Controversial BNP Jewish councillor Patricia Richardson last week failed to win a second local election after being rejected by voters in Essex.

The 59-year-old contested the Loughton Central division of Essex county council last Thursday, finishing in fourth place behind victor Christopher Pond, of the Loughton Residents Association.

Nevertheless, she attracted support from 768 people, representing nearly 10 per cent of the total votes cast. A source at Loughton synagogue said: “The number of votes is worrying but I am pleased she didn’t get in.”

The shul’s minister Rev. Lorraine added: “I encouraged my community to vote for whatever party in order to reduce the possibility of a BNP candidate being successful.”

The turnout was around 62 per cent, compared with just 31 per cent when she was elected to Epping Forest district council with 258 votes last year. The seat place will not be up for grabs again until 2008.

Speaking this week, Richardson suggested the outcome to last week’s poll could have been different if the boundaries had not been altered, and claimed the region she contested included an area which had “not been familiar with our party”.

But the mother of two insisted she did not take the result as a rejection of the party in the area, saying: “Had it been a rejection we would have got zilch.” She also revealed that she had been approached about standing for Parliament within the past year....

http://www.totallyjewish.com/news/stories/?disp_type=0&disp_story=qm0axW

I still cannot for the life of me understand how the BNP accepted a Jew as a member, let alone candidate, representative, and even spokeswoman.

What nationalism in this country needs is some kind of 'Night of the Long Knives'!

Well, as predicted by Tyndall a while back, this was the sort of sick stunt that was bound to ultimately back-fire, leaving the BNP worse off rather than better off for it.


I suspect that what is going on is some-thing very different from the policy line now being peddled to the membership and the public. I have said earlier that these various stunts - the candidate with the black son-in-law, the Sikh columnist, and now the Jewish lady standing in Epping Forest make zero difference to the BNP's appeal to the voters. And this is certainly true in the case of those voters whom the party can conceivably hope to win over in the foreseeable future. But I have also said that the stunts cause a great deal of unrest internally, leading to dissatisfaction and lowered morale in the ranks, and in many cases to people leaving the party.

http://www.spearhead.com/0405-jt4.html

Just shows that selling out totally doesn't actually get you anywhere, doesn't it?

Pity JT still supports Griffin then - he has just admitted his suspension means he cannot get in the BNP EVER! but will continue to give it his full support - including his this months full page pro-Griifin write up in Spearhead. This is not a NA statement just me bewildered by JT's stance.

To be fair to JT, Eddie, as far as I am aware he has always argued his supporters should back the BNP 100% regardless.

I understand his 'united we stand, divided we fall' logic, but the danger of such logic can lead to a situation as expressed by Orwell in Animal Farm, with a totally corrupt leadership c/w a 'my leader, right or wrong' mentality within the rank and file.

BNP members should demand greater transparency from their leaders. At present the BNP leadership simply tells its members along with the British public what it wants them to know.... not necessarily what it has a right to know.

JT's supporters cannot in most cases back the 100% - most just are not allowed too. Anyway thats my 2d worth.

I think partly the way the BNP has gone ideologically, and partly because of the hold the Griffinites have on the BNP, it must be considered lost to the cause of White Nationalism.

Of course there are still White Nationalists in the party membership, but the party itself can no longer be regarded as such.

:D The world battle against the Jews. In a prophetic drawing, an English newspaper shows who will lose this struggle.

Source: Daily Express (London), 14 November 1938


http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/images/lehmann/lehmann3.jpg

To be fair to JT, Eddie, as far as I am aware he has always argued his supporters should back the BNP 100% regardless.

[SIZE=4][COLOR=Black]This he has and this we will ![/COLOR][/SIZE]

ZOGS infiltration of the BNP has been thoroughly successful.Surely it is time now for other means?