I filed to run for U.S. Congress on 6 March - 7th Congressional District - Missouri. Primary elections will be held on 8 August 2006.

So far, I've received one single campaign contribution. George T. from Washington state sent $1,000.00.

I'll post all reports here regarding my campaign, including all monies in and all monies spent, as I do with TAA Fund. 100 percent fool-proof financial accountability and disclosures. No salaries. No profits. All for The Cause.

Contributions should be mailed to: (Send Check, Cash, or Money Order)

Glenn Miller
POB 3861,
Springfield, MO 65808
tel: 417-463-7703

My campaign website is: www.whty.org (http://www.whty.org) (short for Whitey).

I purchased ten 60-second radio "spots" on KGBX radio (Springfield, MO) - 100.5 FM - to advertise my candidacy, my phone number and my campaign website. 4 "spots" were broadcasted last nite, 8 March, 4 will be broadcasted tonite, and 2 on Friday. Cost was $150.00 total. The "spot" is in my voice, and as follows:

"Howdy folks, I'm retired Army Master Sergeant Glenn Miller, a fed up White man, and I'm running for United States Congress.

"Yes, they'll call me a White supremacist and a racist, but guess what, I don't care. I'm running anyway.

"Our country is being over run by tens-of-millions of colored aliens. They're taking our women, our jobs, our country, and our future. White people are drowning in a sea of coloreds, while treasoneous politicians are turning us over to the One World Zionist government.

"It's time to take a stand. Let's send um a message we're fed up. I need your support, so contact me today at 417-463-7703 - WHTY.org. That's 417-463-7703 - WHTY.org.

"Glenn Miller for Congress - Let's git er done !" (end of 1-minute broadcast).

Howdy folks, I'm retired Army Master Sergeant Glenn Miller, a fed-up White man, running for United States Congress.

Patrick Buchanan is right: "The United States Congress is Israel's Amen Corner" and Capitol Hill is Israeli Occupied Territory".

Zionist jews control the United States government. Don't believe it ?? Then come to my website: WHTY.org. I'll prove it to ya.

And surely you know by now, that jews control Hollywood and the American media. Which is why we see so much filth on TV, and why Christ and the bible were kicked out of public schools. Read revelation 2 - 9. Support Israel and you'll go to hell.

This is Glenn Miller for Congress. 417-463-7703. WHTY.org. (end of 1-minute broadcast).

NOTE: The above ad will be broadcast 20 times during the week 13 thru 17 March 06, on talk radio station KADI, Springfield, MO. Cost is $9 per ad for a total of $180.00. (26,000 listeners according to station manager Mark Hill - tel: 417-831-0995)

I'll try to post a link to the audio of both ads here within the next coupla days.

Good ad, but white people are so dumb they don't know what zionist means.

You have to say jew.

Good ad, but white people are so dumb they don't know what zionist means.

You have to say jew.

But I didn't say "zionist". I said "Zionist Jew".

Whatever anyone has against Rounder, thay cannot say he is all talk. He ACTS. I have to admit I have talked about possibly running for office myself. I have not acted though. If I lived in his district, he would most certainly have my help, my support and my vote. As it is, he will have to setle for my support since I do not live in his district. GO GLENN!!! :box:

Whatever anyone has against Rounder, thay cannot say he is all talk. He ACTS. I have to admit I have talked about possibly running for office myself. I have not acted though. If I lived in his district, he would most certainly have my help, my support and my vote. As it is, he will have to setle for my support since I do not live in his district. GO GLENN!!! :box:

You've done a hell of a lot more than talk Walter, as proven by your record of activisms. Running for office is fun and fulfilling. You get to speak your honest mind to millions. BTW, Alex is still thinking of running for Congress, as well. Gil Giles, who got 38,000 votes last time, is also running for Congress - in Mississippi. Others WNs too, I expect will be running.

(Would you do me a favor, and post the two recent media reports in this thread ?? You'll find them both in the Chronological thread. Takes me forever to).

Channel 12 broadcast their "Glenn Miller" interview 3 times on 9 Mar 06; at 5, 6, and 10 PM. Here's the transcript, but the video was much better. The transcript bears little resemblance. In fact, I wore a coat and tie, and came across as an intelligent, though fed-up, White man:




White Supremacist Wants to Run For Congress
HE`S A WHITE SUPREMACIST AND PLANS ON RUNNING FOR CONGRESS. TONIGHT, GLENN MILLER SAYS HE`S SERIOUS ABOUT BECOMING SOUTHWEST MISSOURI`S NEXT LEADER. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY HAS REJECTED HIS APPLICATION BUT BASED ON OUR CONVERSATIONS WITH HIM THURSDAY - MILLER ISN`T ABOUT TO GIVE UP . HE SAYS HE WANTS TO PROVIDE EQUAL RIGHTS FOR WHITES, PUNISH IMMIGRANTS AND EXPOSE JEWS... ALL THIS FROM A MAN WHO CALLS AMERICAN GOVERNMENT `EVIL.`
"I DECLARED WAR ON POLITICAL TRADERS IN WASHINGTON COMMITTING GENOCIDE ON THE WHITE RACE."

THAT WAS TWENTY-YEARS AGO... TODAY, GLENN MILLER IS OUTLINING HIS CANDIDACY FOR MISSOURI`S SEVENTH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.

"TOWNS AND CITIES BEING FILLED WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS AND COLORED ALIENS."

HIS AGENDA IS ADMITTEDLY FILLED WITH HATE...

"I`M SURPRISED YOU CAME- BUT I`M NOT GONNA KISS YOUR BUTT."

A FORMER FUGITIVE AND CONVICTED FELON- MILLER NOW PLANS ON FIGHTING GOVERNMENT FROM THE INSIDE.

"THEY`RE CONTROLLED BY JEWS- JEWS IN A CONSPIRACY TO CONTROL THE WHITE RACE."

"WHITE PEOPLE SHOULD TELL THEIR CHILDREN NOT TO ASSOCIATE WITH BLACKS. ESPECIALLY WHITE GIRLS- BECAUSE THEY INCREASE THEIR CHANCES OF GETTING AIDS A THOUSAND PERCENT."

POLITICS OF SEPARATION AND BLAME. IT`S A PLATFORM MILLER WILL HAVE TO SELL. THUSFAR, AT LEAST ONE PARTY ISN`T BUYING.

"THIS MAN IS FILLED WITH HATE... NO ROOM FOR HIM IN THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY."
"I`LL JUST RUN AS A REPUBLICAN. (WHAT IF THEY DON`T ACCEPT YOU?) I`LL FILE A LAWSUIT. (AGAINST WHO?) THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTIES. I`VE SERVED (IN THE MILITARY). IF I DON`T HAVE THE RIGHT TO RUN, NO ONE SHOULD."
THERE`S ALSO QUESTION TONIGHT ABOUT MILLER`S ELIGIBILITY- GIVEN HIS CRIMINAL PAST. AT THIS POINT- HE IS NOT A REGISTERED CANDIDATE. BUT MILLER SAYS WITH CONFIDENCE, HE BELIEVES HE`D WIN.

ARTICLE TOOLS:
Air Date: 3/9/2006
Reporter: Dan Tordjman

Search News Archive:


Related Links


More Local News
__________________

NO WAY OUT BUT THRU THE JEWS


My Side of The Story


White Patriot Party


My Book - "A White Man Speaks Out"

Democrats reject Miller congressional run; Candidate says he?ll file with GOP

James Goodwin
© 2006, Springfield News-Leader

Jefferson City ? Glenn Miller Jr., whose self-described "pro-white" newsletter has sparked anger and concern in southwest Missouri, will not run as a Democrat for the 7th Congressional District after all.

The Missouri Democratic Party has refused his $100 filing fee, which disqualifies him as a candidate for the party, a spokeswoman for the Secretary of State?s Office said today.

Miller said by phone that he would file Friday as a Republican instead.

"Personally, I don?t see any difference between the parties, but I?ve got to run as something," the Aurora resident said.

Jack Cardetti, spokesman for the state Democratic Party, said the party rejects Miller?s racist views.

"The Democratic Party is certainly a big-tent party, but that does not include white supremacists," Cardetti said.

"It?s our feeling that he has every right to run, but we will do everything we can to keep him off the Democratic Party ticket."

The spokesman for the Missouri Republican Party, when told of Miller?s new plan to file as a Republican, said, "Oh, Lord."

"We don?t support anybody who supports any kind of hate or racist views," spokesman Paul Sloca said.

Miller filed Monday to run for the position held by Congressman Roy Blunt, an Indian Point Republican who has yet to file. He has until March 28 to submit candidacy papers.

To qualify for the ballot, filers need a receipt from a political party, said Stacie Temple, a spokeswoman for the Secretary of State?s Office.

The office, which oversees elections, accepts filing fees on behalf of political parties, but it?s up to the parties to accept or reject the money.

"If the check is rejected, then (filers) are no longer qualified," Temple said.

If rejected by the Republicans, Miller might try running as Libertarian, an independent or a write-in candidate, he said.

"I?m going to exhaust all options to get on the ballot. I?m going to run," Miller said. "And I?m going to do a lot of campaigning."
__________________

NO WAY OUT BUT THRU THE JEWS


My Side of The Story


White Patriot Party


My Book - "A White Man Speaks Out"

Wow. The jewsmedia is really out to get you, Glenn. They accuse you of being hateful and divisive, but I see they have resorted to their old tricks of hate and divisiveness because you are running as a 100% pro-White candidate and speak the truth about them. The DUMBocratz need to pour themselves a cup of shut the fuck up about you being hateful, because them denying you your right to run as a candidate for political office on the ticket of your choice is not only illegal, it is hateful. I am sure the GOP will deny you the right to run just like the DUMBocratz did, so you were right, there is no difference between the two parties. I don't expect any better from the Libertarians either. I am not worried, though, you will find a way to run no matter what and give them the hell they deserve. :box:

Wow. The jewsmedia is really out to get you, Glenn. They accuse you of being hateful and divisive, but I see they have resorted to their old tricks of hate and divisiveness because you are running as a 100% pro-White candidate and speak the truth about them. The DUMBocratz need to pour themselves a cup of shut the fuck up about you being hateful, because them denying you your right to run as a candidate for political office on the ticket of your choice is not only illegal, it is hateful. I am sure the GOP will deny you the right to run just like the DUMBocratz did, so you were right, there is no difference between the two parties. I don't expect any better from the Libertarians either. I am not worried, though, you will find a way to run no matter what and give them the hell they deserve. :box:

Thanks for doing the posting, Walter.

I drove the 325 mile round trip to Jefferson City today and filed as a Libertarian. Republicans refused me ballot status this morning. State Republican Executive Director Jared Craighead (tel: 573-636-3146) told me so in a phone conversation. On my request, he's sending me written and signed verification of the rejection. I'll need it when I sue their asses.

All I can do now is wait for word from the Libertarians. But like you, I'm not optimistic. Come Monday, we'll find out what attorneys have to say about all this. A $10 million dollar lawsuit against each party sounds about right to me. See ?? Us rednecks aren't greedy.

Do you have to have a ton of signatures to run as an Independent? In Virginia you have to gather quite a few signatures. From what I've been told this dates back to 1965 when George Lincoln Rockwell ran as an Independent for Governor and paid just a $100 filing fee. After that our jew-friendly General Assembly added the so many thousand signature requirement. I know come Hell or high water you'll continue your run for CONgress. Now if we could just talk Ron Doggett or Ironguard1940 into running against the Kike CONgressman from Virginia, Eric Cantor. His last opponent 4 years ago (I think) was Ben "Cooter" Jones from the Dukes of Hazzard tv show. We prefer to call him "Cooner" since he boasted about his lifetime NAACP membership when the local niggers wanted to bitch and moan about the Confederate flag on the top of the General Lee car.

Do you have to have a ton of signatures to run as an Independent? In Virginia you have to gather quite a few signatures. From what I've been told this dates back to 1965 when George Lincoln Rockwell ran as an Independent for Governor and paid just a $100 filing fee. After that our jew-friendly General Assembly added the so many thousand signature requirement. I know come Hell or high water you'll continue your run for CONgress. Now if we could just talk Ron Doggett or Ironguard1940 into running against the Kike CONgressman from Virginia, Eric Cantor. His last opponent 4 years ago (I think) was Ben "Cooter" Jones from the Dukes of Hazzard tv show. We prefer to call him "Cooner" since he boasted about his lifetime NAACP membership when the local niggers wanted to bitch and moan about the Confederate flag on the top of the General Lee car.

About 4,000 signatures of registered voters, Walter. The "Write-In-Candidate" route is another option, and I have the necessary paperwork for that which I obtained yesterday from the State Elections Department in Jefferson City.

White men like Ben "Cooner" Jones do more harm to our Race than good, as you implied.

To be allowed to run for the US House of Represenatatives as an independent candidate in Virginia, you need at least 1000 signatures from eligible registered voters that live in the district you are running in. To run for the US Senate as an independent candidate, you need at least 10,000 signatures from eligible registered voters that live in Virginia. At least 400 of these signatures must be from each congressional district (as US senators represent the entire state). Yes, the kikes make it as difficult as possible for anyone other than the two sides of the same coin (Repubs and Demos) to run for office, much less win elections.

A very viable option would be to advertise yourself as a write-in candidate on the radio and TV and in the paper. You do not need any signatures to do it (I don't think you do) and can still run a good campaign giving those traitors in Congress hell. Just a thought.

Oh, here is a f**ing classic quote from a self-proclaimed beacon of tolerance:

"As the party of Lincoln, we do not support anybody who is a white supremacist," Jared Craighead, executive director of the (Missouri) state Republican Party, said Friday.

Can anyone tell me what is wrong with that quote? No wonder they are called the stupid party!!!

Wow, Rounder, 26 papers attacked you all at once? Well, I will go back to what Hitler said about the jewsmedia attacking us-you ain't wasting ANY days!!! :box:

About 4,000 signatures of registered voters, Walter. The "Write-In-Candidate" route is another option, and I have the necessary paperwork for that which I obtained yesterday from the State Elections Department in Jefferson City.

White men like Ben "Cooner" Jones do more harm to our Race than good, as you implied.

Well, SA Mann implied this originally, but I 100% concur-trash like Ben Jones does our race the most harm. In fact, Whites like him do our race far more harm than any nonwhite or jew could even dream about doing. This is because united, no one can defeat the White race. White race-traitors like Jones divide the White race and weakens us, leaving us open for attack by the muds and kikes.

4,000 signatures, huh? Sounds like the Missouri legislature knew you might run for office there eventually and beefed up the number of signatures you need to run as an independent. Wow, even Virginia is not that bad. Each state has its own rules for running for office, and it seems none of the states make it easy on the independent candidate. Which begs the question: is this really a democracy, like the powers that be want us to believe? :confused:

If anybody pro-White is willing to run as a Write-in candidate for US Senator from Virginia, you've got my vote. I'd never vote for George Allen aka Howdy Doody.:D

I received a whooping $500.00 in today's mail (27 March) from George T. from Washington state. George had already sent me $1000,00 about a month ago. He's the only financial contributor to my campaign thus far, other than myself.

Many thanks George. Wish we had a hell of a lot more patriots like ya. A hearty "Hail Victory !!!"

Regarding the James Hart campaign in Tennessee - the Republican Executive committee met in Nashvile over the weekend and voted that Hart could not run as a Republican. But they don't have the real power, they had to ask some official to ban Hart. That official said he would not ban Hart, he passed the job to some higher up. He will decide around the first week in April.

Hart was not allowed into the room while the "Execs" were discussing his case. He said he protested outside the hotel with a sign regarding democracry, President Bush and Iraq (as in, we need democracy, here, too.) He says if the bigwig rules against him, he will sue and he will win.

He was asked on the radio if he was a white supremacist, and he went into a speech about how only the white man had invented the light bulb, the airplane and so on. He describes himself as a humanist, which is how atheist jews signing manifestos like to describe themselves. The only people around here who would vote for a Humanist are the same ones who would vote for Hillary....He sounds like a Southerner when he talks, though.

The political ramifications of this case are said to be "huge", since Hart was a Republican, fulfilled everything demanded of a candidate, got on the ballot legally, and got 60,000 votes when he ran the last time.

About 4,000 signatures of registered voters, Walter.

In order to have 4,000 VALID signatures, you would probably have to collect well over 6,000 . I am absolutely certain that election officials would go over all your signatures with an extra special fine toothed comb. Most likely, they would even disallow many valid signatures . So, BE PREPARED , if you decide to take that route .

In order to have 4,000 VALID signatures, you would probably have to collect well over 6,000 . I am absolutely certain that election officials would go over all your signatures with an extra special fine toothed comb. Most likely, they would even disallow many valid signatures . So, BE PREPARED , if you decide to take that route .

Roger and thanks for the heads-up.

If the federal court rules AGAINST Rounder, that's even better than if they rule FOR him. If they say, "It's legal for party officers to ban racists", then every politician who ever said nigger, will panic. The smalltime crooks fighting over the courthouse jobs will be saying, "You said nigger ten years ago! You're a racist! You can't be on the ballot! I get your job!" "No, you said nigger! I have witnesses! YOU can't be on the ballot! I'm not a racist! My daughter is shacked up with a nigger!" Then the party chairman will make a ruling on who's a racist and who gets to be on the ballot. Like throwing in a grenade and letting them fight each other over who has to sit next to it.:)

If they say, "It's legal for party officers to ban people from primary elections at their discretion", then "the system" will explode even faster. All the politicians all over America will be banning their serious opponents from the ballot. People will wake up more and more to the fact that the only reason they pay taxes is that the government is poking a gun barrel up their nose, that we don't have real elections, and that there's nothing legal about it.

If party officers can decide who gets to be on "their" ballot, likewise they can decide who gets to vote in "their" primary. That's what the Libbertoons already believe. In tight local elections both Dem & Repub officers will be "demoncratically" standing at the poll "disqualifying" people they think will vote against their "chosen candidate" in the primary. ("It's our right to decide who gets to vote in OUR primary. The federal judge said so.")

As true as your statement is, the media will spin Glen’s loss as ineptitude on his part. Because he has no legal council at this point, this will seem plausible to the sheeple, if they even hear about it.

I wonder if the ACLU would take up his cause <GRIN>

Sue all three parties for conspiracy to deprive you of your civil rights, Glenn.

Sue all three parties for conspiracy to deprive you of your civil rights, Glenn.

Not realistic . That would require very deep pockets ( millions in lawyer's fees ) and a sympathetic court . Rounder doesn't have either one of these .

Sue all three parties for conspiracy to deprive you of your civil rights, Glenn.

I just might do that, Walter. It's only $250.00 per whack and since I file pro se, the other related costs are minimal.

Regarding the ACLU, I spoke with one ACLU attorney who said he's too busy to take my case. And I left 5 separate phone messages with the Kansas City ACLU's office, describing my case, and asking them to phone me. None ever did.

I just might do that, Walter. It's only $250.00 per whack and since I file pro se, the other related costs are minimal.

Regarding the ACLU, I spoke with one ACLU attorney who said he's too busy to take my case. And I left 5 separate phone messages with the Kansas City ACLU's office, describing my case, and asking them to phone me. None ever did.

The ACLU will take any case except those that favor racially conscious Whites. We are on our own.

$200.00 from Steve B. for campaign donation, was received in today's mail (3 Apr 06).

Many thanks, Steve.

The ACLU will take any case except those that favor racially conscious Whites. We are on our own.

ACLU has it's own political agenda, which doesn't include anything close to WN.

I received a $100.00 campaign donation from Proud White Guy in yesterday's mail (26 Apr). Many thanks, PWG.

Regarding my lawsuit, the Secretary of State filed a MOTION TO DISMISS coupla days ago. No mention at all as to her legal grounds to deny me ballot access, only vague, judicial bullshit criticising the wording of my lawsuit. For example: "Deficient Pleading as to Entire Complaint".

I'll have my legal expert look over her 12-page Motion to Dismiss, then I'll respond with my own motion for the court to deny her's. I have coupla weeks in which to prepare my response.

If I lose the case, it'll be due to some technicality, not due to the merits of my complaint.

Oh, the Secretary of State also asked the court to make me pay all court costs related to my lawsuit.

This just proves that there is no such thing as a leagle system. We are on our own. Hal Turner is right.

The longer Rounder's suit goes on, the more damage it does to ZOG. Federal judges aren't stupid. The judge knows it's nonsense to let party officials decide who gets to be on the primary ballot. This is as obvious as 1+1=2 to a federal judge.

It's also obvious to the political hacks Rounder is suing (who see this as an amoral game - they just have a different perspective on life, like pirates). Only a few pothead Libbertoons really think the elections should be privatized.

Party officials are selected mainly through unsupervised voting: caucuses and such. The original reason for having government-run primary elections (this used to be taught in high school civics class) was to supervise the voting, to get away from the cheating in the party-run caucuses and conventions: having meetings without telling everybody, voting to throw out legitimate votes, all the childish shenanigans that almost everybody who's ever been involved in party politics knows go on.

Some states, like Missouri, included voting for SOME party officials, in the primary. But even if ALL party officials were elected in primaries, giving those party officials veto power over candidates, amounts to making the public offices appointed, not elected. You might as well just elect party officials, and let them appoint the public officials, if their party got more votes in the primary. No November election necessary.

The judge also knows it's nonsense to throw Rounders' suit out for ANY reason, "technical" or otherwise. All the laws and rules and rulings always say that substantive justice controls. If Rounder scribbled, "The state people swiped my wheelbarrow and I told the state people I was suing. - Rounder" on a paper towel and dropped it on the court clerk's desk, that's enough for a civil suit, if the judge is really doing his job.

I once filed a federal suit against a state bureaucrat in Iowa. I didn't bother to look up anything. Basically, I wrote a letter to the court saying at the very top of the page, my name and whom I was suing, then further down saying what happened, enclosing a personal check for the filing fee, and stating in a P.S. that I'd sent a copy by certified letter to the state bureaucrat. I didn't even show up for the hearing. The federal judge had a hearing anyway. He ruled against me, but gave semi-logical, written reasons.

Rounder's suit is a gigantic lose-lose proposition for ZOG. If the judge rules against Rounder (including any kind of dismissal on any kind of "technicality") it will be a green light for all the local party crooks all over the country to start bypassing the primaries by letting party officer Boss Hogg stop anybody from filing against his brother-in-law for dogcatcher. Effectively primaries will have been abolished, and everybody with the political awareness of a precinct chairwoman will know it. This will accelerate the loss of confidence in "demoncracy" and hasten ZOG's downward spiral.

If the judge rules FOR Rounder, the Jews will think it's 1933. "Federal judge rules for Klan in election."

Well now HPD, that's an encouraging and an interesting posting. Makes sense too.

Obviously, the court and the SOS is taking my complaint seriously. I received two court documents on Friday:

1) States: "David A. Johnston, Assistant Attorney General, hereby enters his appearance on behalf of the Missouri Secretary of State. Service of process is waived with respect to this defendant." And. . .

2) An Order signed by judge Richard E. Dorr, which states, in part:

"A proposed scheduling order/discovery plan ("Proposed Plan") shall be filed on or before July 11, 2006.. . . The Proposed Plan shall also state whether the case will be tried to the Court or to a jury. . . Plaintiff's counsel shall take the lead in preparing the Proposed Plan. . It is expected that the discovery completion date will not exceed 180 days. . ."

What's interesting about all this is that no journalist and no politician has stepped forward and publicly criticised the SOS's refusal to place my name on the primary elections ballot.

I'm not optimistic. I believe the judge will throw my case out on some technicality, and not even address the issue of whether or not the SOS has the legal right to refuse to print my name on the ballot.

We'll see.