Ancient pyramids found in Ukraine

11.08.2006

Gigantic pyramids, very similar to Egyptian ones, have recently been discovered in Luganshchina. Scientists conclude that five thousand years ago, a highly developed civilization lived on the territory of modern Ukraine.

http://english.pravda.ru/science/tech/11-08-2006/83895-pyramids-0

http://www.gizapyramid.com/piramida22.jpg
Russian Experimental Pyramid in the Tver Region


I keep trying to avoid the pyramid thing but the Russians have been researching the old fashioned way, they build small(er) pyramids and study what it is they do or don't do.

It's the only way we're going to find out what in hell our ancestors knew. The ancients absolutely did not build pyramids as tombs or ceremonial objects, so what did they build them for?

Russian reseachers have a right to an opinion because they are doing the donkey work. They think pyramids involve inerton waves (see below). Is it true? I don't know. Russians are studying pyramids and we're bankrolling Israel, so if anyone finds out it will be them and not us.


Pyramid's Field

As we have just seen, invisible inerton waves of the Earth always accompany any physical process that occurs on the Earth surface or inside of it. Because of that the Earth inerton field may be treated as an alternative to the aether wind which, speaking the language of physicists of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the Earth might experience in its motion through the world aether.

Apparently, just inerton waves increase inside Egyptian pyramids and their models since the pyramids are typical resonators of inerton waves, which are excited in the Earth. In fact, faces of the pyramids are oriented with a high degree of accuracy to the cardinal points of the compass. Besides, the ratio between the side of the square apyr and the height hpyr of a pyramid is very close to the value pi / 2. The equality is held for the Great Pyramid, apyr / hpyr = pi / 2, and this means that its shape corresponds to an optimal resonator. At all events, the profile of the Great Pyramid (along the East-West line) unambiguously points that it was built as a resonator of the best quality-factor. Moreover, the word pyramid itself indicates to its inner properties – the "inside fire" of the construction.

Figure 5 shows profiles (along the East-West line) of three possible shapes of pyramids: a sharp pyramid, the Great Pyramid and an obtuse pyramid. The first one that is shown in the Figure depicts those Russian ones which were described in the second section; the pyramid is characterized by the ratio a / h = 0.5. Since the value 0.5 is approximately three times less than the number pi / 2, we may suggest that parameters of such sharp pyramid are not able to keep the inerton waves inside the construction. The sharp pyramid plays rather the role of a radiator (but a sharp pyramid may function also as an antenna absorbing inerton radiation from outer space). We mentioned above that researchers from the company "Gidrometbribor" indeed fixed presumptively ionic formations over the sharp pyramid. To the contrary, an obtuse pyramid may rather function as a radiator that emits amplified inerton waves into the Earth surface. The Great Pyramid of Giza and the smaller pyramids should work the same as the resonator described in this article as the happy medium, i.e. do not intensively radiate up or down.


Rest of page (includes Figure 5 and other interesting things about the Russian experimental pyramid):

http://www.gizapyramid.com/DrV-article.htm

The word for pyramid in ancient Egypt was not pyramid but "Mir". Which is also a Russian or commie word meaning Universe, I think.

The Russians have been sadly, sadly misled, in my opinion.

The word for pyramid in ancient Egypt was not pyramid but "Mir".

Our knowledge of pyramids comes from the Greeks. The word "pyramid" was clearly describing something and Ancient Greece had pyramids too.

It's all hypothetical to us, as I say. The Russians are doing the work and they will reap the rewards. If they're misguided they'll just write it off as a research project. It still beats paying for Israel's wars.

Richard Poe ("Mister Black Egypt") wrote a piece 4 years ago about Thor Heyerdahl. Actually a good eulogy. The Greek pyramids are still not very well known.

http://www.newsmax.com/commentmax/get.pl?a=2002/4/28/174008


Thor Heyerdahl and the Pyramids of Greece
Richard Poe
April 28, 2002

With all the war news blaring from our TV sets, few Americans found time last week to mark the passing of 87-year-old Thor Heyerdahl. Yet his death haunts and accuses us, like a dagger pointed at our hearts.

The great Norwegian explorer lived as few men dare to live in this effeminate age. Heyerdahl roamed the seas in primitive, handmade craft, as intimate with death as his Viking forebears had been.

In 1947, he sailed more than 4,000 miles across the Pacific Ocean in a balsa-log raft named Kon-Tiki. He crossed the Atlantic in 1970, in a ship of reeds modeled after those of the pharaohs.

Armchair critics sneered, dismissing Heyerdahl's exploits as publicity stunts, devoid of scientific merit. A shameless few even mock the great man in death.

"History Isn't Made by Daft Men on Rafts," reads the headline of an article by Ross Clark in the London Sunday Telegraph of April 21.

"The flaw in the Heyerdahl approach is that it provides rather more entertainment than it does enlightenment," sniffs Clark. "Thanks to Kon-Tiki, almost every layman now believes that … the Polynesians jumped onto balsawood rafts and crossed the Pacific. Heyerdahl did it and so, therefore, must the Polynesians. But all Heyerdahl showed was that it was possible to sail for 4,500 miles on a raft. …"

Well, yes. That is "all" that Heyerdahl showed. But for many of us, that is enough.

Safety first is the motto of our age. We prefer full-body searches at the airport and national ID cards imprinted with our DNA codes to the scary possibility of maybe tangling with a terrorist at 30,000 feet.

Heyerdahl thought differently. He was a man from another age.
Stone Age tribes – the ancestors of today's Australian aborigines – once crossed from Southeast Asia to Australia by boat or raft, far from sight of any land. A similar spirit drove the Stone Age seafarers who settled Malta, Crete and the misty British Isles.

Of prehistoric mariners, Norwegian archaeologist A.W. Brogger declared, "Distance was no object … they knew no frontiers, needed no passport or identity papers or tickets. The earth was free, the world lay open, and they wandered across it as though a thousand miles was nothing but a joyous adventure."

That was the spirit of Thor Heyerdahl.

I corresponded briefly with Heyerdahl in 1997. At the time, I was writing "Black Spark, White Fire," a book which examines the theory that Egyptian seafarers may have landed in Greece during the Bronze Age, planted colonies, founded royal dynasties and helped kindle Western civilization.

Greek legend holds that an Egyptian king named Danaos sailed a war fleet to the Peloponnese, conquered Greece and ordered the natives to call themselves "Danaans" in his honor.

A number of pyramids dot the Greek landscape to this day, structures of great antiquity and mysterious origin. Greek archaeologist Theodore Spyropoulos links them to the royal house of Danaos.

Spyropoulos' theory is understandably controversial. But conventional scholars treat it with far more contempt than it deserves. They claim that Egyptians were poor sailors, incapable of reaching Greece.

Oddly, no one disputes that Egyptian vessels made regular stops in Crete, Lebanon, and even Ethiopia. If they could sail 900 miles down the Red Sea, why not a mere 560 miles to Greece?

I thought a quote from Heyerdahl would lend weight to my argument. Tracking him down to the Canary Islands, I interviewed the great man by fax.

"[The Egyptians] could very easily have sailed from Egypt to Greece, " Heyerdahl responded. An Egyptian reed boat could probably make the crossing in "a week on average," he estimated.

I will never forget the moment when those blessed words, under Heyerdahl's letterhead, fell gently into my fax tray.

And now let me make a confession.

Sometimes I dream of duplicating Danaos' voyage in an Egyptian-style vessel – just as Heyerdahl might have done. Go ahead. Laugh. It's a silly dream, I know, especially for a man like me, whose greatest nautical feat to date has been circumnavigating Manhattan by kayak.

Yet every gust of salt air from the East River sends my mind roaming.

Maybe I'll never muster the courage or money to organize such an expedition. But because of Heyerdahl, I dreamed of it. Heroes, conquerors, explorers and knaves – all alike must die. But the greatest men leave something behind. The very lives they lived cause other men to dream. They make our puny lives greater, if only in our imaginations.

Such a man was Thor Heyerdahl.

"Oddly, no one disputes that Egyptian vessels made regular stops in Crete, Lebanon, and even Ethiopia. If they could sail 900 miles down the Red Sea, why not a mere 560 miles to Greece? "

I seem to recall that the Egyptians stayed pretty close to shore, sailing up and down the coast, and that's why they don't get counted as great sailors. Supposedly they kind of hated the open sea.

http://gogreece.about.com/od/weirdgreece/

Vampires! UFOs! Greek Pyramids! Ooooh, I hope I don't dream about Vampires!!!!