I posted this first on the Peak Oil forum.
http://www.peakoil.com/post238125.html#238125

Wow... If we are rolling back female rights, can we reinstitute smoking on airplanes please? I'm just sayin...
"We" aren't going to roll back female rights. It's not going to be a legislative or policy sort of thing. The usual historical forces will return women to their traditional role, because it was the superabundance of extrasomatic energy that let them (temporarily) climb out of it. Women will be wives because that's how they will acquire an economic niche for motherhood. Women will be mothers because every race that stubbornly persists in having a low birthrate will be wiped off the Earth by those who maintain a high birthrate.

The fact that the side having the biggest army usually wins the battle translates into a requirement for women being frequently mothers to warriors and to the next generation's mothers.

Overpopulation cannot be controlled by limiting births. An attempt to do so naturally fizzles for either of two reasons. As "responsible" people limit their family size and "irresponsible" people do not, the capacity for civic responsibility gets culled out of the population. Each generation is less inclined than its predecessor to obey calls for birth control. That's the piecemeal type of failure.

There's also a catastrophic failure mode in which a population that mostly heeds the call to limit family size finds itself, due to its smaller numbers, vulnerable to conquest by another population that did not try to limit its birthrate. The war is fought, the biggest army wins, and the losers are exterminated.

So the notion that birth control is a way to solve overpopulation is wrong.

And when a copious resource of extrasomatic energy isn't available, women can no longer be afforded careers at the expense of motherhood. If they insist on it, they will be as good as cutting the throat of their own nation. Eventually, the Earth will be the possession of those whose women "knew their places" and stayed there.

Jerry Abbott

Looking back, it seems obvious that the unreconstructed family was destined to re-emerge after the passage of feminism's storm of social change. Following the original impulse to address everything in the lives of women, feminism turned its focus to cracking open the doors of the public power structure.

This was no small task. At the beginning, there were male juries and male Ivy League schools, sex-segregated want ads, discriminatory employers, harassing colleagues. As a result of feminist efforts -- and larger economic trends -- the percentage of women, even of mothers in full- or part-time employment, rose robustly through the 1980s and early '90s.

But then the pace slowed. The census numbers for all working mothers leveled off around 1990 and have fallen modestly since 1998. In interviews, women with enough money to quit work say they are "choosing" to opt out. Their words conceal a crucial reality: the belief that women are responsible for child-rearing and homemaking was largely untouched by decades of workplace feminism. Add to this the good evidence that the upper-class workplace has become more demanding and then mix in the successful conservative cultural campaign to reinforce traditional gender roles and you've got a perfect recipe for feminism's stall.

What is going on? Most women hope to marry and have babies. If they resist the traditional female responsibilities of child-rearing and householding, what Arlie Hochschild called "The Second Shift," they are fixing for a fight. But elite women aren't resisting tradition. None of the stay-at-home brides I interviewed saw the second shift as unjust; they agree that the household is women's work.

http://www.alternet.org/story/28621/

Death to Feminism :cheers: :cheers:

Census Report NOVEMBER 30, 2004

http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/families_households/003118.html

Feminism is one of the most destructive anti-white ideologies to come out of the '60's. I don't believe it is any coincidence that most of the feminist leaders were jewesses.

Feminism has nothing to do with women's rights. Feminism was created to destroy the white race by alienating white women from white men, and turn white women into degenerates. They did this by aligning (politically) white women with minorities against the white men whom they deem as "the patriarchy" and "oppressors".

Anyone caught peddling feminism in a white state will be taken out back and machine-gunned.

Feminism is one of the most destructive anti-white ideologies to come out of the '60's. I don't believe it is any coincidence that most of the feminist leaders were jewesses.

The founder of feminism are almost all jewesses, but yes, they do have a large following of White women. And I believe the feminists who have practiced this destruction for years, can not be help. But their are younger women that can still be reached. There will come the time when men will just take them back to the home. By force if needed.

Feminism is definately one of the most destructive elements introduced into society. Its cousin is racemixing, and they go hand in hand. Feminism was designed to brainwash White men into being wimps, and White women into having less or no children and/or not getting married. The reason its cousin is racemixing is because no matter how brainwashed White women are into thinking they like metrosexuals, in the end, they want a masculine male, and along with brainwashing White women into thinking White men are effeminate, and actual brainwashing of White men, they encourage racemixing by promoting other races as having White qualities. They also make Asian women seem appealing to White males. They go to great lengths to make other Whites seem undesireable, and nigger bucks and Suzie Wong as desireable as possible. The good news is that the jews are getting so carried away with pushing their lies that Whites are beginning to wise up.

Something kinda ironic about feminism is it apes the very behavior it proffesses to despise. It pressures women into becoming feminists, and telling them how to think, and criticizes homemakers. There was once a WN site with a sub-section dealing with feminism, but I forget the link.