http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/West/02/14/samesex.marriage/index.html

Hundreds of gay and lesbian couples ringed San Francisco's City Hall on Saturday to be married, before a judge hears a challenge Tuesday from two groups opposed to same-sex marriage.

Looks like the issue of gay marriage is going to explode upon the nation pretty soon. It seems to be already happening and getting people really rowdy in many places. Whatever happens, I suspect that its going to be BIG.

[QUOTE=Georgie]http://www.cnn.com/2004/US/West/02/14/samesex.marriage/index.html



Looks like the issue of gay marriage is going to explode upon the nation pretty soon. It seems to be already happening and getting people really rowdy in many places. Whatever happens, I suspect that its going to be BIG.[/QUOTE]

LOL This ought to wake a few lemmings up. Queer marriage makes a mockery of one of the most important events in their lives.

time to make some elbow room!

Who brought the rope?

The media is acting like it's a good thing, even though it is a violation of state law. Soon to be changed using press as leverage. Most are still against this, so why the sudden push? Bound to cause controversy, masking something the press would rather not cover. Several items on that list.

One of the Judges that ruled today (feb 17) is the grandson of Earl Warren, the other is a flip. The flip was the one that on Friday said to come back Tuesday, then said he wasn't ready. Imagine, a fucking shitskin FLIP chuckling as he fucks with what's left of your civilization. How pathetic it is to see the white conservatives desperately running around trying to get someone to enforce the law. LOL!!

And I still read on this board how we are going to take it all back with the ballot.

[SIZE=4]BAHAHAHA!!![/SIZE]

Speaking of the abuse of colons, I had FoxJews channel on in the background as I puttered around the shop and it seems the judges delayed the ruling because of a typo: a semicolon in place of a period or something.

Dunno if it's true or not, but if so, it would be typical of the ZOG courts to stymie any attempt to right the situation by any means no matter how petty, while the pre-verts merely have to show up, display their feelings and genitals and voila their wishes will be granted in due course.

I have noticed that "The Law™" must be strictly adhered to when it comes to guns, saying the 14th Amendment means that preggo wetbacks dropping litters here makes them citizens or forcing taxpayers to subsidize these same wetbacks, and so forth but the same legal apparatus is strangely rubbery when it comes to sticking it to faggots or "minorities" of any stripe or smell operating outside the letter of the law.

It's been kind of funny watching the blacks complain about how the queers are trying to take over their victim status. Imagine some black not getting a promotion because the company needed to up their queer numbers. Friggin idiots.

What could be more beautiful than Megan Muffstop tying the cherry knot with Susie Secondbaseman? They're registered at Starkist, you know!

I think gay marriage is probably inevitable. Of course the lemming public are foolish to allow it. Gays are using that jew-like reasoning that never seems to fail when used against unaware Whites; "We only want to be treated with human dignity just like you."

Then again, I'm not really that outraged by the idea since interracial marriage is legal. That alone "devalues" marriage more than gay marriage could.

Maybe when gays get enough power and acceptance with White suburban moms & dads as legal marriage will give them, perhaps young gay muds will start aggressively flirting with young straight White boys and girls with impunity, and that'll wake-up the lemmings.

I think gay marriage is probably inevitable. Of course the lemming public are foolish to allow it. Gays are using that jew-like reasoning that never seems to fail when used against unaware Whites; "We only want to be treated with human dignity just like you."

You may be right, but I'm hopeful that this will be that proverbial KrazyStraw that fractured the ol' humped ruminant's spine between the C5 and C6 vertabrae.

Thing is, that "we only want equal treatment" argument has been used for so long that folks are getting jaded to it, especially when stuff like, say AA for instance, is obviously unequal, simply not allowed to be discussed. "Civil Rights" arguments lose their appeal when you realize you're last in line to get some.

Deep down, folks have an instinctive aversion to someone who prefers "doin' the hot stinky with an exit instead of an entrance" (thanks to CarolontheWeb for that little gem*). For homos to sit there on sore, pus-filled asses and say that their plunging of scheiss-covered wangs into each others' butts is the moral and legal equivalent of a good-ol' Sunday-after-church roll in the hay with one's wifey just strikes a chord of revulsion.

Also not helping the situation are that the culture shocks are coming too close together. Used to be, whites were drip-fed this crap simultaneously with propaganda carefully crafted to help the toxins stay down. Now, within the space of six months, we have pop star and monkeyball molesters, saggy, dusky teats on prime-time in front of the kiddies, lawbreaker Roy Moore as evil religious ideologue vs. lawbreaker Gavin Newsome as heroic defender of opressed butt rangers, amnesty for wetbacks and their litters, body bags without the nukes to make them "worthwhile," Mel Gibson the Christian/Nazi "hater" and a host of others I'm forgetting to catalogue.

The jew media's getting lazy and not laying the proper groundwork before excreting this stuff straight into the living room.

I think, I hope White America's gag reflex is kicking in.


*Another good one: "A homosexual 'community' is a bathroom stall in a gay bar."

Oh, on the interracial mating/dating/marriage thing: that may have gone down easier (with the masses of asses at least) because the black is nominally defined by his color, instead of by his behavior as he should be. Therefore, it's relatively easy to craft propaganda showing the monkey-in-manpantz acting human and it takes a little while to discern that's a load of bullshit. However, fags are defined soley by where they put their pokeys, and no amount of skillful propaganda designed to make them seem innocuous (American Beauty's doctor/lawyer faggot combo is a good example) can prevent people from begging the question, "Which one's the butch and which one's the bitch?" or reflecting on the "shitty" nature of gay butt plowing.

"You mean he puts that where? And it's covered with what?"

As shocking as all that is, I'm stunned (well, not really) that no one here has even mentioned this story...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3443293.stm

Apparently plenty more where he came from, and now a wonderful legal precedent is on the books for cases wherein if there is "consent" (if such a term can be applied in the case of a clearly mentally deficient person), one can get off with just a handful of years jail time and a stern talking to.

Discuss.
Disgust?

[QUOTE=Ur-Quan]As shocking as all that is, I'm stunned (well, not really) that no one here has even mentioned this story...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/3443293.stm

Apparently plenty more where he came from, and now a wonderful legal precedent is on the books for cases wherein if there is "consent" (if such a term can be applied in the case of a clearly mentally deficient person), one can get off with just a handful of years jail time and a stern talking to.

Discuss.
Disgust?[/QUOTE]

What exactly are you trying to get at? No one said that White people didn't committ crimes. You seem like a smart boy/girl, you do realize that in parts of Africa they still practice cannibalism and slavery. SLAVERY! How long ago did those racist White folks outlaw slavery in their countries?

I realize white people commit crimes, that wasn't what I was attempting to bring to peoples' attention. Cases of cannibalism in Africa are a result of ancient tribal conflict, civil war, and general lawlessness. Also, these cases have nothing to do with this article. Neither does slavery, please do not confuse the issue.

The Meiwes case is different because Germany is not a lawless country. He was caught and pled guilty to the charges. He engaged in what was clearly a homosexual, cannibalistic relationship, and the law let him off relatively easy. I can't imagine a sentence so light being handed down in this country.

That's the point I was getting at. Gay marriage may be a legal step in the wrong direction in the opinion of some, but a verdict such as this is by comparison running full tilt in the wrong direction, hollaring all the way. Some may say the crime was mitigated by his victim's willingness, but I say that's setting a dangerous precedent.

[QUOTE=Ur-Quan]I realize white people commit crimes, that wasn't what I was attempting to bring to peoples' attention. Cases of cannibalism in Africa are a result of ancient tribal conflict, civil war, and general lawlessness. Also, these cases have nothing to do with this article. Neither does slavery, please do not confuse the issue.

The Meiwes case is different because Germany is not a lawless country. He was caught and pled guilty to the charges. He engaged in what was clearly a homosexual, cannibalistic relationship, and the law let him off relatively easy. I can't imagine a sentence so light being handed down in this country.

That's the point I was getting at. Gay marriage may be a legal step in the wrong direction in the opinion of some, but a verdict such as this is by comparison running full tilt in the wrong direction, hollaring all the way. Some may say the crime was mitigated by his victim's willingness, but I say that's setting a dangerous precedent.[/QUOTE]

There is no dangerous precedent, as far as I’m concerned fags can cannibalise each other as much as they want, the more the merrier.

I realize white people commit crimes, that wasn't what I was attempting to bring to peoples' attention. Cases of cannibalism in Africa are a result of ancient tribal conflict, civil war, and general lawlessness. Also, these cases have nothing to do with this article. Neither does slavery, please do not confuse the issue.

The Meiwes case is different because Germany is not a lawless country. He was caught and pled guilty to the charges. He engaged in what was clearly a homosexual, cannibalistic relationship, and the law let him off relatively easy. I can't imagine a sentence so light being handed down in this country.

That's the point I was getting at. Gay marriage may be a legal step in the wrong direction in the opinion of some, but a verdict such as this is by comparison running full tilt in the wrong direction, hollaring all the way. Some may say the crime was mitigated by his victim's willingness, but I say that's setting a dangerous precedent.

From what I hear, Germany has been degraded into a very gay-tolerant country. Kind of sad considering how different it was only 60 years ago. LOL.