I recently made a post about the attack on the WTC buildings, and got this by way of response from "Mark 3 22":

CGI? Really!? So are all those hundreds of people that said they saw a plane hit, are they the super secret A.I. Robots that I've been hearing about?

Gee, that's not what I remember. If you're talking about the same thing I remember, there was a guy talking about the Pentagon saying, Considering most people like you take a three word quote completely out of context to justify this absolute theory of deception, who's really the one deceiving here?

I couldn't help but notice many of the tools of deception being used: ridicule, avoiding the facts, trying to direct the attention somewhere else (to the Pentagon instead of the WTC which is all my post was about), and of course the pot calling the kettle black. Along with that childish grade school mentality that comes with those who never grew much throughout their life, which to me indicates that they never really were interested in finding out the Truth about anything.

So I thought I would look into what Bible passage he uses for a screen name. I mean, it makes him sound like a Christian, right? Some kind of holy roller who is really into his Bible studies.

So what does "Mark 3 22" refer to?


Mark 3 22: "And the scribes which came down from Jerusalem said, He hath Beelzebub, and by the prince of the devils casteth he out devils."

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+3%3A22&version=KJV


Wiki has this to say about the passage:

In Mark 3:22, the Pharisees accuse Jesus of driving out demons by the power of Beelzeboul, prince of demons, the name also appearing in the expanded version in Matthew 12:24,27 and Luke 11:15,18-19. The name also occurs in Matthew 10:25.

Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand. If Satan drives out Satan, he is divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand? And if I drive out demons by Beelzebul, by whom do your people drive them out? So then, they will be your judges. But if I drive out demons by the Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.─Matthew 12:25-28

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beelzebub

Yes, the Pharisees, the very ones who went on to write the Talmud that forms the spiritual basis for today's "Orthodox Jews", in Mark 3 22 these terminal liars smear Jesus by calling him a master of demons, a sorcerer. It's a claim which they continue to repeat in the Talmud and in Orthodox Judaism lessons to this day.

So the screen name "Mark 3 22" refers to the passage where the Pharisses bore false witness against Jesus! It is a passage that refers to the use of deception to smear honest men. And the related passage in Matthew talks about how a divided house cannot stand.

So that’s the meaning of the screen name of "Mark 3 22". Interesting choice, is it not?

pk

I recently made a post about the attack on the WTC buildings, and got this by way of response from "Mark 3 22":



I couldn't help but notice many of the tools of deception being used: ridicule, avoiding the facts, trying to direct the attention somewhere else (to the Pentagon instead of the WTC which is all my post was about), and of course the pot calling the kettle black. Along with that childish grade school mentality that comes with those who never grew much throughout their life, which to me indicates that they never really were interested in finding out the Truth about anything.

So I thought I would look into what Bible passage he uses for a screen name. I mean, it makes him sound like a Christian, right? Some kind of holy roller who is really into his Bible studies.

So what does "Mark 3 22" refer to?



http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+3%3A22&version=KJV


Wiki has this to say about the passage:



Yes, the Pharisees, the very ones who went on to write the Talmud that forms the spiritual basis for today's "Orthodox Jews", in Mark 3 22 these terminal liars smear Jesus by calling him a master of demons, a sorcerer. It's a claim which they continue to repeat in the Talmud and in Orthodox Judaism lessons to this day.

So the screen name "Mark 3 22" refers to the passage where the Pharisses bore false witness against Jesus! It is a passage that refers to the use of deception to smear honest men. And the related passage in Matthew talks about how a divided house cannot stand.

So that’s the meaning of the screen name of "Mark 3 22". Interesting choice, is it not?

pk

Indeed. Thank you PK

Maybe he was born on March 22.

So exactly how do you think CGI was used on 9/11? I was able to maintain a straight face while typing that, too.

One more thing, sort of a standard question I like to ask new posters:

Do you believe the Moon landings were faked?

Donnie, I already had you on ignore. Pity I still wasted the time in reading another one of your idiotic posts.

And just to think, you could have been on the winning side. What a total loser.

Back to ignore you go, it's shadow time buddy.

Donnie, I already had you on ignore.

Then how did you read my post?

Pity I still wasted the time in reading another one of your idiotic posts.

One of the idiotic posts you read while you had me on ignore? You Christians really can perform miracles!

And just to think, you could have been on the winning side.

Any side populated by surperstitious cranks like you isn't going to win, man. That is a cold, hard fact.


What a total loser.

As in most roadhouses, opinions vary. And yours is as meaningless as the next.

Back to ignore you go, it's shadow time buddy.

I'll alert the media.

What's 'CGI'?

I puzzle more over what Jeremiah said about the scribes before the time of Christ and before Mark was written (http://bible.cc/jeremiah/8-8.htm):

“How can you say, ‘We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us’? But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.

One more thing, sort of a standard question I like to ask new posters:

Do you believe the Moon landings were faked?

Ironically, blind faith in aspects of the official narrative as a litmus test for intelligence is used equally by both the laity and the learned.

Maybe he was born on March 22.

So exactly how do you think CGI was used on 9/11? I was able to maintain a straight face while typing that, too.

One more thing, sort of a standard question I like to ask new posters:

Do you believe the Moon landings were faked?

Actually Donnie his name is indeed biblical. He stated so in a post on SF.

What's 'CGI'?

I puzzle more over what Jeremiah said about the scribes before the time of Christ and before Mark was written (http://bible.cc/jeremiah/8-8.htm):

.

CGI is "Computer Graphics Imagery"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-generated_imagery

Like when we see Harry Potter flying around on a broom.


Jer. 8:8 hm, yes Jer. 8 is an interesting read. I wish every "judeo-Christian" would read this, it really does contradict the idea that a Christian should support these israelis.

It's basically talking about God giving those who sided with Satan a chance to redeem themselves (specifically mentioning the "Kings of Judah, his princes, his priests, and the "inhabitants of Jerusalem"" no less - hello judeos are you listening???). Yet they choose not to.

To me, Jer. 8:8 points out the folly of presuming that you know more than God. The Scribes, they being basically the record keepers/bureaucrats of the "evil family" (the Pharisees, who later became the wandering Jews, who later became bolsheviks and zionists), wrote in vain. They thought they knew what they were doing, threw their lot in with the wrong crowd, and ended up with nothing.

"How do ye say, We are wise, and the Law of the Lord is with us?"

They just don't get it. They still think they are on God's side, even when challenged by God Him/Herself. Kind of ties in with John 8:45, because when they believe in lies they'll never hear the Truth. To them it will seem like a lie.

Read the earlier line, Jer. 8:5, even when given a second chance they still wouldn't turn to God, or turn to Truth! "they hold fast deceit, they refuse to return."

Then Jer 8:6 "no man repented him of his wickedness, saying What have I done?" They simply cannot see that what they are doing is wrong.

Great example Armstrong! It really is a passage that illustrates the futility of trying to reason with a Donnie or a Mark 3 22. They'll just never get it, even when confronted with God himself they'll still think they are right.

And I know that I'm dealing with one of them when they return my politeness with ridicule, answer my fact based opinions with insults, seek to confuse with diversionary tactics, and won't ever provide relevant information for my consideration. They don't deal in Truth. Rarely with facts. They are rude, mean, and bring me no joy. To me they are very easy to identify.

If someone has Truth within them they will seek it. If they have it not, maybe they just never will. It really is pretty sad, imo. I like to think that everyone does have a choice, and still can turn to Truth if they just make the decision to do so. But who really knows, Jer. 8 is basically saying they won't, ever.

I respect those who still try tho. I'm still working on my friends and family, but for a lot of these online folk I quickly run out of patience.

Ironically, blind faith in aspects of the official narrative as a litmus test for intelligence is used equally by both the laity and the learned.

Then it's good that I'm able to easily distinguish between the two, eh?

If someone truly believes in things that are demonstrably untrue (faked Moon landings, the Bible, HAARP earthquake wars, etc.) then they just don't accept reality.

Accepting reality is a big problem for many people. Huge.

CGI is "Computer Graphics Imagery"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer-generated_imagery

Like when we see Harry Potter flying around on a broom.


Jer. 8:8 hm, yes Jer. 8 is an interesting read. I wish every "judeo-Christian" would read this, it really does contradict the idea that a Christian should support these israelis.

It's basically talking about God giving those who sided with Satan a chance to redeem themselves (specifically mentioning the "Kings of Judah, his princes, his priests, and the "inhabitants of Jerusalem"" no less - hello judeos are you listening???). Yet they choose not to.

To me, Jer. 8:8 points out the folly of presuming that you know more than God. The Scribes, they being basically the record keepers/bureaucrats of the "evil family" (the Pharisees, who later became the wandering Jews, who later became bolsheviks and zionists), wrote in vain. They thought they knew what they were doing, threw their lot in with the wrong crowd, and ended up with nothing.

"How do ye say, We are wise, and the Law of the Lord is with us?"

They just don't get it. They still think they are on God's side, even when challenged by God Him/Herself. Kind of ties in with John 8:45, because when they believe in lies they'll never hear the Truth. To them it will seem like a lie.

Read the earlier line, Jer. 8:5, even when given a second chance they still wouldn't turn to God, or turn to Truth! "they hold fast deceit, they refuse to return."

Then Jer 8:6 "no man repented him of his wickedness, saying What have I done?" They simply cannot see that what they are doing is wrong.

Great example Armstrong! It really is a passage that illustrates the futility of trying to reason with a Donnie or a Mark 3 22. They'll just never get it, even when confronted with God himself they'll still think they are right.

And I know that I'm dealing with one of them when they return my politeness with ridicule, answer my fact based opinions with insults, seek to confuse with diversionary tactics, and won't ever provide relevant information for my consideration. They don't deal in Truth. Rarely with facts. They are rude, mean, and bring me no joy. To me they are very easy to identify.

If someone has Truth within them they will seek it. If they have it not, maybe they just never will. It really is pretty sad, imo. I like to think that everyone does have a choice, and still can turn to Truth if they just make the decision to do so. But who really knows, Jer. 8 is basically saying they won't, ever.

I respect those who still try tho. I'm still working on my friends and family, but for a lot of these online folk I quickly run out of patience.


The Abingdon Bible commentary says that Jeremiah was objecting to specific forgeries and alterations made in scripture by the scribes. Specifically Abingdon claims Jeremiah was objecting to changes made in the Northern Israeli written book of Deuteronomy. Specifically that Deut 7: 1-12 had been added.

It is not enough to realize the whole 'Word of God' had been forgotten about until a copy was found in the wall of a building that was being rebuilt, recopied, and then promulgated once again.

Thanks for explaining CGI images.

Don't hurt yourself thinking too hard, pk1225. You won't have enough brain cells left if you keep this up.

Actually Donnie his name is indeed biblical. He stated so in a post on SF.Well, that's a simple accusation that should have a simple basis. Would you mind showing me this post?

The only thing I've ever "admitted" was that the name is polysemous. *for you retards that get your Truth from the Bible, Polysemous is multiple, but somehow intertwined, meanings*

Considering that the biblical aspect is only one portion of the overall meaning, considering I'm not religious, considering the passage relates to blasphemy....hmmm