The Final Solution
March 2nd, 2004, 03:50 PM
From Giuseppe Furioso:
In a pamphlet put out by the Anti-Defamation League titled, Holocaust
Denial:
A Pocket guide it says on p. 11, '' Working with chambers measuring 225
sq.
ft. the Nazis forced to their deaths 700 to 800 men, women and children
at a
time.'' The den in my home is 18' by 15' and therefore a bit larger at
270 sq.
ft. Last year my high school graduated 730 students...I think you get
my
point.
joe
GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com
PS The bibliography list 12 names and except for Jean-Claude Pressac,
they
are all Jews.
-----------------
Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York says:
"The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon.
Through
its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers,
with a
horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state,
and the most
successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired
victim
status. Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood - in
particular,
immunity to criticism, however justified. " (Finkelstein, The Holocaust
Industry (2000) published by Verso, p 3).
Some further quotes:
"In an authoritative study, Leonard Dinnerstein reported: Sixty
thousand
Jews.. walked out of the concentration camps. Within a week more than
20,000 of
them had died.". But 'As it entered into negotiations with Germany
[just two
years ago, in 1999], the Holocaust industry demanded compensation for
135,000
still living former (camp inmates).'
On page 83 he notes that 'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently
put
the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million.'
On page 127 he further observes 'If 135,000 former Jewish slave
laborers are
still alive today, some 600,000 must have survived the war. That's at
least a
half-million more than standard estimates.. If Jews only constituted
20% of
the surviving camp population and, as the Holocaust industry implies,
600,000
Jewish inmates survived the war, then fully 3 million inmates in total
must have
survived. By the Holocaust industry's reckoning, concentration camp
conditions couldn't have been that harsh at all; in fact, one must
suppose a remarkably
high fertility and remarkably low mortality rate.. If, as the Holocaust
industry suggests, many hundreds of thousands of Jews survived, the
Final Solution
couldn't have been so efficient after all - exactly what Holocaust
deniers
argue. (pp127-8). ''The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the "greatest
robbery in
the history of mankind".. The Holocaust industry has clearly gone
berserk.'(p
138-9).
[A Google search for 'Holocaust survivor' turns up an embarrassingly
large
number of 'survivors' even 50 years after the end of WW2.]
Is Finkelstein's evaluation fair?
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number
of
survivors: Olga Lengyel's Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true story
of
Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).
The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune:
"Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US
construction of
the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering "You
have done a
real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten
(sic)
speak."
Lengyel says:
'After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews
and
Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was
all the time
it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280
corpses
per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency,
functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits,
which could
destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000
corpses were
handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well
for
German industry.' (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any
remains of or
in 'death pits' has been found.]
This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million
in 40
days, or almost six million in 240 days (eight months).
Could this claim be a misprint?
Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland,
fully
confirms these figures:
'Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of
about
18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a
further
8,000 in the same period.' (p 118; Return to Auschwitz - paperback
edition by
Granada (1981, 1983).
According to the cover blurb, 'The subject of the award-winning
Yorkshire
television documentary of the same name.' 'Both engaging and
harrowing.an
important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of
which conveys
so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive' -
Martin
Gilbert, The Times.
Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the
'Holocaust'
and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes
his
own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:
In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states:
'The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe's Jews
was
unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period
during which
it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of
Jews
were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.'
(p.26).
If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a
million for a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and
this does not
include the awe-inspiring claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and
Lengyel
with Gilbert's blessing.
Could Finkelstein be wrong? Could the 6 million figure itself be a
shocking
underestimate of the dramatically LARGER Jewish holocaust implied by
the
figures given by Lengyel, Hart and Gilbert? Could all the Zionist
apologists who
beat the Holocaust drum every week be themselves in denial of this far
more
enormous catastrophe? Could the millions of Jews who have publically
manifested
themselves in large numbers in certain roles in America during the
second half of
the 20th century be examples of miraculous biblical-type resurrections
from
the dead or some other type of rematerialisation?
Or are we simply dealing here with the usual mendacious atrocity
stories
concocted to support dubious agendas?
In a pamphlet put out by the Anti-Defamation League titled, Holocaust
Denial:
A Pocket guide it says on p. 11, '' Working with chambers measuring 225
sq.
ft. the Nazis forced to their deaths 700 to 800 men, women and children
at a
time.'' The den in my home is 18' by 15' and therefore a bit larger at
270 sq.
ft. Last year my high school graduated 730 students...I think you get
my
point.
joe
GiuseppeFurioso@aol.com
PS The bibliography list 12 names and except for Jean-Claude Pressac,
they
are all Jews.
-----------------
Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York says:
"The Holocaust has proven to be an indispensable ideological weapon.
Through
its deployment, one of the world's most formidable military powers,
with a
horrendous human rights record, has cast itself as a 'victim' state,
and the most
successful ethnic group in the United States has likewise acquired
victim
status. Considerable benefits accrue to this specious victimhood - in
particular,
immunity to criticism, however justified. " (Finkelstein, The Holocaust
Industry (2000) published by Verso, p 3).
Some further quotes:
"In an authoritative study, Leonard Dinnerstein reported: Sixty
thousand
Jews.. walked out of the concentration camps. Within a week more than
20,000 of
them had died.". But 'As it entered into negotiations with Germany
[just two
years ago, in 1999], the Holocaust industry demanded compensation for
135,000
still living former (camp inmates).'
On page 83 he notes that 'The Israeli Prime Minister's office recently
put
the number of "living Holocaust survivors" at nearly a million.'
On page 127 he further observes 'If 135,000 former Jewish slave
laborers are
still alive today, some 600,000 must have survived the war. That's at
least a
half-million more than standard estimates.. If Jews only constituted
20% of
the surviving camp population and, as the Holocaust industry implies,
600,000
Jewish inmates survived the war, then fully 3 million inmates in total
must have
survived. By the Holocaust industry's reckoning, concentration camp
conditions couldn't have been that harsh at all; in fact, one must
suppose a remarkably
high fertility and remarkably low mortality rate.. If, as the Holocaust
industry suggests, many hundreds of thousands of Jews survived, the
Final Solution
couldn't have been so efficient after all - exactly what Holocaust
deniers
argue. (pp127-8). ''The Holocaust may yet turn out to be the "greatest
robbery in
the history of mankind".. The Holocaust industry has clearly gone
berserk.'(p
138-9).
[A Google search for 'Holocaust survivor' turns up an embarrassingly
large
number of 'survivors' even 50 years after the end of WW2.]
Is Finkelstein's evaluation fair?
Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number
of
survivors: Olga Lengyel's Five Chimneys: a woman survivor's true story
of
Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).
The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune:
"Passionate, tormenting". Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US
construction of
the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering "You
have done a
real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten
(sic)
speak."
Lengyel says:
'After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews
and
Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was
all the time
it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280
corpses
per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency,
functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits,
which could
destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000
corpses were
handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well
for
German industry.' (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any
remains of or
in 'death pits' has been found.]
This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million
in 40
days, or almost six million in 240 days (eight months).
Could this claim be a misprint?
Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland,
fully
confirms these figures:
'Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of
about
18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a
further
8,000 in the same period.' (p 118; Return to Auschwitz - paperback
edition by
Granada (1981, 1983).
According to the cover blurb, 'The subject of the award-winning
Yorkshire
television documentary of the same name.' 'Both engaging and
harrowing.an
important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of
which conveys
so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive' -
Martin
Gilbert, The Times.
Martin Gilbert, indefatigable Jewish campaigner on behalf of the
'Holocaust'
and biographer of Winston Churchill, adds to the rich flavour and makes
his
own numerical claims, certainly not without chutzpah:
In his book Auschwitz and the Allies (1981) he states:
'The deliberate attempt to destroy systematically all of Europe's Jews
was
unsuspected in the spring and early summer of 1942: the very period
during which
it was at its most intense, and during which hundreds of thousands of
Jews
were being gassed every day at Belzec, Chelmo, Sobibor and Treblinka.'
(p.26).
If we assume a minimum figure of 200,000 per day, this amounts to say a
million for a five-day working week, or 6 million in six weeks, and
this does not
include the awe-inspiring claims for Auschwitz put forward by Hart and
Lengyel
with Gilbert's blessing.
Could Finkelstein be wrong? Could the 6 million figure itself be a
shocking
underestimate of the dramatically LARGER Jewish holocaust implied by
the
figures given by Lengyel, Hart and Gilbert? Could all the Zionist
apologists who
beat the Holocaust drum every week be themselves in denial of this far
more
enormous catastrophe? Could the millions of Jews who have publically
manifested
themselves in large numbers in certain roles in America during the
second half of
the 20th century be examples of miraculous biblical-type resurrections
from
the dead or some other type of rematerialisation?
Or are we simply dealing here with the usual mendacious atrocity
stories
concocted to support dubious agendas?