I met a fellow recently who I had known of in my profession for years, and the last last few years of my racial awareness I had assumed he was a jew and probably a fag to boot. He has curly but flowing dark hair and a hooked nose, pasty white skin and lives in San Francisco. I had always seen his name in an association with another man he is in buisiness with. He is quite accomplished and successful thus my conclusion that he was likely an enemy was formed.

After meeting him I found out he is a Italian family man, yet quite liberal in his politics. He is not a "jew".

But is he something else that is equally at odds with my genetics?

It struck me last night that perhaps our present vocabulary is missing a concise, accurate word for those who appear to be our dedicated enemies.
The problem I'm attempting to deal with here is brought up by several questions?
Is there some crucial genetic similarity between those we call our "jewish" enemies and the ostensibly "White" people that work for the same agenda?

Anyone familiar with jew Michael Bradley's writing knows he sees the conflict as one of dominantly Neanderthal genetic repository (jews) vs. Cro-Magnon (Atlantean) survivors. He may be on to something.

My experience has found a number of irreconcilable non-jews as well as a number of comparatively harmless "jews".

Thoughts?

Most rabid philo-semites are usually average white people who have been sucked into the cult of Christian Zionism. Funny thing about it though, the majority of these Christian cultists wouldn't recognize a contemporary Jew if he came up and punched them in the face. All their understanding of Jews comes from their limited understanding and interpretation of the Bible and the stories about the Jews from long ago it contains. Most Evangelical Christians from the South and Midwest have no direct experience with Jews today, because there still aren't many Jews living in these regions. Also, most Evangelicals, while claiming to love Jews, instinctively oppose all things today that we associate with Jews, the typical degenerate liberal Jewish cultural crap, homosexuality, multiracial rap culture, etc. Unfortunately, Evangelicals have been tricked into supporting neo-conservative phony US nationalism and militarism.

So I don't know if you could call such misguided people true philo-semites or not. But they make up most all of what passes for philo-semites in the Red State regions.

I met a fellow recently who I had known of in my profession for years, and the last last few years of my racial awareness I had assumed he was a jew and probably a fag to boot. He has curly but flowing dark hair and a hooked nose, pasty white skin and lives in San Francisco. I had always seen his name in an association with another man he is in buisiness with. He is quite accomplished and successful thus my conclusion that he was likely an enemy was formed.

After meeting him I found out he is a Italian family man, yet quite liberal in his politics. He is not a "jew".

But is he something else that is equally at odds with my genetics?

It struck me last night that perhaps our present vocabulary is missing a concise, accurate word for those who appear to be our dedicated enemies.
The problem I'm attempting to deal with here is brought up by several questions?
Is there some crucial genetic similarity between those we call our "jewish" enemies and the ostensibly "White" people that work for the same agenda?

Anyone familiar with jew Michael Bradley's writing knows he sees the conflict as one of dominantly Neanderthal genetic repository (jews) vs. Cro-Magnon (Atlantean) survivors. He may be on to something.

My experience has found a number of irreconcilable non-jews as well as a number of comparatively harmless "jews".

Thoughts?

I'm pleased you think such deep thoughts. I'll put my 2 cents worth in with them.

I do not believe there's a genetic similarity between jews and Aryans who work for the jewish agenda. Those Aryans do so for one or both of two reasons: (1) Self interests, and (2) They are misguided fools.

Examples: Falwell, Robertson, and Billy Graham. They, and all successful religious leaders know damn well if they, in any way, expressed anti-jew or anti-Israel views, they'd suffer severe consequences at the hands of jews. They'd be attacked personally via the jews' media, condemned by the lemmings as a result, and they'd lose much, if not all, their wealth and power. Their self interests far outweigh their feelings of patriotism or responsibilities towards their racial kin.

Self interests are also the guiding motivations for all politicians, as well. Ditto for big business leaders, and on down the line.

The Aryan masses are simply ignorant and misguided. Especially, those influenced by the "big" religious leaders, such as Falwell, Robertson, and Graham, et. al.

Edberg once pointed out that pastors of smaller, independent protestant churchs are far more apt to be receptive to our TRUTHS about the jews. And I agree.

Thanks for your interesting insights and observations.