Log in

View Full Version : 5.7 Handgun..........


Ray_Air
February 18th, 2006, 06:53 PM
Does anyone know a place that sells the Five-Seven handgun by FN? It shoots the 5.7x28mm round. This is an awesome handgun and I cant find one.

Aryan race
February 19th, 2006, 09:09 AM
I held one of those "hand rifles" just the other day. That thing is amazing!

Although, the ammo (http://www.impactguns.com/store/fn_ammunition.html) is pretty frikkin expensive.

JoeSixPack
February 19th, 2006, 04:50 PM
I'm not familiar with the 5.7 but I have been looking at the Kel-Tecs.

Here is the PLR-16 with optional accessories. Definitely a "hand rifle", shoots common .223s although it is not at all concealable.
http://www.impactguns.com/store/media/kel_plr_wacc.jpg
http://www.impactguns.com/store/640832000375.html

ragnar
February 22nd, 2006, 02:17 AM
http://www.impactguns.com/store/818513002509.html

Antiochus Epiphanes
February 22nd, 2006, 08:51 AM
pretty hi-vel rounds, no? what is available?

New Order
February 22nd, 2006, 11:17 AM
The ammo sold in USA is different from European round due to all the "cop killer bullet" nonsense. So you are, in effect, paying big money for a popgun.

Ray_Air
March 2nd, 2006, 12:11 PM
The ammo sold in USA is different from European round due to all the "cop killer bullet" nonsense. So you are, in effect, paying big money for a popgun.


The 5.7x28 round has a velocity of 2,100fps. Soft body armor is only "rated" to stop up to 1400fps. I have seen Level 2 armor stop a Tokarev 9mm round, but barely. Also in some of my tests 9mm Magsafe penetrated a Level 2A (16 layer kevlar)vest and penetrated 18 of 22 layers of kevlar in a Level 2 vest. Also 9mm Corbon Pow-R-Ball penetrated Level 2 armor, but was stopped by Level3A. And if you want to really fuck someone up with a handgun, I guess just use a 50 caliber.

Archer
March 11th, 2006, 09:08 PM
Those bullets are too small. :( Get a .44 magnum or a .357 magnum or .38 special if you want a high velocity pistol. :)

Enkidu
March 11th, 2006, 10:12 PM
I'm not an expert on guns, but you get lots more kinetic energy out of the .223 5.56mm NATO round than from ordinary factory off-the shelf 357 mag.

The numbers range a bit, but using fairly common values:

.223 5.56 NATO -- 55 grain 2600 fps produces 412.7 ft-lbs kinetic energy. (muzzle energy = 825 ft-lbs) [Note you can buy .223 5.56 NATO lots hotter than this, lots hotter]

.357 mag -- 158 grain 1300 fps produces 296.4 ft-lbs kinetic energy. (muzzle energy = 593 ft-lbs)

Of course results would vary with different bullet weights and muzzle velocity.

----

If you want to calculate your own values use this formula:

Kinetic Energy = 1/2 M * (V squared) --- Divide this by 450400
Muzzle energy is the same formula without the 1/2.

M = mass in grains; V = muzzle velocity in feet per sec.; 450400 is number of grains in a pound multiplied by gravitational constant 32. ft/(per sec / per sec)

I rounded off a lot.

Take home questions. Why do shooters use muzzle energy, rather than kinetic energy? Does muzzle energy have a meaning other than just being twice kinetic energy at the muzzle?

Enkidu

By the way. That Kel-Tec 223 looks like a great gun. I want one.

Oops. I just edited the formula. 450400 is (grains in a pound multiplied by the constant of gravity) * 2 (I had written 'divided')
Gosh! I'm surprised no one caught this. I think all the divide by 2, multiply by 2, complication goes away if you use the Metric system and calculate joules instead of ft-lbs.

Enkidu
March 11th, 2006, 11:14 PM
Ha!!! I figured it out. Man, I'm surprised people haven't jumped in here. There is no difference in Kinetic Energy and Muzzle Energy. All the values above for Muzzle Energy are correct; ignore the values for Kinetic Energy, they are all half the correct values.

The formula for Kinetic Energy is simply K. E. = 1/2 MV^2. But since in the English system they use grains the factor to convert grains from weight to mass is 7000 * 32 ft/sec^2, to make the formula a little easier shooters moved the initial 1/2 into the conversion factor which makes it 450400 and dropped it from the initial formula, so they come up with... M. E. = MV^2/450400 with the 1/2 embedded in the grain from weight to mass conversion.

Wow!!

Enkidu