Arthur Kemp's "March of the Titans"

http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/



"PaleoAmerican Ethnic Diversity", if I may be so bold...

http://www.whiterevolution.com/text/paed.shtml

Arthur Kemp's "March of the Titans"

http://www.stormfront.org/whitehistory/

Ha! You beat me to it!

ITZ # 1 !

.

Here's some others:

Arthur Schopenhauer "The Fourfold Root"
Friedrich Nietzsche "Beyond Good and Evil"
Julius Evola "Men Among the Ruins"

These will give you an understanding of the structure of the Indo-European belief system.

I learned more from David Duke's "My Awakening" than from any other book, save a KMacD book. A dictionary of WN thought, it is. Every topic is covered. A must-have.

Any of the Icelandic Sagas are good, I especially recommend the Vinland Sagas and the Saga of Eirik the Red.

It's amazing, though, how much good material is available on the internet, if you know how to filter it and take the anti-White innuendoes with a grain of salt. Just doing a google search for

Takla Makan
Tarim Basin
Kennewick man
Tocharian


will produce a lot of good information about White preHistory.

Because I'm a partially alpha personality, I had to go find links.

1. Takla Makan

"The Takla Makan Mummies
In the late 1980's, perfectly preserved 3000-year-old mummies began appearing in a remote Chinese desert. They had long reddish-blond hair, European features and didn't appear to be the ancestors of modern-day Chinese people. Archaeologists now think they may have been the citizens of an ancient civilization that existed at the crossroads between China and Europe."

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/chinamum/taklamakan.html

2. Tarim Basin

"ANNOUNCER: In the heart of central Asia, ancient bodies offer puzzling clues.

VICTOR MAIR: They say that they had red hair, bluish-green eyes. It's a European type of person. "

http://homepages.ihug.co.nz/~wayfarer/anomaly/archaeology/urumchi_trans.htm

"Ephthalites was the name given by Byzantine historians and Hayathelaites by the Persian historian Mirkhond, and sometimes Ye-tai or Hua by Chinese historians. They are also known as the White Huns, different from the Hun who led by Attila invading the Roman Empire. They are described as a kindred steppe people originally occupied the pasture-lands in the Altai mountain of southwestern Mongolia.

Toward the middle of the 5th century, they expanded westward probably because of the pressure from the Juan-juan, a powerful nomadic tribe in Mongolia. Within decades, they became a great power in the Oxus basin and the most serious enemy of the Persian empire."

http://www.silk-road.com/artl/heph.shtml

"Four thousand years ago, a community lived in the Tarim Basin -- in what is now the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China -- in the heart of Asia.

According to sweeping physical evidence, they were not Chinese. They were not even Asian.

They were Caucasian."

http://sln.fi.edu/inquirer/mummy.html

3. Tocharian

"In 1987 Victor Mair, a Professor of Chinese at the University of Pennsylvania, discovered some remarkably well preserved human mummies in a museum in the Chinese Province of Xinjiang. For a satellite image of the area click here. The mummies are of particular interest in that they are Caucasian not Chinese. More than 100 mummies have been excavated by archaeologists, some of them date to 2,000 B.C."

http://geography.berkeley.edu/ProgramCourses/CoursePagesFA2002/geog148/Lectures/Lecture21/tocharians/mummies.html

"Tocharian manuscripts dating to the 8th c. AD were found at sites surrounding the Tarim Basin west of China and north of Tibet early in the twentieth century. Most of these manuscripts related to Buddhism. The language of these texts proved to an Indo-European language, one however that was quite separate from the neighboring Iranian and Indic languages.
As the manuscripts were deciphered, it turned out that they contained two different Tocharian languages. The older one on the east, Agnean, was called Tocharian A, the one in the west which was also attested in the east, Kuchean, was called Tocharian B.

Recent discoveries of Caucasian mummies dating to as early as the second millennium BC in areas known to have been inhabited much later by Tocharian speakers have occasioned much controversy and speculation."

http://www.utexas.edu/cola/depts/lrc/iedocctr/ie-lg/Tocharian.html

4. Kennewick Man

"American Indians are trying to make sure Kennewick Man's remains don't go under the X-ray machine while his fate remains in the hands of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. "

http://www.kennewick-man.com/

"Public interest, debate, and controversy began when an independent archaeologist, working on contract to the Kennewick coroner, decided the bones were ancient but might not be Native American. He described them as "Caucasoid" and sent a piece of bone to a laboratory to be dated. The final date indicated an age of 8,400 years, making Kennewick Man one of the oldest and most complete skeletons found in the Americas. But if it is true that these human remains are thousands of years old, and are not Native American, then who was Kennewick Man? "

http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/kman/virtualexhibit_intro.htm

"Several Indian tribes on the Columbia Plateau, led by the Umatilla, hope to win the right to rebury the skeleton, which they consider an ancestor. When it seemed likely that the Indians would achieve their goal under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act -- a law that enables tribes to file claims to remains to which they can demonstrate a cultural affiliation -- a group of eight leading American anthropologists, fearful that invaluable information on the first peopling of the Americas could potentially be lost, sued the federal government for the right to study the remains"

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/first/claim.html

And for a one-sided look that says Kennewick Man was only Native American, and could not have been Caucasian, try... your own government!

http://www.cr.nps.gov/aad/kennewick/

5. Ainu

(Probably a result of intermixing in Asia - early Eurasians.)

The language of the Ainu bear-worshippers of Northern Japan has generally been considered a language-isolate, supposedly being unlike any other language on earth. A few researchers noticed a relationship with languages in south-east Asia, others saw similarity with the Ostiak and Uralic languages of northern Siberia. The Ainu look like Caucasian people, they have white skin, their hair is wavy and thick, their heads are mesocephalic (round) and a few have grey or blue eyes. However, their blood types are more like the Mongolian people, possibly through many millennia of intermixing.

None of the Ainu words were exactly the same as in Basque, but many were extremely close such as ikoro and koro (money), kokor and gogor (to scold), tasum and eritasun (illness), iska and xiska (to steal). A surprise was the Ainu word nok (testicle) which is much like the Basque word noka (familiarity with women). In English slang the same word is used in "to knock up" meaning "to cause a woman to become pregnant." In Indonesian nok means "unmarried young woman," while dénok means "slender, elegant woman." In Dutch slang the word is slightly altered to neuk (sexual intercourse). There is little doubt that the word goes way back to the Neolithic or even Paleolithic. From the following comparisons it seems clear to me that Ainu and Basque are genetically related. In comparing Ainu with Dravidian, I did not find such a relationship, although Dravidian itself is obviously also related to Basque. Two separate branches of the same tree?

http://www.islandnet.com/~edonon/ainu.htm

(See pictures here.)

http://www.mnh.si.edu/arctic/features/ainu/index.html

Here's some others:

Arthur Schopenhauer "The Fourfold Root"
Friedrich Nietzsche "Beyond Good and Evil"
Julius Evola "Men Among the Ruins"

These will give you an understanding of the structure of the Indo-European belief system.

If you are looking for Evola's treatment of ancient Indo-European beliefs, the book to read is Revolt Against the Modern World not Men Among the Ruins, which mainly deals with politics and political philosophy.

In the area of White History and Archaeology, I highly recommend:

1. John Day, Indo-European Origins: The Archaeological Evidence (Washington, D.C.: Institute for the Study of Man)

Day is one of us, and he has done the most thorough job possible of marshalling and critically analyzing all the latest relevant archaeological data.

If I were to recommend one book by Schopenhauer, who is one of my favorite thinkers, it would have to be:

2. Parerga and Paralipomena [Additions and Omissions], vol. 2: Shorter Philosophical Essays. The Payne translation is now in paperback from Oxford.

Schopenhauer is probably the greatest philosophical stylist after Plato, and these essays are brilliant. His remarks on the Jews clearly influenced Hitler. Schopenhauer, not Nietzsche, was his favorite philosopher by the way.

This is a great resource on White history and archaeology, political ideology, National Socialism, etc. And it is a very tastefully designed site to boot.

http://library.flawlesslogic.com/