Lars Redoubt
May 22nd, 2011, 11:52 PM
21 June 07
Hail Osred! Many thanks for your latest issue of Renewal, & your inclusion of my disillusioned critique of Jefferson. My, those “proto-Odinists” are jumping out all over. Steve of Queensland claims that “maggots” have been feeding on the reputations of “our heroes.” With a “hero” like Jefferson, White people don’t need an enemy. My rule of thumb (an Odinist expression) for any religion is to what extent does it protect Whites?
If we dump the biological fact of race, then I, in Jeffersonian fashion, would reject it. In my Jeffersonian outlook, religion must serve Man, not destroy him. Therefore, it must serve the survival of those who believe in a religion. If a leader, like Jefferson, Washington or Lincoln, does not believe in the religion of the majority of his race, & if he, like those I mentioned, connives at the enslavement of Whites & the extermination of Whites, as in America’s ‘holy’ war, as predicted to Washington by Cornwallis, I would be insane to claim him to be an “Odinist” of any degree, for my definition of Odinism says it is a White man’s religion.
Edith points out the fact that Jefferson, being a lawyer & a Freemason, knew the current meaning of words like “all men are created equal”, that is, what those words meant to Whites, but, since he planned to extinguish the White gene pool in North America from the beginning, by the creation of an Anglo-Mestizo “race,” as the Jesuits did in Latin America, we must understand that Jefferson’s meaning was quite different than his readers’ meaning. This was said by those who read & heard Ian Smith’s words, & then compared them to his deeds. As I noted: Smith promised Whites what they wanted to hear, & he gave Blacks what they wanted. The Blacks wanted Rhodesia, so Ian Smith gave it to them, under Henry Kissinger’s orders, on behalf of the Rothschild-Rockefeller interests, not White interests.
Unfortunately, I do not know whose tender ego I have offended in regard to Jefferson, but he, she, it errs when I am accused of harboring a “pre-existing dislike of Jefferson.” Quite the contrary, for I was born in the USA, am qualified to be a Son of the American Revolution, & I was ‘edjewcated’ in U.S. schools, where Washington, Jefferson & Lincoln were treated as saints, if not as ‘all-wise’ demi-gods. I did read the article written by he, she or it. The fact is that I did not address the allegations therein which the writer interpreted from Jefferson’s statements, for I consider Jefferson as a pro- or anti-White man. Since he served jew-supremacist interests via Freemasonry, I must conclude that Jefferson was anti-White. I can imagine the writer on Jefferson in Renewal to be happy if he saw a Black judge practicing Anglo-Saxon legal traditions on a White defendant who ‘denied’ the Voodoo religion. Perhaps he would be joyful to learn about the notorious mulatto ‘Odinist’ of the NW USA, who is now serving a prison term for murder, as I recall.
If we reject the biological basis of Odinism in the White Race in favor of alleged Odinist doctrine, supposedly applicable to all races & mixtures thereof, we fall into the errors of all ‘universalist’ cults, including Christinsanity.
The mysterious author of the Jefferson article asks me, a Thomson, whether I’d prefer to live in Bush’s Jew Yawk Shitty (as many pronounce it) or Jefferson’s Virginia. That is easy for me to answer: The Thomsons were brought to America in chains, as White slaves, according to an Internet website on genealogy. I’d rather take my chances in Jew Yawk of today than sing songs of homage to slave-owner Jefferson, accompanied by my fellow (Black) slaves, who were more expensive than Whites, & therefore received better treatment from Massuh Thom & his fellow slave-owners, including George Washington.
I was edjewcated to believe that Jefferson’s deism was in accord with Freemasonry’s mechanistic Cosmic Clock-Winder or Great Architect of the Universe: Deus ex Machina. The writer (s) in Renewal seem to long for the inclusion of noted historical figures as “one of us” & “proto-Odinists.” If we ignore race in favor of religion, we may interpret a “proto-Odinist” to be one who gets non-Odinists killed in large numbers, especially Moslems & Christians. By this standard, Genghis Khan, “Trotsky”, “Stalin,” Ben Gurion et al. would make fine “proto-Odinists.” In fairness, we should include Chaka Zulu in this list.
Such wishful-thinkers, to euphemise a more appropriate term, would be able to call Jefferson’s corn-whisky “proto-mead,” if they wished, just as the moon is “proto-green cheese.” My H.B.N.S. Award goes to the author of your Jefferson article, for it is indeed Hopeless But Not Serious.
All the best. ORION!
Eric
P.S.: Can ‘Odinists’ serve bankster interests? Jefferson did.
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.
Hail Osred! Many thanks for your latest issue of Renewal, & your inclusion of my disillusioned critique of Jefferson. My, those “proto-Odinists” are jumping out all over. Steve of Queensland claims that “maggots” have been feeding on the reputations of “our heroes.” With a “hero” like Jefferson, White people don’t need an enemy. My rule of thumb (an Odinist expression) for any religion is to what extent does it protect Whites?
If we dump the biological fact of race, then I, in Jeffersonian fashion, would reject it. In my Jeffersonian outlook, religion must serve Man, not destroy him. Therefore, it must serve the survival of those who believe in a religion. If a leader, like Jefferson, Washington or Lincoln, does not believe in the religion of the majority of his race, & if he, like those I mentioned, connives at the enslavement of Whites & the extermination of Whites, as in America’s ‘holy’ war, as predicted to Washington by Cornwallis, I would be insane to claim him to be an “Odinist” of any degree, for my definition of Odinism says it is a White man’s religion.
Edith points out the fact that Jefferson, being a lawyer & a Freemason, knew the current meaning of words like “all men are created equal”, that is, what those words meant to Whites, but, since he planned to extinguish the White gene pool in North America from the beginning, by the creation of an Anglo-Mestizo “race,” as the Jesuits did in Latin America, we must understand that Jefferson’s meaning was quite different than his readers’ meaning. This was said by those who read & heard Ian Smith’s words, & then compared them to his deeds. As I noted: Smith promised Whites what they wanted to hear, & he gave Blacks what they wanted. The Blacks wanted Rhodesia, so Ian Smith gave it to them, under Henry Kissinger’s orders, on behalf of the Rothschild-Rockefeller interests, not White interests.
Unfortunately, I do not know whose tender ego I have offended in regard to Jefferson, but he, she, it errs when I am accused of harboring a “pre-existing dislike of Jefferson.” Quite the contrary, for I was born in the USA, am qualified to be a Son of the American Revolution, & I was ‘edjewcated’ in U.S. schools, where Washington, Jefferson & Lincoln were treated as saints, if not as ‘all-wise’ demi-gods. I did read the article written by he, she or it. The fact is that I did not address the allegations therein which the writer interpreted from Jefferson’s statements, for I consider Jefferson as a pro- or anti-White man. Since he served jew-supremacist interests via Freemasonry, I must conclude that Jefferson was anti-White. I can imagine the writer on Jefferson in Renewal to be happy if he saw a Black judge practicing Anglo-Saxon legal traditions on a White defendant who ‘denied’ the Voodoo religion. Perhaps he would be joyful to learn about the notorious mulatto ‘Odinist’ of the NW USA, who is now serving a prison term for murder, as I recall.
If we reject the biological basis of Odinism in the White Race in favor of alleged Odinist doctrine, supposedly applicable to all races & mixtures thereof, we fall into the errors of all ‘universalist’ cults, including Christinsanity.
The mysterious author of the Jefferson article asks me, a Thomson, whether I’d prefer to live in Bush’s Jew Yawk Shitty (as many pronounce it) or Jefferson’s Virginia. That is easy for me to answer: The Thomsons were brought to America in chains, as White slaves, according to an Internet website on genealogy. I’d rather take my chances in Jew Yawk of today than sing songs of homage to slave-owner Jefferson, accompanied by my fellow (Black) slaves, who were more expensive than Whites, & therefore received better treatment from Massuh Thom & his fellow slave-owners, including George Washington.
I was edjewcated to believe that Jefferson’s deism was in accord with Freemasonry’s mechanistic Cosmic Clock-Winder or Great Architect of the Universe: Deus ex Machina. The writer (s) in Renewal seem to long for the inclusion of noted historical figures as “one of us” & “proto-Odinists.” If we ignore race in favor of religion, we may interpret a “proto-Odinist” to be one who gets non-Odinists killed in large numbers, especially Moslems & Christians. By this standard, Genghis Khan, “Trotsky”, “Stalin,” Ben Gurion et al. would make fine “proto-Odinists.” In fairness, we should include Chaka Zulu in this list.
Such wishful-thinkers, to euphemise a more appropriate term, would be able to call Jefferson’s corn-whisky “proto-mead,” if they wished, just as the moon is “proto-green cheese.” My H.B.N.S. Award goes to the author of your Jefferson article, for it is indeed Hopeless But Not Serious.
All the best. ORION!
Eric
P.S.: Can ‘Odinists’ serve bankster interests? Jefferson did.
--------------------
Write to:
Mr. Eric Thomson
P.O. Box 896
Yakima, Washington 98907-0896
U.S.A.