http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=14064&highlight=puerto


:eek:

LoL you ever see his pic, he looked like one drunk fuck!!!!!

LoL you ever see his pic, he looked like one drunk fuck!!!!!
I must remember not to take any pictures after I've been at the shandy. Thanks, my respected lad.

Judge for yourself?

Judge for yourself?
I always get a mental vision of what a poster looks like, and when I actually see their picture, I can not believe how off I am. I thought JohnJoyTree would of look like a young Keith Richards or a Paul McCartney.

I like British music and JJT is British so..... ok, dumb association. :D

']JohnJoyTree is the most intelligent moderator/poster on SF. He is racially aware, yet will not be drawn into the "power" thing that many mods there have. For any fence sitters JohnJoyTree is the type of person who will persade them to fall onto the WN side. The rest of the mods show themselves for what they really are...power crazed lunatics.


He sides with feminists, 67. ;)

Give me some beano.

[67] said-
The idea of women wanting to get away from the kitchen sink...disgusting
The idea of their wanting to clunk us over the head with it- at least, equally disgusting.

']The idea of women wanting to get away from the kitchen sink...disgusting ;)


Kitchen sink, or the American family in general? Film at 11.

They try to get away from going to church too. Just ask me. Sometimes, you have to drag them by the hair.

Cabinger, on Thanksgiving I talked with a woman in her sixties who had been somewhat involved in the Berkeley scene of 64, 65, 66. She told me that she concluded long ago that jewess -feminism (I kept calling it that- she smiled, but still kept always referring to "feminism")...had been a terrible, terrible thing in hindsight because of the millions and millions of families it destroyed.

I'd previously thought this woman was pretty liberal, but it turns out she REALLY got behind this killing fact. You could tell it was a big issue with her. Maybe there are many more like her. ...Wish they'd start speaking up.

Cabinger, on Thanksgiving I talked with a woman in her sixties who had been somewhat involved in the Berkeley scene of 64, 65, 66. She told me that she concluded long ago that jewess -feminism (I kept calling it that- she smiled, but still kept always referring to "feminism")...had been a terrible thing because of the millions and millions of families it destroyed.

I'd previously thought this woman was pretty liberal, but it turns out she REALLY got behind this killing fact. You could tell it was a big issue with her. Maybe there are many more like her. ...Wish they'd start speaking up.

Well, I'm glad she came out of the closet (so to speak) and admitted the truth. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the female of today is a LOT different from the female of yesterday.

Let's just look at our grandparents, for example. These people toiled and labored hard all their lives so some uppity Uber feminist can tell them that gender roles are wrong??? Are you fucking kidding me? It was FINE!

America back in the day was built on traditional gender roles, and traditional values. It worked and it was good. If fact, gender equality never even entered into their mind, I'll bet. This wasn't a poison they even knew about. The male did his thing, and the female did hers. It was natural and they did it to survive.

Isn't it interesting how far our glorious white culture has plummetted since the 1960's? :(

[67] said-
Maybe I'm starting to understand the WN ideology. You simply don't like the idea of people that you have enslaved throughout history to "fight back".

The troika Freidan, Steinem & Abzug?

[67], was that the year you were born? Cause that's the year before I started to hate jewess Freidan.

[67] said-


The troika Freidan, Steinem & Abzug?

[67], was that the year you were born? Cause that's the year before I started to hate jewess Freidan.


I have visions of gallows.

']Maybe I'm starting to understand the WN ideology. You simply don't like the idea of people that you have enslaved throughout history to "fight back". Correct me if I'm wrong. Giving examples of course.

I see, 69. Only White people are guilty of "enslaving" others? Enlighten me o' wise sage and soothsayer on how you came to that conclusion?

Cabinger said-
I have visions of gallows.
Don't let's start that "day of the rope" stuff, Cabinger!
You'll get "the membership" all riled up about Rockwell's "White Power", and all the work REAL White activists (as opposed to "loonies") are doing. Then we'll have to remind them of Andrew McDonald's references, and by that point the shit will have REALLY hit the fan.

Maybe I'll get lucky and DREAM of the "day of the rope" tonight.

[67] said-
Whats the difference between you fighting back at the oppression that you believe in, and women fighting back at the oppression they believe in?
Both instances were/are instigated by jewry and their shabbez goy lackeys, true enough.

Fight back against people like you, of course.

']Hurrah, you are the first person to alter my nickname in the hope of making it "comical", well done. This is actually quite a well known WN tactic against people who disagree with you.

As for your more intelligent comments...no, white people are not the only race guilty of enslaving others. The race thing is actually irrelevant when it comes to women, they do not want to be enslaved anymore, and they will fight back.

You still haven't enlightened me O' noble soothsayer of truth. How exactly are women going to "fight back" and what are they fighting against? And what exactly is this female "enslavement" you speak of. I'm curious....

']Why are you here? Multiculturism works well for the vast majority of people. You feel oppressed by it, so you fight back. Whats the difference between you fighting back at the oppression that you believe in, and women fighting back at the oppression they believe in?

Troll, you base your assumption that "multiculturalism works well for the vast majority of people" on what exactly? What a joke.

']They will fight back using the law.
They are fighting against your oppression,
"Enslavement" means that you do not wish them to live their lives to the full extent of their abilities.

Please be specific! What EXACTLY are White Males doing to deprive women of living "their lives to the full extent of their abilities"? I must know what "oppression" I am being accused of.

']I base my assumption on the fact that the vast majority of people do not accept what you preach to be true.

Troll, you did not even answer the question (big surprise). I have met very few people that truly LOVE the idea of multiculturalism AND live their lives as "multiculturally" as possible. Go back and come up with your proof that people like multiculturalism both in theory and practice. Otherwise back off of the crazy assumption. The vast majority do NOT like it and do NOT support it. Most people, as much as you may hate it, accept something much closer to what I preach than you.

Related to this, go read "The Myth of Diversity": http://www.amren.com/divers.htm

Getting back to the topis.

1. Johnjoytree is a good writer and contributor and he has been for a long time. Somebody wants to call him non-White ought to have convincing proof. Otherwise buzz off.

2. There are plenty of White folks in Puerto Rico, Central, South America, Mexico. Read up on your geography. A few percent only perhaps, but a few percent of many millions is plenty of people.

3. ...unless maybe you dont consider Mediteranean folk White, in which case go back to item 1- buzz off. That's writing off millions of allies when you need them most. Such stupidity should retreat into the obscurity of extinction.

Getting back to the topis.

1. Johnjoytree is a good writer and contributor and he has been for a long time. Somebody wants to call him non-White ought to have convincing proof. Otherwise buzz off.

2. There are plenty of White folks in Puerto Rico, Central, South America, Mexico. Read up on your geography. A few percent only perhaps, but a few percent of many millions is plenty of people.

3. ...unless maybe you dont consider Mediteranean folk White, in which case go back to item 1- buzz off. That's writing off millions of allies when you need them most. Such stupidity should retreat into the obscurity of extinction.

1. John Joytree is new to the movement. He hasn't been anything for a long time. The way he conducts himself on the forum MIGHT be fine for arguing with anti-racists (has he ever persuaded any?), I will give you that much, but his views on gender relations (which he enforces by deleting posts) and the way he handles the Talk forum are a huge negative. He deletes all posts by men that are used for money by the women on the forum. He also deletes all the posts where guys are being two-timed (or worse) on the board by a girl. He never banned a girl that committed fraud against other board members. On the other hand, if any girl complains about any guy on there, you can expect an almost immediate ban. I already detailed this on another post but you seem to be unaware or are simply ignoring this.

Is he White? Sure. The pic he posted is one of a drunk half-British/half-Spanish guy. ;)

2. This is only if you are very generous about who you consider White. In South America, particularly in countries like Argentina, this is true. However, in Puerto Rico, Mexico, and especially Central America (LOL), the number of actual Whites that are unmixed is miniscule. The vast majority of those that are "Whites" there have European male lineages and mixed Injun/Nigger female lineages depending upon which of the three you choose.

']I am not a troll, I disagree with you.



If you think the majority of people dislike multiculturism you are living in a dream world. That is why you are a minority and the majority rules you.

Wow, I asked for proof and this is all that you provide. Damn, all those people moving out to the suburbs, afraid to go to the cities, and gating their communities must really be loving that multiculturalism!

You are trolling because you are not staying in your forum. You have no concern about our cause.

The unfortunate thing is, even if we somehow do manage to "win", feminism will still have a long long lasting impact on our race. Telling women that they dont have to "stay in the kitchen" and that they can go out and become businesswomen and life their life to the fullest is quite possibly the most stupidest and unnatural thing you could do. In our basic designs, we weren't mean to go out and work for corporations, talk on cell phones, live freely without those hateful men, NO. Our most basic goal is to procreate so that the species can live on. It is a law by which all other animals live by, yet we humans have completely twisted it around. And if women are going out and becoming career women, there are no kids being born, and our race will die. If having children with a woman and having her "stay in the kitchen" means that you are oppressing her, then I certainly don't mind oppressing them.

Feminism, when you get down to the nitty gritty of it, especially with the claim that it "frees" women, is a trully sick perversion. And lets not forget the whole claim that marriage is an institution created by men to enslave women. Wow...a complete dismisal of natural laws.

This is what happens with the freedom that democracy supposedly gives people. It gives them too much extra time to think up of stuff like feminism. People really dont know how to rule themselves at all.

John Robinson is right on the money. You guys should be so lucky as to marry a beautiful Puerto Rican Latina:


White Latins are beautiful

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would be more than willing to welcome a beautiful white Puerto Rican into my family as my wife!

Why Latins are some of the most beautiful and talented Whites in the world and most have a good record on racial matters. Did Argentina or Chile ever go along with bombing Hamburg and Dresden? No of course not, not so the idiots in London.

Also, note that Latins always take a strong stand against Black criminals and Black political scams. There are no Blacks on Latin television, no Blacks as elected officials in any Latin country that I am aware of, Castro promoted some in the military, but that is it.

Latin Whites want to be European and we will certainly welcome the best White Latins, including Puerto Ricans on our side.

(Please note that the Puerto Rican day sexual assaults in Central Park were not done by Puerto Rican Whites, but by Mud untermenschen).

Feminism puts terrible pressure on a woman to "succeed in a man's world" (which is quickly becoming something other than a man's world). You have to wonder at a woman who has a career and gives up having children (she's giving up a lot), or has children and puts them in day care or hires a "nanny". I know that there are legitimate cases where women have to work and have to put kids in those situations, but I think that generates a lot of guilt in them. Let's just take the example of a woman who does not "have to work". She has a career and she's expected to be a successful career woman, keep a decent household, raise wonderful children, etc. etc. It just ain't gonna happen. There are only so many hours in each day, and something has to give somewhere. Feminism not only makes White men loosers, but also the women themselves and the children, not to mention the broader picture of the White race.

I consider a woman very fortunate to be able to stay home with her children with all the flexibility that implies. In doing so, she's making life much easier for her husband if she raises them right, prepares a nice dinner which the whole family can enjoy together, keeps the house in fairly decent order and in general does things beneficial to the family, including household projects or gardening. A good man is appreciative of this, and a smart woman knows it and is pleased to honor him as the person who is strong enough to take care of his family and be a good father to her children! I think it's a mutually fulfilling and respectful symbiosis. It's worked well for centuries.

I am a stay-at-home mom and housewife. I earned a graduate degree before I had kids, and also worked and did some publishing. But I'm not a feminist. I like being a woman and having a traditional woman's role in life.