If even .02 percent of Europeans had the mental clarity of this Israeli we'd be out of the fix we're in. Especially enjoyable is his satire about the Rosenbergs. For more of his writings (and others) the information for joining his Yahoo group is at bottom. -- FJ.

Lobster for Iran

by Israel Shamir

“Iran’s biggest threat since Nazis,” said Israeli defence minister Shaul Mofaz, according to the Guardian; (http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1760728,00.html) “The world must not wait! Since Hitler we Jews have not faced such a threat” as presented by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who “further stirred international outrage by calling on Israeli Jews to be resettled in Europe” (...thus the Guardian).

These guys are hard to please! In the 1930s, Hitler called for the Jews to be resettled outside of Europe, and they declared war on him. Now Ahmadinejad calls for the resettlement of Jews in Europe, and the Jews still respond with a war cry. That is, unless the Guardian missed the point in its report, and the outrage actually came from the Europeans who preferred the Palestinians to serve as unwilling host to these difficult guests.

Anyway I beg to differ: President Ahmadinejad is the biggest threat since Gerard de Nerval, a flamboyant French poet, promenaded a lobster on a blue ribbon lead, just as one exercises a dog, along the Palais Royal gardens in order to épater le bourgeois. A truly poetic soul, an enfant terrible if ever there was one, Ahmadinejad aimed to wake us up from our over-long after-dinner nap. What can the Iranian do if ‘Jews’ is the only magic word that awakens us from this slumber? Sexual innuendos would not bestir even a child fresh from his AIDS-awareness lesson. An attack of Christianity would be warmly applauded by the undeniable masters of European minds, Messrs Sauerkraut and Finkelrot. In this post-modernist age, when the Vagina Monologues have entered the matinee repertoire, it is not that easy to épater the increasingly blasé bourgeoisie. If Ahmadinejad would call for the resettlement of six million European Muslims outside of Europe, nobody would raise an eyebrow with the possible exception of Oriana Fallaci and M. Le Pen, who might object to his plagiarism. If he were to call for the erasure of France from the world map, the French would not sit up and pay attention: they think there is already a Brussels directive to this effect!

I admire Ahmadinejad. Not as a politician: let the Iranians judge him on this merit. Not as a divine: I leave this to the Muslims. But as a true poet who unveiled our hypocrisy and slaughtered our last sacred cow. This is the only possible explanation of his deeds and words: Iranians have really no reason to care about the Jewish holocaust, one way or other. Nobody accuses them, not even Mr Yehuda Bauer of Jerusalem’s Holocaust memorial institute, who is prone to accuse the World and its niece for failing to save the Jews. The Persians from Cyrus to Hosroes to Mohammad Resa Shah were always good to Jews, and even in these mad days there is a large and flourishing Jewish community in Iran. Ahmadinejad spoke about the Holocaust like Hillary conquered Everest – because it presented a challenge!

The innocent revisionist historians were so excited when he toyed with an idea of “finally discovering the truth”. They prepared their well-thumbed books and diagrams of gas consumption and body heat. But Ahmadinejad is interested in the hard facts of World War II about as much as Nerval was interested in exercising his lobster. Acceptance of Holocaust dogma is a sign of submission to the Tel Aviv–New York Axis, a sign of the new colonialism. Ahmadinejad refused it just as St Paul refused to accept the Noahide laws: not because St Paul wanted to partake of pagan sacrifices, but because he did not want to take his orders from the Jews.

The European leaders, the docile supporters of patent war criminals, of George W. Bush, the murderer of umpteen Iraqis, Afghanis and sundry Arabs, of Shaul Mofaz, the murderer of an eight-year-old girl (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3238626,00.html) (among hundreds of others) he killed last week in besieged Gaza, all sat up and expressed their outrage. They did not object when Israel strafed and bombed defenceless Gazans. When Israeli politicians threatened to turn Iran into “radioactive desert”, they did not describe it as “a call to genocide”. By his challenge, president Ahmadinejad saved the honour of human race, as only a poet can do.

I admire Iran, for the fiery crimson of their rose gardens and for the azure of its old mosques, for the ravishing beauty of its women, whose black eyelashes enhance the whiteness of their skin shining through their black chadors. I admire Iran for its marvellous painting that overcame the iconoclastic ravages. I admire Iran for the spiritual subtlety of its poets, who united their love to women with their adoration of God in one undivided chant just as the Song of Songs did. Their Rumi and Jami, Sa’adi and Ferdousi, Hafiz and Khayyam were of the most daring and sincere poets who ever graced our earth. Ahmadinejad is heir to their tradition, a daring mocker of our hypocrisy, a boy who saw through the emperor’s new clothes. Even if the ham-fisted Yank should flatten this daredevil, and burn the rose gardens of Shiraz just as he once incinerated the blossoms of Nagasaki, we may be proud of Ahmadinejad, our contemporary who dared to tread on the tiger’s tail.

II


The European and American reaction to Iran’s nuclear program was that of Uncle Tom’s slaveowner, Simon Legree, on learning of an escaped slave. How does this dusky dare to touch the white masters’ toys? Their empty talk of an “Iranian threat” is designed for the ignorant: Iran has never, ever attacked a European nation since the wars for Anatolia in the 5th century BC; whereas European imperialists have repeatedly occupied and controlled Iran, most recently in 1942, or by proxy in 1953, when they deposed democratically-elected Mosaddeq and returned to dominate this ancient nation.

Yes, the old colonialism is dead. England can’t rule over Iraq, nor France over Algeria, but the new collective colonialism, that of the imperialist Core of highly industrialised Western nations over the rest of the world, is hardly any better. The old masters have decided to pool their resources and powers to rule their erstwhile slaves together. They switched from the Athenian model where a citizen had his slave, to the Spartan model, where slaves belong to all Spartans. In this new collective imperialist universe, the US is the arm, the enforcer of this new colonialism, while the mind, the ideology is supplied by a vast syndicate that unites and coordinates the majority of newspapers and networks of both left and right from Madrid to Moscow and from Texas to Timbuktu, despite their pretensions of competition and rivalry.

This syndicate is the real powerbase of what two American professors, John Mearsheimer of Chicago, and Stephen Walt of Harvard, (M&W for short) politely called ‘Israel Lobby in the US’, though this syndicate has other fish to fry beside that of the State of Israel’s. While fully approving of M&W’s endeavour, we should say: they minimised rather than exaggerated the problem, for it is a global, rather than a local (the US) phenomenon. The fearsome AIPAC is just the visible tip of iceberg below which are miles and miles of solid ice: media lords, chief editors, their pundits, Masters of Discourse, in short. As if by a magic wand, the Iranian crisis made it visible to the naked eye: they have all cried out in one mighty voice like the legion of demons in the Capernaum synagogue in response to Christ’s words.

In his thought-provoking speech Ahmadinejad said: “The vast Zionist network has been at the service of the imperialists for decades.” This is open to an argument whether the Zionist network serves the imperialists, or the imperialists serve this network. It’s an example of Managerial Revolution: Jews were managers for the imperialists, until they took over the show, some would say. Oh no, they remained docile to their imperialist overlords, argue others. Whatever position we take, the Zionists and the Imperialists are surely integrated and intermeshed, and if one accepts the idea of the Iranian threat to Israel, one subscribes to this demonic network.

The nations that refuse the Masters of Discourse are subjugated by force. A nuclear weapon serves as a great equaliser, as did the Smith & Wesson gun in the Wild West. In order to prevent too much equalisation, the American pioneers kept guns out of native hands. The same policy now drives the West in its attempts to keep nuclear power out of reach of Iranians.

A few days ago I was invited to a live discussion on Russian TV Channel One, where the Moscow BBC bureau chief rhetorically asked why a peaceful Iran would need ballistic missiles, and he listed the Iranian missile arsenal. He could not answer the question of why a peaceful Britain would need ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons! Actually, why would anybody need one? But if England, with its long and bloody history of subjugating the Third World from Ireland to Japan, may have these toys, then it is likewise the duty of any important country willing to protect its populace from the Western masters’ whims.

Yes, Iran is still working on a peaceful program of atomic energy, but if and when that country decides to build the bomb, we may support this decision, as it would enhance peace. Actually, few people did more for the cause of world peace than Julius and Ethel Rosenberg and their associates Harry Gold and Klaus Fuchs. These wonderful men passed the secrets of American-built nuclear weapons to Russia, and thus saved Moscow and St Petersburg from the fate of Hiroshima. Without their heroic deed, the colonial masters would have turned Russia into a radioactive desert. Joseph Stalin passed the know-how to emerging China, and this was a very good deed -- otherwise the Americans wouldn’t have hesitated to nuke Vietnam as they did Japan.

The Russian nuclear shield is the only thing Gorbachev and Yeltsin did not break down in their destruction of the Soviet Union, probably because they did not expect the patriotic forces to ever return to power in Moscow. This shield allows the Russians to disregard the nagging of Frau Merkel, and gives them their freedom of choice: to sell their oil and gas to Europe or to turn the stream towards China. It allows the Belarus people to have the president they elected by huge majority: without it, Lukashenka would share the fate of Noriega and Milosevic for his steadfast refusal to sell the assets of Belarus to George Soros. Let Iranians, too, have this freedom of choice, and restore balance in the region.

And to sincere well-wishers of our Israeli well-being I’ll say: Iran is no danger. The truth is, the Jews could live extremely well in Palestine. By making peace with the native inhabitants in 1948, we would have kept our common home, Palestine, as the hub of the Middle East with Iraqi oil coming to Haifa refineries and trains from Baghdad to Cairo flying by Lydda and Jaffa, with Muslim pilgrims coming to al Quds on their way to Mecca, with Christians walking in the footsteps of Christ from Bethlehem to Nazareth and with Jews doing their aliya (this word meant an annual pilgrimage to Jerusalem like the Hajj, rather than a permanent immigration to Palestine as Zionists wont). We would prosper beyond our wildest dreams, as the prophets promised, if we were to kick the nasty old habit of separateness and dominance.

It is not too late even now, sixty years and many deaths later. For this purpose, we may take the advice of Ahmadinejad: let the exclusive Jewish state be eliminated from the map of the region to be replaced by one state of all citizens of the land, Jews or not. “The right to govern belongs to all people of Palestine, be they Muslims, Christians, or Jews”, said Ahmadinejad, and by golly, only a Jewish supremacist may object to his words.

When I said this at the TV discussion in Moscow, I was attacked by the Chairman of a Russian Jewish Congress and Director of a Zionist Middle East Institute, a greasy and spotty bully of a man with hanging belly, a living cartoon from Der Sturmer, with the fitting name Satanovsky. “Watch out, - he told me after the show, - "apparently you have never been beaten hard enough. Here in Moscow we know of no restraints of democracy, my Jewish lads will tear your balls off like they did to many men like you. Israel should remain a Jewish state forever”. Such Jewish Mafiosi are the real leaders of the Jewish Lobby and chief supporters of the Jewish state abroad. These sort of people lead the Jewish organisations in Russia, in America and elsewhere. They need a Jewish state to escape their lands in the hour of wrath, but we, the ordinary citizens of Israel, do not need it.

However, the Mafia can’t rule forever. I take heart in the words of Ahmadinejad: “The young tree of resistance in Palestine is blooming and blooms of faith and desire for freedom are flowering. The Zionist regime is a decaying and crumbling tree that will fall with a storm. (Remember the parable of the barren tree? - ISH) Palestine is the meeting point of right and wrong. The destiny of the region will be decided in the land of Al-Qods and it will be a great honour to share in the victory of Palestine.” The victory of Palestine is our victory and we shall be happy to share in it.

“Now, will there be a war?,” one is often asked. I have no full confidence of George Bush, he does not share his plans with me. But while the gatekeepers of the Left say that Oil is the reason for the war, in my view Oil can be the reason for peace. As the price of oil has now crossed the $70 threshold, President Bush must decide whether he will survive its hike above $120 -- whether his voters in the red states will happily accept the advice of an American Jewish Congress pundit and director of their Israel/Middle East Office Eran Lerman (previously of Israeli intelligence) to stop driving cars every other day. Bush has the power to steer the US away from its perilous course, and tell to the Jewish Congress pundits to shove it.

And to my Israeli countrymen: I’ll remind you of our age-long tradition of friendship with Iran. Two thousand years ago, a picture of the Iranian capital city Susa was presented on the Eastern gate of the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. Mishna (Berakoth 9) called for being especially careful towards it: “never show disrespect to the Eastern gate!” According to Rambam, this was done so that they would have the fear of the king of Persia upon them. This tradition is worth remembering and carefully preserving.

To subscribe to this group, send an email to: shamireaders-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
The items published in the group can be seen on:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shamireaders/messages (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/shamireaders/messages)

Is it just me, or does one get the feeling that just when one is beginning to understand what the hell he is trying to say, one determines, no, that was not it.
And the more I try and figure out just what he is trying to say, the more I determine he is saying a lot without saying anything.
WHAT THE HELL IS HE TRYING TO SAY?
Bush is a bad guy. Jews/muslims/palestinians/ are friends. Zionists are evil.
WHAT THE HELL IS HE TRYING TO SAY?
The Jabberwocky is easier to understand.
I'll come back and try this one again later.
Once my headache goes away.

Somehow I don't think the Zionist Gangster Jews are going to fall for "Our diversity is our strength". Who's he talking to? Everybody else. He knows the Jews are the biggest bastards and will always run everything, everywhere. What does "making peace" mean to jews, who are always either demanding something be given them or stealing it, anyway? "If Jews can stop being Jews, then we will have world peace." I guess that's it!

"...The truth is, the Jews could live extremely well in Palestine. By making peace with the native inhabitants in 1948, we would have kept our common home, Palestine, as the hub of the Middle East with Iraqi oil coming to Haifa refineries and trains from Baghdad to Cairo flying by Lydda and Jaffa, with Muslim pilgrims coming to al Quds on their way to Mecca, with Christians walking in the footsteps of Christ from Bethlehem to Nazareth and with Jews doing their aliya (this word meant an annual pilgrimage to Jerusalem like the Hajj, rather than a permanent immigration to Palestine as Zionists wont). We would prosper beyond our wildest dreams, as the prophets promised, if we were to kick the nasty old habit of separateness and dominance..."

Missing the point. Israeli dissidents are in the belly of the beast. I first stumbled across Shamir about 5 years ago and it was on his site I discovered some of the interesting things they say.

It's an acquired taste I grant, but again it was Israeli dissidents who first pointed out that 911 could only have been done by the Mossad. Jews in Israel saw the fingerprints half a world away.

Shamir is also the one who had his book banned in France for "hate" against... Jews. I'd have loved to have been in the courtroom when they accused a Semite of being an anti-semite.

Either way his book is still banned in France but you can download it at Solargeneral. Highly recommended.

Oh, that's why it almost made sense.
Bottom line being, I really do not trust any jew.
Sometimes they like to confuse issues by saying things like, "Oh, I'm not the bad jew. THOSE jews are the bad jews. I am the good jew because I talk about what bad things the bad jews are doing".
You know, kind of like smiling and offering to shake your hand while the other is behind their back with a knife ready to plunge into you as soon as they have hold of your hand and can pull you off balance.
I will check it out, though.
Nothing like having a jew confirm their atrocities.
For whatever reason.

99.99% of what these jewish dissidents say is BS and benefiting the jew in some way. See thread about ant-semitism benefiting jewz

sometimes its tossing shit like that out so others can point at you and laugh at the silly racist.

Do we really need a heeb to point out how bad heebs are?

I will check it out, though.
Nothing like having a jew confirm their atrocities.
For whatever reason.

I got the idea of paying attention to jewish/israeli dissenters from Eric Thomson's interview with "J.G.Burg." He confirmed to Thomson that the holocaust was absolute shit, and that Rich Jews actually were living off the suffering of their poorer cousins. And MAYBE that's where they got the idea from.

Read with care, I've found lots of good stuff from Israelis and Jews who deviate from the party line. It's tricky. I don't love the guys but I want to KNOW MY ENEMY, and insiders know the most.

___________________________

Eric Thomson's interview with Jewish dissident "J.G.Burg" (Josef Ginsburg)

Josef Ginsburg, who wrote under the pen name of "J.G. Burg", came to Toronto to assist Ernst Zündel's defence effort in The Great Holocaust Trial in 1988, at which time I was able to speak to this remarkable anti-Zionist jew and to make extensive notes after each conversation.

"Mr. Burg", as he preferred to be addressed, was the author of several booklets on such favorite Zionist subjects as the so-called Holocaust, the founding of the bandit-state of Israel, the so-called "diary" of Anne Frank, German "guilt", etc. Unfortunately, none of his works are available in English, to my knowledge and most of them appear to be out of print. I am sure the Zionists are happy about that, for my own readings of his works answered any question I might have had as to why the "Bundeszog" or Zionist Occupation Government of Germany and their jewish masters were attempting to surround "J.G. Burg" with a wall of silence.

Zionist thugs had even attacked him in a cemetery where he was visiting the grave of a lady friend who had perished in a fire which "Burg" insisted had been set by the Zionists. Josef Ginsburg, who no longer needs the threadbare cover of his pen name, now that he is dead, probably put up a good fight, despite his years. He was a short, tough, wiry, agile and keenly alert man, with penetrating gaze and hawk-like features. His sharp eyes and almost haughty demeanor seemed to challenge all whom he met, as if to say: "You, there! How do you serve or thwart my purpose?" Being a jew, he often involved himself in confusing circular and/or corkscrew reasoning of the sort exemplified by Franz Kafka's stories. When his guard was up, as it usually was, he would only answer a question with a question: "Is your name Josef Ginsburg?" "Why do you ask me that?"

Certainly, I would have received nothing but questions in answer to my questions, had I told him that I was treating our conversations as an interview and that I was secretly making notes of his statements. For anyone who did interview him, with his knowledge, it was a struggle all the way. Whenever there were witnesses, cameras, microphones and/or tape recorders in evidence, he would become very cagey and evasive. He insisted that no one take any pictures of him and he actually made a videotaped interview in which only the face of the interviewer ever appeared on camera! After this "night and fog" appearance, he demanded and received the interviewer's promise that the interview would not be released or shown to anyone before his death. Although I did not tell him that I was taking notes, I respected Mr. Ginsburg's wishes also in this regard.


Josef Ginsburg was exasperating, for he was an eyewitness to history, specifically the Zionist-National Socialist collaboration which Zionists have always exerted themselves so mightily to cover up. Yet, he would not reveal publicly how he had learned the truth about the Holohoax and the gas chamber lie. He would even quibble about his own identity and the political connections which caused him to be among the first Soviet inspectors of all the so-called death camps in Poland.

Privately, he made no attempt to hide his Communist connections and sympathies. Yes, he had toured the concentration camps of Auschwitz, Birkenau, Maidanek, Treblinka, Sobibor and all the others in Poland, as a member of the official Soviet inspection team and he found no evidence whatsoever of any attempt on the part of the Germans to exterminate anyone and certainly not by means of lethal gas chambers!

But by refusing to admit this in any public interview, his statements debunking the Holocaust legend were largely dismissed by journalists as 'unauthoritative opinion', which went unreported. That gave these prostitutes of the pen an 'easy out', for they were already being paid to believe in the Holohoax. If Ginsburg had been more open to them, he could have at least raised some doubts in their own minds, regardless of the rubbish their editors deemed 'fit to print'.


I told him that he should tell them that he was a Communist and a member of the Soviet inspection team ("our gallant Soviet allies"), for in Soviet Canuckistan, alias Canada, that would be tantamount to sainthood. The word of a Communist jew "simply must be true" and the only rebuttal available to the Zionist Holocaustorians would be (a) to prove that he was not a Communist or (b) not a jew.

But Josef Ginsburg would not go all out, as he saw it, to set the historical record straight. To this day it is a mystery to me why he wanted to 'pull his punches' or "hide his candle under a bushel", as the jew-book says. Perhaps he feared for his life, although he and his work were no secret whatsoever to the Zionists and their German Occupation Government stooges, for he lived in Germany and could be contacted through a small publishing firm there. Maybe he thought they could not locate him if he concealed his real name and background. He behaved as if he feared to compromise his 'security', no matter how illusory that security appeared to me and others.


Josef Ginsburg's motive for attacking Zionism by stating historical truth was indeed very jewish: he feared that jews were endangering their survival by putting all their political eggs into the Zionist basket. He saw in Communism, as his fellow jews had seen in Christianity and Capitalism, a protective cloak of universalism in which the body of jewish tribalism would thrive, much like certain maggots thrive beneath the protective skin of a living host, as they feed off the host's blood, I opined, for the similarity was obvious.

Ginsburg saw the Zionist drive to particularize jewish, as opposed to Gentile, interests as extremely dangerous. I certainly agreed with him on this point and I asked him why the Rothschilds, the International Zionists par excellence, had funded Theodor Herzl's Territorial Zionist efforts, which, if successful, would serve to identify, separate and isolate the jewish population from the rest of the world.

"The Rothschilds had to do it," said Ginsburg, "because it is so ordered in their family compact." I asked him what he meant by that, thinking of A. Conan Doyle's "The Musgrave Ritual". "Each heir to the Rothschild fortune must read the compact and agree to fulfill its provisions, to the best of his ability, during his lifetime," he said. "There is no argument with the terms of the compact, regardless of any perception of danger or undesirability on the part of the heir. The family compact has the force of law." "But," I said, "the state of Israel is very much a danger to the interests of world jewry." "I agree with you," said Ginsburg. "The Rothschilds may also agree with you, but they must carry out the orders which have been in effect for many centuries. They have no recourse."


Although jews have not only survived, but thrived, prospered and conned their way to conquest via such fallacious 'universal creeds' as Christianity and Capitalism, Ginsburg was convinced that 'Communism was the only way to go'. I mentioned Jabotinski's group, from which came the founders of Israel, as being a bunch of Communist-Zionists. "That is a contradiction in terms," he said, "for true Communism is internationalist and all-inclusive. It cannot be nationalist and therefore exclusive. That is why I call the Territorial Zionists who founded the state of Israel 'Zionazis' and that is why people like Ben Gurion, Levi Skolnick, alias Eshkol and Golda Meyersohn, alias Meir, got along so well with the German Nazis, especially after their little Kristallnacht show which they deemed necessary to scare their fellow jews out of Germany, hopefully to settle in Palestine."


"You bring up this recurrent theme of German Nazi-Zionazi collaboration," I said. "This is a fairly new concept to me."

"And rightly so," he said, "for that is just the way the Zionazis who control the media want their collaboration to be: secret. Eichmann was one of their weak links. That's why they had to kidnap him from Argentina and murder him in Israel. They locked him in a glass box in the courtroom, supposedly for his protection, but really to keep him from hearing the real questions and giving real answers.

Eichmann was a fool. He did not even know that he had a dangerous secret, for he had done nothing wrong. He should have kept his mouth shut and gone into hiding when he heard about the Zionazis' murder of his jewish counterpart, Joel Brandt, in Israel."

"So, innocence can be deadly," I said.

"Yes," he agreed, "the guilty know why they should cover their tracks and they know how to do it."

"So what was Eichmann's role in German Nazi-Zionazi collaboration?" I asked.

"He worked with Joel Brandt and others to smuggle jews out of Europe and into Palestine, against the wishes of the British who governed the territory under a mandate."

"Would Eichmann have known about the Ha'arev or Transfer Agreement which allowed jews emigrating from Germany to take their wealth with them in the form of German-made goods?" I asked. "Another reason for his judicial murder," said Ginsburg.


"You mentioned earlier that the Zionists and the Nazis collaborated on the drafting of the so-called Nuremberg Race Laws," I said.

"Yes," he said, "one of the Zionist collaborators was Rabbi Leo Baeck, who now lives in London, England."

"What did Baeck do?" I asked.

"He helped the Nazis define who was a jew and who was a German and he suggested the adoption of the yellow, six-pointed star as the symbol of the jewish nation."

"You mean that this symbol was not previously used to signify judaism?" I asked.

"Oh, it was a jewish symbol, just as it was a Babylonian symbol. The six-pointed star was used by many different people. The German Condor Legion used it as a badge of rank in Spain during the Fascist War from 1936 to 1939. Your American police often use the six-pointed star. But as late as the 1930s, "The Lion of Judah" was used to symbolize jewish nationality. You may remember the British newspaper story which appeared in March, 1933, headlined "Judea Declares War on Germany."

"Yes," I said.

"Well, the article carried a frieze-like strip of lions and swastikas across the front page which symbolized 'Germans versus jews'. No six-pointed stars!" he exclaimed.

"I remember the article," I said. "Samuel Untermeyer of the World Jewish Congress declared a boycott of all German goods. Did this mean that there was a conflict between the Territorial Zionists and the International Zionists?"

"No," he said. "The Zionists were only making sure that German foreign trade would remain under their control, as they had done with Germany in World War I. They made the blockade and broke it themselves. No one else was allowed to do that, so it was really a Zionist monopoly of German trade."

"What, in your opinion, was the reason for the Zionist 'declaration of war' on Germany in 1933, only a month after Hitler's election as Chancellor?" I asked.

"The Zionists (and all other jews, I thought) never do anything for only one reason," he said. "Their declaration of war was given with at least a twofold purpose. One reason was their hatred of Hitler's economic program and his intention of nationalizing the Bank of Germany, which was owned by the Rothschilds, as are all so-called national banks today."

"So you agree that the Rothschilds and their bankster stooges control the creation of money for the entire world," I said.

"Yes," he smiled grimly. "Their 'tekla mekla' money is created out of nothing and they charge interest on it!"

"What would be another reason for the Zionists' declaration of war on Germany?" I asked.

"To conceal their collaboration with the Nazis," he said.

"What were some major points of Nazi-Zionist collaboration?" I asked.

"First, was the creation of a Zionist state in German-controlled territory. Second, was the German Government's assistance for jews to leave Germany, preferably to enter Palestine illegally. Third, was Zionist assistance in supplying Germany with foreign exchange and goods, even during World War II." he said.

"But why would the Zionists support Germany, when they wanted the Allies to win?" I asked.

"The Zionists did not help Germany sufficiently to win the war, but only to make a profit and maintain their influence with the Germans," he said. "Zionazi Ben Gurion bragged that he was fighting London and Berlin."

"You said that the Germans helped the Zionists to build a state within German-controlled territory," I said.

"Yes," said Ginsburg. "Zionists were given such jurisdiction in transit/training camps like Theresienstadt and they also established autonomous zones in parts of occupied Poland and Russia, as well as ruling over the ghettos of Polish cities like Warsaw, Lublin and Crakow."

"Is it true," I asked, "that the Germans taught jews such trades as carpentry, bricklaying, machine tooling, plumbing, farming, animal husbandry, auto mechanics, etc.?"

"Yes," he said, "they did. The Germans also helped the Zionists to have their own money, banks, postage stamps, post offices and police, all of which were recognized by the German authorities."

"It is so different from the Hollywood version of German-jewish relations which the Zionists want us to believe," I said. "Was there, in your experience, sufficient jewish suffering during World War II to call it a 'holocaust'?" I asked.

"Oh, there was jewish suffering," he said, "but nothing to compare with German suffering!"

"Was jewish suffering due to German policies?" I asked.

"Indirectly," he said. "The jews suffered most under the Zionists, especially in the ghettos and the autonomous areas. A jew could be thankful if he were in a German camp like Auschwitz, for at least he would be fed as long as supplies lasted and he would receive medical treatment."

"What was going on in the Zionist-ruled districts that caused jewish suffering?" I asked.

"It was a catastrophe!" he said. "The Zionist administration was so criminal and corrupt that essential supplies, such as food, clothing and medicines wound up in the hands of black marketeers and speculators. There were shocking scenes of jewish children begging and starving outside jewish restaurants, while fat jewish diners looked out at them with indifference and jewish policemen strolled by, unconcerned!"

"What about the autonomous areas, where there was open land?" I asked.

"That was even worse!" he declared. "True, there was farmland and woodland, tools, implements and simple housing, wells and streams, but rich jews who had previously relied upon Gentile laborers and servants could not fend for themselves. Once again, jewish criminals stole the German food supplies, so even the rich jews suffered and died under Zionist misgovernment."

"In regard to hoarding, speculating and black marketeering, you had mentioned Simon Wiesenthal," I said.

"Yes," he said. "The Gestapo had a department called the Stachel (barb), composed of jewish agents who spied on fellow jews who were hoarding and black marketeering. The agent received a reward in the form of a percentage of the value of any contraband he discovered. Wiesenthal was such an agent."

JOSEF GINSBURG on how to make a jew tell the truth:

Jew-wise Gentiles know about the "jews' oath" or Kol Nidre prayer, which all devout jews say every year to absolve them from telling the truth in the year to come.

But there is a way to make a religious jew tell the truth, according to Josef Ginsburg, who was himself the son of an orthodox rabbi.

"First, all Christian symbols must be cleared from the room. Then, a Hebrew bible and a rabbi must be present. The jew must don a skull cap and take a rabbinical oath which nullifies the Kol Nidre anti-oath oath."

After this procedure, Josef Ginsburg claimed that "99.5% of all the sick holocaust stories would become truthful silence!" Jews are not otherwise bound to tell the truth, because their courtroom oath (as well as their pledge of allegiance) is deemed by them to be of no account, whatsoever!

Yes, it is true.
To better overcome the opposition, one need to understand the opposition as much as possible.
Military strategists understand the wisdom of knowing everything about the enemy that one can.
One cannot address a rattlesnake in the same manner as one addresses a kitten.
Simplified analogy, but true.