The Final Solution
March 17th, 2004, 10:34 AM
Rabbi Dresner's Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos
E. Michael Jones, Ph.D. is the Editor of Culture Wars magazine, as well
as
author of several books available from Fidelity Press.
Go to original for the ENTIRE essay:
http://www.culturewars.com/2003/rabbidresner.html
The connection between Jews and pornography is like the connection
between
Jews and Bolshevism.
....Both are forms of revolutionary activity, ultimately traceable to
Jewish
concepts that have been secularized. Jews become involved in
pornography for
reasons similar to why they become involved in Communism, which is to
say, not
just because they happened to be Jews but because being Jewish as they
and
Sabbatai Zevi and Wilhelm Reich defined it found logical expression in
producing
pornography as a form of cultural warfare through moral subversion.
Ultimately, the relationship between Jews and pornography is similar to
how Marx
described the relationship between the communist party and the
proletariat. Just as
the Jews were the vanguard of revolutionary activity in Russia, so they
are in
the vanguard of sexual revolution in the United States. The Jewish
concept of
the chosen people naturally transformed itself into the concept of the
revolutionary vanguard as soon as the Torah evaporated as the core of
Jewish
identity. Messianic politics replaced waiting for the Messiah.
....When William Cash wrote his already cited article in the British
magazine
The Spectator discussing Jewish dominance in Hollywood and, therefore,
the
pornography industry, the discussion prompted an outraged response from
Abraham
H. Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League. To raise the issue meant
that
one was guilty of propagating an anti-Semitic canard, even though, in
the case
of Luke Ford, it was a Jew who raised the issue. 'Those Jews who enter
the
pornography industry,' Foxman opined, 'have done so as individuals
pursuing the
American dream, not as representatives of their religious group.
Moreover,
anti-Semites never seem to take note of the fact that the most
prominent
pornographers in America are Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt, neither of
whom is the least
bit Jewish. Finally, though individual Jews may play a role in
pornography,
Jewishness does not.'
....Foxman then fell back on the same justification for obscenity that
Irving
Thalberg used in his fight with the Legion of Decency. Pornography is
controlled by 'consumers,' most of whom are Gentiles. Therefore,
Gentiles are
ultimately responsible for pornography. According to Foxman, even if
Jews dominate a
particular field, as is the case with both Hollywood and the related
pornography industry, that bears no relationship to the fact that they
are Jews, no
matter how one defines the term. To say otherwise is to be an
anti-Semite.
...Foxman is being more than a little disingenuous here. In mentioning
Larry
Flynt and Hugh Hefner as the paradigmatic Gentile pornographers, he
failed to
point out that 1) that Hugh Hefner would object to being called a
pornographer
and 2) that Larry Flynt is a significant contributor to the ADL. He
also
failed to mention, as Rabbi Dresner points out in his book, that Hugh
Hefner
received the ADL's freedom award in 1980.
...The religion of impulse likewise found significant Jewish
involvement. An
unusually high percentage of the material on sexual liberation was
written by
Jews, as well as among its advocates. On a more commercial level, for
example,
Jews have been strongly represented in the Playboy enterprises. B'nai
Brith's
Anti-Defamation League had no problem, for example, when some years
back they
presented their American Freedom Award at a fashionable black-tie
dinner-dance to Hugh Hefner. . . . About the honoree, the ADL says,
with an apparent
straight face, that the empire he founded has had a far-reaching
impact, not only
on the publishing industry, but on the mores of American society as
well.
...In other words, the ADL was rewarding Hefner for the role he played
in
bringing about widespread moral corruption and the spread of sexual
deviance in
America. The question remains, why would the Jews at the ADL be
interested in
rewarding this sort of behavior? Why, as Dresner asks in his book, did
American
Jewry remain silent when the ADL conferred its freedom award. 'Both the
Jewish establishment and nonestablishment observers,' Dresner laments,
'took it in
stride, raising not a finger of protest. It was Catholic William
Buckley of
National Review who pointed to the Jewish issue.'
E. Michael Jones, Ph.D. is the Editor of Culture Wars magazine, as well
as
author of several books available from Fidelity Press.
Go to original for the ENTIRE essay:
http://www.culturewars.com/2003/rabbidresner.html
The connection between Jews and pornography is like the connection
between
Jews and Bolshevism.
....Both are forms of revolutionary activity, ultimately traceable to
Jewish
concepts that have been secularized. Jews become involved in
pornography for
reasons similar to why they become involved in Communism, which is to
say, not
just because they happened to be Jews but because being Jewish as they
and
Sabbatai Zevi and Wilhelm Reich defined it found logical expression in
producing
pornography as a form of cultural warfare through moral subversion.
Ultimately, the relationship between Jews and pornography is similar to
how Marx
described the relationship between the communist party and the
proletariat. Just as
the Jews were the vanguard of revolutionary activity in Russia, so they
are in
the vanguard of sexual revolution in the United States. The Jewish
concept of
the chosen people naturally transformed itself into the concept of the
revolutionary vanguard as soon as the Torah evaporated as the core of
Jewish
identity. Messianic politics replaced waiting for the Messiah.
....When William Cash wrote his already cited article in the British
magazine
The Spectator discussing Jewish dominance in Hollywood and, therefore,
the
pornography industry, the discussion prompted an outraged response from
Abraham
H. Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League. To raise the issue meant
that
one was guilty of propagating an anti-Semitic canard, even though, in
the case
of Luke Ford, it was a Jew who raised the issue. 'Those Jews who enter
the
pornography industry,' Foxman opined, 'have done so as individuals
pursuing the
American dream, not as representatives of their religious group.
Moreover,
anti-Semites never seem to take note of the fact that the most
prominent
pornographers in America are Hugh Hefner and Larry Flynt, neither of
whom is the least
bit Jewish. Finally, though individual Jews may play a role in
pornography,
Jewishness does not.'
....Foxman then fell back on the same justification for obscenity that
Irving
Thalberg used in his fight with the Legion of Decency. Pornography is
controlled by 'consumers,' most of whom are Gentiles. Therefore,
Gentiles are
ultimately responsible for pornography. According to Foxman, even if
Jews dominate a
particular field, as is the case with both Hollywood and the related
pornography industry, that bears no relationship to the fact that they
are Jews, no
matter how one defines the term. To say otherwise is to be an
anti-Semite.
...Foxman is being more than a little disingenuous here. In mentioning
Larry
Flynt and Hugh Hefner as the paradigmatic Gentile pornographers, he
failed to
point out that 1) that Hugh Hefner would object to being called a
pornographer
and 2) that Larry Flynt is a significant contributor to the ADL. He
also
failed to mention, as Rabbi Dresner points out in his book, that Hugh
Hefner
received the ADL's freedom award in 1980.
...The religion of impulse likewise found significant Jewish
involvement. An
unusually high percentage of the material on sexual liberation was
written by
Jews, as well as among its advocates. On a more commercial level, for
example,
Jews have been strongly represented in the Playboy enterprises. B'nai
Brith's
Anti-Defamation League had no problem, for example, when some years
back they
presented their American Freedom Award at a fashionable black-tie
dinner-dance to Hugh Hefner. . . . About the honoree, the ADL says,
with an apparent
straight face, that the empire he founded has had a far-reaching
impact, not only
on the publishing industry, but on the mores of American society as
well.
...In other words, the ADL was rewarding Hefner for the role he played
in
bringing about widespread moral corruption and the spread of sexual
deviance in
America. The question remains, why would the Jews at the ADL be
interested in
rewarding this sort of behavior? Why, as Dresner asks in his book, did
American
Jewry remain silent when the ADL conferred its freedom award. 'Both the
Jewish establishment and nonestablishment observers,' Dresner laments,
'took it in
stride, raising not a finger of protest. It was Catholic William
Buckley of
National Review who pointed to the Jewish issue.'