PDA

View Full Version : Bye, Bye Bye Boeing Bye Bye


Palatine Creator
02-02-2005, 01:42 AM
http://www.vialls.com/boeing/giantkiller.html

Bye, Bye Bye Boeing Bye Bye
(With apologies to Janis Joplin)

New technology from 'Old Europe' overwhelms old technology from new America. The belly comes from Spain, the wings from Britain, the nose from France, and the interior from Germany.

Copyright 1 February 2005

Beauty is more than just skin deep. A miracle of 21st Century technology, the Airbus A 380 has broken new barriers. Where the ancient Boeing 747 has one and a half million vulnerable rivets, the Airbus has none, using laser-guided electric welding instead. Primary construction revolves around the use of state-of-the-art carbon fiber and other enormously strong composites. New York would cheerfully kill to rid the world of this Boeing-destroyer, as it did with Concorde at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport on 25 July 2000, in a deliberate attempt to assassinate President Jaques Chirac, and, at the same time, forever undermine the credibility of European aerospace excellence.

Nineteen sixty-six seems a very long time ago, but it was on March 11 that year that French President Charles de Gaulle stunned the western world by sending an aide-mémoire to France's 14 partners in the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), in which he announced that all French forces would be withdrawn from the Alliance integrated command. De Gaulle also stated that all French NATO bases and HQ's would be closed within a year. General de Gaulle was a gentleman, and he kept his word.

At the diplomatic level, the reason appeared to be that Charles de Gaulle could not and would not trust America to 'protect' France if Russia attacked Europe, but the real reasons behind his decision were infinitely more profound. You see, President de Gaulle knew all there was to know about Zionist plans for a 'One World Government', and he also knew that France would be crushed into economic submission as an integral part of those Zionist plans.

Less than one year later the French Force de Frappe (Strike Force) was in operation, equipped with sixty-two formidable Mach 2 Mirage IV-P low-level bombers, each capable of delivering a home-made [French] sixty-kiloton nuclear bomb with stunning accuracy. And while the New York media tried to laugh the whole matter off as a bit of a gallic joke, Charles de Gaulle made it painfully clear that he was deadly serious:

"It is obvious that the megatonnes which we could employ do not match the numbers which America and Russia could unleash", de Gaulle said, "But once a certain nuclear capacity is reached and in regard to our direct defense, the size of the respective arsenals does not have an absolute value.

He continued, "For since a man and a country can only die once, deterrence exists once one has the means to inflict mortal damage on a possible aggressor, the determination to use them and the confidence in one’s ultimate decision."

The amazing Mirage-IVP carried much of France's nuclear role in the air for 32 years with the AN-52 nuclear bomb and ASMP missile. In July 1996 the Mirage was [officially] retired from this role, but 5 have been kept for strategic reconaissance missions. They are operated by the 1/91 Gascogne squadron at Mont-de-Marsan, while the rest of the Mirage-IVPs are kept in fully air-conditioned hangars discreetly dotted across France, lest they should suddenly be needed again at short notice.

While Germany continued to bow the knee to its American occupation troops, and allow them free access to frequently unwilling German women, and sometimes children, France was having none of it. In a very real sense, France forced the pace in forming the fledgling European Union, because men like Charles de Gaulle knew that European unity and massive trade were the only tools capable of defeating the New York moneylenders.

Somehow, Europe as a whole had to find a way of freeing itself from the stranglehold of worthless US Federal Reserve notes, which would had to be replaced with revenue derived from the sale of tangible [real] products, such as cars, aircraft, farm products and so on. This was finally achieved in January 2005, when Germany alone (just one of 25 EU member states), published its export/import figures for the financial year 2004.

During 2004, Germany exported products worth US$ 950 billion, while importing products valued at only US$ 748 billion, meaning that Germany made a gross profit for the year of US$ 222,000,000,000. During the same time frame, America's total exports were two hundred billion less than Germany, with American imports completely off the clock. If anyone out there ever wanted hard proof that America is now totally bankrupt, Germany just provided that proof in the form of properly audited balance sheets.

The Boeing 747's design and manufacturing techniques date back to the fifties and the 'good old days' of the Cold War. Despite new engines and flashy flight deck instruments, nothing else has changed. This aircraft is essentially as old and out-of-date as the Boeing B-47 bomber.

Though few people would consider the luxurious Airbus A-380 as a warplane, its very existence will have more strategic impact on future wars than any military design, which requires explanation. Try looking at it this way: At present America has a finite number of military aircraft, ships and tanks, but cannot afford to import the raw materials to build more. What you see is what you get, and George W. Bush is fast starting to look like Romulus Augustulus, the last emperor of the Roman Empire.

On the flip side of the coin, the European Union, Russia and China are positively swimming in oceans of real Euros, Roubles, and Yuan generated by real sales of real goods, and they produce more goods as each year goes by. Mostly these nations trade with each other, across Asia and South America, but with barely a glance towards the USA. Though the United States looks big on a map, its population represents only five-percent of the global market, and traders grow more skeptical of the failing US Dollar as each week goes by. Nowadays many nervous international traders are refusing to accept US Dollar payments, demanding Euros instead.

For nearly a hundred years, the New York Zionists and their forbears have held the world to ransom, using blackmail and sheer force of arms to extract real goods in exchange for useless 'fiat' currency notes, junk bonds, and political bribes. It was never going to last for ever, and the launch of the A-380 on January 18 marked the official beginning of the end, at least from a European perspective.

After successfully sabotaging Concorde 4590 and nearly killing French President Jacque Chirac in 2000, the New York Zionists went on to deliberately sabotage the dedicated A-380 airport terminals in Dubai and Paris. The subliminal message was obvious, i.e. hinting strongly that anything aeronautical designed or built by Europe was intrinsically unsafe, and thus "certain to crash".

Though it is one of the main instruments designed to undermine Boeing Aircraft Corporation and thus the entire American defense industy, the A-380 Super Jumbo is still a stunning aircraft in its own right, and will doubtlessly attract vast numbers of passengers on its merits. Though in standard three-class configuration the A-380 will carry around 560 passengers, rather than a possible 810 maximum in 'cattle truck' mode, it will do so 27% cheaper per passenger-mile than the Boeing 747, with part of this made possible by the engines burning about 20% less fuel.

Curiously, Boeing's counter propaganda about the giant aircraft seems to have fallen flat on its face. The A-380 is not noisier than the Boeing 747, but many decibels quieter, even at maximum takeoff power. The A-380 does not require a special runway, and in fact has a shorter takeoff and landing run that the Boeing 747. The only airport alterations required are special departure and arrival gates, which were originally designed to handle a throughput of around 350 passengers, and will be hard pressed to handle 550 in their current configurations. They could still do the job of course, but the delays would be unacceptable.

Perhaps most irksome of all for the Wall Street moneylenders, is that the giant European aerospace corporation that own Airbus, has not borrowed a single American fiat cent in order to completet this or any other Airbus project, meaning that Wall Street cannot pull the financial plug and make Airbus Industries simply disappear.

Unable to stop the A-380 by direct means, or by indirect acts of sabotage on Concorde and the A-380 terminals, the money lenders sent Boeing off on a different and quite ridiculous tack, made necessary by the fact that America no longer has enough spare cash to build new aircraft or new production lines.

Palatine Creator
02-02-2005, 01:43 AM
France was the principal driving force behind both Concorde and the Airbus A-380. After surviving an assassination attempt by the doomed Concorde, which only just missed his Presidential Air France Boeing 747 by the side of the runway at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport in 2000, Jaque Chirac is justifiably proud of "Old Europe's" stunning technological achievement.

Armed only with a cheap artist's impression, Boeing salesmen set off around the world in an attempt to achieve the impossible, to wit selling the concept of a middle weight airliner dubbed the Boeing 7E7 "Dreamliner", but without first building a prototype of even a full scale mockup. This was to be an exercise in gathering sufficient cash to start building a mockup - which is an incredible way of trying to sell aeroplanes, because it tells everyone instantly that you are so broke you can't afford to show them the real thing.

This is not the first time Boeing has tried this bizarre approach. Within twelve months of the sabotage of Concorde 4590, the corporation suddenly released an artist's impression of the "Sonic Cruiser", a hybrid space-age transonic jet they seemed sure would replace the Concorde, once orchestrated American media pressure had managed to have the Mach 2 Concorde permanently grounded, which, curiously enough, is exactly what happened. Unfortunately for Boeing, no one wanted to buy their 'Sonic Cruiser" painting, so the project eventually folded and died.

But the 7E7 was going to be different, and during the Spring of 2003, All Nippon Airways of Japan placed a firm order for 50 of these unproven aircraft at a fixed price of US$115 million for each airplane. Alas though, All Nippon was not prepared to hand over any ready cash in advance, meaning the full scale mockup and production line could not be started.

http://www.vialls.com/boeing/images/giantkiller9.gif

"Dreamliner" is a very appropriate name, because this aircraft only exists in the fertile imaginations of Boeing's sales personnel. There is no prototype and no pre-production aircraft, although Boeing does have a few hundred spare copies of this artist's impression.

Time dragged slowly by, and then on Friday January 28, 2005, Boeing got the big break it had been looking for. The Boeing Company and officials from the Peoples' Republic of China signed an agreement for the purchase of 70 Boeing 7E7 Dreamliners by Chinese airlines. The agreement mentions a fixed price of US$110 million per airplane. The salemen had pulled it off, and managed to sell more than 100 aircraft based only on an artist's impression! Not bad, but there was to be a very nasty sting in the tail.

The very next day at Davos in Switzerland, Fan Gang, director of the National Economic Research Institute at the China Reform Foundation, boldly stated [on belalf of the Chinese Government], "The U.S. dollar is no longer, in our opinion is no longer seen as a stable currency, and is devaluating all the time, and that's putting troubles all the time," he said in impeccable English.

Fan Gang continued, "So the real issue is how to change the regime from a US dollar pegging to a more manageable - pause - reference - pause - say Euros, yen, those kind of more diversified systems. If you do this, in the beginning you have some kind of initial shock; you have to deal with some devaluation pressures."

China is a very powerful economic force nowadays, and the man from China had just put his boot into the US Dollar, a point well noted by all present. Naturally this means the US Dollar will continue to fall like a stone, going into final freefall when Russia and OPEC decide to start trading their oil stocks in Euros instead of dollars.

So, Boeing has talked itself into the fixed-price delivery in 2008 of more than a hundred 7E7s [now the 787s], with that price fixed in US Dollars. Oh dear, now how much will the US Dollar be worth in four years time, when the Euro has become the world's only viable reserve currency? Let us take 25% of its current value against the Yuan and Yen, which means that Boeing will be contractually obliged to deliver brand-new 787 aircraft to China and Japan for today's equivalent price of a second-hand Boeing 737, or declare bankrupcy.

It is no exaggeration to say that Boeing is the 'flagship' of the American defense industry, and if Boeing goes to the wall, so will everyone else. No more aircraft carriers, no more stealth bombers, and no more attacking overseas sovereign nations in the sacred name of New York Zionist 'Democracy'. Perhaps none of this would have happened at all, if certain certifiable maniacs had resisted the temptation to try and assassinate the French President back on 25 July 2000. Food for thought.

Synthetic Zionist 'terrorism' and the Boeing 747 - both out of date and scheduled for the scrap heap.

Coming soon:

"Zionist Elite Prepares to Desert America, Part 2"

R MacDonald
02-02-2005, 02:15 AM
I heard also that Bush is replacing the Presidential Helicopter Fleet with an overseas model, screwing US based manufacturer Sikorsky out of an over 50 year contract.

I think George Norrey mentioned it on Coast to Coast AM last week.

Proud White Guy
02-02-2005, 02:37 AM
We have seen this coming for a long time,with outsourcing,and the exportation of jobs,and intelligence.

We import niggers,and other turd world assholes.

We have not been a manufacturing country for a long time,its over.

We are done!!!

The King
02-02-2005, 02:38 AM
[QUOTE=R MacDonald]I heard also that Bush is replacing the Presidential Helicopter Fleet with an overseas model, screwing US based manufacturer Sikorsky out of an over 50 year contract.

I think George Norrey mentioned it on Coast to Coast AM last week.[/QUOTE]
I'm almost sure the contract was given out to an American company. Even then I'm sure there will be a lot of outsourcing done either way.

Palatine Creator
02-02-2005, 03:09 AM
[QUOTE=R MacDonald]I heard also that Bush is replacing the Presidential Helicopter Fleet with an overseas model, screwing US based manufacturer Sikorsky out of an over 50 year contract.

I think George Norrey mentioned it on Coast to Coast AM last week.[/QUOTE]
Here's an article about that story:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/arms_helicopter_lockheed_dc

Lockheed Team Wins Presidential Chopper

Fri Jan 28, 8:18 PM ET

Top Stories - Reuters

By Andrea Shalal-Esa

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy (news - web sites) on Friday gave a transatlantic team led by Lockheed Martin Corp. (NYSE:LMT - news) a $1.7 billion contract to build a new fleet of 23 U.S. presidential helicopters, a deal valued at up to $6.1 billion.

The decision was a stunning setback for Connecticut-based United Technologies Corp.'s (NYSE:UTX - news) Sikorsky Aircraft unit -- which for nearly 50 years has built and maintained the green and white "Marine One" helicopters that fly the president.

Sikorsky had wrapped itself in the American flag to pitch its twin-engined VH-92, based on the Black Hawk helicopter.

But lower cost, a larger cabin and faster delivery schedule allowed No. 1 Pentagon (news - web sites) supplier Lockheed to prevail with its US101, based on the three-engined EH101 made by AgustaWestland Inc., a unit of Italy's Finmeccanica SpA (SIFI.MI).

The deal attracted international attention, with Prime Ministers Tony Blair (news - web sites) of Britain and Silvio Berlusconi of Italy personally pressing President Bush (news - web sites) on behalf of Lockheed's British-Italian design.

Assistant Navy Secretary John Young said the decision came after an "exhaustive and deliberative" search and would ensure a high level of quality and safety for future presidents.

"This decision truly reflects the best value and capability for the American taxpayer who is funding it, the Marines who will operate it and future presidents who will fly in it," Young said in a statement.

He told reporters he received no guidance from the White House except to "pick the best value choice for the mission."

Texas-based Textron Inc.'s (NYSE:TXT - news) Bell Helicopter is the other big partner and Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman Corp.(NYSE:NOC - news) will provide electronics for the new chopper.

Lockheed Vice President Stephen Ramsey said 65 percent of the US101 would be built in the United States, with the remaining 35 percent to be split between Britain and Italy.

Young downplayed any impact on the U.S. industrial base, saying both companies entered good bids and met "Buy America" provisions for U.S. content.

Sikorsky President Stephen Finger said the company was disappointed about the decision and insisted its VH-92 flew farther, faster and carried more than the EH101.

He said he was confident about the future of the company's S-92 program, and said Sikorsky still expected to double its business by 2008.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (news - web sites), a Connecticut Democrat, said the decision was "outrageously wrong" because Sikorsky had vowed to build a helicopter that was "100 pct made in America.

"I am committed to do everything in my power to right this wrong," Lieberman said in a statement, saying he hoped Sikorsky would challenge the contract award with federal officials.

Another Connecticut lawmaker, Rep. Rosa DeLauro (news, bio, voting record), also a Democrat, vowed to introduce legislation requiring the new helicopters be made entirely in the United States.

Stephen Moss, president of AgustaWestland's U.S. arm, said the US101 team was prepared to move all production of the helicopter to the United States, if that became necessary.

He emphasized that the EH101 was a "proven product," with 99 helicopters already flying in Iraq (news - web sites) and Bosnia.

The first model of the new presidential helicopter, to begin operations in October 2009, will have 2,500-horsepower engines built by General Electric (NYSE:GE - news) and a range of 250 miles, compared with the 100-mile range of the current "Marine One" VH-3D.

Later, it will be upgraded to travel 350 miles at a speed of 140 knots. It will be able to carry 14 passengers and a crew of four, compared with just 10 now.

The cost of the new helicopter will begin at $75 million a copy, gradually rising to about $110 million, Young said.

Analysts said the win could give Lockheed and its partners a competitive edge when the Air Force buys 194 new search and rescue helicopters next year, although Young downplayed that, saying the requirements were very different.

In addition, it could help Bethesda, Maryland-based Lockheed sell another 200 helicopters to the U.S. Coast Guard (news - web sites) and Department of Homeland Security in future competitions.

Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), a New York Democrat, praised the decision in a press release, saying Lockheed's victory would bring hundreds of new jobs to its Owego, New York, plant.

Shares of Lockheed Martin, which closed at $56.38 in regular trading on the New York Stock Exchange (news - web sites), rose 2 percent after the decision was announced, to $57.60 in after-hours trading.

Shares in United Technologies closed nearly unchanged at $102, but fell to $101.25 after hours. (Additional reporting by Tim Dobbyn, Charles Aldinger, Anna Willard and Daisuke Wakabayashi)

lawrence dennis
02-03-2005, 10:57 PM
[QUOTE=Palatine Creator]
He emphasized that the EH101 was a "proven product," with 99 helicopters already flying in Iraq and Bosnia.

The first model of the new presidential helicopter, to begin operations in October 2009, will have 2,500-horsepower engines built by General Electric (NYSE:GE - news) and a range of 250 miles, compared with the 100-mile range of the current "Marine One" VH-3D.[/QUOTE]

Aren't the Iraqis successfully shooting some of these down?

Toni
02-04-2005, 09:21 AM
While searching the web about ties Lockheed Martin to the White House...I came across this book...I have not read the book... this was an interesting quote

The Iraq invasion and occupation will cost at least another $200 billion over the next three to five years. U.S. policy is now based on what's good for Chevron, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Bechtel, not what's good for the average citizen. Dick Cheney's ties to conglomerate Halliburton are the tip of the iceberg since at least thirty-two top officials in the Bush administration served as executives or paid consultants to top weapons contractors before joining the administration.

http://www.bookfinder.us/review6/1560255617.html


greedy jewz or greedy goyz?