the red baron

I noticed over the past week, nationalvanguard.org and resist.com (metzger's site) were down. strom is saying on his page it was due to hacker attacks. does anybody have info on Metzger's outtage? We dont need to always leap to conclusions.

Perhaps you would care to vote in my National Linder Poll??
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=3955

[QUOTE=The Red Baron]I want to live in a USA run by Don Bolshevik Black, where people disappear in the night, and all records of their existence are destroyed. I want to take orders from the top about what I should think. I want Don Black to say, "Don't speak about the Topeka Rally, or think of it, even though we all know it's there, because I say it shouldn't be there, so go along and pretend like it isn't."

THE IRS NEEDS TO AUDIT DON BLACK TO DETERMINE IF HE IS LYING TO THE GOVERNMENT ABOUT HIS INCOME AND SQUANDERING WHITE NATIONALIST FUNDS ON PROTITUTES AND GAMBLING LIKE HIS GOOD BUDDY DAVID DUKE, THE CONVICTED FELON/LIAR/THIEF/HYPOCRITE.

A THREAD ON STORMFRONT.ORG BY CHARLES A LINDBERGH DESCRIBES THE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS THAT DON BLACK RECEIVES FROM POSTERS ON HIS FORUM EACH YEAR.

WHERE DOES BLACK REALLY GET HIS MONEY, AND HOW MUCH IS HE GETTING? THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND ENQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW!

HARDWORKING WHITE NATIONALIST, WHERE DO YOUR DOLLARS GO WHEN YOU DONATE TO STORMFRONT/NATIONAL ALLIANCE?

CONSIDER DONATING TO WHITE REVOLUTION INSTEAD, AND SEE RESULTS. THE MAY 15TH RALLY IN TOPEKA KANSAS HAS ALREADY GENERATED NATIONAL MEDIA ATTENTION AND LAWSUITS TO SUPPORT FREE SPEECH. FREE SPEECH IS SOMETHING WHICH DON BOLSHEVIK BLACK DOES NOT SUPPORT. HE HAS BANNED MENTION OF THIS IMPORTANT PRO-WHITE RALLY FROM HIS FORUM!! UNBELIEVABLE? BELIEVE IT! THIS FAST-TALKING CON ARTIST ONCE LED AN ARMED TAKEOVER OF A SMALL CARIBBEAN ISLAND WHICH IN ALL ACTUALITY WAS JUST A COMPLEX CON-GAME DESIGNED TO DEFRAUD HIS FINANCIAL BACKERS. HE DIDN'T SPEND VERY MUCH TIME IN PRISON. SOME PARTIES CONCLUDE THAT HE WAS MADE AN OFFER HE COULDN'T REFUSE BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WHILE SITTING IN THEIR GULAGS, BECOME A MOLE INSIDE THE DOMESTIC RACIALIST MOVEMENT AND YOU CAN BE FREE. THINK ABOUT IT.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Mithras]
don black-jack is a faggot. his stromfront is a disgrace to whites everywhere. he and purple-pansy faggot-ass strom are what is wrong with the aryan movement. nationalvanguard.org is boring as hell. EURO is pathetic (lobby jews-yeah whatever moron!)....

to be continued... :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]


That's why I think it's a real strategic mistake for Linder to show up at that Sacramento meeting after being "disinvited."

Who wants to crash an event after being told he's not welcome? Seventeen year olds at a keg party maybe but it doesn't look good in this situation. It accomplishes nothing since he will surely not be allowed to address the audience. It makes us look desperate. On the other hand how many people did Mueller say demanded refunds if Linder is not allowed to speak? Sixty or so? Those people are liable to show up if Linder insists on being there, even if it's out on the sidewalk. But if he makes it known he's not going to be there they'll stay home for sure. They have demanded ticket refunds from Mueller and that amounts to around two thousand bucks. If Mueller doesn't send them back their money it makes him look like a chump and a fraud for soliciting funds under false pretenses. If he does the honorable thing and refunds the money that's two grand extra they'll have to come up with out of their own pockets to pay for the event. Not to mention there'll be sixty seats in the meeting room that remain conspicuously empty.

I don't presume to tell Alex Linder what to do, but if I were in his position there's no way in hell I'd show up there. Let the chickenshits have their closed meeting. But don't take the spotlight off their cowardice by showing up there and creating a meaningless disturbance just to give them a few nyaa nyaa nyaas from outside the conference room entrance....

After it's over, if any of those Stromfront types show up on this VNN board, particularly the "moderators" we'll just laugh them right the hell outta here. They have the authority to post objections to Linder being "disinvited" over there at SF but so far I haven't read one peep about it.

This should be looked at as the final break between VNN and Stromfront and NA and IHR. Let them have their closed club members only meeting in Sacramento, we'll leave them alone. From now on though there will be no pretense of VNN cooperation with any of those groups nor do we expect any from them. Although I disagreed with him on more than a few things, Doc Pierce used to have a standing rule against temporary alliances with unfriendlies. I think that should apply to subversive so-called whites as much as it does to nigs, mexes, muds or jews.

[QUOTE=Nick]That's why I think it's a real strategic mistake for Linder to show up at that Sacramento meeting after being "disinvited."

Who wants to crash an event after being told he's not welcome? Seventeen year olds at a keg party maybe but it doesn't look good in this situation. It accomplishes nothing since he will surely not be allowed to address the audience. It makes us look desperate. On the other hand how many people did Mueller say demanded refunds if Linder is not allowed to speak? Sixty or so? Those people are liable to show up if Linder insists on being there, even if it's out on the sidewalk. But if he makes it known he's not going to be there they'll stay home for sure. They have demanded ticket refunds from Mueller and that amounts to around two thousand bucks. If Mueller doesn't send them back their money it makes him look like a chump and a fraud for soliciting funds under false pretenses. If he does the honorable thing and refunds the money that's two grand extra they'll have to come up with out of their own pockets to pay for the event. Not to mention there'll be sixty seats in the meeting room that remain conspicuously empty.

I don't presume to tell Alex Linder what to do, but if I were in his position there's no way in hell I'd show up there. Let the chickenshits have their closed meeting. But don't take the spotlight off their cowardice by showing up there and creating a meaningless disturbance just to give them a few nyaa nyaa nyaas from outside the conference room entrance....

After it's over, if any of those Stromfront types show up on this VNN board, particularly the "moderators" we'll just laugh them right the hell outta here. They have the authority to post objections to Linder being "disinvited" over there at SF but so far I haven't read one peep about it.

This should be looked at as the final break between VNN and Stromfront and NA and IHR. Let them have their closed club members only meeting in Sacramento, we'll leave them alone. From now on though there will be no pretense of VNN cooperation with any of those groups nor do we expect any from them. Although I disagreed with him on more than a few things, Doc Pierce used to have a standing rule against temporary alliances with unfriendlies. I think that should apply to subversive so-called whites as much as it does to nigs, mexes, muds or jews.[/QUOTE]

I respectfully disagree, Nick. If 60 people did want refunds because of Linder being "disinvited" it shows Linder has quite a lot of support and for "himself" not to attend would be caving into the "forces of chickenshit" (love that line) and giving them exactly what they want.

Linders going to show up. If there is anything we have learned about Alex is, you tell him what he can't do and he'll throw %1000 at you to show that he can!

If the conference allows Linder to speak then the forces of right and reason will have prevailed. If Alex isn't allowed to speak then he can do his usual excellent job of reporting everything back to us. Either way the conference should be a corker. I for one kinda like the intrigue and controversy over the whole thing. Adds interest, arouses the curiosity and holds the attention of everyone involved and those that aren't.
Exciting ITZ!

Nick,

I agree with much of what you say, except that I think it does no harm for Mr. Linder to go, given that Mueller himself made it clear that it was his wish that Linder be allowed to at least attend, if not speak (dunno Mueller's position on that or if Linder was even slated to address). I agree that no one on "our side" should cause a ruckus, for it only legitimizes their complaints. However, I think to leave when dismissed (behind the scenes, no less!) only serves to embolden these would-be zampolits to more and greater delusions of importance. After the conference, I fully agree that this represents the break-point with the stormfront/NA wing as the pretense of cooperation was apparently just that, a pretense, and pretty much all one-way to boot.

Fair points Steve and MST, but I still wouldn't go. Just a matter of personal bitchiness I guess. If somebody invites me somewhere then tells me at the last minute I'm suddenly not invited my immediate reaction is Ok, I won't go and get you upset nancy, but don't call me again.

P.S. It does make me wonder if the closed club was using Linder as a drawing card all along but never had any intention of really letting him speak. It's been known for a couple weeks that he was scheduled to be there so why all of a sudden NOW is he told to stay home? Maybe the ticket sales were slow and they needed a special attraction, but a special attraction they could "disinvite" at the last minute.


Edit: Added P.S.