xpn_Dr38lDk

hwdYRrWAB9E

Israel’s apologists and the Martin Luther King Jr. hoax

http://electronicintifada.net/content/israels-apologists-and-martin-luther-king-jr-hoax/4955

Farrakhan is the only black leader in recent memory not in the pocket of the Jews. MLK had Jewish handlers, speech writers, financiers. This is not remotely surprising.

It may be hard for you bottom-feeding scum to comprehend, but Martin Luther King was a visionary and a fine human being. Of course he supported Israel!

YouTube - ‪Why Gold & Silver? FULL MOVIE - Mike Maloney Tells All‬‏

http://www.trumanlibrary.org/oralhist/wright.htm


You Mad bastards from the Heart Of Darkness, are not the light of anything, but suffering for the entire Western World.

Shameless self decieving monsters.

http://www.newnation.org/NNN-wichita.html

Few working class Whites can live in peace away from Congoids today, as our children for 70 years have suffered needless warring because of your connivance.


www.ussliberty.org

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/germanyandengland/1.shtml


Dec. 7, 1941 has lead US to this day of insecurity.


Open borders, but you gangsters have Whites grouped at our airports.

Your tribe's talk radio shows incite hate and lie's for more War.

Say howdy to Big Al, when you meet him.

http://www.newnation.tv/forums/showthread.php?p=431796#post431796

Utah 1974 was loaded with Extremely Naive Whites, but....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hi-Fi_Murders



Why Neocons Love Martin Luther King?
Submitted by roho on May 16, 2011 - 17:29 Neo-Con Watch Civil Rights Communism Foreign Intervention MLK
"Now why would a Neoconservative War Booster like Cal Thomas pay such homage to a leftist icon like MLK?"

http://lsrebellion.blogspot.com/2008/04/why-neocons-love-mlk.html

Hat Tip to "Old Rebel". 2008.

http://originaldissent.com/node/1598

Friday, April 4, 2008
Why Neocons love MLK

Now why would a Neoconservative war booster like Cal Thomas pay such homage to a leftist icon like Martin Luther King? Here he is, on this anniversary of King's assassination:


Much has been written and spoken of that horrible day 40 years ago. Much more will be written and spoken in decades to come. King is as much a part of American history as is Abraham Lincoln. Why do evil men so often take from us those who seek to do good? ...

King sent out more than a ripple of hope, he sent out a flood. Without him there might not have been a civil rights movement, at least not one as effective in breaking the chains of injustice. That's a legacy that should make all Americans proud. That's why King deserves more than a national holiday. In what he said about race and brotherhood, he deserves to be followed.

The oh-so-politically-correct Charlotte Observer chimes in harmoniously with this hymn to King in the same op-ed section -- and notice the little hint it drops as to what it is about MLK that both liberals and Neocons like:


Four decades later, some observers still lament that. They also lament that since Dr. King's death the quest for civil rights and equal justice remains unfulfilled and in many ways stalled. A new report from the Institute for Policy Studies shows wide disparities in health, education and income of whites, with whites much better off than blacks, Latinos and Native Americans. The per capita income of blacks is 57 cents for every dollar whites make, just three cents more than it was 40 years ago.

That quote tells us why liberals revere King's legacy. They're the first to scream that it's "racist" to guard our border with Mexico. But now that we've imported all these poor people here, suddenly, it's our obligation to do something about all that poverty. And that means more social programs, more bureaucracy, more taxes to pay for them -- all the things liberal social engineers love.

But the same editorial also tells us what makes Neocons want to jump on the MLK bandwagon:


No voice is speaking out against such failings with the power that Martin Luther King's brought in 1968. That's shameful. It's also detrimental to the continued prosperity of this country. Dr. King said it best: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."

This justifies intervention everywhere, whether at home or abroad. If you’ve ever wondered why the media, government, and the education system hype the King myth, it's about the projection of US power. King’s renovated persona and myth (since his actual character isn't quite as admirable) are the key to perpetuating and spreading the power of the DC ruling elite domestically and internationally. King now personifies the Civil Rights revolution that DC launched in the late 1950’s and early 60’s to counter what was then DC’s greatest rival on the world stage, the Soviet Union.

Like its old rival, the Soviet Union, the US projects itself as a “proposition nation” uniquely committed to equality, human rights, and diversity. The Soviets had likewise asserted that their forces represented the triumph of the Enlightenment virtues of liberation and equality.

Khrushchev launched a campaign to bring communism to the African nations emerging out of the 19th century’s colonial empires, hoping to utilize resentment against the West to set up client states throughout the continent.

Interestingly, the more immediate result of Khrushchev’s focus on communist revolution in the former colonies in Africa was felt in the US. The Eisenhower, Kennedy, and Johnson administrations, despite the private prejudices of many top leaders, committed the US to a Civil Rights agenda at home to diminish the appeal of “African Socialism” at home and abroad. When President Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock to enforce integration, he was elbowing the Soviets aside with the US brand of universalism and equality. The US eventually turned its commitment to civil Rights into a sweeping domestic policy of coerced equality that enabled the Federal government to expand its power into all facets of private life, not too different from the Soviet example. It was at the same time that DC radically altered its immigration policy with the 1965 Immigration Act which, despite assurances it would not change America’s ethnic makeup, was obviously designed to do just that. This was done to make the US appear to be even more of a “universal” nation than its Soviet rival.

So not only has DC’s crusade for equality paid off with more power at home—the dream of every ruling class—but it has also provided the perfect cover for an aggressive foreign policy that keeps the military-industrial complex funded. In Iraq, as we’ve been lectured repeatedly, US military forces are there to spread democracy.

As King said, "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." And the Neocons' Trotskyite roots assume their universalist revolution must expand or die.

Ronald Reagan, who signed the legislation making MLK day a national holiday, knew what he was doing. It was Reagan who pulled America's military to its feet after the debacle of Vietnam and got it fighting and winning again with play wars in Panama and Grenada to boost its confidence. By adopting King's legacy as official US policy, Reagan legitimized and sanitized the projection of American power.

Bush's Secretary of State even made this explicit:


Condoleezza Rice, the most senior black woman in the Bush administration, has levelled a charge of racism against critics of the US drive to bring Western freedoms to the Middle East.

In an unusually personal speech, Miss Rice, the national security adviser to President George W Bush, said the push to bring democracy and free markets to the Middle East was "the moral mission of our time", to be compared with the civil rights movement that ended racial segregation in America. ...

Black Americans should stand by others seeking freedom today, she went on, and shun the "condescending" argument that some races or nations were not interested in or ready for Western freedoms.

"We've heard that argument before. And we, more than any, as a people, should be ready to reject it," she said. "That view was wrong in 1963 in Birmingham and it is wrong in 2003 in Baghdad and in the rest of the Middle East."

You don't support the war? You don't want the Federal government to have even more power to do good? Then you've failed to follow the example of Dr. King. Shame.

posted by Old Rebel @ Friday, April 04, 2008


10 Comments Links to this post

10 Comments:
At April 4, 2008 1:58 PM , Michael Hill said...
Great Article, Mike. By the way, the Institute for Policy Studies is more left-wing than is the SPLC (if that is possible). Keep up the good work. All these icons (MLK, Lincoln)of the Establishment must be discredited.


At April 4, 2008 3:10 PM , Michael Tuggle said...
michael hill,

Well, thanks. I'll get an occasional email asking why I question MLK's legacy, and you've phrased it perfectly: because he's an icon of the Establishment.


At April 4, 2008 4:12 PM , Anonymous said...
Mike

MLK not only was and is an icon of the DC empire, he was the consumate plagiarist borrowing and stealing his speech material along the way!

Pawmetto
PS I do not know how to use my blogger name or "handle". It rejects each time I type in Pawmetto.Have to use anonymous until I figure it out!


At April 4, 2008 5:19 PM , Pinky said...
Under the bold type heading of:
Choose an identity
Make sure you have Google/Blogger chosen. That should show your identity as Pawmetto.
.
Regarding the article and MLK, I think we have to consider that there was a movement involved that was far greater than any single person.
.
So, I agree with you about how MLK's "legacy" is used by the current political establishment.
.
The man said he had been to the mountain and seen the other side.
.
That remains for you and I to do the same thing without the benefit of the establishment which is from hell, if you ask me.
.
Something very sinister took place in those troubled days during the 1960s. My life was changed forever, I know that. Forty years later I'm only beginning to learn the meaning of it all.


At April 4, 2008 5:45 PM , Pawmetto said...
thanks pinky!


At April 4, 2008 6:11 PM , Snaggle-Tooth Jones said...
This post has been removed by the author.


At April 4, 2008 6:12 PM , Snaggle-Tooth Jones said...
This post has been removed by the author.


At April 4, 2008 6:13 PM , Snaggle-Tooth Jones said...
Well, I for one must protest all the MLK bashing that's occurred here today. I'm a banker, and were it not for the illustrious King, I'd have one less day to hunt ducks in NE Colo.


At April 4, 2008 6:53 PM , Pinky said...
.
If you see Cheney there while you're hunting...
.
Well, you can figure it out for yourself.
.
:<)


At April 9, 2008 6:42 PM , Clint said...
Check out this book's description on Amazon.com:

An Act of State: The Execution of Martin Luther King
By William F. Pepper

Supposedly a Court has found several governement agencies responsible for the assasination but the media refuses to touch it.


Post a Comment