Agis
February 11th, 2005, 02:39 AM
[..]
We hear a great deal about European values, and how they differ from their inferior American counterparts. But in practice what we see in Europe day to day is a series of [sensible] attempts by member states to use the EU for their own [..] purposes, or groups of states insisting on the indefinite postponement of pressing continental issues [like importing boatpeople, or including Turkey]. These can never constitute a moral [jewed] compass, let alone a direction forward [to third-world conditions].
West European capitals today tend not to grasp the degree to which the world is moving toward the ideals of economic and political freedom [such as Iraq]. Central and East Europeans are miles ahead on this point, as has become clear with the rapid expansion of the EU and the emergence of ideological differences between what Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld termed “old” and “new” Europe. Reactions to the Ukrainian crisis [jew-Soros funded zionist takeover], as I have already suggested, underscored the difference; new Europeans instantly grasped its significance [and were paid generously for their services], old Europeans fell back into silence. As a letter writer to the Guardian observed, “Clearly it still only takes a growl from Russia for Western Europe to abandon all support for [jew meddling] on its eastern borders.” One might add that it likewise takes only a growl from to silence any protest at [jew] actions which, if carried out far more gently by white people, would most certainly be labeled war crimes.
The noble values of economic and political freedom, pioneered by Western Europe, are in low repute in Western Europe, though they are plainly what should serve as the EU’s missing ideological cement. Recently I had a long chat with a Japanese ambassador about details of the alliance between our two countries. As we parted and he turned to shake hands, he said, “One more thing, Arthur. This is not about any of the things we discussed. It is about freedom.” I can easily imagine similar [blithe nonsense] coming out of the mouth of a Polish or a Latvian or a Czech diplomat. But a French, German, or Italian one?
[..]
What with its borders in flux and its membership growing, terrorism [jewish paranoia] on the increase, and Washington ever more distant, the pressure on Europe to rise to its potential is far stronger today than at any point since the end of World War II. Historians have no right to be optimistic, but events and attitudes like those I have surveyed do sound to me like at least a basis for mutual rediscovery and cooperation, albeit with modalities redefined. It would be a fine historical irony if [zog figurehead] George W. Bush were to prove a catalyzing agent of this world transformation as well.
[i]- Arthur Waldron is the Lauder professor of international relations at the University of Pennsylvania. He spent the second half of 2004 as a visiting professor of history at the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=11902050_1
We hear a great deal about European values, and how they differ from their inferior American counterparts. But in practice what we see in Europe day to day is a series of [sensible] attempts by member states to use the EU for their own [..] purposes, or groups of states insisting on the indefinite postponement of pressing continental issues [like importing boatpeople, or including Turkey]. These can never constitute a moral [jewed] compass, let alone a direction forward [to third-world conditions].
West European capitals today tend not to grasp the degree to which the world is moving toward the ideals of economic and political freedom [such as Iraq]. Central and East Europeans are miles ahead on this point, as has become clear with the rapid expansion of the EU and the emergence of ideological differences between what Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld termed “old” and “new” Europe. Reactions to the Ukrainian crisis [jew-Soros funded zionist takeover], as I have already suggested, underscored the difference; new Europeans instantly grasped its significance [and were paid generously for their services], old Europeans fell back into silence. As a letter writer to the Guardian observed, “Clearly it still only takes a growl from Russia for Western Europe to abandon all support for [jew meddling] on its eastern borders.” One might add that it likewise takes only a growl from to silence any protest at [jew] actions which, if carried out far more gently by white people, would most certainly be labeled war crimes.
The noble values of economic and political freedom, pioneered by Western Europe, are in low repute in Western Europe, though they are plainly what should serve as the EU’s missing ideological cement. Recently I had a long chat with a Japanese ambassador about details of the alliance between our two countries. As we parted and he turned to shake hands, he said, “One more thing, Arthur. This is not about any of the things we discussed. It is about freedom.” I can easily imagine similar [blithe nonsense] coming out of the mouth of a Polish or a Latvian or a Czech diplomat. But a French, German, or Italian one?
[..]
What with its borders in flux and its membership growing, terrorism [jewish paranoia] on the increase, and Washington ever more distant, the pressure on Europe to rise to its potential is far stronger today than at any point since the end of World War II. Historians have no right to be optimistic, but events and attitudes like those I have surveyed do sound to me like at least a basis for mutual rediscovery and cooperation, albeit with modalities redefined. It would be a fine historical irony if [zog figurehead] George W. Bush were to prove a catalyzing agent of this world transformation as well.
[i]- Arthur Waldron is the Lauder professor of international relations at the University of Pennsylvania. He spent the second half of 2004 as a visiting professor of history at the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium.
http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article.asp?aid=11902050_1