit of black/chink etc. I say use them why we can.
Why is the Queen a race traitor? Only she has the power to stop mass immigration. And the race rape of her people?:nigmelon:

If you didn't include people with dark brown hair then that would rule out over 50% of the whites around today.

If you only allowed blonds then you would have about 5% of the white population at most.

And frankly most of the heroes, leaders and inventors of the white european people's history have had brown hair so why it's claimed that blond nordics are superior to other whites i have no idea.


http://www.adolfthegreat.com/site/fileadmin/Image_Archive/Personalities/Hitler-A/Solo/hitlerblueeyesji6.jpghttp://www.solarnavigator.net/history/explorers_history/Napoleon_Bonaparte_young_officer.jpg

Blonds are not superior. But it is a trait that is more likely to imply a higher degree of racial purity. Also it is a recessive gene, also red hair is recessive. Recessives are lost through OUT BREEDING.

Blue eyes are recessive and pale skin is recessive.

As the only Whites left in the future may well be those who are most discriminating in favour of who has no contamination from other races, they are sure to favour any recessive traits that are associated with northern Europeans. Superiority or inferiority has nothing to do with it!

Is that clear now?

It's just one path of possible evolution - which implies branching off from the rest to move towards being another species.

Btw did you know Napoleon hated the French because he was racially abused when he was young for being so much darker than the norm for French. He was a Corsican. Now he would not be considered dark though. That's how fast demography changes.

Why is the Queen a race traitor? Only she has the power to stop mass immigration. And the race rape of her people?:nigmelon:

Nonsense.

It is for the parliament to decide the immigration policy in any nation that has one.

Time for a mass movement of BNP supporters to one of the major parties so the BNP faction controls a percentage of the party and a percentage of the MPs. This splinter can decide to withhold support for the governing party if they do not meet the policy demands.