Alex Linder
July 27th, 2012, 09:43 AM
Alex Cockburn, RIP
I always enjoyed reading Alex Cockburn, especially when I disagreed with him, which was over the half the time. In "Beat the Devil," his column in the Nation, he unmasked the stupidity and hypocrisy of his colleagues. Whenever he fulminated against the editors, you could almost see Victor Navasky cowering under his desk.
Alex was the real thing, one of the last leftists who actually believed in something more than self-promotion or increasing the burden of taxes, regulation, and surveillance on ordinary human beings. He often went too far on too little evidence, and his thinking was often infected with the maudlin sentimentality one expects from a leftist. Sentimental or fierce, he was almost always worth reading.
His untrumpeted and unblogged death was in stark contrast with those of other celebrity journalists who have gone to their grave drawing attention to themselves. Not surprisingly, his enemies on the right and left--he inspired equal numbers of both--have been quick to insult his memory. The obituaries make interesting reading, not simply because it is amusing to see little men attack the dead, but also because they tell us what we must never never say without incurring official displeasure.
Alex is almost always condemned for anti-Semitism. It's not that he ever put forward a race-theory, much less scape-goated Jews. No, his anti-Semitism was of a subtler kind. He refused to demonize Arabs, and he criticized the government of Israel when it did what any moral person, including lots of Israels, knows to be immoral.
Another of his sins was his consistency. When the rest of the anti-war left got on the bandwagon for American imperialism, Cockburn continued to criticize American's crusades to remake the world in his image. On the other hand, he also consistently defended little people from the gigantic interests of monopoly business and monopoly government. He even opposed gun control, using the Chestertonian argument that it was simply an attempt to disarm and enslave the people. Worst of all, perhaps, in the eyes of the phony left, was the rational skepticism he applied to the religion of Global Warming.
In reading the anathemas hurled at Cockburn, you can learn what our masters don't want you even to think, much less dare to utter. But I'm forgetting one other charge that has been made frequently: Alex Cockburn is supposed to have made an alliance with the evil "palaeoconservatives" at Chronicles magazine, to which he contributed a regular column. Like most things said about him, this is a lie. We took his syndicated column and put it on our website, even when we strenuously disagreed with his arguments. I was proud to run it and pleased every time knee-jerk conservatives took me to task for it.
Alex Cockburn was rumored to be prickly, though John Fund in a fair-minded obit at National Review Online pays tribute to his good humor. I only met him once, and he was extremely kind to a man he must have regarded as either a pariah or a righwing nutjob. He promised to pay me a visit to look over our "shop." I did the same, though nothing came of it. We exchanged notes and calls once or twice during the Wars of Yugoslav Succession, and I do believe I helped him to tumble to the truth, even though it went against his pro-Muslim grain. To this day, American politicians say their country is fighting terrorism, even though they are perfectly happy to help Islamic terrorism in Kosovo.
Like him or not, agree with him or not, Alex Cockburn acted more like a man than a journalist. His ferocious style made enemies right and left, but his fearlessness also won him respect from the only sort of people who are entitled to give it. May God have mercy on his soul.
http://fleming.dailymail.co.uk/
I always enjoyed reading Alex Cockburn, especially when I disagreed with him, which was over the half the time. In "Beat the Devil," his column in the Nation, he unmasked the stupidity and hypocrisy of his colleagues. Whenever he fulminated against the editors, you could almost see Victor Navasky cowering under his desk.
Alex was the real thing, one of the last leftists who actually believed in something more than self-promotion or increasing the burden of taxes, regulation, and surveillance on ordinary human beings. He often went too far on too little evidence, and his thinking was often infected with the maudlin sentimentality one expects from a leftist. Sentimental or fierce, he was almost always worth reading.
His untrumpeted and unblogged death was in stark contrast with those of other celebrity journalists who have gone to their grave drawing attention to themselves. Not surprisingly, his enemies on the right and left--he inspired equal numbers of both--have been quick to insult his memory. The obituaries make interesting reading, not simply because it is amusing to see little men attack the dead, but also because they tell us what we must never never say without incurring official displeasure.
Alex is almost always condemned for anti-Semitism. It's not that he ever put forward a race-theory, much less scape-goated Jews. No, his anti-Semitism was of a subtler kind. He refused to demonize Arabs, and he criticized the government of Israel when it did what any moral person, including lots of Israels, knows to be immoral.
Another of his sins was his consistency. When the rest of the anti-war left got on the bandwagon for American imperialism, Cockburn continued to criticize American's crusades to remake the world in his image. On the other hand, he also consistently defended little people from the gigantic interests of monopoly business and monopoly government. He even opposed gun control, using the Chestertonian argument that it was simply an attempt to disarm and enslave the people. Worst of all, perhaps, in the eyes of the phony left, was the rational skepticism he applied to the religion of Global Warming.
In reading the anathemas hurled at Cockburn, you can learn what our masters don't want you even to think, much less dare to utter. But I'm forgetting one other charge that has been made frequently: Alex Cockburn is supposed to have made an alliance with the evil "palaeoconservatives" at Chronicles magazine, to which he contributed a regular column. Like most things said about him, this is a lie. We took his syndicated column and put it on our website, even when we strenuously disagreed with his arguments. I was proud to run it and pleased every time knee-jerk conservatives took me to task for it.
Alex Cockburn was rumored to be prickly, though John Fund in a fair-minded obit at National Review Online pays tribute to his good humor. I only met him once, and he was extremely kind to a man he must have regarded as either a pariah or a righwing nutjob. He promised to pay me a visit to look over our "shop." I did the same, though nothing came of it. We exchanged notes and calls once or twice during the Wars of Yugoslav Succession, and I do believe I helped him to tumble to the truth, even though it went against his pro-Muslim grain. To this day, American politicians say their country is fighting terrorism, even though they are perfectly happy to help Islamic terrorism in Kosovo.
Like him or not, agree with him or not, Alex Cockburn acted more like a man than a journalist. His ferocious style made enemies right and left, but his fearlessness also won him respect from the only sort of people who are entitled to give it. May God have mercy on his soul.
http://fleming.dailymail.co.uk/