I was watching the news tonight and they showed this White Christian couple who already had 4 children of their own but now they were adopting 2 new BLACK children. Both the husband and wife were so pathetically meek looking and quiet that I couldn't help but think, "When did Christianity become so damn soft?"

Look at the Crusades, thousands of White Christian warriors FIGHTING enemies.....at one time Christianity was a religion spread by the sword just like Islam but look at Christianity now??? It's become twisted into this WEAK never-ending EMOTIONAL TEAR FESTIVAL......what happened? When did this pathetic PASSIVE trend become the most prevalent way of expressing your religion?

Mental pacifier.

When did this pathetic PASSIVE trend become the most prevalent way of expressing your religion
Biblical Scriptures can be twisted to say just about anything, to justify just about anything. This is another reason I don't like Christianity. It can be used to justify racism, or fight it, as it has in the past when the abolishionists used it as a weapon against slavery. It can create a Jim Jones or a Promise Keeper. Fuck that. I'm sorry, but I don't want the survival of my race to come down to an argument of interpretation. Whitey needs a new religion; one with clear pro-White values.

Racist Christians are defending what cannot be defended.

I think it was the Reformation and the rise of democracy. Before that, the Church was in bed with all the noble families in Europe and both parties derived benefit from the deal. Rome would crown the kings and they in turn would enforce the edicts of the Vatican.
The Church was not squeamish about kicking the jews around for sure, and had some bad-ass mercenaries fighting the infidels like the Crusaders as you mentioned, the Knights Templar, Teutonic Knights, the Helveticans (todays Swiss Guard) and others.

Protestantism watered down the authority of Christianity and put the emphasis on teaching believers they were "depraved" instead of being Defenders of the Faith. Wussy-ism.

Well said.

Biblical Scriptures can be twisted to say just about anything, to justify just about anything. This is another reason I don't like Christianity. It can be used to justify racism, or fight it, as it has in the past when the abolishionists used it as a weapon against slavery. It can create a Jim Jones or a Promise Keeper. Fuck that. I'm sorry, but I don't want the survival of my race to come down to an argument of interpretation. Whitey needs a new religion; one with clear pro-White values.

Racist Christians are defending what cannot be defended.

Right on about every bozo calling things the way he wants to. That's why the west had a "Pope" and kept the Scriptures away from the sheeple and we instead relied principally upon a thing called "Tradition." Instead, now every silly sonofabitch can crown himself King. It's a Judeo-puritan's dream situation. Every man a pope, every man a king. If every man's a king, then nobody's better than anybody else. Absolute social, religious, racial and economic egalitarianism is the objective of the Jew-Puritan alliance since Cromwell cut hte head off the English King, and the nutty anabaptists and calvinists ran rampant through the continent.

Who threw the Jews out of England? Edward I. Who brought em back? Cromwell, the regicidist. Who first emancipated the Jews on the Continent? That spawn of the French regicide, Napoleon.

I was watching the news tonight and they showed this White Christian couple who already had 4 children of their own but now they were adopting 2 new BLACK children. Both the husband and wife were so pathetically meek looking and quiet that I couldn't help but think, "When did Christianity become so damn soft?"

But this is the natural way of Christianity.It is a religion for the weak and those with a slave mentality.It has corrupted the Aryan race and is one of its principal causes of decay."Much labour has been expended in all ages, and especially in the Christian ages, to reduce mankind to this half-sided efficiency, to the "good": even today there is no lack of those deformed and weakened by the church for whom this object coincides with "humanisation" in general, or with the "will of God", or with "salvation of the soul".[Nietzsche, "The Will To Power".]

Look at the Crusades, thousands of White Christian warriors FIGHTING enemies.....at one time Christianity was a religion spread by the sword just like Islam but look at Christianity now??? It's become twisted into this WEAK never-ending EMOTIONAL TEAR FESTIVAL......what happened? When did this pathetic PASSIVE trend become the most prevalent way of expressing your religion?

The Aryan warrior mentality was exploited by the hermaphrodites of the mediaeval church to conquer new lands for its sick Semitic religion. Eventually when Christianity succeeded in making Aryan man effeminate and weak the warrior spirit in our race was almost extinguished. Now the church has to rely upon a much softer approach as there are few Aryans left with the warrior mentality and fortunately the Churches power base has diminished along with its influence in the world.

The Aryan warrior mentality was exploited by the hermaphrodites of the mediaeval church to conquer new lands for its sick Semitic religion. Eventually when Christianity succeeded in making Aryan man effeminate and weak the warrior spirit in our race was almost extinguished. Now the church has to rely upon a much softer approach as there are few Aryans left with the warrior mentality and fortunately the Churches power base has diminished along with its influence in the world.

Well, the part about the softer church corresponding to the generally wimpier population I agree with, good point. But I hardly think the mediaeval church were hermaphrodites nor were they exploiting as much as perhaps being used itself by "Aryan Warriors" like Charlemagne and his Franks.

THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES begins with its organization in 1948 (notice this date is after the communist Jews won WW2) with 147 denominations from both Protestant and Orthodox back- grounds. Today, it has grown to include 293 member d nominations representing some 400 million people. It has been and is a major force and voice of what is commonly called ECUMENISM, a term used to describe the effort to bring all churches into "a visible unity in one faith and one eucharistic fellowship". The WCC, while admitting that the ecumenical movement is broader than its own institution, claims with ample justification that it is "the most nearly comprehensive instrument of the ecumenical movement in the world today". It should be further noted that, while the original goal of the ecumenical movement and the WCC was "the unity of the churches", the new vision of the WCC is for the unity of all religions-and, in fact, all mankind. It should be clear to all who have been watching the WCC that it has become a modern Tower of Babel.

Do not forget for one minute, however, that when WCC leaders speak and WCC pronouncements are issued IT IS ALWAYS THE VOICE OF RADICALISM AND REVOLUTION THAT IS HEARD. There are repeated attacks upon "Western Imperialism" and "capitalism" but seldom a word of criticism for socialism and communism. Non- communist dictatorships are repeatedly attacked but no word is ever spoken against the communist dictators. A few conservative voices are occasionally heard within WCC meetings-but these rarely, if ever, become a part of the official statements which go to the governments of the world and to the United Nations as a "representative voice of the churches". Those who claim that the WCC is becoming more "evangelical" are either blind or naive. Evangelicals who remain in the WCC are being used as window dressing to hide the WCC apostasy.

THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES IS FULLY COMMITTED TO THE CREATION OF A NEW SOCIETY based on socialistic principles and deceitfully called "The Kingdom of God". They state: "The participation of the Church in the creation of a new society is not a secondary or derivative dimension of its existence. It begins at the very centre in the celebration of the sacraments as an anticipation of what the world is to become ...." Dr. Philip Potter, WCC General Secretary, quoted from a 1969 WCC Central Committee directive as follows: "We call upon the churches to move beyond charity, grants and traditional programming to relevant and sacrificial action leading to new relationships of dignity and justice among all men and to become THE AGENTS FOR THE RADICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF SOCIETY." He also made it perfectly clear what this involved when he said, "But the conflict has become intense when it has been perceived that A RADICAL CHANGE OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND POLITICAL STRUCTURES ARE NEEDED AND NOT THE MERE PRUDENTIAL TRANSFER OF RESOURCES AND TECHNOLOGIES." Another WCC document stated: "In the developed countries it means changes in the production structure and employment policies which will ONLY BE POSSIBLE THROUGH A CERTAIN 'SOCIALIZATION' of decisions that have so far been taken autonomously on the basis of interests of the private sector." MR. BUSINESSMAN, MR. and MRS. FREEDOM-LOVING AMERICAN-the World Council of Churches has made it abundantly clear what their goal is! Are you willing to sit idly by or even help support this effort to destroy the very foundations of our faith and freedom ?

THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES AND THE UNITED NATIONS continue their close ties. In fact, we might call them "blood brothers". There were repeated favorable references to all sorts of UN programs in the Central Committee Documents at Jamaica - The New International Economic Order, the New International Information Order, the World Health Organization, the World Court, UNESCO, etc. It was reported that "an intervention was made on behalf of the WCC in the Security Council debate on South Africa in March 1977." It was stated that they were seeking "to sensitize churches, inviting them to lobby with their governments . . . as well as to mark the 30th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights." The WCC issued a special document promoting the UN sponsored International Year of the Child, totally ignoring the fact that even though this appeal is made with the image of starving children in mind, the real thrust of this program is toward socialization of the child and the family. Individual believers and churches that are opposed to the philosophy and program of the UN should realize that it is not their voice which is heard in places of power and decision-it is the voice of the false prophets in the WCC that prevail and speak for you whether you like it or not.

AT THE VERY HEART OF THE WHOLE MATTER IS THE FAILURE OF THE WORLD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES TO ACCEPT THE BIBLE as the authoritative, infallible, inerrant, eternal, unchangeable Word of God. Note the following: "In the WCC we experience both the possibility for common confession of faith and worship together and also the obstacles to Christian unity, We are agreed in giving vital place in our thinking to bible study and worship; we are able to worship our one Lord in the very different way of the churches represented among us. YET WE ARE ALSO AWARE OF PROBLEMS CONCERNING THE AUTHORITY OF THE BIBLE REMAINING UNSOLVED AMONG US and of the fact that we are yet part of one eucharistic fellowship. It is not surprising therefore that there is controversy among Christians about the meditative use (rather than simply the intellectual study) of the holy books of other faiths and about the QUESTION OF COMMON WORSHIP BETWEEN THOSE OF DIFFERENT FAITHS." One speaker said, "The document on Hope coming out of Bangalore had succeeded in bringing out the fruitful tension between doctrinal unity and union in radical involvement in human hopes." But it has not settled the underlying question." What is that underlying question? "The problem is no longer the problem of loving one another, but the problem of understanding the faith." The doctrinal basis of the WCC is an empty shell-a front to deceive the unwary. Only by accepting God's Word as our only, absolute and final authority can we enter into true unity with those who truly belong to Christ-and at the same time be fully separated from those who appear as angels of light but are in reality the servants of Satan.

http://www.fundamentalbiblechurch.org/Tracts/fbcwcc.htm

****Both the husband and wife were so pathetically meek looking and quiet that I couldn't help but think, "When did Christianity become so damn soft?"

Look at the Crusades, thousands of White Christian warriors FIGHTING enemies.....at one time Christianity was a religion spread by the sword just like Islam but look at Christianity now??? It's become twisted into this WEAK never-ending EMOTIONAL TEAR FESTIVAL......what happened? When did this pathetic PASSIVE trend become the most prevalent way of expressing your religion?

The weakening of the Christian Church (and I can only speak about the Catholic Church) had several roots. One was the Church's unfortunate let up of its persecution of judaica. This was helped in part by the so-called Reformation which drove a deep wedge in Christianity that the jews used and manipulated.

Two was the rise of judaic ideas in Marxism, and prior to that "egalitarianism" and "tolerance" that inflamed the intellectual anuses of the French Revolution. Both ideas (equality and tolerance) were corruptions of valid Catholic social thought from about the 1500s Spanish Jesuits. These two ideas, along with a rise of a polluted neo-liberalism, allowed the jew to use division and dissent as tools to divide the enemy (Christian Europe) for his paranoid benefit, because, as we know, diversity means division and weakness in Europe means strength and ascendency of the kike.

Three was the final (though temporary) defeat of the Catholic Church by Vatican II. Liberal theologians in the Church whined for fundamental changes in the Church that turned it away from the Church Militant to the 'church pansy.' The recent pederasty culture is a symptom of Vatican II and the ultimate feminization and jew perversion of the Church. The jews loved this state of affairs because they could con and connive based on the lie of "anti-semitism" in the Church. And thousands of sad-assed clergy wept at the presumed horror of 'christian hatred.' They have even spread the pernicious lie that the "jew" was our "elder brother." Bullshit!

Vatican II was the high-water mark of 'church pansyism.' The appropriate emotions prescribed for the "christian" became tears and guilt. The "christian," especially in White nations, was to take on the new vocation of door mat and allow jew intrigues to continue without a peep from the sheep.

There is, however, a growing White remnant in the Catholic Church. It WILL use the concept of 'just violence' to achieve the ends of restoration of the Faith. The time is coming when the jews like "Cardinal" Lustiger and his coterie of traitors in the Body of Christ will come to their just end. When the Faithful return to authority in the Church, the perfidious jews will scurry; but we will have them trapped and they will NOT survive....

MacDiarmid
"Ne obliviscaris!!!"

The weakening of the Christian Church (and I can only speak about the Catholic Church) had several roots. One was the Church's unfortunate let up of its persecution of judaica. This was helped in part by the so-called Reformation which drove a deep wedge in Christianity that the jews used and manipulated.

Two was the rise of judaic ideas in Marxism, and prior to that "egalitarianism" and "tolerance" that inflamed the intellectual anuses of the French Revolution. Both ideas (equality and tolerance) were corruptions of valid Catholic social thought from about the 1500s Spanish Jesuits. These two ideas, along with a rise of a polluted neo-liberalism, allowed the jew to use division and dissent as tools to divide the enemy (Christian Europe) for his paranoid benefit, because, as we know, diversity means division and weakness in Europe means strength and ascendency of the kike.

Three was the final (though temporary) defeat of the Catholic Church by Vatican II. Liberal theologians in the Church whined for fundamental changes in the Church that turned it away from the Church Militant to the 'church pansy.' The recent pederasty culture is a symptom of Vatican II and the ultimate feminization and jew perversion of the Church. The jews loved this state of affairs because they could con and connive based on the lie of "anti-semitism" in the Church. And thousands of sad-assed clergy wept at the presumed horror of 'christian hatred.' They have even spread the pernicious lie that the "jew" was our "elder brother." Bullshit!

Vatican II was the high-water mark of 'church pansyism.' The appropriate emotions prescribed for the "christian" became tears and guilt. The "christian," especially in White nations, was to take on the new vocation of door mat and allow jew intrigues to continue without a peep from the sheep.

There is, however, a growing White remnant in the Catholic Church. It WILL use the concept of 'just violence' to achieve the ends of restoration of the Faith. The time is coming when the jews like "Cardinal" Lustiger and his coterie of traitors in the Body of Christ will come to their just end. When the Faithful return to authority in the Church, the perfidious jews will scurry; but we will have them trapped and they will NOT survive....

MacDiarmid
"Ne obliviscaris!!!"

Interesting post, thank you.

One interesting thing about the elder brother matter. Some jewish authority did not take that Pope's sentence in a positive way at all and if one looks in the Bible the stories concerning elder brothers, can understad why ;)

Best regards

Interesting post, thank you.

One interesting thing about the elder brother matter. Some jewish authority did not take that Pope's sentence in a positive way at all and if one looks in the Bible the stories concerning elder brothers, can understad why ;)

Best regards
True. We know what happened to Joseph and his jealous older brothers! HA!

The weakening of the Christian Church (and I can only speak about the Catholic Church) had several roots. One was the Church's unfortunate let up of its persecution of judaica. This was helped in part by the so-called Reformation which drove a deep wedge in Christianity that the jews used and manipulated.

Two was the rise of judaic ideas in Marxism, and prior to that "egalitarianism" and "tolerance" that inflamed the intellectual anuses of the French Revolution. Both ideas (equality and tolerance) were corruptions of valid Catholic social thought from about the 1500s Spanish Jesuits. These two ideas, along with a rise of a polluted neo-liberalism, allowed the jew to use division and dissent as tools to divide the enemy (Christian Europe) for his paranoid benefit, because, as we know, diversity means division and weakness in Europe means strength and ascendency of the kike.

Three was the final (though temporary) defeat of the Catholic Church by Vatican II. Liberal theologians in the Church whined for fundamental changes in the Church that turned it away from the Church Militant to the 'church pansy.' The recent pederasty culture is a symptom of Vatican II and the ultimate feminization and jew perversion of the Church. The jews loved this state of affairs because they could con and connive based on the lie of "anti-semitism" in the Church. And thousands of sad-assed clergy wept at the presumed horror of 'christian hatred.' They have even spread the pernicious lie that the "jew" was our "elder brother." Bullshit!

Vatican II was the high-water mark of 'church pansyism.' The appropriate emotions prescribed for the "christian" became tears and guilt. The "christian," especially in White nations, was to take on the new vocation of door mat and allow jew intrigues to continue without a peep from the sheep.

There is, however, a growing White remnant in the Catholic Church. It WILL use the concept of 'just violence' to achieve the ends of restoration of the Faith. The time is coming when the jews like "Cardinal" Lustiger and his coterie of traitors in the Body of Christ will come to their just end. When the Faithful return to authority in the Church, the perfidious jews will scurry; but we will have them trapped and they will NOT survive....

MacDiarmid
"Ne obliviscaris!!!"

I have to say I enjoyed this post quite a bit. Lustiger needs to get worked over by a new Torquemada. What we need is thorough Ausrottung of Jewish influence in all sectors of society including faith communities.

I have to say I enjoyed this post quite a bit. Lustiger needs to get worked over by a new Torquemada. What we need is thorough Ausrottung of Jewish influence in all sectors of society including faith communities.
Thank you. I agree. Jews need to be removed from the Church and if their conversion is true they should be given leadership roles in the ghettoes we need to recreate.

What we need to do is rip out jewish influence in our race. And that means christinsanity.

Christianity is the antithesis of Judaism. And besides paganism and atheism have been manipulated by the Jews far more than Christianity ever was.

During the great persecutions of Christians by Rome, the Jews were the solid allies of the Roman pagans.

Today, look at how the Jews constantly use atheistical ideas and attitudes to undermine our people.

-since few are willing to be truthfull, as the priest who told a dirty rabbi the possibility of justice waiting for him and his nasty breed:

"Had not a Catholic bishop in Slovakia responded to the personal appeals of a rabbi and his people in 1942 as they faced the threat of 'deportation to the east' with words about the justice of their plight?
It is not just a matter of deportation. You will not die there of hunger and disease. They will slaughter all of you, old and young alike, women and children at once. It is the punishment you deserve for the death of our Lord and Redeemer."