Horst Mahler writes to Robert Faurisson on the proposed revisionist conference in Iran:

Dear Robert Faurisson,
I disagree. The conference should be held under any circumstances. The incarceration of Ernst Zündel, Germar Rudolf, David Irving, Siegfried Verbeke e.a. is not a blow to revisionism but to the holocaustreligion. Before these events revisionism was in a deep crisis. All the facts that dismantle the Big Lie are reported in hundreds of articels and books. Germar Rudolf summarized the findings of the revisionists. There is nothing more to be done on this field. Now it is time to go to jail for the truth.
Robert, do You remember Your words You’ve shouted when we said goodby in Vichy:? „Auf ins Gefängnis!“ („Let’s go to jail!“) The truth is the weapon to destroy Yewish supremacy. And this will change the world and save the mankind. But the truth never wins without these human beings who are ready to die for the truth.
The question for the human race now is whether there are enough of those human beings to rescue the peoples from Yahwe.
Thousands of moslems are ready to die for Allah. This is no option for us Europeans. Europe is the continent of freedom. Freedom means to live for the truth. Nothing else.
Imagine! The leading and well known revisionists are invited by the Iranien Head of State to participate in a scientific conference of historians to discuss the Holocaust. The invited persons join in a declaration in advance that they know the risk of being kidnapped on their journey but will go to Teheran anyway. If these persons are then picked up because of delivery orders from Israel or their vasalls, the fight to free the revisionists becomes a worldaffair. This is –after having said in Your writings what has to be said – the maximum You can achieve for mankind.
Maybe the Jews will kill us. So what? Robert - come on!
Sincerily Yours,
Horst Mahler
Is it appropriate for WNs to accept invitations from the enemy?

Horst Mahler writes to Robert Faurisson on the proposed revisionist conference in Iran:


Is it appropriate for WNs to accept invitations from the enemy?Why not? The Muslims are in a struggle as well from the Anglo-kike imperialism. We invade they're land, and they invade us…

Is it appropriate for WNs to accept invitations from the enemy?

Come on, I don't think in this circumstance Iran can be looked at as "the enemy." The enemy is the Jew, and its power and lies. A high profile world platform like this should not be passed up. The sorry state the West is in right now, and the entire ongoing situation in the Middle East, all thanks to the Jew, demands that this once in a lifetime opportunity to expose the Jew takes place, for all the world to see.

There is no better place in which to host an international conference on the holocaust, what with all the saber rattling indicating that Iran is next on the American/Zionist chopping block. And no one will have to worry about the ADL/JDL screwing it up at the last minute, as they like to do.

Horst Mahler writes to Robert Faurisson on the proposed revisionist conference in Iran:


Is it appropriate for WNs to accept invitations from the enemy?


Repeat after me: The Iranians are not our enemy. The Iranians are the enemy of the Great Satan. In the global struggle against the Jewish World Order, the Iranians are our allies.


Keep repeating this until it comes to you. It will.

Who is the real enemy of Allah? The Jews or Europeans? The Jews want to enslave the Arabs. The Europeans want to be left alone. Send the Muslims back to they're origin... If Allah sees Jews as manipulators of western nations with which will destroy Arabs world on behalf of Israel, then, it is beneficial for both Europe and Arabs to unite and throw off the Yahweh beast before both continents are destroyed in a bloody war of gentiles from Jews whom have no allegiance to either continent but Israel”, will be left standing as the world's capital.

Repeat after me: [SIZE=2][B]The Iranians are not our enemy...The secular Iranians are not our enemy.
As long as death threats are issued to those Whites who are openly supportive of Salman Rushdie's literature, we must be wary of them. Furthermore, those Iranians who stay in their country are certainly not our enemies

Dear Horst:

I share your sentiments of wishing to throw off the Yiddish yoke and kill the Holocaust Lie which has given the Foreskinners so much power. I also have greatest respect for you personally as a courageous fighter for truth in the ugly Orwellian reality that is Your-Rope (Europe). And it is as cool as crispy cucumbers that the head honcho of Iran has invited the Bigass Revisionists to a conference to help put the lie to the Holohoax. But your call for the Bigass Revisionists to attend such a conference, particularly under threat of jail, is at best foolish and pointless, and at worst wrongheaded, ignorant and evensuicidal. The following are some thoughts on this matter which I would like to share.
Call me 'un-conventional', but conventions, conferences, colloquia and other collegial coffee clatches are largely pointless as far as their ostensible purpose is concerned. If there is a genuine need to communicate some Great Idea by reading a Scholarly Paper, the paper can just as well be duped and mailed (or more modernly, e-mailed) to whoever you are trying to communicate with. Of course the Great Scholar who is One Of Those Chosen to Present a Paper does not get the ego trip of standing up in front of all his Colleagues to prove What A Great Guy He Is, but then that is not supposed to be the purpose of the conference. Indeed, my 'un-conventional' way of communicating by mail is much more equalitarian and meritocratic, because papers distributed by mail, as opposed to Being Read At A Conference, are then more likely to be judged on their merits, rather than on whether one has numerous letters, elevated degrees and other High Academic Piffle following his name. This, of course, is heavily influenced by my own lack of academic piffle, but is nonetheless deeply felt because I well know that those with the highest degrees are often those who have proved only that they can kiss a** and jump thru academic hoops, rather than actually produce anything that has any scholastic worth. In all this, of course, I do not deny the REAL purpose for most convention-al people -- hunting for a new academic appointment among assembled colleagues, eating at new restaurants, and getting a decent (edit) fellatio act (/edit) -- but the men who have to go off to Timbuktu or Ultima Thule in order to get these things are, in my view, part of a rotten borough system -- whether of academics, marriage, or some other -- that needs to be radically revised or chucked wholesale rather than shorn up around the edges.
Nor do I deny that there is value in seeing people face to face with whom you may need to share an academic foxhole at some future time; but in reality I think that the value of direct contact is rather limited, and is actually inferior to an extended period of intellectual exchange via email, where a man will reveal many unapparent trappings of character 'malgre lui'.
But there is more than the pointlessness of conferences to make a case for scotching the one presently under consideration, and that is the POINTFULNESS OF NOT GOING. For one thing, in the words of JBR Yant, 'Islam Is Slam' as far as Western values are concerned. Have we so soon forgotten the lesson of Islamic expatriate Salman Rushdie, who is to this day still under police guard in England for writing some silly book that the mullah-fukkas didn't approve of? At the time I remember writing a piece of doggerel which was a takeoff on the familiar ditty of Solomon Grundy:
Salman Rushdie, Born on a Monday, To England on Tuesday, Wrote on a Wednesday, Published on Thursday, Fatwa on Friday, Killed on a Saturday, Buried on Sunday, And that was the end of Salman Rushdie.
It didn't quite turn out that way, of course; but at the same time I remember proposing to the publishing industry (via a letter to Publishers Weekly) that each publisher insert a leaf in every newly published book that would insult Islam as a way of showing a united front of Western disdain for the anti-freedom attitude that Salamis officially have. The letter, of course, was not published, nor (of course) was the suggestion I made accepted -- not that it would have been anyway -- but at least I did what I could.
And then there is the little matter of jail. You say -- and for that matter, so does Prof 'Shoah Constrictor' Faurisson, apparently -- that we have done everything, and now it is time to go to jail, presumably to become martyrs. But unfortunately, in that particular martyrhood, there are no 70 virgins in Paradise -- only obliteration. More specifically, we have not by any means 'done everything': Assembling revisionist information is only the FIRST STEP, and in some sense, a MINOR one. The big job is EDUCATION. People who are not educated-- who have been caught between knowing nothing of their past on the one hand, and fearing the labels of 'racist' and 'antisemite' on the other -- will care nothing if some 'nut' has been put in prison for 'denying the obvious' or hurting the feelings of 'those wonderful suffering People'. Prison is death --intellectually, spiritually, and often physically. In Germany, so I hear, the prisons are fairly civilized; but in America they are anything BUT civilized:
They are the bailiwicks of the worst class of sweaty Africoid brutes who relish using white men's anuses for their sexual pleasure. If that is your cup of nepenthe or hemlock, you are welcome to it.
Now I know it is your fervent wish to free yourself and Western man from the Jewish yoke, but have you ever seriously considered what it would be like living under the ISLAMIC yoke? The Western Jews may have assassination teams, and the Israelis may be torturers and ossifrages, but Jewish society, bad as it is, is a collosal improvement over what is basically a superstitious medieval society which not only tortures and assassinates, but which burns books, enforces chador and purdah, stones adulterers, and chops hands, feet and heads after church. [Tto which I could have added that my webpage is officially banned by the Saudi government, but not by the government of Israel.] As JBR Yant once remarked, the Islamics could significantly improve their system of justice by introducing the guillotine. So I ask, are these the people you want to make alliance with? Yes, Islamics invented the zero, but they have added little to it since, and as a result remain at zero. They are hostile to Western values; and their religion, which promises them seventy virgins in Paradise if they are martyred, makes them a dangerous cancer on the face of this earth. A Jewish future for the West may be full of lies and Holocaustianity, but an Islamic future is a boot stamping on a human face forever.The author seems to be missing the point of going, on the basis that not everybody is hooked to the internet. Everybody has a telivision, though. Therefore, the assembly of revisionists has its symbolic value. Even if it's over the heads of most viewing

The Birdman is wordy, self absorbed, and distractive. Flying saucer guy. Lowest common denominator. Not a serious element in our cause. Sometimes interesting though.

Jews have their assets on the ground in Iran you better believe it. I'd not put it past them to blow the whole fucking thing up if it ever convenes and then blame it on a patsy.

Another thing. It's going to take way more than Truth to defeat Jewry. It will take the usual instrumentalities of social and political power which often as not have nothing to do with truth. Horst is ever the German Idealist. For much as I admire German Idealism, I was born and bred an American pragmatist and attending this conference seems like a bad idea to me. If they even get around to holding it. So far as we know, no date is scheduled so there's no decision.

What's more is if people are going they should keep it quiet and not trumpet it out to Hymie over the internet. Let the Jews find out on their own rather than giving them the courtesy of free information.

"Truth seldom is pleasant; it is almost invariably bitter. A loss of courage may be the most striking feature which an outside observer notices in the West in our days..."

"Such a decline in courage is particularly noticeable among the ruling groups and the intellectual elite, causing an impression of loss of courage by the entire society. Of course, there are many courageous individuals, but they have no determining influence on public life."

~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Commencement address at Harvard University , June 8, 1978

"To defend oneself, one must also be ready to die. There is little such readiness in a society raised in the cult of material well-being. Nothing is left, then, but concessions, attempts to gain time, and betrayal."

~ Alexander Solzhenitsyn

And no, Iran is not our enemy.

All of the muslims are our enemy. But all of the jews are our enemy too. Very few wars are two sided, most have many sides.