PDA

View Full Version : To NUKE or not to NUKE?


The Final Solution
04-16-2004, 01:00 AM
The heated disagreement over whether 'Kwa's biggest shitty's should be vaporized has so disturbed the congeniality and tranquility more typical of VNNF that I must offer a possible compromise. How about some of our White braniacs try to reverse-engineer the kike contraption described below for use first against the prime Race-enemy and then, if necessary, on other non-White Races. I believe the gift of justice should be bestowed on selected White Race-traitors in a far less impersonal manner.

Israel is Developing 'Ethnic Bomb' for Growing Biological Weapons Arsenal
Mark Weber

Israel is working on an "ethnically targeted" biological weapon that would kill or harm Arabs but not Jews, according to Israeli military and western intelligence sources cited in a front-page report in the London Sunday Times, November 15, 1998 ("Israel Planning 'Ethnic' Bomb as Saddam Caves In," by Uzi Mahnaimi and Marie Colvin).

In developing this "ethno-bomb," the British paper went on, Israeli scientists are trying to exploit medical advances by identifying distinctive genes carried by some Arabs, and then create a genetically modified bacterium or virus. The goal is to use the ability of viruses and certain bacteria to alter the DNA inside the host's living cells. The scientists are trying to engineer deadly microorganisms that attack only those bearing the distinctive genes.

The secret Israel program is based at the Institute for Biological Research in Nes Tsiona, a small town southeast of Tel Aviv, the main research facility for Israel's clandestine arsenal of chemical and biological weapons.

A scientist there said the task is very complicated because both Arabs and Jews are of Semitic origin. But he added: "They have, however, succeeded in pinpointing a particular characteristic in the genetic profile of certain Arab communities, particularly the Iraqi people." Diseases could be spread by spraying organisms into the air or putting them in water supplies.

Some experts have commented that while an ethnically targeted weapon is theoretically feasible, the practical aspects of creating one are enormous. All the same, a confidential Pentagon report warned last year that biological agents could be genetically engineered to produce new lethal weapons.

US Defense Secretary William Cohen revealed that he had received reports of countries working to create "certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic-specific." A senior western intelligence source confirmed that Israel is one of the countries Cohen had in mind, the Sunday Times report added.

Reliable Record
The Sunday Times report is all the more credible given the prestigious paper's past record of reliable reporting. In a detailed front-page report published on June 19, 1977, the Sunday Times first revealed to the world that Israeli authorities had been torturing Palestinian prisoners, that this torture was "widespread and systematic," and that it "appears to be sanctioned at some level as deliberate policy." At the time Israeli officials and Jewish-Zionist leaders in the United States protested the Sunday Times revelations, and denied the charge. Later, though, Israeli torture of prisoners was independently verified by Amnesty International, and others.

Another recent Sunday Times article revealed that Israeli jets have been equipped to carry chemical and biological weapons. "There is hardly a single known or unknown form of chemical or biological weapons ... which is not manufactured at the [Nes Tsiona] Institute," a biologist who is a former Israeli intelligence official told the newspaper. And the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot, citing a foreign report, has told readers that hundreds of bottles of deadly anthrax toxin are stored at the Institute.

The "ethnic bomb" claims have been given further credence in Foreign Report, an authoritative Jane's publication that closely monitors security and military matters. It cites unnamed South African sources as saying that Israeli scientists, in trying to develop an "ethnic bullet" against Arabs, have made use of similar biological studies conducted by South African scientists during the Apartheid era (and later revealed in testimony before that country's "Truth and Reconciliation Commission"). Foreign Report also says that Israelis have gained insights into the Arab genetic make-up by conducting research on "Jews of Arab origin, especially Iraqis."

The British Medical Association has become so concerned about the lethal potential of genetically-based biological weapons that it has opened an investigation. Dr. Vivienne Nathanson, who organized the research, said: "With an ethnically targeted weapon, you could even hit groups within a population. The history of warfare, in which many conflicts have an ethnic factor, shows how dangerous this could be."

A spokesman for Britain's biological defense establishment confirms that such weapons are theoretically possible. "We have reached a point now where there is an obvious need for an international convention to control biological weapons," he said.

The Anti-Defamation League lost no time denouncing the Sunday Times "ethnic bomb" report. Abraham Foxman, national director of the influential Jewish-Zionist organization, called it "irresponsible and dangerous." The ADL official went on: "This sensational story is reminiscent of the age-old anti-Semitic blood libel myth of Jews deviously targeting non-Jews with poison." Question: How does Foxman know that this report is not true? Do high-level Israeli officials routinely inform the ADL of the Zionist government's top-secret military programs?

A senior Israeli government official similarly rejected the Sunday Times report, saying "this is the kind of story that does not deserve denial." Such Israeli declarations are virtually worthless, however, considering that the Zionist state refuses officially to acknowledge that it has nuclear weapons, a fact that even authoritative American sources have confirmed.

'Human Guinea Pigs'
Victor Ostrovsky, a former case officer of Israel's Mossad intelligence agency, recalled in his book The Other Side of Deception how he first learned of the Zionist state's secret weapons center:

It was Uri who enlightened me regarding the Nes Zionna [Tsiona] facility. It was, he said, an ABC warfare laboratory -- ABC standing for atomic, biological and chemical. It was where our top epidemiological scientists were developing various doomsday machines. Because we were so vulnerable and would not have a second chance should there be an all-out war in which this type of weapon would be needed, there was no room for error. The [captured] Palestinian infiltrators came in handy in this regard. As human guinea pigs, they could make sure the weapons the scientists were developing worked properly and could verify how fast they worked and make them even more efficient.

As most of the world recognizes, United States policy toward countries that develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons is sanctimonious and brazenly hypocritical.

Recently, for example, the US government sharply condemned India and Pakistan for testing nuclear weapons. Of course, the only country ever to have actually used nuclear weapons is the United States. In August 1945, American forces instantly killed tens of thousands of Japanese civilians with atomic bombs, first in Hiroshima and then in Nagasaki -- even though America's most competent military leaders held that there was no military need to use the horrific weapon. (See: "Was Hiroshima Necessary," in the May-June 1997 Journal, pp. 4-12).

To prevent the government of Iraq from developing "weapons of mass destruction" (to use the currently fashionable phrase), the United States regularly bombs the hapless Arab country, and enforces an economic embargo that (according to authoritative estimates) has already claimed the lives of more than 200,000 Iraqi children.

For decades, though, America's political and intellectual leaders -- reflecting their obsequious subservience to Jewish-Zionist interests -- condone Israel's growing arsenal of sophisticated nuclear, chemical and biological weapons.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From The Journal of Historical Review, Nov. — Dec. 1998 (Vol. 17, No. 6), pages 24-25.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v17/v17n6p24_Weber.html

Colonel-Voltz
04-16-2004, 10:54 AM
You know, we could make an ethnic weapon that would simply make the target violently ill. This would reduce the chances of disaster while still preventing the enemy from completing their objectives.

Dethicus
04-16-2004, 01:09 PM
i hope we nuke the stupid fucking sand niggers in iraq

Spandau
04-16-2004, 01:10 PM
[QUOTE=Dethicus]i hope we nuke the stupid fucking sand niggers in iraq[/QUOTE]

That's fine. As long as the zhids in Occupied Palestine get it too.

Old White Goat
04-16-2004, 01:15 PM
I worry more about the kikes in my local courthouse than the kikes over on the other side of the world in Israel. They can do whatever they want to the ay-rabs I couldnt care LESS. Just confiscate their nukes, and give them guns and let them kill each other.

Dethicus
04-16-2004, 01:16 PM
[QUOTE=Spandau]That's fine. As long as the zhids in Occupied Palestine get it too.[/QUOTE]

i hope the pallies get nuked too, those carpet jockey's danced on 9/11

Spandau
04-16-2004, 01:17 PM
[QUOTE=Dethicus]i hope the pallies get nuked too, those carpet jockey's danced on 9/11[/QUOTE]

Do 'em all. They are our racial enemies in the end.

Dethicus
04-16-2004, 01:28 PM
glad to see there arent as many dune coon lovers here as there are on stormfront.org

some fag on stormfront said WN's should wear sand nigger-stinian headscarves lol fucking idiots

Antiochus Epiphanes
04-16-2004, 04:00 PM
I read the stuff about that in Seymour Hersch's book Sampson Option. The Izzies couldnt get the gene sequencing right cuz they're too close to the dunes themselves.

I have a friend who says many young people in Germany wear Pal scarves to show anti-Israel sentiment. That's fine I guess but I dont like wearing stuff that looks like a tablecloth--

Dethicus
04-16-2004, 04:08 PM
only race traitors would wear that sand nigger shit

The Final Solution
04-16-2004, 08:28 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=1]You're seriously proposing that silent, invisible weapons such as these are "better" than nuclear weaponry?[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

I'm seriously proposing considering all alternatives before doing anything drastic. Oh, I forgot, you're not doing anything, just pecking away at a keyboard. Never mind.

Nigger_Boy
04-16-2004, 09:04 PM
There was a short story I read somewhere on the net but I can't remember exactly where. Basically it was about this white man who was a molecular biologist. His family is murdered by turd world savages and he goes on to reap the greatest revenge imaginable. See, he designs a new super disease that kills everyone it comes into contact with. It spreads through air and water and is incurable, killing it's victims within a matter of weeks after initial exposure. But the thing of it is, the disease spares white people. It's designed to affect only the genetic structure of non-whites. So this mad scientist spends his last years travelling the world and spraying the disease all over the planes he travels in. And in a matter of years, the entire planet is depopulated of all non-whites and Earth becomes the perfect utopian white paradise that God and Nature intended it to be. It was one of those stories where you finish it and say "if only!"

It's on one of these WN sites somewheres if you look around you might find it.

Billy Bob
04-16-2004, 09:55 PM
[QUOTE=norcalnative1971][SIZE=3]The total nuclear destruction of the world's 100 largest cities would NOT be "the End of the World," but seriously, the dawn of a New World, full of opportunities for those of quality.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

You can't seriously think the world would be inhabitable after something like this, could you?

MOMUS
04-17-2004, 01:34 AM
What do you think of that?
[QUOTE=Dethicus]i hope the pallies get nuked too, those carpet jockey's danced on 9/11[/QUOTE]

999
07-02-2004, 12:56 PM
Nuking 100 cities instead of 2 like the kikenvermin did in 1945 will not mean the end of the world.

It will mean that the world gets 50 times as much damage as it did it 1945.

999
07-02-2004, 03:03 PM
Aha. So one modern nuke is let's say 1000 times stronger than the ancient ones of 1945, so nuking 100 cities would be like 100,000 Hiroshima's.

Although Hiroshima was quite flattenend out with one of those nuke-lites. I wonder what the rationale is of bombing a city with a nuke that is 1,000 times stronger than necessary.

Interesting that Hitler refused to use his nervegasses Tabun and Sarin that the Allies didn't have and with which he could have won the war. But ZOG USA didn't have any moral hesitation against using weapans of mass destruction against civilians of a country that wanted to capitulate. Kikenvermin like George W. Bush and his "adversary", ahum, John Fucking Kohn still think it was a great idea to exterminate 100,000s women and childeren.

999
07-02-2004, 03:29 PM
Thanks for pointing that out Vlad. It would really need a lot of Hiroshima-type nuke to burn out that cesspool Jew York. Better to use a 1000 times stronger nuke. I will remember that. :cool: