Can somebody please tell me just WTF is going on here?


http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/reg/bnr_06.jpg

I see this crap each time I tune on to Yahoo.

What's the silly Nigger supposed to be doing to the stupid white boy?

Would we be seeing a picture with a White man doing this to a nigger bitch?

Miscegenation propaganda, that's what. Have you seen the previews for the new movie coming out 'Something New'? It's about a black woman finding a new lover, a white guy.

Them and MSN post that kind of shit all the time in little snippet ads. It's nothing less than subliminal.

No, it's more than that. Advertisers use socially transgressive images to catch your eyeballs. People who buy advertising services are buying eyeballs. That's a big part of this and it explains how Jews as agents of social subversion, have made billions on Madison Avenue selling social transgression to capitalist purchasers of mass media advertising.

This is where we need a deeper understanding of problems. You could send every single Jew on a plane ride back to Izrahell and there would still be a phalanx of social subversives lining up to take the jobs they just left and continuing the social destruction agenda.

The German National Socialists of the 1930s understood this and so they sought to do lots more than just remove the Jews-- although they did that and that was a hell of an accomplishment all alone-- they sought to change culture and society and restore organic order.

I don't think that advertisers use race mixing images to grab your attention. The people that work in that field have had their college indoctrination ...

many employers prefer those with experience in related occupations plus a broad liberal arts background. A bachelor’s degree in sociology, psychology, literature, journalism, or philosophy, among other subjects, is acceptable.
http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos020.htm#training (http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos020.htm#training [/QUOTE)

Just as the jew uses his worldview to influence the direction of today's movies those in the field of marketing transfer their worldview of how society should be into their ads. Those buying the advertising risk the label racist should they opt to change the races the advetisers have decided upon. They now just go with the flow.

No, it's more than that. Advertisers use socially transgressive images to catch your eyeballs. People who buy advertising services are buying eyeballs. That's a big part of this and it explains how Jews as agents of social subversion, have made billions on Madison Avenue selling social transgression to capitalist purchasers of mass media advertising.

This is where we need a deeper understanding of problems. You could send every single Jew on a plane ride back to Izrahell and there would still be a phalanx of social subversives lining up to take the jobs they just left and continuing the social destruction agenda.

The German National Socialists of the 1930s understood this and so they sought to do lots more than just remove the Jews-- although they did that and that was a hell of an accomplishment all alone-- they sought to change culture and society and restore organic order.


Well said and 100% true. I personally still see a lack of race mixing in 40 second TV commercial spots. Race mixing is used as an eyeball grabber when they aren't necessarily selling a manufactured product. They use it was a "click here!" type ad. When it comes to selling paper towel however, they don't want to alienate those people who are still subliminally against race mixing, which is large albeit diminishing group.

I don't think that advertisers use race mixing images to grab your attention. The people that work in that field have had their college indoctrination ...

Just as the jew uses his worldview to influence the direction of today's movies those in the field of marketing transfer their worldview of how society should be into their ads. Those buying the advertising risk the label racist should they opt to change the races the advetisers have decided upon. They now just go with the flow.

In those college classes they "deconstruct" race over and over again. thus, these folks are acutely aware of race and the signficance of race in advertising. The number of White vs black faces in advertising is never a mistake.

Certainly you are right that they are "programmed." But where I would disagree, is with the notion that a politically correct college student turned advertising geek, would not deliberately insert an uncommon image into advertising to deliberately catch eyeballs. They WONT be accused of racism, because it blatantly promotes miscegenation-- the opposite. And, everyone will know damn well it will catch eyeballs which is THE objective in advertising.

I doubt an advertiser consciously thinks of using mixed races in an order to attract viewers. I’m more apt to believe that they try to include all races whenever possible in order to appease their personal ‘diversity is great’ ideals. The fact that most pairings are white women with minorities is just evident that white women dominate the field of modeling and that a black male is the epitome of the picture of diversity these days.

If you’re of the school of thought that white America is racist, as most of the leftist thinking types are, then why would you actively incite that group by posing mixed pairings in the advertising of products they use? That’s why I think it’s just a reflection of the marketers’ idealistic view of the present ‘diversity is our strength’. They are oblivious to any negative interpretation of their ‘inclusive’ models.

Besides, pairings of people have been used since marketing began. It’s not the people that are to be focused on but what those people are doing that is what is supposed to catch the eye. The fact that the couple in the ad above are mixed should come secondary to the fact that they are at the beach, playfully strolling along.

If you’re of the school of thought that white America is racist, as most of the leftist thinking types are, then why would you actively incite that group by posing mixed pairings in the advertising of products they use?

I'd call it the "bandwagon effect". "Hey there, look at this white woman! She's hanging out with a nigger, look at how much fun she's having! Don't you want to have fun too? Go on, white woman, find a nigger to hang out with!" :mad:

I doubt an advertiser consciously thinks of using mixed races in an order to attract viewers. I’m more apt to believe that they try to include all races whenever possible in order to appease their personal ‘diversity is great’ ideals. The fact that most pairings are white women with minorities is just evident that white women dominate the field of modeling and that a black male is the epitome of the picture of diversity these days.

If you’re of the school of thought that white America is racist, as most of the leftist thinking types are, then why would you actively incite that group by posing mixed pairings in the advertising of products they use? That’s why I think it’s just a reflection of the marketers’ idealistic view of the present ‘diversity is our strength’. They are oblivious to any negative interpretation of their ‘inclusive’ models.

Besides, pairings of people have been used since marketing began. It’s not the people that are to be focused on but what those people are doing that is what is supposed to catch the eye. The fact that the couple in the ad above are mixed should come secondary to the fact that they are at the beach, playfully strolling along.



http://www.interracialsingles.net/index.html

http://www.interracialsingles.net/images/photos/148_302/02.jpg

http://abcnews.go.com/US/PollVault/story?id=866977&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

Poll: Contact Between Races Up
Discrimination Remains as Racially Mixed Communities Multiply
Analysis By GARY LANGER
June 21, 2005 — - Social contact between the races has grown over the decades, to the point where three-quarters of white and black Americans have a friend of the other race, more than half have broken bread at dinner and seven in 10 live in racially mixed communities.

Racial discrimination, however, remains a reality for many blacks: Fifty-four percent in this ABC News survey have felt they've been discriminated against because of their race, compared with 19 percent of whites. And 13 percent of blacks -- a small percentage, but one in eight individuals -- say they experience discrimination "very often."

Overall, though, two long-term trends are positive for race relations. In 1973, just 20 percent of Americans said they'd had a friend of the other race home for dinner (whites for blacks, blacks for non-blacks). That doubled by the mid-'90s, cracked into a majority in an ABC News poll in 2003 and remains there now, at 52 percent. (Blacks are more likely than whites to have shared dinner with a friend of the other race. A majority of blacks has done so, 63 percent, compared with just under half of whites, 48 percent.)

Similarly, in 1981, 54 percent of whites said they had a fairly close personal friend who was black; today, 75 percent of whites say so. Among blacks in 1981, 69 percent said they had a white friend; today, it's 82 percent.

Race relations were in the news last week when the Senate approved a resolution apologizing for never passing anti-lynching legislation. Race relations also are the focus of a new film, "Crash," that's explored on the ABC News program "Nightline" tonight.

In this poll, 70 percent of all Americans describe their community as racially mixed, ranging from 77 percent of blacks to 67 percent of whites. People in rural (or so-called "non-metro" areas by Census designation) are the least likely to live in racially mixed communities; 56 percent do, compared with 72 percent in metro areas.

Racially mixed communities are most prevalent in the West and South (where 74 percent and 73 percent, respectively, say they live in one), a bit less so in the Northeast (63 percent).

There's an apparent difference in this survey in the number of blacks who say they've been discriminated against racially -- 54 percent, compared with 64 percent in a January 2003 poll. That difference is not significant, however, given the sample sizes. (There was an insufficient sample of Hispanics in this survey for separate analysis.)

Finally, generational differences suggest that contact between the races may continue to increase. Seniors are the least likely Americans to say they have a friend, or have shared dinner with someone, of the other race. Younger adults are much more likely to say so.

Have a friend of another race

Age 65+ 61%
Age 35-64 75
Age 18-34 83
Had a black/white friend home for dinner

Age 65+ 35%
Age 35-64 54
Age 18-34 57


Methodology
This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone June 2-5, 2005, among a random national sample of 1,002 adults. The results have a three-point error margin. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, Pa.

I find it hard to believe that that was the original intent of the marketers. I do believe that those viewing the ads over a period of time, along with the same visuals in other mediums and in life in general would be more inclined to consider such a pairing for their self.

Those that are rejected by the majority of the opposite sex of their own race will embrace the advances of another race, advertising or not.

Cracker, it would seem that the AP writer agrees with your view, in a roundabout way. I stand by my hypothesis that miscegenatory ad copy is a money making ploy.

http://www.sptimes.com/2005/02/22/news_pf/Worldandnation/Diversity_in_ads_not_.shtml

Diversity in ads not reflected in real life
Advertisers are filling commercials with a mix of races and ethnicities, but critics contend such utopian situations rarely exist.
By Associated Press
Published February 22, 2005

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Somewhere there's an America that's full of neighborhoods where black and white kids play softball together, where biracial families e-mail photos online and where Asians and blacks dance in the same nightclub.

And that America is on your television.

In the idyllic world of TV commercials, Americans increasingly are living together side by side, regardless of race. The diverse images reflect a trend that has been quietly growing in the advertising industry for years: Racially mixed scenarios - families, friendships, neighborhoods and party scenes - are often used as a hip backdrop to sell products.

The ads suggest America's ethnic communities are meshing seamlessly, bonded by a love of yogurt, lipstick and athletic gear. Last year, Verizon used a fictional interracial family - white and Hispanic - in seven commercials pushing their communications products in an effort, according to a company spokesman, to "portray something that was contemporary and realistic."

Such commercials allow advertisers to convey an inclusive corporate image and reach a broad ethnic range of consumers. Many applaud them as an optimistic barometer of racial progress.

But critics say such ads gloss over persistent and complicated racial realities. Though the proportion of ethnic minorities in America is growing, experts say, more than superficial interaction between groups is relatively unusual. Most Americans live and mingle with people from their own racial background.

Advertising, meanwhile, is creating a "carefully manufactured racial utopia, a narrative of colorblindness" says Charles Gallagher, a sociologist at Georgia State University in Atlanta.

Only about 7 percent of marriages are interracial, according to Census data. About 80 percent of whites live in neighborhoods in which more than 95 percent of their neighbors are white, and data show most Americans have few close friends of another race, Gallagher said.

"The lens through which people learn about other races is absolutely through TV, not through human interaction and contact," he said. "Here, we're getting a lens of racial interaction that is far afield from reality." Ads make it seem that race doesn't matter, when real life would tell you something different, he added.

Multiracial images have long been used by advertisers, but the current version exploded onto billboards and magazine ads in the late 1980s, when United Colors of Bennetton ads began picturing interracial close-ups such as a white woman and black woman hugging an Asian baby. Some protested when, in 1989, the company ran a picture of a black woman breastfeeding a white baby.

Since then - and particularly since data from Census 2000 underscored the nation's increasing ethnic complexity - ads that meld racial groups in less controversial ways have slowly become the norm. Interracial settings now are used as a matter-of-fact backdrop to sell wine and bath soap. In a typical ad, a white family or couple will be in the foreground talking or laughing while, in the background, black friends and a few Asian children may linger.

"For so long, speaking to consumers of color has been absent from the landscape," said Dana Wade, president of Spike DDB, a New York ad agency that uses multiracial images in most of its advertising. "It's important to correct that."

Said Ellen Neuborne, editor of Marketing to the Emerging Majorities , an advertising industry newsletter: "This is a very smart way to approach the idea of diversity marketing."

Commercials for Yoplait feature a multiracial group of girlfriends sitting around laughing and comparing the yogurt to various wonderful activities: "This is day-at-the-spa good. This is a-weekend-with-no-boys good."

In another, a new Olympus mp3 player/camera is promoted by a white preteen and Asian senior citizens dancing in a gyrating pop-locking style popular with 1980s rappers. The main character is a hip, young actor of mixed Asian and Latino heritage.

Experts say such depictions are largely provoked by the advertising industry's penchant for offering flawless images to sell products.

"Often, advertising doesn't reflect reality - everyone is beautiful and pretty and thin, so a lot of advertising is very unrealistic," said Sonya Grier, a marketing professor at Stanford University. "It's always been something that reflects our aspirations, what we can be."

Today, she added, "multiculturalism is socially desirable."

During the Super Bowl, beer maker Anheuser-Busch Cos. ran nine commercials that included every major racial group, some in mixed settings, some not. In one of its most popular, promoting designated drivers, the black comedian Cedric the Entertainer pretended to turn a steering wheel in a nightclub, unwittingly sparking a multiracial crowd to do copycat dance moves. Every shot in the commercial pictured at least two ethnic groups - some had four.

The ad's racial diversity "was very much discussed" during the planning stages, said Bob Lachky, vice president for brand marketing at Anheuser-Busch. "That's very much the club situation in any progressive club in America. ... The look was very, very representative of our customer base."

Lachky added that such diversity would not work in any ad setting: A commercial featuring pop star Justin Timberlake knocking on a fan's door, he said, had an all-white cast. "It didn't lend itself to multicultural images, necessarily, because it was at someone's home," Lachky said.

Verizon might beg to differ. Last year, the company ran a series of ad featuring three families, one black, one Latino and one with a Latina mom and a white dad. The last family, named the Elliotts, was geared to appeal to mass market consumers, said John Bonomo, a company spokesman. Ethnicity was never mentioned.

That was also the case in a recent Lays potato chip commercial featuring two black kids and two white kids, neighbors, commiserating over a lost softball and eating potato chips.

Such depictions hardly reflect most real-life neighborhoods, said Jerome Williams, a professor of advertising and African-American studies at the University of Texas at Austin.

"Despite the progress we've made on civil rights and other things," he said, "if you look at the United States in terms of where we live and who our friends are and where we go to church, we live in different worlds."

Whoa, lookee here at this blog, right on the money! Bunch of damned half-castes yapping endlessly!

http://www.mixedmediawatch.com/

"tracking media representations of mixed people"

In those college classes they "deconstruct" race over and over again. thus, these folks are acutely aware of race and the signficance of race in advertising. The number of White vs black faces in advertising is never a mistake.


Yes, this absolutely is true; if they truly were color-blind, the chips would fall where they may, and you'd go through periods where the models were all white. At worst, blacks would be proportionate to their numbers in the population.

Yes, this absolutely is true; if they truly were color-blind, the chips would fall where they may, and you'd go through periods where the models were all white. At worst, blacks would be proportionate to their numbers in the population.

Didn't think this little "bitch" would raise so much controversy here.

Just watching TV at night I would think (if I didn't know differently) that the black population of America would be at least 50%;base on the amount of niggers represented in almost every TV program,movie and commercial;even the TV news.

I must have two or three hundred TV channels, and fly through them like a computer virus trying to find a white program.Usually it's hopeless. Generally I turn it off and go to bed.

But they’re not colorblind. They are well aware of the races and in order to show equal representation in each ad there will be at least one representative of the black and white race as that is the biggest cultural hurdle to cross.

Representing, at least, the black and white factor in all advertising helps present a view that we’re now at harmony with each other but it’s just an unintentional consequence of marketers divvying out the roles equally on a per ad scale. That's why they end up being overrepresented on the whole, SunofSparta.

Can somebody please tell me just WTF is going on here?


http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/reg/bnr_06.jpg

I see this crap each time I tune on to Yahoo.

What's the silly Nigger supposed to be doing to the stupid white boy?

Would we be seeing a picture with a White man doing this to a nigger bitch?
LOLOL, it's actually, a very cool pic - THE GUY HAS NO HEAD. That's about it.

While we're on this subject, AOL is worse. I mean, their problem isn't just limited to putting some spade in an ad--what AOL does is pick the dumbest lightweight news stories with a nigger subject and ram them down your throat, such as "NBA bans bling on the court--is this a racist decision?" replete with nigger jargon like "bling" accompanied by some nig athlete's ugly mug. EVERY DAY you're confronted with some sneering rapper or some other nigger, and even in an article featuring a white face, they'll sprinkle ebonics jargon in, like "have you got game?" or some such.

One of today's is "Athletes who broke the color barrier" with a picture of Tiger Woods. It's not just during nigger history month, it's every day.

They expect you to understand what "bling" means. They force you to notice some real-life street nigger or some other lowlife; it's not just an imaginary Kindly Negro Doctor in an ad.

AOL can kiss my ass. Screwheads.

They're still at it! I mean every day!

Yesterday there was some "desperate housewives" ridicuoulousness about the scandal" of a black career woman falling for the white gardener. I don't know if they were referrring to that TV show or what.

EVERY DAY on aol they have this shit!

Yeah this is something they're doing everywhere now.

Can somebody please tell me just WTF is going on here?


http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/reg/bnr_06.jpg

I see this crap each time I tune on to Yahoo.

What's the silly Nigger supposed to be doing to the stupid white boy?

Would we be seeing a picture with a White man doing this to a nigger bitch?



You mean jewhoo?

Oh please those bastards, They seized my account ! And its been hacked,
all my mail from Micetrap records had bugs.. other WN/NN stuff totally polluted, do NOT trust JEWYOO!