Log in

View Full Version : The three branches of the Caucasian race


Mike Jahn
February 14th, 2004, 07:45 PM
In Madison Grant's 1916 book "The Passing of the Great Race" he lists the 3 branches of the Caucasian race:

The first is the Nordic or Baltic subspecies. This race is long skulled, very tall, fair skinned, with blond or brown hair and light colored eyes. The Nordics inhabit the countries around the North and Baltic Seas, and include not only the great Scandinavian and Teutonic groups, but also other early peoples who first appear in southern Europe and in Asia as representatives of Aryan language and culture.

The second is the dark Mediterranean or Iberian subspecies, occupying the shores of the inland sea, and extending along the Atlantic coast until it reaches the Nordic species. It also spreads far east into southern Asia. It is long skulled like the Nordic race, but the absolute size of the skull is less. The eyes and hair are very dark or black, and the skin more or less swarthy. The stature is stunted in comparison to that of the Nordic race and the musculature and bony framework weak.

The third is the Alpine subspecies occupying all central and eastern Europe, and extending through Asia Minor to the Hindu Kush and the Pamirs. The Armenoids constitute an Alpine subdivision and represent the ancestral type of this race which remained in the mountains and high plateaux of Anatolia and western Asia. The Alpines are round skulled, of medium height and sturdy build, both as to skeleton and muscles. The coloration of both hair and eyes was originally very dark and still tends strongly in that direction, but many light colored eyes, especially gray, are now found in the Alpine populations of western Europe.

While the inhabitants of Europe betray as a whole their mixed origin, nevertheless the three main subspecies are each found in large numbers and in great purity, as well as sparse remnants of still more ancient races represented by small groups or by individuals, and even by unit characters.

These three main groups have bodily characters which constitute them distinct subspecies of Homo sapiens.

Georgie
February 14th, 2004, 08:53 PM
I think we all know where niggers come from. I fail to see how "we" could have come from Africa. "They" obviously did.

Martin Lawrence and Will Smith are what I would call the "chimp" niggers. They look like chimpanzee's. Dave Chappelle also fits into this category although he may be a spider monkey. I've also seen niggers who look like gorilla's (can't think of any right now) and orangutangs (Eve from the Ruff Ryders). Interesting how niggers seem to fit so easily into different types of monkey's.

http://www.ezthemes.com/previews/C/Chimpanzees.jpghttp://imagesdal.citysearch.com/profile/48/5d/343979p1.jpg

Georgie
February 14th, 2004, 10:39 PM
A few years ago when Tim Burton did his remake of "The Planet of the Apes" there was a bit of controversey due to the fact that black actors and extras were picked to play the roles of gorillas. I suppose it hit a little too close to home if ya know whum sayin'!

I think I remember some of that. There was 1 particular nigger that I remember but I can't remember his name he was the REALLY REALLY big, fat stupid looking one. They had used him for a gorilla. Christ, the guy fucking looks like a gorilla himself.

Kurt
February 15th, 2004, 05:55 PM
I think I remember some of that. There was 1 particular nigger that I remember but I can't remember his name he was the REALLY REALLY big, fat stupid looking one. They had used him for a gorilla. Christ, the guy fucking looks like a gorilla himself.

His name is Michael Clarke Duncan.

Did he really need any makeup?

http://www.moviestar-photos.com/graphics/241/241599.jpg

http://images.reviewer.co.uk/news/pota/pota_mcd1_332x200.jpg

Georgie
February 15th, 2004, 06:45 PM
Thanks for finding out who that nigger was, Kurt. You're right, he doesn't need any because he fits into the "gorilla nigger" section.

http://www.moviestar-photos.com/graphics/241/241599.jpghttp://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/gorilla.jpg

Antiochus Epiphanes
February 27th, 2004, 01:11 PM
I am under the impression Gorillas are less violent, self destructive, and unpredictable than Negroidicus Americanus.

Mike Jahn
February 27th, 2004, 02:28 PM
I am under the impression Gorillas are less violent, self destructive, and unpredictable than Negroidicus Americanus.

You might have a point there! :D

Aryan Lord
March 2nd, 2004, 04:52 PM
I am under the impression Gorillas are less violent, self destructive, and unpredictable than Negroidicus Americanus.

Yes and infinitely more attractive!! ;)

Uncle Marc
March 13th, 2004, 04:52 AM
....gelungener Beitrag kann ich nur sagen!....musste ja nun doch ueber die photos schmunzeln!

...das war Kurt...Ohne Helm und ohne Gurt.....einfach Kurt! :)

Mike Jahn
November 3rd, 2008, 07:48 PM
Madison Grant

Mike Jahn
December 4th, 2008, 07:44 PM
Madison Grant

The Passing of The Great Race

1916

http://www.churchoftrueisrael.com/pgr/pgr-toc.html

Wagner
December 4th, 2008, 08:55 PM
Anyone have any stereotypically images that represent the various branches?

Antiochus Epiphanes
December 8th, 2008, 09:57 AM
Anyone have any stereotypically images that represent the various branches?

get baker's book race

there are some good websites out there which cover "physical anthropology" which refers to what anthropology was before Franz Boas Jewed it.

Mike Jahn
December 10th, 2008, 11:59 PM
Anyone have any stereotypically images that represent the various branches?


http://www.white-history.com/earlson/hfk/reoehcover.htm