The 60’s in particular was a horrible decade for whites. The snivel rights movement went into full gear. As angry nogs marched through white neighborhood demanding access to white society most whites, except for a handful or principled white southerners, decided to look the other way rather than take a stand. As a result, ZOG crushed the small southern resistance because whites did not band together fight for their self-interests, along with the future of their children.

The 60’s brought the 1964 “civil rights” law, eviscerating freedom of association and personal property rights. This too met little resistance from the white population.

The 60’s would have been an opportune time for a racial civil war. Most of America was still segregated, and the mexicans were not a factor then. Appeasement was the path whites (as a whole) chose to take.

White adults are not children. Whites CHOOSE to submit to jewish demands for compliance, because it easier to blend in and look the other way, rather than fight.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.

White Nationalists need to avoid the cult of victimology. If not the movement is finished.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]The 60’s in particular was a horrible decade for whites. The snivel rights movement went into full gear. As angry nogs marched through white neighborhood demanding access to white society most whites, except for a handful or principled white southerners, decided to look the other way rather than take a stand. As a result, ZOG crushed the small southern resistance because whites did not band together fight for their self-interests, along with the future of their children.

The 60’s brought the 1964 “civil rights” law, eviscerating freedom of association and personal property rights. This too met little resistance from the white population.

The 60’s would have been an opportune time for a racial civil war. Most of America was still segregated, and the mexicans were not a factor then. Appeasement was the path whites (as a whole) chose to take.

White adults are not children. Whites CHOOSE to submit to jewish demands for compliance, because it easier to blend in and look the other way, rather than fight.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.

White Nationalists need to avoid the cult of victimology. If not the movement is finished.[/QUOTE]

Well Jim it all boils down to the fact that ZOG has been able to keep the majority of whites fat dumb and happy. The moment they start to feel a growling in their belly things will change. That goes double for the pet monkeys we keep. I don't think we have to wait much longer.

[QUOTE=Augustus Sutter]Well Jim it all boils down to the fact that ZOG has been able to keep the majority of whites fat dumb and happy. The moment they start to feel a growling in their belly things will change. That goes double for the pet monkeys we keep. I don't think we have to wait much longer.[/QUOTE]

Quite possible. This of course was predicted in the "Turner Diaries", although society was degraded to much greater degree in the novel. Note that the strategy of the "organization" was to further disrupt ZOG and society by terrorist attacks, so each tribal group was forced to band together, choose alliances and fight for their own survival.

WW2 was the turning point of it all.


PROTOCOL No. 2
1. It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the mercy of our international AGENTUR; which possesses millions of eyes ever on the watch and unhampered by any limitations whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their subjects among themselves.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.



Jim, who are you?




------------

[QUOTE=Franco]Jim, who are you?




------------[/QUOTE]

What difference does it make?

PROTOCOL No. 6
1. We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs of colossal riches, upon which even, large fortunes of the GOYIM will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom together with the credit of the States on the day after the political smash ...

2. You gentlemen here present who are economists, just strike an estimate of the significance of this combination! ...

3. In every possible way we must develop the significance of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us.

4. The aristocracy of the GOYIM as a political force, is dead -- We need not take it into account; but as landed proprietors they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-sufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land. This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon landed property -- in loading lands with debts. These measures will check land-holding and keep it in a state of humble and un-conditional submission.

5. The aristocrats of the GOYIM, being hereditarily incapable of contenting themselves with little, will rapidly burn up and fizzle out.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]What difference does it make?[/QUOTE]



Aww, come on, Jim. You can tell me. I won't tell anyone.

Maybe I should start a thread to see if any helpful VNNF posters would be willing to help you find another forum to post at? Good idea? :D





-------------

That has been his position since he got here, what, six or so months ago. Jews are blameless and endangered, Whites are reprehensible and deserve their fate. Nothing he has read since has changed him a bit. You should read through his posts to get an idea of who or what he is.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.
[QUOTE=Franco]Jim, who are you?




------------[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MOMUS]That has been his position since he got here, what, six or so months ago. Jews are blameless and endangered, Whites are reprehensible and deserve their fate. Nothing he has read since has changed him a bit. You should read through his posts to get an idea of who or what he is.[/QUOTE]

No Momus, I do not believe that whites deserve their fate. I do believe that you and Franco deserve your prospective fates, however.

[QUOTE=Franco]Aww, come on, Jim. You can tell me. I won't tell anyone.

Maybe I should start a thread to see if any helpful VNNF posters would be willing to help you find another forum to post at? Good idea? :D





-------------[/QUOTE]

How about a better idea, Frankster. Why don't you attempt to make a point on the thread, or attempt to put me in my place using your superior intellect.

If not then just admit you can't handle anyone that's not your vapid sycophant.

I found a good quote from you Jimmie:

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
Just because HG or myself don't believe every moronic conspiracy theory that you believe doesn't make either of us a Jew or an anti.

Do you have any idea you're exalting Jews to superhuman status? Do you think that much of them? Do you have that much of an inferiority complex?

You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]No Momus, I do not believe that whites deserve their fate. I do believe that you and Franco deserve your prospective fates, however.[/QUOTE]

Hate to break the news to you, Momus, but if there are jewish orgs monitoring this site (and I'm sure there are), they have to laughing their collective asses off reading some of your posts.

They like your posts, though, so bend a knee again, faggot.



[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Hate to break the news to you, Momus, but if there are jewish orgs monitoring this site (and I'm sure there are), they have to laughing their collective asses off reading some of your posts.[/QUOTE]

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]How about a better idea, Frankster. Why don't you attempt to make a point on the thread, or attempt to put me in my place using your superior intellect.

If not then just admit you can't handle anyone that's not your vapid sycophant.[/QUOTE]




Do you have any relatives in Tel Aviv, Jim?





-----------

[QUOTE=Franco]Do you have any relatives in Tel Aviv, Jim?[/QUOTE]

Yes, Ariel Sharon is my half-brother.

How about you? Are any of your siblings afflicted with Down Syndrome, too?

Isn't this piece of shit a real live-wire? If he isn't a kike it isn't because he doesn't want to be. he is the next thing to it, a shabbas-goy willing to do anything for them, including making a pitiful ass of himself on this forum.



[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Yes, Ariel Sharon is my half-brother.

How about you? Are any of your siblings afflicted with Down Syndrome, too?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Augustus Sutter]Well Jim it all boils down to the fact that ZOG has been able to keep the majority of whites fat dumb and happy. The moment they start to feel a growling in their belly things will change. That goes double for the pet monkeys we keep. I don't think we have to wait much longer.[/QUOTE]


I hope you are correct. Although, Some people seem to be too far gone.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Yes, Ariel Sharon is my half-brother.

How about you? Are any of your siblings afflicted with Down Syndrome, too?[/QUOTE]

Are you drinking this evening, Crowe?

[QUOTE=Intrepid]Are you drinking this evening, Crowe?[/QUOTE]

No, I don't drink. I'm high on life. lol

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]How about a better idea, Frankster. Why don't you attempt to make a point on the thread, or attempt to put me in my place using your superior intellect.

If not then just admit you can't handle anyone that's not your vapid sycophant.[/QUOTE]


Anyone who doth dare not conform to "free thinking" (oh sweet irony!) will feel the froth from the orifice of MOMUS!

Why does MOMUS dislike "source nazis"? Because we all know bullshitters hate to be called out to support thier ludicrous statements and predictions.



...

Such as "Northern chinese and japs are whiter than Whites"? Har har![QUOTE=Anima Eternae]

Why does MOMUS dislike "source nazis"? Because we all know bullshitters hate to be called out to support thier ludicrous statements and predictions.



...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MOMUS]Such as "Northern chinese and japs are whiter than Whites"? Har har![/QUOTE]


I said lighter skinned, not "whiter" (in the context of white as a racial category). Nice jew-play with the words.



...

Kindly read again what you just posted. You want to say that I talk jewspeak?

Phrase it how you will. You are still making an absurd statement that you pulled out of yer stinking post-sophomoric ass. Neither japs nor chinks are lighter skinned that europeans, idiot. Cite your source, if you can stay within the bounds of decency.
Enough said.


[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]I said lighter skinned, not "whiter" (in the context of white as a racial category). Nice jew-play with the words.



...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe] No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.

White Nationalists need to avoid the cult of victimology. If not the movement is finished.[/QUOTE]

I agree 100% with old Crowe quotation above. Many of the extreme anti-Semites here on VNN are not White Nationalists (i.e., pro-white) at all; they are just anti-Jew, just Jew haters. They are irrelevant.

It is enough that Crowe defined the Jews as an “out-group.” Some anti-Semites actually scream, cry, and moan about Jews killing Palestinians and Iraqis. In doing so, those anti-Semites define those out-groups as in-groups. Thus those anti-Semites prove they are not white nationalists.

Many of the extreme anti-Semites here on VNN are not White Nationalists (i.e., pro-white) at all;





[SIZE=5][COLOR=DarkRed]WHAT?? WHAT???[/COLOR][/SIZE]








------------

[QUOTE=NorWind]I agree 100% with old Crowe quotation above. Many of the extreme anti-Semites here on VNN are not White Nationalists (i.e., pro-white) at all; they are just anti-Jew, just Jew haters. They are irrelevant.
[/QUOTE]

Not quite irrelevant. Momus and Franco both manufacture carbon dioxide, which in turn is consumed by plant life and converted into oxygen. So it is not quite correct to state they have no purpose in life.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Not quite irrelevant. Momus and Franco both manufacture carbon dioxide, which in turn is consumed by plant life and converted into oxygen. So it is not quite correct to state they have no purpose in life.[/QUOTE]




Hey, this link is in your signature line:

http://www.wbal.com/commentary/smith/

Why do you have that link here at VNNF?

Why not tell the VNNF board what the hell you are doing here at VNNF??




----------------------

[QUOTE=NorWind]Some anti-Semites actually scream, cry, and moan about Jews killing Palestinians and Iraqis. In doing so, those anti-Semites define those out-groups as in-groups. Thus those anti-Semites prove they are not white nationalists.[/QUOTE]




The ends justify the means. Many lemmings are bleeding-hearts when it comes to the darker peoples, and pointing out the jewish habit of persecuting Pals is a good way of waking some of them up. I myself wish we could be rid of them all (jews and their desert rat cousins) but that doesn't stop me from occasionally using the situation in the Middle East to make lemmings start thinking about jews.

[QUOTE=Franco]Why do you have that link here at VNNF?[/QUOTE]

Why not? It was your suggestion that we link something in our sigs. This radio talkshow host is the best in the nation (IMO) and although he has to tone it down a bit for mainstream radio, I believe his a WN.

[QUOTE=Franco]Why not tell the VNNF board what the hell you are doing here at VNNF??[/QUOTE]

I'm posting messages. This is a message board, is it not?

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Why not? It was your suggestion that we link something in our sigs. This radio talkshow host is the best in the nation (IMO) and although he has to tone it down a bit for mainstream radio, I believe his a WN.



I'm posting messages. This is a message board, is it not?[/QUOTE]




Ok, I will re-phrase that, Jim, just so that you understand:

Why are you posting on a hard-core WN message board?????




-------------------

[QUOTE=Franco]Why are you posting on a hard-core WN message board?????




-------------------[/QUOTE]

There's a difference between being hard-core and just plain stupid, Franco.

I suggest you attempt to stay out of the latter category, even if it means you alter your worldview to something other than utter fantasy.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]There's a difference between being hard-core and just plain stupid, Franco.

I suggest you attempt to stay out of the latter category, even if it means you alter your worldview to something other than utter fantasy.[/QUOTE]





It's time for you to find another forum, Jim.





--------------

[QUOTE=Franco]It's time for you to find another forum, Jim.





--------------[/QUOTE]

And miss out on your whining? How could I pass that up?

By the way Franco, I'm sure you've read Linder's welcome page.

"This forum will be a free-speech forum. That means you can say pretty much whatever you want, as long as you stay away from anything illegal. If you're here to disrupt, we will dump you. But if you simply disagree, with me or anyone, you'll have all the room you need to make your case. There will be a few moderators, but I'd like to see the members of this forum exhibit self control."

So if you wish to have a meaningful debate with any of the points I've brought up, fine. But if your only response is to ask me to leave, then piss off.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]By the way Franco, I'm sure you've read Linder's welcome page.

"This forum will be a free-speech forum. That means you can say pretty much whatever you want, as long as you stay away from anything illegal. If you're here to disrupt, we will dump you. But if you simply disagree, with me or anyone, you'll have all the room you need to make your case. There will be a few moderators, but I'd like to see the members of this forum exhibit self control."

So if you wish to have a meaningful debate with any of the points I've brought up, fine. But if your only response is to ask me to leave, then piss off.[/QUOTE]

Jim I've gone over this with you several times. The problem with you is that you are contantly trying to shift blame away from the Jews; earlier I called it blaming the victim. That does not mean I am promoting victimology amongst White Nationalists.

(PROTOCOL No. 6: 5. The aristocrats of the GOYIM, being hereditarily incapable of contenting themselves with little, will rapidly burn up and fizzle out)


The aristocracy did not put the interest of the whole first, and consequently, the whole was defeated.

WW2 was the turning point of it all, or as George Lincoln Rockwell puts it: WW2 was the Alamo of the White race. So, yes it was the upper elite goys who sold out for a few shekels as Henry Ford tried to warn his fellow aristocratic stratosphere.

After WW2, the international Aliens went to work in dismantling nations birth-right.

The bold text describes your efforts here, Crowe, from your first day.
No Jews. Just right.
Does "No shabbas goy" need to be added in order for you to understand that this forum isn't for you?

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.


[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]By the way Franco, I'm sure you've read Linder's welcome page.

"This forum will be a free-speech forum. That means you can say pretty much whatever you want, as long as you stay away from anything illegal. If you're here to disrupt, we will dump you. But if you simply disagree, with me or anyone, you'll have all the room you need to make your case. There will be a few moderators, but I'd like to see the members of this forum exhibit self control."

So if you wish to have a meaningful debate with any of the points I've brought up, fine. But if your only response is to ask me to leave, then piss off.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Augustus Sutter]Jim I've gone over this with you several times. The problem with you is that you are contantly trying to shift blame away from the Jews; earlier I called it blaming the victim. That does not mean I am promoting victimology amongst White Nationalists.[/QUOTE]

Fair criticism, but I don't believe I'm shifting blame away from jews, as much blame belongs there, but rather to put some things into perspective.

It would be much easier for me to simply parrot the party line, rather than be honest, but I don't believe much is gained by insincerity or dishonesty. Also the truth can be painful, as witnessed by some of the reaction I'm getting.

Back to my original post. It's a given that a 2 to 3 percent ethnic group is able to exert trememdous influence and control over the host population to advance their own self-interests. From that given, you have to assume either:

A. Jews are vastly superior to host populations (even if they acheive this by dubious means), or

B. Whites simply rolled over and allowed this to happen (although I agree it is a bit more complex than this).

Certainly if we expell the jews our task will be much easier to recondition the lemmings but how likely is that? If jewish intermarriage is at 70 percent will they even be identifiable?

Work to name the jew, expell the jew or even kill off the jews, but that still doesn't alter my argument that the emphasis should not be on the actions or inactions of any outgroup, including the jew, but rather on behaviour and belief systems of the ingroup we are part of.

I know the counter argument is get rid of the jew and everything else will simply fall in place, however I believe this wishful thinking falls back the ingroup being the question once again.

[QUOTE=MOMUS]The bold text describes your efforts here, Crowe, from your first day.
No Jews. Just right.
Does "No shabbas goy" need to be added in order for you to understand that this forum isn't for you?[/QUOTE]

"Disruption" doesn't mean countering your stupidity, Momus.

Do you define speaking out against the agenda of International Jewry as stupidity? That is what you do here, counter charges against your precious kikes.

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.


[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]"Disruption" doesn't mean countering your stupidity, Momus.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MOMUS]Do you define speaking out against the agenda of International Jewry as stupidity?[/i][/QUOTE]

No, I have never defended the actions of International Jewry. If you weren't so feeble-minded you could see that my post has nothing to do with that.

[QUOTE=Augustus Sutter]The problem with you is that you are contantly trying to shift blame away from the Jews; earlier I called it blaming the victim. [/QUOTE]

If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?

[QUOTE=NorWind]If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?[/QUOTE]

I'm not too sure, but sounds a lot like Franco.

You can use all the Doc Martin-style insults your vast brain is capable of contriving, it doesn't prevent your pro-jew agenda from showing through.



[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]No, I have never defended the actions of International Jewry. If you weren't so feeble-minded you could see that my post has nothing to do with that.[/QUOTE]

This crap makes no sense at all, but thanks for announcing your jewish sympathies.



[QUOTE=NorWind]If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NorWind]If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?[/QUOTE]

What if Momus was being raped by three big niggers? Chances are he would claim that they were jews in blackface.

Hyuck, hyuck! Some more sterling Jim Crowe wit.

Well, there is no chance of Jim Crowe being raped by kikes, he has already dropped a knee for them.

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]What if Momus was being raped by three big niggers? Chances are he would claim that they were jews in blackface.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=NorWind]If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?[/QUOTE]

Wow you really are a deep thinker! It so simple after reading your brilliant insight. Thanks!

Kike-loving Jim Crowe thought it a very sensible post. I like it when Crowe shows his zionist side here. Let him expound on how the poor lil jew couldn't be up to any mischief, it's all the Whites' fault.

I have to work today, I'll check when I return to see if the forum shabbas goy has made any new sucking sounds here in his ongoing forum fellatio of World jewry.

Originally Posted by Jim Crowe
You might as well drop a knee and give a Jew some fellatio.




[QUOTE=Augustus Sutter]Wow you really are a deep thinker! It so simple after reading your brilliant insight. Thanks![/QUOTE]

Neither japs nor chinks are lighter skinned that europeans, idiot. Cite your source, if you can stay within the bounds of decency.
Enough said.


Well MOMUS, considering for about 95% of my other claims I cite soruces, I'd say you have an obligation to cite yours.

Show me that your average European or white American has lighter skin than a northern Jap or Chinese. Climitization is on my side.


...

[QUOTE=MOMUS]I have to work today, I'll check when I return to see if the forum shabbas goy has made any new sucking sounds here in his ongoing forum fellatio of World jewry[/QUOTE]

Don't they have Negroes to hand out towels at the restroom?

Ayuck yuck! Crowe yer a card, a true asset to the forum. Dog Martin can learn from your subtle responses.



[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]Don't they have Negroes to hand out towels at the restroom?[/QUOTE]

Seeya idiot. I knew you couldn't support that absurdity. I don't have to prove anything, Mr Cite Your Source. You are the one who claims on a White racist forum that gooks are 'lighter-skinned" than Whites.



[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]Well MOMUS, considering for about 95% of my other claims I cite soruces, I'd say you have an obligation to cite yours.

Show me that your average European or white American has lighter skin than a northern Jap or Chinese. Climitization is on my side.


...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=MOMUS]Ayuck yuck! Crowe yer a card, a true asset to the forum. Dog Martin can learn from your subtle responses.[/QUOTE]

Momus,

I thought you were going to work. One more incident of tardiness and your jew-boss will have to write you up. lol

[QUOTE=NorWind]If a 13 year old girl is being rapped by three big niggers, she is clearly a victim.

If a big tough guy blames some little sniffling cowardly pack of effeminate parasites for nearly every problem, what would you call him?[/QUOTE] I'd call him "knowledgeable", porkchop. If it was'nt for the kike's promotion of all things nigger in the first place, odds are these dusky dipshits would'nt be in a position to be "rapping" a 13 y.o. They've been emboldened to perpetuate these harmless "pranks" on the nasty, racist White population on account of jewish behind-the-scenes prodding and egging-on of their imaginary grievances against the honkies who've been holding them down for the past couple centuries. Hell, the black bastards would'nt even be here today, if it was'nt for your beloved, benevolent masters. Auggie's right - you really are a deep thinker. Yeah man.

Seeya idiot. I knew you couldn't support that absurdity. I don't have to prove anything, Mr Cite Your Source. You are the one who claims on a White racist forum that gooks are 'lighter-skinned" than Whites.

The one-dimensionality of MO's "personality" shines through. Leave it to this imbecile to believe that white as a racial category is actually solely based on skin color. Get edumacated, trash. :D



...

[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]Well MOMUS, considering for about 95% of my other claims I cite soruces, I'd say you have an obligation to cite yours.

Show me that your average European or white American has lighter skin than a northern Jap or Chinese. Climitization is on my side.


...[/QUOTE]Of course the Whiteman skin changes color to reddish when expose to sunlight, but the newborn skin is always white. Orientals skin is yellow from their genetic code from birth.

please, continue with your absurdity, Its becoming quite entertainment.

Orientals skin is yellow from their genetic code from birth.

please, continue with your absurdity, Its becoming quite entertainment.


What's the matter, el douche? Couldn't defend your absurd statements on evolution, so you had to come to another thread?


Please, I do encourage thee to show me a newborn east asian infant with "yellow" skin.

"Yellow" means nothing, biologically.


...

Let's leave aside your jewish-style ad hominems and get back to the fact that you aver that japs and chinks are 'lighter-skinned' than Europeans. You're full of shit and you know it. You can call me all the names available to a post-sophomoric scholar such as yourself but it is you who remains the fool with no source to cite to back such an absurd claim.
Tell me again why you post at VNN Forum while you're busy with a response.


[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]The one-dimensionality of MO's "personality" shines through. Leave it to this imbecile to believe that white as a racial category is actually solely based on skin color. Get edumacated, trash. :D



...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]The 60’s in particular was a horrible decade for whites. The snivel rights movement went into full gear. As angry nogs marched through white neighborhood demanding access to white society most whites, except for a handful or principled white southerners, decided to look the other way rather than take a stand. As a result, ZOG crushed the small southern resistance because whites did not band together fight for their self-interests, along with the future of their children.

The 60’s brought the 1964 “civil rights” law, eviscerating freedom of association and personal property rights. This too met little resistance from the white population.

The 60’s would have been an opportune time for a racial civil war. Most of America was still segregated, and the mexicans were not a factor then. Appeasement was the path whites (as a whole) chose to take.

White adults are not children. Whites CHOOSE to submit to jewish demands for compliance, because it easier to blend in and look the other way, rather than fight.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.

White Nationalists need to avoid the cult of victimology. If not the movement is finished.[/QUOTE]

The jews control the fate of whites and they (unlike us) know it :mad:

We have been trying to expose ZOG for 50 years now and have gotten nowhere and it will be the same in 50 years time :mad:

[QUOTE=Skunk]We have been trying to expose ZOG for 50 years now and have gotten nowhere and it will be the same in 50 years time :mad:[/QUOTE]

Which means it might be time for different strategy.

Modest behavioral changes with the white community will elevate their status tremendously.

MOMUS complaining of ad hominem?


Mayhaps George Bush shall complain about drunkards!



...

I knew you couldn't support that absurdity. I don't have to prove anything, Mr Cite Your Source. You are the one who claims on a White racist forum that gooks are 'lighter-skinned" than Whites.

[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]MOMUS complaining of ad hominem?


Mayhaps George Bush shall complain about drunkards!



...[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=the Great Gazoo][font=Book Antiqua][size=4]Only by assuming responsibility can one take control. They go hand-in-hand; you cannot have one without the other. A victim by definition has surrendered control of his fate to his adversary. Making Jews reasonable for the pathetic condition of Whites enables Jews to reduce Whites to that pathetic condition. The only power that Jews exert over Whites is the power that Whites have ceded to them. The fact that Whites have made Jews the de facto Gods on Earth is an acknowledgment of their own inferiority, and incredible stupidity. [/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]The White race went to the precipice of extinction of its own free will, and volition to receive the coveted Darwin award that it so eagerly awaits. All the Jews did was to exploit, and exasperate the preexisting vulnerabilities of Whites, and Whites were too stupid, or greedy to notice, or care. Its time to face the truth, most Whites are as dumb as a stump, and will fight among themselves for the privilege of kissing Jewish ass, and, or kicking any Jew’s enemy’s ass, in the vain hope of unleashing Jesus’ whoop-ass. Moreover, if they will not do it Jesus, they certainly will for Uncle Shem’s shekels.[/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]Much to the delight of Jews, the White Nationalists are not much better as they spend most of their time dwelling on Negroid inferiority, to alleviate their own inferiority complex. Ironically, White Nationalists ape the ape in this regard, and content themselves with a pissing contest over past glories. Soon the great White leader will gather the remnants of his flock, so they can all chant “I am somebody“in perfect harmony, and draw yet another defiant swastika in the sand, as they proudly sport their “White is beautiful too” tee shirt. Publicly, the Jews will express great consternation over the event, and wail at the nearest holohoax shrine. Privately, they laugh their asses off, as the dumb schmucks will believe anything the talking picture box tells them. [/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]Unless White Nationalists begin to understand the nuances of the psychological warfare that Jews have waged against them, they will continue to be led astray. Moreover, they will continue to shoot themselves in the foot with their own propaganda. The best example of which is when a beautiful White woman is depicted with a caption that reads in affect “Don’t have sex with me non-White beast man”. Not only will this increase the lust of non-Whites, it shows that White Nationalist men fear that White women will actually go cuckoo for cocoa cock should they fail to heed the dire warning, or enticement depending on the perspective.[/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]Syphilis dude was not much better; as it implies White Nationalists fear White women lust after something so hideous, even Medusa would not touch it with a bargepole. In addition, it gives the impression that White Nationalists are impotent, and fear Black men, which nicely dovetails with the Jewish propaganda cliché. Insulting the intelligence of the target audience, and making a parody of the movement in the process enhances the Jew’s stereotype of White Nationalists. [/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]A positive affirmation of what is White and why it should be defended is much more effective. Picture a happy young White couple with a gorgeous White baby with the caption “Their future is our future”, and explain why White Nationalism is necessary to secure that future. For a negative affirmation, picture a distraught White woman burdened with her mulatto brood with the caption: “Where is my daddy?” What is important to remember with propaganda is that realities are created, and mediocre propaganda can have unintended consequences that make it detrimental to the intended purpose. [/size][/font]


[font=Book Antiqua][size=4]Before Rounder beats me to death with his pom-poms, I do support the pamphlet, warts and all. Whatever faults it may have, it helps to enable White people who take “responsibility” for their people’s condition to assume control of their destiny instead of being a “victim”. While I am pontificating, I might add that it is imperative that Whites develop an altruistic nexus, and collaborate in as many ways as possible. The Jews fear enlightened White benevolence that effectively cuts the parasite out, and prey upon disorganized White malevolence, that brings the parasite, and his zoglings in. Sieg Heil. [/size][/font][/QUOTE]

I have to give credit to Bragi for this response, but I believe in this instance it should be repeated:

[SIZE=6]AHHH SHADDDUPPP!!![/SIZE]

"the natural aristocracy of our race, which once gave it some sense of direction, has been totally destroyed...We are left with what is, on the whole, an Aryan proletariat..."Revilo Oliver .

[QUOTE=MOMUS]I knew you couldn't support that absurdity. I don't have to prove anything, Mr Cite Your Source. You are the one who claims on a White racist forum that gooks are 'lighter-skinned" than Whites.[/QUOTE]


MOMUS, you never cite anything.


You are relying on the literal definition of racial words to support your claim, which of course is naive and childish.

With the amount of things I cite, it's your turn to cite something. Show me that north asians have darker skin, or "yellow" skin". Fool.


;)


...

Seem’s like every critter’s on earth claim to be white.

[QUOTE=El Duce]Seem’s like every critter’s on earth claim to be white.[/QUOTE]

Stop wordplaying like MO'.


I said that northerns asian are probably lighter skinned than your average white American or European.


I never said they were "whiter", and if you think the race is based solely on pigmentation then you're even more misinformed than I could imagine.



...

[QUOTE=the Great Gazoo][font=Book Antiqua][size=4][color=black]That was a real thigh slapper. I can see why you would want to credit your bosom buddy for that zinger. After all, it was such a hoot! Anymore rapier wit from the [/color][color=black]peanut[/color][color=black] gallery? [/color]Risu inepto res ineptior nulla est.[/size][/font][/QUOTE]

We have to lighten up here once in a while. Why with all the flame wars and death threats it starts to get morbid.

Quid rides?...De te fabula narratur.

[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]................The 60’s would have been an opportune time for a racial civil war. Most of America was still segregated, and the mexicans were not a factor then. Appeasement was the path whites (as a whole) chose to take.

White adults are not children. Whites CHOOSE to submit to jewish demands for compliance, because it easier to blend in and look the other way, rather than fight.

No outgroup, including the jews, control the fate of whites. This responsibility lies with the white population alone.

White Nationalists need to avoid the cult of victimology. If not the movement is finished.[/QUOTE]

I agree. We must lead Whites not Jews, not traitors or the lackeys of Jews. We will lead and achieve our objectives by any means necessary.

Cite your source, please. Unless that source is your fundamental aperture, as I suspect.

[QUOTE=Anima Eternae]Stop wordplaying like MO'.


I said that northerns asian are probably lighter skinned than your average white American or European.


QUOTE]