Polygamy Rights?


"Polygamy rights is the next civil rights battle." So goes the motto of a pro-polygamy organization that has been watching the battle over homosexual "marriage" rights with keen interest.

"We're coming. We are next. There's no doubt about it, we are next," says Mark Henkel, founder of www.TruthBearer.org.


Traditional values groups often argue that legalizing same-sex "marriage" is a "slippery slope" -- that if marriage is redefined to allow homosexuals to "wed," it will be further redefined to allow other unions, including polygamous ones.


Homosexual rights leaders and their allies insist that the "slippery slope" argument is a rhetorical dodge. It's a "scare tactic," says Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson.

http://www.washtimes.com/specialreport/20051211-121113-7195r.htm

aren't mormons polygamists? :o

I would imagine this to be good news to KD Rebel enthusiasts.

aren't mormons polygamists? :o


lol Yes they are by belief. It's not legal though.

Without a doubt your best one liner post, that I have seen. :D

I would imagine this to be good news to KD Rebel enthusiasts.

Polygamy Rights?


"Polygamy rights is the next civil rights battle." So goes the motto of a pro-polygamy organization that has been watching the battle over homosexual "marriage" rights with keen interest.

"We're coming. We are next. There's no doubt about it, we are next," says Mark Henkel, founder of www.TruthBearer.org.


Traditional values groups often argue that legalizing same-sex "marriage" is a "slippery slope" -- that if marriage is redefined to allow homosexuals to "wed," it will be further redefined to allow other unions, including polygamous ones.


Homosexual rights leaders and their allies insist that the "slippery slope" argument is a rhetorical dodge. It's a "scare tactic," says Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson.

http://www.washtimes.com/specialreport/20051211-121113-7195r.htm

and for gay polygamists, just imagine how the complexities where laws of inheritance, property rights, and retirement benefits would be worsened. the line should have been drawn at man-woman monogamy which is the winning combination for Western society, nothing else. not polygamy and not homosexual partnerships.

Polygamy Rights?


"Polygamy rights is the next civil rights battle." So goes the motto of a pro-polygamy organization that has been watching the battle over homosexual "marriage" rights with keen interest.

"We're coming. We are next. There's no doubt about it, we are next," says Mark Henkel, founder of www.TruthBearer.org.


Traditional values groups often argue that legalizing same-sex "marriage" is a "slippery slope" -- that if marriage is redefined to allow homosexuals to "wed," it will be further redefined to allow other unions, including polygamous ones.


Homosexual rights leaders and their allies insist that the "slippery slope" argument is a rhetorical dodge. It's a "scare tactic," says Freedom to Marry founder Evan Wolfson.

http://www.washtimes.com/specialreport/20051211-121113-7195r.htm

At least the Mormons are white, and it helps counter balance the explosive growth of the Niggers and Mexicans. Society doesn’t condemn Niggers and Mexicans from having sex with 9 different women and having 15 kids. The only difference between the average minority and a white polygamist are marriage licenses.

just think, a man and his wives, 2 or 3 stay at home and all the other go earn money for the family. Nice huh?

Polygamy=more white babies. Therefore, it's illegal.

The ZOG hath spoken.

...Society doesn’t condemn Niggers and Mexicans from having sex with 9 different women and having 15 kids. The only difference between the average minority and a white polygamist are marriage licenses.This is a very important point. Almost all non-white societies 'practice' polygamy of some sort, whether the 'unions' are sanctioned by church or state or not. The monogamy of white societies is not the norm for non-whites, and so it is 'disrespectful' of the 'diversity' of other 'cultures' not to allow polygamy in quickly-darkening white societies. When the jews set out to destroy us, they really did their homework on how best to do it, to destroy the normal white family as the basis on which civilization depends.

There is nothing at all to prevent a man from living with a dozen concubines if he so wishes.One surely does not need a "licence" for this to be legal.