http://www.albasrah.net/images/3loj/mass-grave-us-soldiers.htm
Warning:Graphic pictures of the dead.

[QUOTE=Cracker oftheWhip]http://www.albasrah.net/images/3loj/mass-grave-us-soldiers.htm
Warning:Graphic pictures of the dead.[/QUOTE]

I call fake on this one. No helmets, uniforms, or dogtags..and arabs would usually wag such trinkets in front of the camera for all to see.

They are saying that US brass had the evidence removed and buried the bodies to keep casualty figures from reflecting reality.
That tattoo is American, its like can be seen on any tat parlor wall.

I wouldn't doubt the existence of special groups from the Inner Party circle who attend to jobs like that; like the Harvey Keitel character in Pulp Fiction.
In all the Arab news stories of "massacres" of US troops in Iraq there are reports of choppers and jeeps arriving to stop filming and remove evidence. It seems to be SOP.

We, the American public, have no idea what goes on there.

Edit: The thinking of those behind this is that those dead GIs will wind up as nothing but MIA statistics after it's all over. Temporary gain is won by forestalling public aversion to the ongoing slaughter.

[QUOTE=cruo-Stagarana]I call fake on this one. No helmets, uniforms, or dogtags..and arabs would usually wag such trinkets in front of the camera for all to see.[/QUOTE]

Hard to tell if they are American soldiers without proper ID and/or analysis like dental records.
The one picture of the corpse with the tribal arm tattoo seems to be that of a non-Middle Eastern foriegner, could be European soldier or a worker of some kind who came to Iraq to drive a truck or something.
So, to state as fact that there is a US military conspiracy to hide numbers of dead US troops is just speculation based on little evidence.
Perhaps though.

Anyway, those are some sad pictures. Wouldn't advise anyone of joining the army or going over to Iraq to carpetbag.

It's true that I'm willing to think the worst of those who brought off this war.

What if there were a Custer-like take-down of a fair-sized American unit? It could and may happen. How do you think ZOG would deal with it?

Maybe it did here, on a smaller, manageable scale.

Momus, You may well be correct. We really don't know. I doubt though that the US military would just bury a bunch of slaughtered troops in the sand outside og Falluja. Wouldn't make much sense because it would be omly a mtter of time before those bodies are discovered by someone.
There are many other better ways of disposing of dead people than just burying them in the sand. That is proabbaly one of the worst things you can do if you'd want to hide something.

Plus, if they were killed by the enemy, they'd brandish those dog tags and military emblems like there was no tommorrow like someone mentioned.

Probably a few missing independent contractors and/or a couple of MIA soldiers.

Sad and gruesome no matter. Pics that the ZOG US doesn't want you to see.

hmmm. Only a few more hours to go until major polling in the US and this pops up. Whatever it means, that alone makes me damn uneasy when thinking about what the lemmings will wake up to in the morning and do with it at the polling booth.

I think it might be American soldiers because of that tattoo. That is a pretty neat tattoo which could only be done by using computers etc and only Americans get tribal tats like that because we are trendy bastards that do anything cool. I'm having a hard time believing the story that American officers had them buried to lower casualty numbers but then again it's possible.

The statement from the Iraqi Army dates back to March, 2004 and the bodies were long-dead by then. So the killing or ambush was earlier still. By the time Western forensics experts do tests, if ever, the issue will be moot, history.



[QUOTE=Stan Sikorski]hmmm. Only a few more hours to go until major polling in the US and this pops up. Whatever it means, that alone makes me damn uneasy when thinking about what the lemmings will wake up to in the morning and do with it at the polling booth.[/QUOTE]

Maybe they are mercenaries.

I'm curious to know the number of MIA’s in Iraq since the invasion. So far, the Gov issue death toll only, but not the number of maimed, or the MIA. -nay if their not dead, the individual is destroyed- Combine them together, the number would be astounding.


It pisses me off when I see those pictures of dead soldiers, I can think of nothing but the Cowards lackeys politicians who would sell their own mother for a few shekels.

[QUOTE=El Duce]I'm curious to know the number of MIA’s in Iraq since the invasion. [/QUOTE]http://www.aiipowmia.com/iraq/oifpwmia.html

The body bag in the Pic could be somewhat telling, if some of the corpses were found in NATO/U.N. issue bags it would be a dead give away they were military personnel and at one point were in U.S. or other allies hands.
I mean, why would insurgents bother to zip any of them up before dumping them in a mass grave?

[QUOTE=Cracker oftheWhip]http://www.aiipowmia.com/iraq/oifpwmia.html[/QUOTE]Thanks for the link.

Its been just little over a year, thousands are dead/ maimed/ MIA

Fast forward 5 years from now, that number will increase by ten fold.


I hope I live long enough to see justice be done on the Shabbaz front man goy hanged! Nuremberg style.