I just heard about MCP's latest, below is the ad copy from AFP. If it's half as good as it sounds we may have another resource for waking up the sheep.


http://www.americanfreepress.net/Agora/agora.cgi?cart_id=%%cart_id%%&keywords=new%20%jerusalem




The New Jerusalem:
Zionist Power in America

The New Jerusalem: Zionist Power in America is an eyeopening inside look at the American Zionist elite today, the most thorough, fact-filled comprehensive up-to-date overview on the subject yet published. Here, between two covers for the first time is hard data and information—taken primarily from “mainstream” pro-Zionist sources—relating to the power of the Zionist elite in America today . . .

This one-of-a-kind survey doesn’t focus on the “Israeli lobby” or on the historic role of the Zionists in intrigues of the past. There are lots of books—and some very good books—on those subjects. Instead, The New Jerusalem examines—in stark detail— the incredible array of wealth and clout of the American Zionist community, demonstrating—beyond any question— that the Zionists undeniably constitute the “power elite” in the United States today . . .

And we’re not just referring to their well-known influence over the American media. A lot of folks have written about that . . . Instead, The New Jerusalem goes much, much farther . . . For the average individual to assemble this information would cost hundreds (if not thousands) of dollars and dozens of hours of research . . .

Many of the books cited are out of print and hard to find—but Mike’s sources are all “mainstream” authors and sources and all pro- Zionist. This is an invaluable resource volume you’ll refer to time and again in debating with friend and foe alike, writing letters to the editors of local newspapers, calling radio talk shows and in the course of research.

Here are just some of the highlights . . .

• A detailed overview of some 200 major Zionist families . . . Who they are. What they own. Where and how they made their vast fortunes. Some names you’ll recognize. Many you won’t. This is the first time EVER that this information is being made available to grass-roots Americans. You’ll be amazed at the details that Mike has compiled . . .

• Hundreds of cold, hard facts and figures about the sources of Zionist wealth and power in America . . .

• The industries they dominate;

• Their impact on culture and society;

• Their vast influence on the education system;

• The names of Zionist political action committees;

• How Zionist voting power is magnified . . .

• The first-ever complete accounting of the Zionist names appearing in the most recent (2004) list of the famous Forbes 400 list of the billionaires and mega-millionaires in America today—available nowhere except in the pages of The New Jerusalem (and not even in Forbes itself!).

Softcover, 184 pages, $ 25.00

http://www.wingtv.net/thornarticles/newjerusalem3.jpg





Michael Collins Piper's The New Jerusalem

Some words burn with the fury of boric acid through steel. This statement certainly applies to a quote Michael Collins Piper uses near the end of The New Jerusalem which originates from former president Harry S. Truman's unpublished diary: “The Jews have no sense of proportion, nor do they have any judgment on world affairs. The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish. They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs, or Greeks are murdered or mistreated as [post-war] Displaced Persons as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power – physical, financial or political – neither Hitler nor Stalin had anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog.”

These words carry as much power and poignancy as anything ever written in the annals of history; but as Piper points out, Truman wasn’t the only president to feel such resentment toward the Jews. Of course we’re all familiar with Richard Nixon’s views (he once called financier Robert Vesco a “cheap kike” and determined that “the IRS is full of Jews”). But how many people were aware of Jimmy Carter’s re-election hopes in 1980: “If I get back in, I’m going to fuck the Jews.” Likewise, George Bush Senior’s Secretary of State, James Baker, had this to say (long before the neo-cons rose to power): “Fuck the Jews. They don’t vote for us anyway.”

Harry S. Truman’s assertions on Jews and world affairs rings even truer today, for Piper opens The New Jerusalem by showing how the two most pivotal events of our still-young 21st century – 9-11 and the Iraqi War – are both unequivocally based upon U.S. policy in the Middle East.

In regard to 9-11, if you’re naïve enough to still believe the government’s “official” version of events – that 19 Arab cave-dwellers planned, orchestrated, and executed the September 11 terror attacks – you can’t deny that it would have been caused by America’s molly-coddling relationship with the terrorist nation of Israel. But as we know, 9-11 was actually an inside job perpetrated by a small cabal within (and outside) our government. And why would they perpetrate such a psychopathically bloodthirsty mass murder? Answer: because it served as a pretext for our war in the Middle East where the United States is nothing more than a proxy doing Israel’s dirty work. So, in this sense, Piper’s claim is absolutely correct.

In a similar vein, Piper refers to a book by Benjamin Ginsberg entitled The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State. As the title implies, Jews have always had a historic ‘embrace’ of the State because, in pure Machiavellian terms, that’s been the means to arrive at their ultimate goal – power. This embrace, though, oftentimes proves fatal, for regardless of where the Jews have resided – since biblical times - they have been enslaved, driven out, or killed en masse. Everywhere!

Again, you may wonder why. Surprisingly, the answer is simple. Throughout the ages, Jews have manipulated the ‘system’ to gain great wealth and power. And although Jews today only constitute 2% of America’s population, they unite with other like-minded individuals to create an array of very potent organizations and lobbies that ultimately seek not only political power, but also social influence as well (i.e. Hollywood, TV, etc).

This arrogance is conveyed quite vividly by Mr. Ginsberg. “Jews often, secretly or not so secretly, conceive themselves to be morally and intellectually superior to their neighbors.” Thus, the Jews inevitably begin to abuse their power, and are eventually exposed and dealt with in the methods described above. Does this same fate await the neo-cons of today, along with the multi-tentacled Zionist lobby, the corrupt media kingpins, Ariel Sharon’s genocidal regime, and those who are building an Apartheid Wall from the West Bank's northern-most point to Jerusalem? If the past is any indicator, history will not treat these "enemies of the people" kindly.

One of the unfortunate results of this arrogant pursuit of power is clear – war. And as Michael Collins Piper explains, three-quarters of America’s foreign aid expenditures is geared toward (either directly or indirectly) Israel’s safety. Thus, not only do we surrender $10 billion to Israel every year, but our annual outlays to Egypt are primarily administered for one reason – so that they won’t attack Israel. Isn’t it clear what a vicious cycle has been created by our subservience to Israel, and what a vulnerable position it puts us in as a nation?

Worse, our current debacle in Iraq isn’t the first war engineered by Jewish elitists. Anyone who cares to objectively study history will discover the same hidden hands behind the Civil War (where Rothschild interests financed both the North and the South), as well as the Bolshevik Revolution, World War I, World War II, and the first Desert Storm Iraqi War.

To his credit, Piper illustrates how this pattern exists today with our Orwellian ‘war on terror.’ But as many people mistakenly perceive, President George W. Bush is not the one calling the shots. Rather, the New World Order controllers have yet again dispatched a host of agents to do their bidding (in the same vein as Colonel Edward Mandel, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, and Samuel P. Huntington). This time the provocateur is Natan Sharansky, who has joined forces with other neo-cons mentioned in Piper’s previous work, The High Priests of War (Wolfowitz, Richard 'the Prince of Darkness' Perle, William Kristol, etc).

Piper writes, “The Bush agenda (rather the agenda of Bush’s Zionist handlers) is no more than a modernized brand of old-style Bolshevism inspired by the late Leon Trotsky.”

And although the detrimental effects of such an infiltration are obvious (especially in regard to foreign policy), criticism of Israel brings swift and vengeful retaliation in certain circles. In fact, one of the most riveting elements of Piper’s book is his concise analysis of the Zionist community at large, who charge that any criticism of Israel makes one not only anti-Semitic and anti-Israel, but also anti-American and anti-Christian, because (at least in their eyes) Israel’s goals and America’s goals should be one-in-the-same. Such a philosophy, though, is nothing new, for it extends back many generations to a time when families such as the Rosenwalds, Friedsams, Blumenthals, Schiffs, Warburgs, Lehmans, Baruchs, Bronfmans, and Guggenheims rose to prominence. These individuals, along with the representatives and organizations they spawned, eventually became what Ferdinand Lundberg called ‘the de facto government which “is actually the government of the United States – informal, invisible, shadowy” (America’s Sixty Families).

Strangely, the above subjects are rarely discussed on Sunday morning talk shows or in the opinion pages of major daily newspapers. It seems as if we can intellectually debate virtually any subject in this country – abortion, gun control, taxation, outsourcing to China, the oil policies of Hugo Chavez, Russia’s views on the West, or AIDS in Africa; but anyone who criticizes (or even discusses) how the Jewish lobby’s treasure chest influences U.S. lawmakers is instantly labeled an anti-Semite.

Needless to say, Piper’s The New Jerusalem is an invaluable resource for any person who wants to clearly see how this country (and the world-at-large) is being manipulated by a hidden (and not-so-hidden) Zionist power. Plus, in addition to the topics already mentioned, the author also delves into the Zionist connections to Enron, the Inslaw Affair and PROMIS software, the Bronfman crime family’s relationship to John McCain, media control (especially at the late Katherine Graham’s Washington Post), how corporate journalists were compromised via Operation Mockingbird, the possibility of there being another “Deep Throat,” Donald Trump, and a who’s who of the Jewish elite. Historically, Piper also touches upon the Holocaust Industry and how it is exploited by those who constantly seek the role of victim, Jewish control of the trans-Atlantic slave trade from Africa, the murder of author/researcher Danny Casolaro by a sub-unit of the Department of Justice’s OSI (Office of Special Investigations), and a continuation of Final Judgment’s analysis of Meyer Lansky’s underworld Mafia ties and his role in key 20th century events.

Once you read this book, I guarantee you’ll never see the world around you in the same light again.

Strangely, the above subjects are rarely discussed on Sunday morning talk shows..Rarely? Name once.

Am I the only one who gets the impression that MCP has solidly slid into the conspiracy theory camp? Jews here, Jews there, Jews everywhere ...

Yes, they have enormous power not only in the U.S. but in the world, and as far as I'm concerned another 6,000,000 :rolleyes: should be gassed, but ...

I do believe that JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and ...

I do believe that 9-11 was carried out by outraged Muslims.

Occam's razor points to these simplest explanations as being correct.

Sorry.

--------------------------

Occam's razor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor)
The principle is often expressed in Latin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin) as:
entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem,
which translates to:
entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity.
Furthermore, when multiple competing theories have equal predictive powers (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_power), the principle recommends selecting those that introduce the fewest assumptions and postulate the fewest hypothetical entities. It is in this sense that Occam's razor is usually understood.

I do believe that JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and ...

I do believe that 9-11 was carried out by outraged Muslims.

Occam's razor points to these simplest explanations as being correct.


???

Occam's razor takes a close look and JFK and 911 sees the opposite. The official story on both are so convoluted no one who looks closely believes them.

It's like what the Birdman says about the Holohoax: Everyone that spends a bit of time crunching the numbers becomes a Denier solely on the batty nature of the purported evidence of "genocide".

Old story along these lines concerns Halley and Sir Isaac Newton. Halley, famous for discovering his comet, askes Sir Isaac "how can you take the nonsense of astrology seriously?" to which Sir Isaac replies, "Because I have looked into the matter, Mister Halley, and you have not."

Look into the matter(s). Piper is a "conspiracy theorist" only to those who have not.

FJ,

In the Civil Forum I posted about Israeli Spying, and there is enough there to begin to look into 9-11. JFK was hit by Mossad because of Dimona.
Piper's book looks great, just Thorn's review is a mindblower isn't it?
The truth is out there maybe some people of influence will begin to connect the dots. We can only hope.

I do believe that JFK was killed by Lee Harvey Oswald and ...

I do believe that 9-11 was carried out by outraged Muslims.

Occam's razor points to these simplest explanations as being correct.

Sorry.


First, "Occam's razor" is just a phrase, not a universal law. I studied Mathematics and Physics for lots of years and Occam's razor was never mentioned, not once. "Occam's razor" is about on the level of "Golly, that's good old down-home guessing."

Second, if you need simple explanations, then you should contain your thoughts to simple questions, like "What's for breakfast, Ma?" That usually has a simple answer.

Third, if you still prefer simple answers, "9-11 was carried out by outraged Muslims" is not only not a simple answer, it is Byzantine and twisted to the point of impossibility. It may be the least simple answer.

Here is an answer somewhat more believable and possible: "9-11 was carried out by outraged Tele-Tubbies."

Enkidu

First, "Occam's razor" is just a phrase, not a universal law. I studied Mathematics and Physics for lots of years and Occam's razor was never mentioned, not once. "Occam's razor" is about on the level of "Golly, that's good old down-home guessing."

Second, if you need simple explanations, then you should contain your thoughts to simple questions, like "What's for breakfast, Ma?" That usually has a simple answer.

Third, if you still prefer simple answers, "9-11 was carried out by outraged Muslims" is not only not a simple answer, it is Byzantine and twisted to the point of impossibility. It may be the least simple answer.

Here is an answer somewhat more believable and possible: "9-11 was carried out by outraged Tele-Tubbies."

Enkidu

Balderdash I say, Balderdash!

I'm with LD on this one. Although I believe that kikes knew their every move, and not discounting the possibility that there may have been demolitions inside the towers, to think that the planes were remote controlled or there were suicide kikes on board is just laughable.

JFK, on the other hand, was shot by agents of the Queen of England and the Rothchilds :D

FJ,

In the Civil Forum I posted about Israeli Spying, and there is enough there to begin to look into 9-11. JFK was hit by Mossad because of Dimona.


Thanks for the heads up.

I keep forgetting about the Civil Forum, it's sort of like VNNF's ghetto. :D