Hey everyone. I'm a blonde, blue-eyed white 16 year old living in the middle of surburbia.

I do not agree that blacks are inferior or more inclined to be evil, etc. I am not rascist. I do not believe the Jews are trying to take over the world. I don't see how you all believe this. I cannot believe that you all advocate "unschooling" and don't understand your reasoning. I don't understand how you learned that the Jews are the terrorists and don't see any evidence for it. I basically haven't believed anything I've read on this site.

But I'm very, very curious to know about this. There's a whole world of white supremacists that I simply don't understand.

So I want to know how you all came to the conclusions that you did. What convinced you?

So I want to know how you all came to the conclusions that you did. What convinced you?
1. 9/11 and Israeli involvement. Google it. There is plenty of evidence of Israeli involvement.

2. "Neoconservative" jews in the Bush administration starting wars and trying to seize the world's oil supplies for Israel.

3. Massive nigger on White (and mestizo on White) crime in the major cities. US government statistices show this. See Also: Hurricane Katrina.

And lots more. Basically, these non-White groups live up to their stereotypes. Such stereotypes persist because they are usually true. The neocon jews ARE trying to "take over the world". The niggers are killing and raping Whites, with little public outcry.

They are our enemies. We must be separated, or we die.

www.fbi.gov see for yourself the crime difference. If you think it's because blacks are poor and down-trodden, you are wrong. Whites have been in far worse financial situations than what blacks have suffered through, and their murder rates haven't changed. Blacks have the HIGHEST murder rate, and the second LOWEST population. They have lower i.q.'s, and higher testosterone levels. Blacks in africa are far worse off than those in america, and yet we owe them everything in the world as far as employment, federal grants, and welfare. Why we hate jews in general is because of their monopoly on what we see, hear, and to an extent, feel.

http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/jewishp/usa/jewmogul.jpeg

nice job posting in the learning forum too, if you have questions such as this post it in the opposition forum, please.

Hey everyone. I'm a blonde, blue-eyed white 16 year old living in the middle of surburbia.
......
So I want to know how you all came to the conclusions that you did. What convinced you?

When I was your age I already had a lifetime of experience with blacks that taught me the hard way about criminal tendencies among blacks. You apparently have not fully enjoyed the rotten fruit of the tree of integration. I hope that you remain blissfully ignorant of Negro crime.

Meanwhile you are free to read here about the preponderance of Negros among violent criminals and check the facts on your own.

http://www.vdare.com/

Color Of Crime, Sound Of (Big Media) Silence
By Jared Taylor

[Recently by Jared Taylor: Further Down The Road (Paved With Good Intentions)]

Today, September 14, the New Century Foundation releases The Color of Crime, our relentlessly factual study of race, crime, and the criminal justice system.

For anyone who ever wondered just how much more likely blacks or Hispanics are than whites to commit various crimes, the answers are here.

It takes hard work to pry the facts out of the reluctant grip of federal crime databases. But the results are eye-opening:

Blacks are just 13 percent of the population but they commit more than half the muggings and murders in the country. Hispanics commit violent crimes at about three times the white rate.

The proportion of blacks and Hispanics in an area is the single best indicator of how dangerous it is. The racial mix is a much better predictor of crime rates than poverty, unemployment, and dropout rates combined.

Although Jesse Jackson and Bill Cosby wring their hands over black-on-black mayhem, blacks actually commit more violent crime against whites than blacks. A black is about 39 times more likely to do violence to a white than the other way around, and no less than 130 times more likely to rob a white.

And yes, everyone's suspicions about rape are correct: Every year there are about 15,000 black-on-white rapes but fewer than 900 white-on-black rapes. There are more than 3,000 gang rapes of whites by blacks—but white-on-black gang rapes are so rare they do not even show up in the statistics.

There is plenty more—but just as interesting will be how the Mainstream Media will treat these facts.

Back in 1999, we released an earlier, less detailed version of this report. [PDF] Even before publication, the Associated Press, Time, CBS Evening News, National Public Radio, Knight-Ridder, and the Washington Times wanted copies. A dozen other media organizations, including the Washington Post, attended the press conference with which we launched the report. At the same time, we arranged to have copies delivered to more than 450 news organizations with offices in the Washington, DC area.

The result: complete silence—with one exception. The Washington Times ran a substantial story on the report, in which it interviewed several prominent criminologists who confirmed the accuracy of our numbers but said they were too inflammatory to be discussed publicly. [VDARE.COM note: One other exception: Dr. Walter Williams, in his Creator's Syndicate column.]

Maybe no other editors thought people are interested in race and crime.

Or maybe they were afraid people are too interested.

Some years back, a group called Violence Free Duluth in Duluth, Minnesota, studied a year's worth of the city's gun crimes. They looked into type of gun used, whether liquor or drugs were involved, the relationship between shooter and victim; age, race, and sex of criminal, etc.

But when they released their report they left one thing out: race of perp.

Frank Jewell, head of the organization, explained that "we didn't include it because it might be misinterpreted."

Duluth's deputy police chief Robert Grytdahl added that race might distract whites from the real problem: "It's a comfortable place for white people to park the [gun crime] problem. It would be a huge distraction, and we wanted to focus on firearms." [Duluth Gun, Crime Study Withholds Race Data, [Pay Archive] By Larry Oakes, Minneapolis Star Tribune, April 30, 1999.]

Mr. Jewell and Mr. Grytdahl are saying, almost in so many words, that the people of Duluth can't be trusted with the truth.

Duluth is about 90 percent white. What if it turned out most of the gun crime was committed by the other 10 percent?

Someone might think Duluth has, not a gun problem, but a minority problem.

When an organization deliberately suppresses its findings like this, it is not doing research: it is putting out propaganda.

It is impossible to know whether the national media suppressed the findings in our earlier report or just didn't think they were newsworthy. But if they thought no one was interested in race and crime they were wrong. Radio talk show hosts greeted the report with shouts of joy.

Over the years, I have spoken on hundreds of radio programs. But no other subject has ever caught the attention of hosts and listeners the way this one did.

Over and over, I was asked to stay on the program longer than scheduled because listeners could not get enough. Producers called up a week later and had me back again because listeners demanded it. Some producers even called because they had heard me on a rival station and wanted a piece of the ratings bonanza.

Most whites lose the power of speech when the subject is race, but they can tuck right into a purely factual discussion of crime rates. Everybody—and I mean everybody—knows blacks commit crime way out of proportion to their numbers. People want to know just how way out the proportions are.

Needless to say, some listeners didn't want to hear that blacks are in jail for robbery at 15 times the white rate. A surprising number of black callers claimed our "racist" white government cooks the statistics. Most white callers said one of two things: either that I was "racist" or that I was brave. (Somehow, no one ever thought I was a brave racist.)

It is a sorry day in America when you are either brave or racist if you dig up and publicize crime data the Department of Justice has been collecting for decades.

The main point of the "racism" accusation was that, even if the numbers were true, publicizing them only encourages other "racists" and feeds stereotypes. This is the Frank Jewell argument: White people can't be trusted with the facts.

Of course, the Internet makes it hard to keep facts under the rug. People know the big media are full of pablum; that's why they come to sites like VDARE.COM and my own American Renaissance.

In fact, more and more people are laughing outright at mainstream prudery. When I talked about crime on the radio, talk-show hosts were exultant: "You didn't read about this in the Baltimore Sun did you? That's right, folks, this is where you get the real news."

This time around, it would be pleasant if AP or the LA Times wrote about The Color of Crime.

But we're not counting on it.

The internet and talk radio will get the word out—and big media will sink just a little further in the minds of people who are tired of being told they can't be trusted with the truth.

The nature of Human advancement is based solely on accomplishment.

Nature does not care about race,religion,desire or any-other event what so ever.

There are ONLY three races;White,Black,Asian;all others are mixtures of some type.

ONLY the White race has always been at the forefront of HUMAN advancement since the dawn of time and recorded history.

Simply put;White inhabitants of this planet have contributed over 99% of all efforts to all inventions,ideas,skills and advancements of any kind, since the beginning of human history.

As THE MASTER RACE,it is the undeniable absolute sacred responsibility of EVERY White person on this planet to act ,work and think toward the greater good of the planet and the HUMAN race.

Blacks and Asians have contributed far far less than any sane person would believe is even minimal for the advancement of the Human race.

Basic White logic:

he who works -earns
he who works most -earns more
he who works less-earns less
he who doesn't work-dies

Basic Black logic:

he who works- is a fool
he who works hard-is a slave
he who doesn't work -can expect SOMEONE else to work for him
he who doesn't work-should receive equality with those who do


Basic Asian logic:

See basic White logic -with ASIAN only advancement and assistance.


TODAY,NOW,as you read this; there is a very real and present RACE WAR and the SIDES are being decided HERE and NOW.The choice is yours,for now.

BUT;

Blond hair, white skin with blue eyes WILL NOT save your useless ass, if you make the wrong choice.

In the final analysis it is YOUR responsibility to LEARN the REAL facts.
White Nationalism is first and foremost solely about the ADVANCEMENT OF WHITE people ,then all other racial matters and political ideas are considered.

READ and keep asking questions and demanding answers.If you do; you will inevitability see the White light of truth that we TRY to occasionally represent here.

Hey everyone. I'm a blonde, blue-eyed white 16 year old living in the middle of surburbia.

I do not agree that blacks are inferior or more inclined to be evil, etc. I am not rascist. I do not believe the Jews are trying to take over the world. I don't see how you all believe this. I cannot believe that you all advocate "unschooling" and don't understand your reasoning. I don't understand how you learned that the Jews are the terrorists and don't see any evidence for it. I basically haven't believed anything I've read on this site.

But I'm very, very curious to know about this. There's a whole world of white supremacists that I simply don't understand.

So I want to know how you all came to the conclusions that you did. What convinced you?


You are most likely not convinced because the majority of White Nationalists have no real understanding of the issues they purport to be interested in e.g. race, history, etc. WN is a subculture to them, a way to feel important. As you can see in this thread the average internet WN is slavishly dogmatic in thinking, drawing from an ever-shrinking about of sources to support a mindnumbingly simplistic outlook on the world. Most of these "WN"s avoid any real confrontation with opposing ideologies of any sort because they lack the education and sometimes mental capacity to understand their own beliefs much less defend them.

Unfortunately, the WN "movement" does not like to admit these problems. Pointing it out will usually result in someone calling you Jew. This is especially common amongst the more mentally ill types because it shows the level of fantasy they live in- they believe that they are engaged in a war with Jews online because they have no courage nor any idea how to fight against "the Jew" in real life. So they concoct this fantasy despite the fact that A. No Jew would ever offer constructive criticism that ultimately HELPS the cause, and B. why would any critic need to be Jewish when there are plenty of non-Jewish people with opposition to WN "ideas" and through the internet one cannot be seen. The cause is that the accuser WISHES his opponent to be Jewish because only here does he ever confront "Jews"(who as stated are often not Jews at all).

The problem with the WN movement is that tactically BAD actions are praised while intelligent actions are called "cowardly". You get a pat on the back if you shout "Jews did it" every time some negative event happens, but if you suggest that maybe we need to verify the evidence in some cases, as well as discuss the Jewish issue in depth in all its complexity you become a "Jew-lover" or "kike-alike". Shouting lots of racial sloagans and slurs while adorned with "Nazi" imagery is praised as "courage" while tactically sound discretion is seen as cowardice.

If you are truly objective I believe you would see the credibility and intelligence of some future movement should it ever be created- but it is not surprising at all that you would not be convinced by many of the posts you see on this board. Sometimes I think a lot of these people seriously DON'T want victory of any sort.

-- Buddha --
Has a high probability of sleeping with NIGGERS.

Feel free to join the conversation Buddha. In 2008 you'll be prime draft age.

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=23917

Blacks have problems. BIG problems. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/race.htm

You would be a great guest on the LARRY KING(JEW) talk,Lie ,BS show.

You would be a great guest on the LARRY KING(JEW) talk,Lie ,BS show.
This is exactly the kind of post that JP was referring to. Although there is a possibility that Buddha may not be what his first post claims him to be, it is our responsibility to try and show someone the right path.

Slag, you should be ashamed of yourself.

You are most likely not convinced because the majority of White Nationalists have no real understanding of the issues they purport to be interested in e.g. race, history, etc. WN is a subculture to them, a way to feel important. As you can see in this thread the average internet WN is slavishly dogmatic in thinking, drawing from an ever-shrinking about of sources to support a mindnumbingly simplistic outlook on the world. Most of these "WN"s avoid any real confrontation with opposing ideologies of any sort because they lack the education and sometimes mental capacity to understand their own beliefs much less defend them.

Unfortunately, the WN "movement" does not like to admit these problems. Pointing it out will usually result in someone calling you Jew. This is especially common amongst the more mentally ill types because it shows the level of fantasy they live in- they believe that they are engaged in a war with Jews online because they have no courage nor any idea how to fight against "the Jew" in real life. So they concoct this fantasy despite the fact that A. No Jew would ever offer constructive criticism that ultimately HELPS the cause, and B. why would any critic need to be Jewish when there are plenty of non-Jewish people with opposition to WN "ideas" and through the internet one cannot be seen. The cause is that the accuser WISHES his opponent to be Jewish because only here does he ever confront "Jews"(who as stated are often not Jews at all).

The problem with the WN movement is that tactically BAD actions are praised while intelligent actions are called "cowardly". You get a pat on the back if you shout "Jews did it" every time some negative event happens, but if you suggest that maybe we need to verify the evidence in some cases, as well as discuss the Jewish issue in depth in all its complexity you become a "Jew-lover" or "kike-alike". Shouting lots of racial sloagans and slurs while adorned with "Nazi" imagery is praised as "courage" while tactically sound discretion is seen as cowardice.

If you are truly objective I believe you would see the credibility and intelligence of some future movement should it ever be created- but it is not surprising at all that you would not be convinced by many of the posts you see on this board. Sometimes I think a lot of these people seriously DON'T want victory of any sort.

You just made my ignore list. I am a happier man. Goodbye shithead. Bet you won't put me on ignore, you wouldn't dare.

You suck. Like a Hoover.

You are most likely not convinced because the majority of White Nationalists have no real understanding of the issues they purport to be interested in e.g. race, history, etc. WN is a subculture to them, a way to feel important. As you can see in this thread the average internet WN is slavishly dogmatic in thinking, drawing from an ever-shrinking about of sources to support a mindnumbingly simplistic outlook on the world. Most of these "WN"s avoid any real confrontation with opposing ideologies of any sort because they lack the education and sometimes mental capacity to understand their own beliefs much less defend them.

Unfortunately, the WN "movement" does not like to admit these problems. Pointing it out will usually result in someone calling you Jew. This is especially common amongst the more mentally ill types because it shows the level of fantasy they live in- they believe that they are engaged in a war with Jews online because they have no courage nor any idea how to fight against "the Jew" in real life. So they concoct this fantasy despite the fact that A. No Jew would ever offer constructive criticism that ultimately HELPS the cause, and B. why would any critic need to be Jewish when there are plenty of non-Jewish people with opposition to WN "ideas" and through the internet one cannot be seen. The cause is that the accuser WISHES his opponent to be Jewish because only here does he ever confront "Jews"(who as stated are often not Jews at all).

The problem with the WN movement is that tactically BAD actions are praised while intelligent actions are called "cowardly". You get a pat on the back if you shout "Jews did it" every time some negative event happens, but if you suggest that maybe we need to verify the evidence in some cases, as well as discuss the Jewish issue in depth in all its complexity you become a "Jew-lover" or "kike-alike". Shouting lots of racial sloagans and slurs while adorned with "Nazi" imagery is praised as "courage" while tactically sound discretion is seen as cowardice.

If you are truly objective I believe you would see the credibility and intelligence of some future movement should it ever be created- but it is not surprising at all that you would not be convinced by many of the posts you see on this board. Sometimes I think a lot of these people seriously DON'T want victory of any sort.

I don't know how I missed this one given the amount of time I spent reading the board last week. I'd say it sums the situation up about as well as I've ever seen. The "movement" is quixotic - it's hard to tell what exactly the "movement" is all about or where it's going. The tendency for WN's to devour their own is something of an embarrasment. There is a noticeable tendency of those who have some desire for power, or who have gained some self importance by joining, to begin pointing fingers at those who use critical judgement in the evaluation of claims made or ideas put forth, especially if the critical commentators are relatively new. There are, however, some good ones here. You just have to look for them. One other source for you to check out on the net is thebirdman.org. John "Birdman" Bryant is a little odd sometimes, but he's a good thinker. An excellent source to check out would be the 3 books by Dr. Kevin MacDonald, which can be found at Amazon. I've all 3 books, but Culture of Critique is the best if you only want 1. Good luck and keep reading the board. There's good stuff here, you just have to have a little patience sometimes.

(FOR THE RECORD: Oy Ze Hate is now on my ignore list. I had no intention of putting him there but because he "bet" that I would not I went ahead and did it anyway. He is presently the ONLY poster in my ignore list. Yes, I am a jerk.)

Now that it's just big people talking...

Kevin MacDonald is one of the most important resources Aryan nationalists will ever have, simply because he is a respected, legitimate intellectual. Yet this is what many WNs simply WON'T get; that people like Kevin MacDonald will never associate with CIs, Costume Nazis, or Conspiracy nuts- nor will they aid organizations with these types. What we need are more people that can understand MacDonald and to exclude people that view the world in a "Hollywood" X-Files manner.

I bet if Kevin MacDonald himself came on here he would most be called a Jew by half the posters on here for critiquing their view of Jewish influence- and the first one to do it would probably be Oy Ze Hate.

I bet if Kevin MacDonald himself came on here he would most be called a Jew by half the posters on here for critiquing their view of Jewish influence
Yes, unfortunately, that is quite a possibility. :rolleyes: Everyone talks about how D. Duke's Jewish Supremacism is the greatest book, and it's a good one in it's own right, but MacDonald's 3 are vastly superior, in my opinion. I got them several years ago and read them in a very short time. They were expensive but worth the price. I think someone else has published them for a much cheaper price. Funny thing, the originals were published and edited by a Jew! (Seymour Itzkoff) That in itself is enough to get the accusations flying around here. It just happens that at the time, that Jewish guy is the only one who would publish it. Ballsy s.o.b., you gotta give him that!

John "Birdman" Bryant is a little odd sometimes, but he's a good thinker

Birdbrain Bryant also advocates sex between grown men and little boys. Something about the noble Spartans being more advanced than the sexually repressed people who criticize him.

You just made my ignore list. I am a happier man. Goodbye shithead. Bet you won't put me on ignore, you wouldn't dare.

You suck. Like a Hoover.Way to go, Oy Ze Hate.

He's a first class, absolutely useless asshole who doesn't even believe in preserving Whites, no matter what he posted some few days ago about his past actions, which "facts" I, for one, do not necessarily believe. J.P. Slovjanski is, at the very best possibility, VNN's equivalent of the "Beached Boys' " years upon years bedridden, locked-in-his-darkened-bedroom, glazed look, TV-staring Brian Wilson. He's kind of a VNNF-obsessed "supposed WN" Anima. At least anti Anima has the dignity
to reveal to us that he's a dink.

You'd oughta change your screen name to Brian Wilson, J.P.-- then we'd take you more seriously. The pity factor.

As a matter of fact, from now on, in all references to you, I will call you Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski.
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=24285
I hope others will join me. We'll wipe out your preferred name by giving you the more apt one.

Birdbrain Bryant also advocates sex between grown men and little boys. Something about the noble Spartans being more advanced than the sexually repressed people who criticize him.
I've never heard this before your post, but I can't argue against it. I have not read his entire site and have read none of his books. Do you know if it's on his site? I don't have the cash for any books at the moment.

Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski whined in post #14-
I bet if Kevin MacDonald himself came on here he would most be called a Jew by half the posters on here for critiquing their view of Jewish influence. Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski bullshit. Kevin MacDonald has met Linder and it's already known that he likes and READS Alex' writings on VNN.

Your writings remind me of neocon Casper's of SF who himself has even begun posting on VNNF.

"By half the posters here" is yet more of your nearly constant, elephantine exaggeration dragging on VNNF, and more importantly- against worldwide WN consciousness and its-- our clearly awakening movement.

For approximately every dozen posts you make here, about one enhances our common effort.

"Half the posters" is an obvious exaggeration. He's just pointing out that K. Mac tends to soft-pedal a bit compared to many of the conspiracy theories prevalent among WN's, and any soft-pedaling would be seen as leniency and therefore excuse-making. This leads to ridiculously intolerant accusations of disloyalty for not taking the hard line.

Why the fuck are you so hard on the guy? Slovjanski has c. 2500 posts on VNNF, has written articles for VNN and Stormfront, was active in NA for a couple of years, yet all this bashing from you. All that and you call him a "supposed WN" and insinuate that he's an anti?! That's just unfuckingbelievable! The criticisms I've seen him dole out may seem harsh to you, but I think they're perfectly justified. It's not enough to have your heart in the right place; you have to be a good, critical thinker, especially for such a floundering movement - mistakes are critical and continuing to make the same mistakes is ruinous. I'm not saying everyone has to be Aristotle, and it would be unfair to expect everyone to be highly intelligent in any sort of racial movement. But J. P. is one with a good head on his shoulders and ought to be listened to. Your kicking him around isn't doing a damn bit of good for anyone.

Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski has earned his stripes that he complains about on such a regular basis. It's odd that he manages to claim the greater number of WN's are dysfunctional, when it appears completely the reverse. He has actually expressed pride in his non-support of TAA, for example. I'm not bothered to give it back to him as others might be. TAA#3 is going out big time, new eyes will be flooding in here, and there will wait Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski with his "special" tactical and strategic wiseness he ballyhoos on here every day. Such a leader. :p

Hal Turner is someone who gets superly criticized. Can you see the difference between Hal and Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski? One gets off his ass; the other is greatly concerned that you think him a strategic expert, even as he does a big fat NOTHING, and simultaneously, assiduously and with tremendous verve runs down virtually all existing WN projects and truth propagandas.

centerfire said-
Your kicking him around isn't doing a damn bit of good for anyone.Yeah, he's a regular Charles Lee.

Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski has earned his stripes that he complains about on such a regular basis. It's odd that he manages to claim the greater number of WN's are dysfunctional, when it appears completely the reverse. He has actually expressed pride in his non-support of TAA, for example. I'm not bothered to give it back to him as others might be. TAA#3 is going out big time, new eyes will be flooding in here, and there will wait Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski with his "special" tactical and strategic wiseness he ballyhoos on here every day. Such a leader. :p

Hal Turner is someone who gets superly criticized. Can you see the difference between Hal and Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski? One gets off his ass; the other is greatly concerned that you think him a strategic expert, even as he does a big fat NOTHING, and simultaneously, assiduously and with tremendous verve runs down virtually all existing WN projects and truth propagandas.


Thank you for again proving that you are indeed mentally dysfunctional. Let's examine the details.

1. You claim I express pride in my "non-support" of the TAA yet I have never done such a thing. I simply don't support the TAA because it is essentially just another flyer distribution project with nothing to back it up. Which brings it to our next point...

2. You and your fellow cult members insist on bitching at anyone who does not support your project. Again it is essentially just another ongoing flyering campaign yet you guys act as though it it some kind of general uprising and call everyone who doesn't support it a coward. Sorry pal but I've put out MY flyers for two years and one thing I've learned is that a flyer is useless if there is nothing on the other end.


3. You seem to share a concept with others on this board that believes that any idea for activism/"resistance"/etc. worth doing is one that can be posted on a forum. As the movement is 99% online it follows that they would be skeptical that there can actually be ideas out there that don't necessarily lend themselves well to being posted on forums- not because they contain illegal ideas per se but because they would take so much time and space and doing so would be a waste of time.


So there's your mental defect trifecta. You've really shown a strange inferiority complex toward me for a least a week now. One would think you are jealous of an independent mind.

Likewise, you and you ex-NA aficionados. Why don't you fuck off, Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski? Or is this the best venue you can find to free-reign discourage 16 year old Whites?

I'm sure you'd be highly valued at AmRen, Vdare or as a staffer to Pat Buchanan.

Ladies and Gentlemen, behold the "WN" cultist and his circus of mental defects!!!

Way to go, Oy Ze Hate.

This guy actually supports Oy Ze Hate, one of the most idiotic conspiracy nuts on the board who can't even follow a complex thought pattern.


He's a first class, absolutely useless asshole who doesn't even believe in preserving Whites, no matter what he posted some few days ago about his past actions, which "facts" I, for one, do not necessarily believe.

Your attemps to read my mind have failed miserably, so you can kiss James Randi's $1,000,000 prize goodbye(randi.org). Secondly, nobody really gives a shit about what you "believe" about my story. There are plenty of people to confirm all of it and I have REPEATEDLY posted links to articles where I am quoted after some flyering action or reports on gun shows we used to do.


You'd oughta change your screen name to Brian Wilson, J.P.-- then we'd take you more seriously. The pity factor.

I don't know who this "Brian Wilson" is, I guess I don't watch as much TV as you.


As a matter of fact, from now on, in all references to you, I will call you Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski.
http://vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=24285
I hope others will join me. We'll wipe out your preferred name by giving you the more apt one.

OH NO!!! THEY'RE GOING TO ATTACK MY NAME BY CREATING A BADLY CONSTRUCTED ALTERNATIVE NAME!! OH WHAT WILL I DO WHEN MY FORUM NAME IS UNDER ATTACK!!!

Thanks for proving what a cultish, fantasizing loser you truly are- you live in this forum world so fervently that you actually believe that people give a shit about the hilarious but rather clumsy jokes about their name.

Likewise, you and you ex-NA aficionados. Why don't you fuck off, Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski? Or is this the best venue you can find to free-reign discourage 16 year old Whites?

I'm sure you'd be highly valued at AmRen, Vdare or as a staffer to Pat Buchanan.

What organization do you currently or have EVER worked for?

Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski whined in post #14-
Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski bullshit. Kevin MacDonald has met Linder and it's already known that he likes and READS Alex' writings on VNN.

Your writings remind me of neocon Casper's of SF who himself has even begun posting on VNNF.

"By half the posters here" is yet more of your nearly constant, elephantine exaggeration dragging on VNNF, and more importantly- against worldwide WN consciousness and its-- our clearly awakening movement.

For approximately every dozen posts you make here, about one enhances our common effort.

Once again you prove my point by acting in a hysterical manner more suited to that of a 14 year old girl. Case and point:

My hypothetical remarks about Kevin were suggesting how he would be treated were he writing his ideas as an ANONYMOUS poster where nobody knew it was him. Second, while I said "half the posters" here I am talking about VNN, but in reality the same effect would occur were he exposed to any branch of the movement at this time.

Most WNs these days might beat up Himmler(for hanging out with Muslims and having the Bhagavad Gita) or Adolf Eichmann(he spoke fluent Hebrew) if they were not fully aware of their history.

Was in WCOTC, WR and posted on SF as you already well know. Moved to Pocahontas county to be close to NA, and try to help them without offending their sensibilities re Creativity alliances. All moot, what with Strom, Gliebe and Walker.

You are really living in the past, Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski. You epitomize the term "net Nazi", more than just about anybody on the board.

Was in WCOTC, WR and posted on SF as you already well know. Moved to Pocahontas county to be close to NA, and try to help them without offending their sensibilities re Creativity alliances. All moot, what with Strom, Gliebe and Walker.

You are really living in the past, Brian Wilson Slowhandjewski. You epitomize the term "net Nazi", more than just about anybody on the board.


Actually I would be the exact opposite of a net Nazi because I am the one that does not engage in online fantasy and roleplaying unlike someone else I know..

For example, posting on SF is a non-issue. I posted on SF, EVERYBODY'S posted on SF. Yet for some bizarre reason you included it as though it were another organization like WCOTC or WR. I would think that with your multiple organization experience you would not attack my posts but actually VERIFY everything that is said about the movement. Instead you have turned to a cult-like following of what is essentially little more than a flyering campaign as though it were the final march on Washington. Those who never attempted any kind of activism at least have an excuse for this kind of behavior.