Some may recall fondly VNNF's former resident money magician, one "Randolph," who left in a huff when nobody was terribly interested in debating him--on his own rather stringent terms--on the economic pontifications of the kike Ludwig Von Mises. In parting, he mentioned he was joining the NA, and apparently he quite rightly joined spermfront (as "Davey Crockett") at the same time, where he has racked up over 1,000 (money-related) posts in three months, putting even Charles A. Lindbergh to shame.

Well, it seems this financial wiz neglected some basic due diligence before joining, as regards what the NA does, what it believes (WLP's economic primer is still up: http://www.natvan.com/what-is-na/na2.html#economic), and what role an individualist could play in a group few have described as a participatory democracy. And his first official act as member was to "pitch" some sort of business arrangement at NA, which surprisingly managed to underwhelm them. So the deal's off, and "Davey" is out of NA.

Suffice it to say, now that he's openly attacking NA, his days at spermfront may also be numbered. If itz any consolation, if you're lurking Davey/Randolph, you'll always be welcome here--in the opposition forum--of VNNF.

I decided to quit the National Alliance one month after joining it because the group is filled with sissies who cannot seemed to do more than toss flyers after cover of darkness.

I am an American, not some foot soldier for some one else's glory. The more I read of the ideology of the National Alliance, the more that I see that it is flawed at its core. I cannot support it.

I wanted so desperately to see Michigan get rid of the damn foreigners and negros that I was willing to compromise on some principles of traditional America. I realized that I cannot do it anymore.

Time to go in another direction.

NA's reaction to Davey:

You struck me as a very odd, quirky, strange individual. Oh and wow...that coffee shop idea was just so cool and original. I couldn't believe how insightful that was

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=124295&page=1&pp=10

FS

I always wondered what the hell happened to our little ‘Randolph’. I got into it with him once when he bashed AH (as he often did), in some thread heer where he was on a soapbox preaching how economically untenable NS is and I responded with an attack on his fucking beloved von miserable kike, and he got snippy with me. He went on and on how “I was stupid an ‘ignerent because just like everyone else on VNN, when you see an idea that comes from a jew, I automatically reject it out of hand without even examining it objectively” (well, yeah I tend to when it comes to yidz LOL), blah blah blah. As I remember it, he actually followed me around for a few days talking up his jewlike bullshit to me until I cut loose with some Nasty on him. I actually never really even looked into (or cared about) jew Von Mises’ economic theses, I just attacked the little douchebag ‘cause he flamed der Fuhrer. ‘Randolph’ is an obnoxious, droning little shite though, isn’t he? And I agree with you, he’s no fuckin WN and should be confined to our opposition ghetto heer if he returns to VNNF. ;)
Cheers

TG

‘Randolph’ is an obnoxious, droning little shite though, isn’t he?

LOL. It seems most people here came to the same conclusion that that NA guy did. At least there's some common ground.

How odd that libbertoon Randolph, so fond of freedom, would flee uncensored VNNF for heavily-moderated spermfront. And even there he's getting terribly frustrated with the newbies' patent failure to recognize what he boldly asserts, solely on a dead kike's authority, to be objective and scientific truisms. Guess you can fool some of the sheeple some of the time...

I have a couple friends who are fetishistically attached to laissez faire. How that could inspire anyone's imagination or loyalty I do not know. Randroid bullshite probably. A pox on all kikes and their heirs including one Alyssa Rosenbaum.

From bad to worse: it seems the hapless Randolph is now being mocked at spermfront for the very fact of being mocked at VNNF.

They do say it's lonely at the top. Or perhaps as a nigger bluesman might put it, if Randolph didn't have bad luck, he'd have no luck at all.

MuadDib
Senior Moderator
Lawdog and I discussed this thread last night, JJT. We're going to let it play out. Let Randolph (aka Davey Crockett, who was deemed an anti at VNN, of all places ... http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=3470 ) show us all of his wisdom, and lead us to a better future.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=124295&page=5&pp=10

where have I heard this before: "NA should...1) Keep the National Alliance only as a publishing arm and keep it out of building organizations or any political activities.

2) Develop numerous pro-white local groups"

here is a flawed comment from that thread by one Mauddib: "You have it backwards, Randolph. You made a claim. It is up to you to prove it. I'm sure that your month of membership has made you an expert.

I've yet to see a news story on your actions. I've yet to see an ADL report on your actions. The NA, on the other hand ..."

Is the ADL the foremost WN org rating service? Or SPLC? Sure, you have to take their opprobrium as a potentially positive sign, but in judging between alternative A or B, the amount the sheckies are complaining about any particular person or any particular org at any one time is not necessarily "proof" of anything.

For example, let's say you're sleaze dees and you're grooming a new infiltrator. Joe Blow, let's say, is working off a deal to get paroled early. In the pen he got the tatts and learned to talk the talk. Now he's shaved his head and 14-88 & so forth. Suddenly Joe Blow has time on his hands and is motivated to help out and can even kick in a few bucks here and there. But people are wary. So Joe makes the internet rounds, attends some demonstrations, ie builds a rep. To ice things the rep, Sleaze Dees runs a profile on "Joe Blow rising star in hate movement." So we should be wary and not reflexively go the opposite direction.

Automatically going the opposite direction of SPLC/ADL is just as bad as automatically going the same direction. Either way, they potentially control your action. We want to chart our own course and not always look to them for the "K" stamp of disapproval.

Is the ADL the foremost WN org rating service?

Interesting point. I can even extend it, but at the expense of straining the crude economic approach of the original subject of this thread. How about a thought experiment to infer by rough order of magnitude who most threatens The Learned Elders by accounting for their worldwide allocation of (our) resources? Some random indicative guesstimates from WWW:

Iraq: “coalition” deployment (peak): 467,000; “coalition” dead: 701; US cost (10 years): $300 billion plus.

Al Qaeda: US deployment (8/03): 9,600; US dead (1/04): 100: US cost (to date): $52 billion.

Hamas: US deployment: TBD (jewdayo-Christian Sen. Lugar has urged US war against freedom fighters in Occupied Palestine); US dead: also TBD; US cost (latest only): $174,000 (3 Hellfire missiles @ $58,000 required to exercise zionist entity’s “natural right” of “targeted killing” of quadriplegic Sheikh Yassin and all bystanders, presumed collectively guilty).

The National Alliance: ADL deployment: one unpaid intern to input Poisoning the Web; ADL dead: 0 (unfortunately); ADL cost: negative (PTW = fundraising tool).

applause for final solution.

the NA is going to bend over backwards to accomodate everyone in the movement

Scipio Americanus

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=124295&page=7&pp=10

It appears this post may have been "much exaggerated":

Hey "Woody": kike Freud dead for good this time

http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=2539