[good intro to the topic - this is a comment on the white fag post from the other thread]

But his ignorance is in thinking that because he does not personally oppress people of a different gender or race, he is not benefiting from oppression. What most people here have critiqued him on is not his experience, but his ignorance about acknowledging his privilege. He states that he feels personally accused as an oppressor- this is a common misconception of people in a privileged position, but it is false. He is not being personally accused when people talk about white male privilege- like someone said below "It's not about you." - and for many people, the complaining about white male's hurt feelings whenever minorities and women speak out gets old.

The guilty party thinks guilt is assigned to individuals because of something they did. But the left assigns guilt by class. If you belong to the wrong class, you're guilty. And they will be happy to wipe you out - quite literally, as in the case of, say, kulaks in the Ukraine.

It is this systemic, unsmiling, hate-shot ideological politics that has allowed the judeo-left to run roughshod over everthing-on-two-feet-has-a-soul christian individualism. The right, for good and bad, has never been able to generate the level of hate the left seems to possess without making any effort at all. Hate pours out of the left effortlessly - see the kayla creature in the opps thread here at VNNF. Whereas we, or most of us, have to actually work to generate hate. What we feel is more disdain, disgust, repulsion, or simple anger that basic facts are being overlooked or suppressed.

We are white bunnies doing battle with a juggernaut until we at least formally and ideologically develop some genuine class hatred of our own. The NS were the closest to doing so, but even they were not thorough or consistent enough. This is why i have harped for years on the danger of allowing, in our hearts and politics, the personal to trump the political. That we "like" someone, the man or his writing, doesn't matter if he doesn't have the right politics. If he aint us, he aint us. An absolute line must be drawn or we are open to subversion.

You can't find a single example of a jew saying this NS or that WN is a good person, but you can find about 99% of WN saying a jew is a good person, one of us, really on our side. As the NS said, "everyone has his 'good jew.'"

We need a clear ideological line, not this wimpy tolerance. Only then do we have basis for building up the fervency needed to win.

So much confusion we see in WN discussions comes from the mixing of two entirely separate things: 1) peaceful change in a stable society; 2) building a White force that can take on a jewish dictatorship.

The two have nothing to do with one another, but because most WN graduate from the conservative right, and fail to cut ties with it, they are continually being mixed. You don't get serious change out of a clown like Pat Buchanan any more than you get a White baby out of The Barrenness.

We are white bunnies doing battle with a juggernaut until we at least formally and ideologically develop some genuine class hatred of our own.

What exactly do you mean by this term, Alex? At this stage in the game, how does it differ from racial hatred?

What exactly do you mean by this term, Alex? At this stage in the game, how does it differ from racial hatred?

Race can be a class. Class doesn't mean economics only, although that is generally what it means in politics. Class could be all rabbits, or all unicorns, or sockpuppets with button eyes, or sockpuppets with felt eyes, or snowmen with carrot noses. Yes, jews are a class to us WN. There are no good jews. That is the only way to mirror, and potentially square up to politically, the jews who say all whites are racist/evil. They may focus on WN, but the "class" they hate and try to genocide includes ALL whites, including women and even faggots.

I'm not using class in the economic sense, just in the ordinary sense - items of a particular type or description.