Log in

View Full Version : Neocon David Horowitz Labels Ron Paul and His Supporters Vicious Anti-Semites


Alexander M.
February 20th, 2011, 12:10 PM
http://theintelhub.com/2011/02/18/neocon-david-horowitz-labels-ron-paul-and-his-supporters-vicious-anti-semites/

Tbow002
February 20th, 2011, 12:30 PM
Lots of great comments. People ar fed up with jews and israel. Just as they wore out their welcome in Germany and Europe in General with the same shit 80 years ago. We have come full circle and they have not learned a damn thing.

Steve B
February 20th, 2011, 12:35 PM
Lots of great comments. People ar fed up with jews and israel. Just as they wore out their welcome in Germany and Europe in General with the same shit 80 years ago. We have come full circle and they have not learned a damn thing.

"i seem to recall a jewish marxist from berkeley with the same name beginning his public career pimping for the black panthers in oakland. but i’m just a crazed paul supporter so what the hell could i possibly know about anything?"

zoomcopter
February 20th, 2011, 01:23 PM
"i seem to recall a jewish marxist from berkeley with the same name beginning his public career pimping for the black panthers in oakland. but i’m just a crazed paul supporter so what the hell could i possibly know about anything?"

Good that the Paul suppoters are connecting the dots........:)

zoomcopter
February 20th, 2011, 01:25 PM
http://theintelhub.com/2011/02/18/neocon-david-horowitz-labels-ron-paul-and-his-supporters-vicious-anti-semites/

Ron Paul must be doing something right to warrant this kind of Jewsih attack :)

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 05:33 PM
"i seem to recall a jewish marxist from berkeley with the same name beginning his public career pimping for the black panthers in oakland. but i’m just a crazed paul supporter so what the hell could i possibly know about anything?"

Sedition and open resistance was many a Jew's calling card before their disgusting flipflop to neoconservatism under Mr. Hollywood Reagan. Underneath the phony costumes, still the same Jew liars agitators and haters, intent on their duty to nation- wrecking.

Rick Ronsavelle
February 20th, 2011, 06:12 PM
Craig Cobb says:
February 20, 2011 at 3:35 pm

A PhD in a hard science acquaintance was describing the particulars of impalements, the physiological exactedness etc, Apparently, the steel rod must enter the anus and have a welded cross piece to support the buttocks, yet still allow the honoree to stand. Of course, the vertical must miss the lungs and heart, navigating itself instead through the muscles of the back. The elevated in society can thus yet rule “ever” along the public roadsides for 48 to 72 hours on average, perhaps more, in some cases, with kind relay helpers offering water and tasty puddings. This fellow is desperately anxious to become in charge of national impalements. He assures me there are thousands of educated like him. I think we can emergency retool our rebar factories overnight. Every third world country like us has at least a rebar factory.

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 06:21 PM
"i seem to recall a jewish marxist from berkeley with the same name beginning his public career pimping for the black panthers in oakland. but i’m just a crazed paul supporter so what the hell could i possibly know about anything?"

The same ones - only worse, as they push for endless wars to benefit Israel.

Today they're using Islamic mercenaries to break up Russia.
The ACPC is dominated by Jews; they run Chechen websites, give them government grants and lobby for them in western governments.

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 06:30 PM
Every White American citizen should be be scared of this Hebrew -occupied government.

What would George Washington and all the founding forefathers think of us now?

Would they consider America under the influence of treasonous acts enacted on the USA population?

They are not going to pop out of their graves to save us.

The USA today feels like a state of Satan.

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 06:53 PM
Regarding Paul's Congressional amendment for turning off the billion dollar spigot to the Jew freeloaders in Israel, he may well be writing his own ticket.
It's a one-way trip.

Thad Charles
February 20th, 2011, 10:04 PM
"i seem to recall a jewish marxist from berkeley with the same name beginning his public career pimping for the black panthers in oakland. but i’m just a crazed paul supporter so what the hell could i possibly know about anything?"
What people don't realize is Horowitz STILL IS a Marxist. Neoconservatism is the bastard son of Trotskyism. They're all Marxists.

Hudson
February 20th, 2011, 10:40 PM
Neoconservatism is the bastard son of Trotskyism.

It is painfully obvious you have no idea what Trotskyism is if you think Fascist Republicans are in any way pushing Trotsky's ideals.

Thad Charles
February 20th, 2011, 10:46 PM
It is painfully obvious you have no idea what Trotskyism is if you think Fascist Republicans pushing Trotsky's ideals.
Uhh well...in a nutshell:
It's also worth noting that the neoconservative preoccupation with exporting social democracy abroad through war and mercantilism reflects the original split between Trotsky and Stalin. Trotsky argued that there could not be "socialism in one country" but rather that the revolution had to be truly international. And so the neoconservatives push for "human rights" and social democratic governments to be imposed on Serbia, for example, by force of arms.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/dmccarthy/dmccarthy23.html

It's no secret.

Hudson
February 20th, 2011, 11:02 PM
Uhh well...in a nutshell:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/dmccarthy/dmccarthy23.html

It's no secret.

My god what a absolutely retarded political theory from the Lew Rockwell site.

Marx opposed bourgeois social-democracy, I'm thinking if Trotsky thought himself an Orthodox Marxist, then he would too.

Myself, I see Stalin as a fascist, and I would say the majority of political professors/scientists consider Stalin to have been a Fascist. "Socialism in one country" that is obviously Nationalism, or National Socialism...I mean, duh. Certainly the working class did not rule when Stalin was in power.

Trotskyism is the theory of Marxism as advocated by Leon Trotsky. Trotsky considered himself an orthodox Marxist. His politics differed sharply from those of Stalinism, which he argued was a break with proletarian internationalism, and in his belief in what he argued was a more authentic dictatorship of the proletariat based on working-class self-emancipation and mass democracy, rather than the unaccountable bureaucracy he saw as having develop under Stalin.

Trotsky's Fourth International was established in France in 1938 when Trotskyists argued that the Comintern or Third International had become irretrievably "lost to Stalinism" and thus incapable of leading the international working class to political power.

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 11:18 PM
It is painfully obvious you have no idea what Trotskyism is if you think Fascist Republicans are in any way pushing Trotsky's ideals.

Irv Kristol is a bastard son of "Trotskyism".
But , like Saul on the road to Damascus, he 'saw the light' and converted.
Uh, yeah, sure. You bet.

Hudson
February 20th, 2011, 11:21 PM
I mean, if Irving Kristol once called himself a Trotskyite, obviously he meant it in a tounge-in-cheek manner, as in he was a political heretic, like Trotsky was a heretic to Stalin.

The conservetard writing for the Lew Rockwell site interpreted and extrapolated Kristol's flippant term in the most literal and nonsensical way.

littlefieldjohn
February 20th, 2011, 11:29 PM
I mean, if Irving Kristol once called himself a Trotskyite, obviously he meant it in a tounge-in-cheek manner, as in he was a political heretic, like Trotsky was a heretic to Stalin.



Nice try, but wrong. He was a serious follower and an extremely vocal supporter of Trotsky, as were many Jews , BEFORE the falling-out with their Uncle Joe.
BTW , it's 'tongue', Noah Webster.

Hudson
February 20th, 2011, 11:42 PM
Nice try, but wrong. He was a serious follower of Trotsky's, as were many Jews , BEFORE the falling-out with their Uncle Joe.
BTW , it's 'tongue', Noah Webster.

Oh give me a break, he was a middle-class jewish boy from brooklyn. He was never no diehard communist.

He claimed to have been a former communist after he was an established conservative. It was a nice hook to get working class people to become pro-business conservatives, with lines like "I was a liberal mugged by reality",

Show me some of his pro-communist writings from his communist days, there ain't none and there never was.

Kristol has always been pro-bourgeoisie, with a pro-zionist take on conservativism, I can only imagine if he hung around communists in his youth, it was because he fraternized with eastern european fellow jewish people from the soviet union, not because he found their ideology appealing first and foremost.

Mike Parker
February 22nd, 2011, 07:02 AM
Kristol has always been pro-bourgeoisie, with a pro-zionist take on conservativism, I can only imagine if he hung around communists in his youth, it was because he fraternized with eastern european fellow jewish people from the soviet union, not because he found their ideology appealing first and foremost.

They were probably second generation immigrants at city college in NY. The student cafeteria was divided into tables based on ideology: there were Stalinists, Trotskyites and at least one other (Bakuninites?). That shows the difference between humans and kikes. For us, college was a place to get drunk, get laid and get a job. Jews go to college to foment world revolution.

As for "bourgeoisie," Jones explains that the jews of the old left had assumed they could radically critique capitalism and Western Civ, all the while maintaining their own cozy jewish family lives. When the new left came along preaching free love, drugs, etc., that's part of what precipitated the break for neoconservatism.

littlefieldjohn
February 22nd, 2011, 05:04 PM
Bernanke's about ready to send one of his war capos, like "Fat Sol" Edelstein to Congressman Paul to explain the 'facts of life" to him.

Hudson, you're entitled to your "opinions", the only problem I can see with them is that they stink (kinda like Irv did).
One of many Jews who helped stab us in the back during the Vietnam era before becoming a chicken hawk for Israeli wars:
Joshua Muravchik

currently a trustee at 'Freedom House' wow, geez, no kiddin (get a job, kike).
Chairman of the Young People's Socialist League, a youth group associated with the Socialist Party of America until 1973 (how about that; just about when 'Nam ended) Also the date of the Yom Kippur War, in which Israel was getting their backside handed to it by the Arabs until, of course, we bailed them and pissed off the Arabs. Bingo! - welcome to the world of OPEC . lmao That near-miss surely entered into the reasoning for the Jew's costume change.

John Liberty
February 23rd, 2011, 02:03 PM
Originally Posted by Thad Charles
Neoconservatism is the bastard son of Trotskyism.

I thought this was general knowledge already? Heeb Democrats defected to the Republican party to start the Neocon movement.

The lesson, according to Boot, is to maintain a very large military even after a major conflict ends and to view the current defense budget – which is approaching nearly half of what the entire world spends on military costs – as “a bargain considering the historic consequences of letting our guard down.” And Boot is not just some obscure neocon hawk. He is Gen. David Petraeus’s BFF. In one recently publicized e-mail exchange between them, they discussed how the general could back away from his congressional testimony which mildly criticized Israel............"benevolent world hegemony," the fatuous phrase in which William Kristol and Robert Kagan summed up the goal of a neocon post-cold war foreign policy, has a positively Soviet ring to it. The idea that the U.S. government must "export democracy" at gunpoint all around the world is a frankly revolutionary program, http://www.libertariantoday.com/2010/08/different-means-same-trotskyist-ends.html


The homo Raimundo has penned many articles on the connection also,

Max Boot starts out his essay on "What the Heck is a 'Neocon?'" – which should have been titled "Who, Me?" – ...........

........."benevolent world hegemony," the fatuous phrase in which William Kristol and Robert Kagan summed up the goal of a neocon post-cold war foreign policy, has a positively Soviet ring to it. The idea that the U.S. government must "export democracy" at gunpoint all around the world is a frankly revolutionary program, profoundly alien to the American conservative ethos that considers hubris a sin and distrusts power in the hands of imperfect men. The idea of democratism in one country – that constitutional republicanism can thrive only in the West, because of cultural and historical factors – is anathema to these militant internationalists. The neoconservative anomaly is that they have succeeded in redefining "conservatism" as Trotskyism turned inside out.http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j010303.html

The esoteric elitist Strauss, the Leninist elitist Trotsky, Schwartz and his mock-operatic "Third and a Half International" re-fighting the inter-Commie faction wars of the 1930s with a gaggle of ex-Stalinists – this is the official "conservative" movement of today! No wonder Commissar Frum and his fellow neocons felt compelled to attack us antiwar, limited government types as "unpatriotic conservatives," going so far as to declare that they "turn their backs" on us. They turned their backs on authentic conservatism some time ago. http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j061303.html

Alexander M.
February 23rd, 2011, 05:58 PM
YouTube - Ron Paul Exposes Israeli Agent Nancy Pelosi

Thad Charles
February 23rd, 2011, 10:06 PM
I thought this was general knowledge already? Heeb Democrats defected to the Republican party to start the Neocon movement.
Absolutely. I mean I hope it is. I just merely pointed out that Horowitz still is, in effect, a Marxist. Along with the rest of the neoconservatives, and this of course includes 99% of today's Republican Party. But people in general are quite ignorant of this fact and we need to trump up this fact to attack them. They're not our friends anymore than the Democrats are and I know a lot of White Nationalists, especially of the Stormdrain variety, don't like that inconvenient truth. Attack them by calling them Marxists which is 100% true.

Hudson
February 23rd, 2011, 10:50 PM
Neocons are not Trotskyites, you fucking retards. What is this Stormdrain?

(Insert facepalm image here)

Try reading what Trotsky believed and what the Pro-Zionist Globalist Republicans believe.

littlefieldjohn
February 23rd, 2011, 10:59 PM
Absolutely. I mean I hope it is. I just merely pointed out that Horowitz still is, in effect, a Marxist. Along with the rest of the neoconservatives, and this of course includes 99% of today's Republican Party. But people in general are quite ignorant of this fact and we need to trump up this fact to attack them. They're not our friends anymore than the Democrats are and I know a lot of White Nationalists, especially of the Stormdrain variety, don't like that inconvenient truth. Attack them by calling them Marxists which is 100% true.

Kikes have infiltrated conservatism in much the same way Jew Communism once infiltrated liberalism.

America First
February 23rd, 2011, 11:02 PM
Neo-Con's One part un-read traitorous fools, and one part willful knowing misleading enemy aliens.


I.E. from Dec. 7, 1941 and through April, 2003 with alot b.s. since and they have fully supported erasing the Bill Of Rights and Airport Peek-a-boo.

Hudson
February 23rd, 2011, 11:05 PM
Kikes have infiltrated conservatism in much the same way Jew Communism once infiltrated liberalism.


That doesn't make any sense. The "conservatism" of which you speak was a movement founded by Barry Goldwater, a Jew who ran for President 2 decades before Reagan used Goldwater's platform to win.

Bret Masterson
February 24th, 2011, 08:42 AM
I like Ron Paul, he isn't perfect, but way better than any of the other choices; he's a baby step in the right direction. The problem I see for him is the baggege of the Republican party itself, which he would carry with him into the White House. I see Ron Paul as isolated in his own party. There aren't a lot of high profile career-establishment Libertarians in either party. I see his cabinet filled with neoCons and establishment bloodsuckers working against him. Hopefully I'm wrong.

The Republican party needs to die. The Democratic party needs to die. The entire money system needs to be thrown out, and with it the political system that is sustained and empowered by it. A well-entrenched and corrupt system will not be voted away. It will not fall on its sword honerably, and apologize for its sins. It needs to be surgically removed. Any success for either party will be marginal at best, any perception of that hypothetical success only validates something unnatural and disgusting. We should make Egypt blush for such modesty at what comes next in America.

SmokyMtn
February 24th, 2011, 09:12 AM
Sedition and open resistance was many a Jew's calling card before their disgusting flipflop to neoconservatism under Mr. Hollywood Reagan. Underneath the phony costumes, still the same Jew liars agitators and haters, intent on their duty to nation- wrecking.

I recall my highschool graduation get together back in 1984, where my father's uncle, at the time an influential Republican, told me that the Republican party sold out America.

At least my family, a few elected officials among them, did the honorable thing in the early 1980s, by leaving the Republican party.

Now, thirty years later, there has yet to be a viable third party. For the last seven years, I have been in agreement with both Dr. William Pierce and Ben Klassen, that what America needs, is not another political party, but instead a new White man's religion, a new world view, not a patchwork of proposals that a political party would bring.

Still waiting for the rest of you to catch up with that idea.

littlefieldjohn
February 24th, 2011, 09:41 AM
I recall my highschool graduation get together back in 1984, where my father's uncle, at the time an influential Republican, told me that the Republican party sold out America.

At least my family, a few elected officials among them, did the honorable thing in the early 1980s, by leaving the Republican party.

Now, thirty years later, there has yet to be a viable third party. For the last seven years, I have been in agreement with both Dr. William Pierce and Ben Klassen, that what America needs, is not another political party, but instead a new White man's religion, a new world view, not a patchwork of proposals that a political party would bring.

Still waiting for the rest of you to catch up with that idea.

Perhaps a suggestion needs to be advanced that the Jew be disallowed in his host nation's national political arena .

Hudson
February 24th, 2011, 12:43 PM
Perhaps a suggestion needs to be advanced that the Jew be disallowed in his host nation's national political arena .


So we can be economically sodomized by rich pure white people instead?

littlefieldjohn
February 24th, 2011, 01:10 PM
So we can be economically sodomized by rich pure white people instead?

You are either out of touch or completely ignorant; perhaps both.

Hudson
February 24th, 2011, 01:23 PM
You are either out of touch or completely ignorant; perhaps both.


Translation: I can't defend my point, so I'll resort to calling you names.

You fail.

Armstrong
February 24th, 2011, 02:02 PM
Neocons are not Trotskyites, you fucking retards. What is this Stormdrain?

(Insert facepalm image here)

Try reading what Trotsky believed and what the Pro-Zionist Globalist Republicans believe.


Nice try Mr. Neo Con Butt Cover Man. But not true....

http://www.google.com/search?q=Neo+Con+trotskiite+communism&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Hudson
February 24th, 2011, 03:05 PM
Nice try Mr. Neo Con Butt Cover Man. But not true....

http://www.google.com/search?q=Neo+Con+trotskiite+communism&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a


I'm sorry, but urbandictionary, davidduke.com, and thedailypaul are not refrences to be sited for whether or not Neoconnery is related to Trotsky.

Massive fail.

Armstrong
February 24th, 2011, 03:57 PM
I'm sorry, but urbandictionary, davidduke.com, and thedailypaul are not refrences to be sited for whether or not Neoconnery is related to Trotsky.

Massive fail.

There's a lot more in that search than those sites, Mr. Hasbara....Plus, communism whether Marxist or Trotskyite, is an analog of Talmudic Journalism. It's all high kikery.

Try the Foreign Affairs (http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/51220/john-b-judis/trotskyism-to-anachronism-the-neoconservative-revolution) article for the Neo Con linkage to Trotskite Communism. They're Neo Cons blowing their own horns.

America First
February 24th, 2011, 04:12 PM
http://www.richardearley.org/

Neo Con's/Enemy Aliens do not want to nor do they like to ever debate men like Richard Earley.


Neo Con's and Patritards can only plant their b.s. in those of the majority of Un-read yapper's who have read a few articles, or read Tom Clancy etc.

Make no mistake about it, real NKVD's/Trolls do read hear and have constantly posted over the years.

My only complaint was that in past years the most prolific SOB's were not deleted. IMO those multi thousand troll posters of the past ONLY caused Working White Men to exit VNNF.
YouTube - Huey Long on the $700 Billion Wall Street Bailout
Bottom there is there was no gain from allowing the trolls spam and not that much learned from them IMO.

America First
February 24th, 2011, 11:18 PM
Since this is Feb. let US not forget, but remember our so called Victory. So that as we look around you can see it with your own eyes. It's not a victory for sure, but defeat IMO.

The slaughter of WW1, WW 2 was one of the pillar's for own Genocide/defeat of our Nation, by reducing our men !

WW 1, WW 2, Korea, and Viet Nam, did remove too many good gene's for ever from our people, just as the tragedy of April, 12, 1861.

Every one of these war's were against our interest, and only insured this day coming IMO.

With out WW 2, and Korea, there would never have been open borders IMO.

YouTube - Iwo Jima: 36 Days of Hell part 5

Mike Parker
February 25th, 2011, 08:42 AM
UNDERSTANDING JEWISH INFLUENCE III: NEOCONSERVATISM AS A JEWISH MOVEMENT

KEVIN MACDONALD

http://www.toqonline.com/archives/v4n2/TOQv4n2MacDonald.pdf