Log in

View Full Version : So where is the CHRC now?


AngryWhiteGuy
July 20th, 2006, 05:50 PM
The other day I was bored and Jewgled up some phrases. One that came to mind was "drunk welfare indians" (minus the quotes). I came across one page with offensive postings about whites, posted by squaw. Here's one that pissed me off.


ALL FOR THE PEOPLE.

4 men gather on the top of 30-story building, an East Indian, a Japanese, an American Indian, and a White Man.

The East Indian guy says, "This is for my people!" and he jumps off.

The Japanese says, "This is for my people!" and jumps off.

The American Indian says, "This is for my people" and pushes the White Man off.

So where is the jewish controlled CHRC and their little lap dog Warman now eh? If they can railroad and fuck over a white man for posting 'offensive' stuff aboot non-whites, why can't the same be applied for the opposite?

Oh wait, nevermind. Whites don't have free speech here in Canuckistan, while non-white scum can bash us all they want. You can bet if the page in question was white run and had jokes about niggers and kikes Warman and the jews would be up in arms calling for the arrest of the posters and the site admin. But since it's run by some of the 'privleged', it's all good. :mad:

If you wish to see the site in question, here it is.
http://www.ayn.ca/Entertainment-Jokes.aspx

Jack
July 22nd, 2006, 01:34 PM
You could file a complaint "human rights" yourself against this Indian for " likely exposing an identifiable group to hatred or contempt" I don't know how they would rule on the case. I do know that if enough people file frivolous complaints, it makes a mockorey out of the CHRT and hopefully leads to this taxpayer funded evil cabal being abolished.

Abzug Hoffman
July 22nd, 2006, 02:29 PM
No way should whites scream for more people to locked up for hate speech crimes. That's like "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." "Them" being ZOG in this case.

If we were going to do anything (besides type on the computer) we should promote that hate speech trials are unfair, the laws should be struck down, and the whites locked up should be let out.

Jack
July 26th, 2006, 11:50 AM
No way should whites scream for more people to locked up for hate speech crimes. That's like "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." "Them" being ZOG in this case.

If we were going to do anything (besides type on the computer) we should promote that hate speech trials are unfair, the laws should be struck down, and the whites locked up should be let out.

Personally, I'm not too thrilled about the idea of filing "human rights" complaints against anyone since I believe in total free speech. However this is one of our few legal options. One positive aspect of this tactic is it would throw sand in their gears since these "human rights" laws are not intended to be used against non-whites and anti's.

An option I like much better is to support Marc Lemire's court challenge to section 13 of the "human rights' act. http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=261124

Your generous donations to Marc Lemire can be sent to:

Canadian Association for Free Expression
(Freedomsite Fund)
P.O. Box 332, Station 'B'
Etobicoke, Ontario
M9W 5L3
CANADA

MOMUS
July 26th, 2006, 12:06 PM
ALL FOR THE PEOPLE.

4 men gather on the top of 30-story building, an East Indian, a Japanese, an American Indian, and a White Man.

The East Indian guy says, "This is for my people!" and he jumps off.

The Japanese says, "This is for my people!" and jumps off.

The American Indian says, "This is for my people" and pushes the White Man off.

That's a stupid version of an old joke. The way I heard it years ago:

The airplane has an engine out and is low on fuel. The pilot says the load must be lightened, volunteers are needed to jump out in order to save the others aboard. So, the Frenchman says "Vive la France!" and gallantly jumps out. The Englishman says "God save the Queen!" and does the same. The Texan says "Remember the Alamo!" and pushes the Mexican out.