View Full Version : It isn't the same movie!
Mann
March 31st, 2004, 07:09 PM
Recently bought "Jaws" on DVD. Now, I know it's a Steven Kikeberg film and I HATE the jew, but I first saw it way before I was racially or jewilly aware, and it holds a fond place in my memories. My girlfriend at the time liked it, and, just for a vicarious thrill, we would sometimes sit on the beach and imagine the shark swimming offshore. I know, dumb! But girls can make you do dopey stuff like that.
Anyway, I watched it last night. And my first thought was, "This doesn't feel right." For example, right from the start, the music seemed wrong; different somehow. It had no presence. I thought, maybe I have to turn up the volume, but that didn't help.
After watching for about twenty minutes, and realising that the film somehow lacked the aural impact that I remembered, I finally began to wonder if I was actually listening to the original soundtrack after all. The more I listened, the more I came to wonder if Kikeberg had replaced the John Wiliams score with some generic orchestra's version. It just didn't sound the same!
Does that seem far-fetched? Was I imagining it?
Certainly, the jew would do something like that, to avoid paying further fees to Williams for his orchestration. Maybe he owned the rights to the actual score, but not to Williams' performance of it. I don't know.
Anyway, maybe I'm wrong, but if not, I wonder how many other movies have been tampered with before going on DVD. I'm thinking of getting The Lion King, but I'm wondering if it will be the same film. I'm sure it's easy, with an animated film, to alter and re-record sections of dialogue that might be taken as Pro-White. Especially since the furore over the film highlighted its popularity with WNs.
Anybody got any comments?
MadScienceType
April 2nd, 2004, 11:46 AM
Does that seem far-fetched? Was I imagining it?
I think you were having an allergic reaction to Richard Dreyfuss.
Mann
April 2nd, 2004, 06:23 PM
Who fucking cares? I thought that movie was a joke when I was a little kid, same for Indiana Jones: like all jew directors, he's vastly overated, then and now.
Let us know if the newly re-released Schindler's List DVD has a different feel to the score.
Are you trying to piss me off, Doppelhaken? I have no intention of buying Swindler's List, and I'm fucking insulted that you suggest I would!!
Didn't you read my post carefully? I said I first saw Jaws before I was jew-aware. Don't you fucking tell me that there aren't any movies, songs, books, etc that you were fond of before you woke up to what was behind them! And don't tell me that you don't enjoy stuff that you know was made by jews.
If I want to watch a movie for its personal sentimental value to me, I'll fucking do it!! I know Kikeberg is a piece of shit. But I have no intention of forfeiting and abandoning any of my fondest memories and past experiences just because they were associated with something that a jew made!
We can separate the effect from the cause. We can distinguish between the object of our affection and the creator of that object. We can take from the jew whatever he wishes to give us, while refusing to pay the price he asks. It isn't that difficult.
I love my wife, but I've never been too crazy about her Mom. And I think her Dad was a piece of shit. But I love my wife. Do you see my point?
Mann
April 2nd, 2004, 06:41 PM
I think you were having an allergic reaction to Richard Dreyfuss.
LOL, MST! maybe you're right.
But you know there again I have a problem. Because I first saw Dreyfuss in one of my most-loved movies, American Graffiti, and today it is difficult for me to actually hate the actor, because I loved the film story that he was in.
See, I've always loved movies, but I've never been a so-called movie "fan". You know, the kind of person who knows all about Hollywood and who's with who, and what year a film was made, and who was in it, etc.. I do know a bit of that stuff, but only because I watch so many films and I have a good memory.
I'm the kind of guy who totally immerses himself in a movie, suspends disbelief and all that. Hell, that's what they're for, after all! If I watch Richard Dreyfuss pretending to be a 60s White teenager in a small town, then that's exactly what he is, for the time being, and I'm quite prepared to believe it and enjoy the ride for 90 minutes.
If I find out later on that he is a kike, too fucking bad. I refuse to let that information ruin a happy experience for me. Sure, if I met Dreyfuss in person, I'd be revolted that I was in the company of a jew. But when I'm watching a movie, I'm there to enjoy a story, and nothing's gonna fuck that up for me.
Let the jews be actors. Let their famous lying skills be put to a good use occasionally. Sure, avoid the blatant "agenda" pieces, but enjoy the rest. Use the bastards. That's my opinion.
COTW
April 2nd, 2004, 06:43 PM
http://www.angelfire.com/dc/top100dvd/6170.html#65
go to 65
"And while it's unfortunately missing the original mono soundtrack, the 5.1 remixes are not all that bad."
You have a good ear Mann.
Mann
April 3rd, 2004, 01:59 AM
http://www.angelfire.com/dc/top100dvd/6170.html#65
go to 65
"And while it's unfortunately missing the original mono soundtrack, the 5.1 remixes are not all that bad."
You have a good ear Mann.
Heh, thanks, Cracker, and thanks for the link. That'll come in handy.
So I was right? Yeah, I won't be modest, I've always had a keen ear for music, especially where it involves visuals. I think everybody does. I guess it's because the whole audio/visual experience gets stored in your memory, so that on a later viewing, if anything's missing, the experience feels different.
Question remains, why the hell do they want to tamper with movies anyway?
Mann
April 3rd, 2004, 02:12 AM
Yeah, I guess I was trying to piss you off.
Well, mission fucking accomplished! (No, it's cool. :cool: )
Actually, I didn't find Jaws scarey, either. But I'm partial to any movie that has boats, beaches, and the sea in it. And that little seaside town appealed to me. My kind of place. Let's say I enjoyed Jaws in spite of the fact that Kikeberg was responsible for it.
The Indiana Jones movies? Well, you gotta admit they weren't boring. :)
Magnus
April 7th, 2004, 05:14 PM
"it is difficult for me to actually hate the actor, because I loved the film story that he was in."
You want to hate the guy just because he is jewish. Those types of statements are exactly why people steer clear of anything we have to do with. Sorry, It just struck me as sounding rather childish. I don't HATE anyone I enjoy watching perform, just because they are a jew or a nigger. I acknowledge the fact they may be different, but I don't hate Richard Dreyfuss. I enjoy the film " JAWS". I also enjoyed the Indiana Jones movies when I was younger, but as of late they do seem pathetic. Indiana always fighting evil Nazis. Okay, that's a typical jew filmaker for you. Thankfully, JAWS was not wearing a Nazi armband or gassing little children. I can live with that, Speilberg or not.
Mann
April 7th, 2004, 05:48 PM
"it is difficult for me to actually hate the actor, because I loved the film story that he was in."
You want to hate the guy just because he is jewish. Those types of statements are exactly why people steer clear of anything we have to do with. Sorry, It just struck me as sounding rather childish.
No, Magnus, I made that comment because Mad Science Type said that I was probably "having an allergic reaction to Richard Dreyfuss", which I took to mean that he didn't much like the guy. So, I just pointed out that I personally found it hard to actually hate him, because of his fond associations for me in films. I wasn't saying that I was trying to hate him but finding it difficult. You know what I mean? You know when we say , "I can't say I hate it", we just mean that it's okay. That's what I was saying.
As I myself said in my post, I can watch jew actors without letting it spoil the movie experience for me. It's one of the things they're good at. Personally, I know I couldn't get up in front of a camera and bullshit like they do. But they're naturals. As I've said, why not use their lying "talents" for our entertainment? It's ironic, I think.
I don't think we're at odds, Magnus. :)
Magnus
April 7th, 2004, 08:34 PM
Yes. I was a bit hasty with my post, then right after posting it I viewed the thread pertaining to this peticular topic. To be honest, the personal lives of "entertainers" have dealt blows to the critiqe (sic) of their movies. For example, I do not view JAWS any different because Dreyfuss is a jew, but look at the character Gandholf different in LOTR beceause he is played by Ian McKellan, an open homosexual. They are just natural emotions felt for whatever reason.
Sorry for the quick assumption that you make childish remarks. That was childish of me.
Mann
April 8th, 2004, 05:44 AM
Yes. I was a bit hasty with my post, then right after posting it I viewed the thread pertaining to this peticular topic. To be honest, the personal lives of "entertainers" have dealt blows to the critiqe (sic) of their movies. For example, I do not view JAWS any different because Dreyfuss is a jew, but look at the character Gandholf different in LOTR beceause he is played by Ian McKellan, an open homosexual. They are just natural emotions felt for whatever reason.
Sorry for the quick assumption that you make childish remarks. That was childish of me.
It's cool, Magnus. And I agree with you about Ian McKellan. It's a damn shame that these people choose to reveal their illness, especially when they know it must have a diminishing effect upon a work of art in which they were involved. Now, when I watch the LOTR movies, I have to make an effort to believe that Ghandalf is a Wizard, rather than a queer actor pretending to be a Wizard.
I shouldn't have to do that. As an actor, it's his job to convince me and the audience that he is what he's pretending to be. If the actor chooses to tell his audience, in another time and place, that he is a actually a perverted queer, then he is betraying his audience. I don't see how a genuinely committed actor could do that. To me, it proves that he is corrupt.
And, hell, that makes me mad! I want to enjoy the character of Ghandalf. I want to believe he exists, at least for the three odd hours I'm watching the film. I want to enjoy Ghandalf's personality, his actions, and his words. I don't want to keep thinking, "This guy sucks other guy's cocks". Shit!
I wish to hell queers would go back into the closet. Anyway, you know what I mean. No sense in getting bent about it, I guess.
vBulletin® v3.8.6, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.