Is anyone interested in anonymous, free, remote shell, e-mail and web space; on an extremely secure system, running non-x86 and an atypical operating systems (so the typical exploits won't work, at all), no strings attached? Like that you can run your own web site, e-mail and so forth, anonymized, which should be excellent for pro-White and racialistic purposes. You could host your views, work and whatever else you have in mind. If you're interested, let me know.

I may eventually publicize the details on the forum, but for now I'll only help people on an per interested individual basis via PM.

Danger, Will Robinson! - YouTube

What kind of response is that? Are you interested in doing anything at all, or just to annoy and screw around? Either way, I'm only trying to address people who're active or willing to get active.

What kind of response is that? Are you interested in doing anything at all, or just to annoy and screw around? Either way, I'm only trying to address people who're active or willing to get active.

To what end?

You wrote this:

Is anyone interested in anonymous, free, remote shell, e-mail and web space; on an extremely secure system, running non-x86 and an atypical operating systems (so the typical exploits won't work, at all), no strings attached? Like that you can run your own web site, e-mail and so forth, anonymized, which should be excellent for pro-White and racialistic purposes. You could host your views, work and whatever else you have in mind. If you're interested, let me know.

I may eventually publicize the details on the forum, but for now I'll only help people on an per interested individual basis via PM.

What conceivable positive purpose could you have in offering this? Anyone who is operating legally (which is the super majority) can get along fine with Yahoo, etc. The average 'WN in the street' has -0- need for any super secret file hosting. Their anonymity protects them.

Any identifiable WN leader or pseudo-leader (who conceivably could make use of such as you offer, in spite of their legality) isn't going to touch you with a 10 foot pole.

The only marks remaining are the scared, the criminal, and the stupid, whose information you will conveniently have access to.

That leaves you as either a fool or you're up to no good.

I've been watching you. You are not a fool.

You act like a cop.

Your ideology doesn't appear heartfelt. . .more like some calculated mean of VNN conversation.

You post often, but inconsequentially.

You have an interesting, memorable username, which is incongruous with the pedestrian nature of your posts.

That username is the same as that of a Ukrainian pianist in New Jersey, Chris Christie's New Jersey, where the Feds ran a ham-fisted set-up operation for WN.

If you drop the 'Y,' you have Evgeny Morozov, a 28 year old 'Belorussian' (and probable jew) who is a hack writer for the 'Internationalist' publications like The Economist, Foreign Policy, CFR, New America, Open Society, etc. One of Evgeny's current talking points is on the use of the internet in government mass surveillance.

Alex, in common midwestern fashion, is married to his conceits, which makes him, among other things, an atrocious judge of individual character within his purview. Both your avatar and your signature appear designed to fly under his admittedly weak radar, designed to feed into his conceits. But to the casual viewer, you look like just another 'one of the guys.'

Now, all of a sudden, after two months of your seeming-but-not-being (and on May Day) you solicit for WN to reveal themselves on your super secret hosting computer.

Fuck off.

What conceivable positive purpose could you have in offering this?
If anyone wants to run a [pro-White] web site or one wants to have a secure e-mail account, all without having to officially register with some web hosting and/or domain registrar, without having to supply any information.


Anyone who is operating legally (which is the super majority) can get along fine with Yahoo, etc.
Did I suggest something 'illegal' then and you call me a cop?!


The average 'WN in the street' has -0- need for any super secret file hosting. Their anonymity protects them.
I guess you're "the average 'WN in the street'" then, eh?


Any identifiable WN leader or pseudo-leader (who conceivably could make use of such as you offer, in spite of their legality) isn't going to touch you with a 10 foot pole.
What isn't legal about it, could you tell me that? You don't even know what I have to offer, you psychic ultra-paranoiac.


The only marks remaining are the scared, the criminal, and the stupid, whose information you will conveniently have access to.
Okay, who's the cop again?! You sound an awful lot like a cop, with the typical: 'If you care for anonymity then you must be a criminal/terrorist!


That leaves you as either a fool or you're up to no good.
Either you are a sock puppet of "Mr. Bowmont", you have the same whiny way of writing and you sure come across similarly, or are you his boyfriend?


I've been watching you. You are not a fool.

You act like a cop.
Projection behaviour, much? (Say, don't cops generally 'watch' people...?) Well, it's exactly because of cowardly, whiny, dumb-shit scum like yourself that I want to offer anonymity to good pro-White people.


If you drop the 'Y,' you have Evgeny Morozov, a 28 year old 'Belorussian' (and probable jew) who is a hack writer for the 'Internationalist' publications like The Economist, Foreign Policy, CFR, New America, Open Society, etc. One of Evgeny's current talking points is on the use of the internet in government mass surveillance.
I'm not a Belarussian, you retard, in Russian the /E/ (or Ye) is usually palatalized, depending on the word accent. Also, Yevgeny is simply the equivalent of Eugene in English and Morozov is a very common familia ('surname') in Russia. 'Good attempt' though, I guess. :rolleyes:


Alex, in common midwestern fashion, is married to his conceits, which makes him, among other things, an atrocious judge of individual character within his purview. Both your avatar and your signature appear designed to fly under his admittedly weak radar, designed to feed into his conceits. But to the casual viewer, you look like just another 'one of the guys.'
Are you questioning Alex Linder's intelligence now?


Now, all of a sudden, after two months of your seeming-but-not-being (and on May Day) you solicit for WN to reveal themselves on your super secret hosting computer.
You know what I find interesting? Whenever someone wants to do something, that someone is going to get called a 'cop' and other attempts to derail (subsequent) threads/posts. It took you only a few minutes to start attacking me and the idea in this thread... and you don't even know what I'm offering. (There are a lot of psychics, besides psychos, on the internet. I've learned that much, as of late.) It's not "super secret" it's anonymous and secure! I guess you don't know what the difference is?! You sound like some panicking housewife.

Many people in this 'movement' are so insanely lazy, the whole idea of doing something offends them and gets them agitated. You're probably also part of the anti-Breivik scum crowd. I'm sure the majority of this type of worthless couch potatoes (as William Pierce aptly called them) are more offended by people like Breivik because they know and realize how little they do themselves, which shames them, more so than that they're supposedly 'disgusted' (or whatever it is) by what 'he did.'

As for you calling me a "cop": I'm hereby saying I'm not a cop. An actual undercover agent, under many Western jewrisdictions, can't operate undercover or can't no longer after he's been asked this question. So, how about you: Are you a cop?

To reiterate, you're offering a putative solution where there is no problem.

You offer no upside--only downside. Anyone availing themselves of your 'service' increases their chances of official hassle exponentially.

You call me an ultra-paranoiac, yet that's the very heart of your own appeal.

A person truly interested in security would never in a million years make the offer you have, as you have. They'd have better sense.

You peddle trust, yet you look untrustworthy.

I find it interesting you pulled a shuck 'n jive with my Evgeny Morozov observation. As all can see, that was not mentioned to claim or imply you are he, as you answered. That's unlikely in the extreme. More likely is that (if there's any connection at all) it's an attempt to be cute, which is a common m.o. of subversives, from long observation. I also find it interesting that prompted from you a protracted, deflective response, yet nary a word was uttered in answer to the other, related observation on your name.

I haven't called you a cop. I said and say you look and act like a cop (official or otherwise), because you do, as delineated. Your legal eagle 'logic' should impress no one.

I don't question Alex's intelligence. And the fact this stunt (if indeed it be) is occurring is the best evidence there is that he, for his many faults, is not on a payroll.

Otherwise, there'd be no necessity to troll.

To reiterate, you're offering a putative solution where there is no problem.
You certainly seem to have a problem with it.


You offer no upside--only downside. Anyone availing themselves of your 'service' increases their chances of official hassle exponentially.
What supposed downside do I offer?! For fuck's sake, I'm talking about free (absolutely free of charge) web hosting and an e-mail account, secured and anonymous. How many 'downsides' are there exactly compared to having your files hosted with mainstream/anti-racist/Jew-owned web-hosting businesses like "Go Daddy" and so forth?


You call me an ultra-paranoiac, yet that's the very heart of your own appeal.
Nice bit of reflecting and psychobabbling there, Freud.


A person truly interested in security would never in a million years make the offer you have, as you have. They'd have better sense.
Oh, why is that, professor psychic ultra-paranoiac?


You peddle trust, yet you look untrustworthy.
Sez the guy who said to have left the forum... Besides, do you know me? Fuck off you harassing idiot.

What have you done? You come across as being one of those weaklings who is offended by people who actually do something.


I find it interesting you pulled a shuck 'n jive with my Evgeny Morozov observation.
Interesting that I don't wish to be compared with comparisons and other psychic figments of your imagination?


I haven't called you a cop.
Why would you say that someone 'acts like a cop' if you didn't suspect, or otherwise wanted to insinuate, that someone is a cop?!


I don't question Alex's intelligence.
No, you do.

About to lose a stipend?

Sez the guy who said to have left the forum... Besides, do you know me? Fuck off you harassing idiot.

What have you done? You come across as being one of those weaklings who is offended by people who actually do something.

Guilty on one count. :)

Let's consider this a brief post-retirement appearance, like Joe DiMaggio hobbling out for an Old Timers' Game or Neil Armstrong in the condom aisle at Revco. Is it really him? My God. . .he's still got it! Not an every day player, but man. . .he's as good once as he ever was!

Congratulations! Your smarmy, danger-flashing persona was enough to rouse me from my well-deserved slumber.

Coming from someone who publicly announced he's willing to rat out people and give away inforamtion i wouldn't trust you with even a letter delivery service.

So anyone willing to trust him with your personal information and IP address? Come on, don't be afraid.

Mr. Blowmouth, you're just upset that your little, equally non-productive, anti-VNN/anti-White pussy boyfriend Thomas "Aintworthshit" de Aynesworth was banned, after he made vile disgusting sub-humanly remarks in the IRC behind Alex Linder's back: <Thomas_de_Aynesworth> Better to be a supporter of HAC
<Thomas_de_Aynesworth> Than a sycophant for a Crohn's addled, fed abetting, slum lord like Linder.

Go beat off to underage beaneresses now, you crypto-pedo hermaphrodite!


Coming from someone who publicly announced he's willing to rat out people and give away inforamtion i wouldn't trust you with even a letter delivery service.
You're a liar, that's a disgusting lie, I don't 'give away information.' But, lying comes quite naturally to you, as I've noticed. Anyway, I was expecting you in this thread. I take you two are a couple?


So anyone willing to trust him with your personal information and IP address? Come on, don't be afraid.
I don't need to know anyone's IP address, in fact, what I'm offering is anonymous for all sides. Especially if you use, say, Tor.