Let there be no doubt in your mind. Anyone currently between 40 and 60 years old will live to see gasoline rationing that will make the '74 gas lines look like "days of plenty". For anyone below 40...it's anybodys guess.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061024/ts_nm/environment_wwf_planet_dc


BEIJING (Reuters) - Humans are stripping nature at an unprecedented rate and will need two planets' worth of natural resources every year by 2050 on current trends, the WWF conservation group said on Tuesday.

Populations of many species, from fish to mammals, had fallen by about a third from 1970 to 2003 largely because of human threats such as pollution, clearing of forests and overfishing, the group also said in a two-yearly report.

"For more than 20 years we have exceeded the earth's ability to support a consumptive lifestyle that is unsustainable and we cannot afford to continue down this path," WWF Director-General James Leape said, launching the WWF's 2006 Living Planet Report.

"If everyone around the world lived as those in America, we would need five planets to support us," Leape, an American, said in Beijing.

People in the United Arab Emirates were placing most stress per capita on the planet ahead of those in the United States, Finland and Canada, the report said.

"It is inevitable that this disconnect will eventually limit the abilities of poor countries to develop and rich countries to maintain their prosperity," he added.
The report said humans' "ecological footprint" -- the demand people place on the natural world -- was 25 percent greater than the planet's annual ability to provide everything from food to energy and recycle all human waste in 2003.

In the previous report, the 2001 overshoot was 21 percent.

"On current projections humanity, will be using two planets' worth of natural resources by 2050 -- if those resources have not run out by then," the latest report said.

"People are turning resources into waste faster than nature can turn waste back into resources."

RISING POPULATION

"Humanity's footprint has more than tripled between 1961 and 2003," it said. Consumption has outpaced a surge in the world's population, to 6.5 billion from 3 billion in 1960. U.N. projections show a surge to 9 billion people around 2050.

It said that the footprint from use of fossil fuels, whose heat-trapping emissions are widely blamed for pushing up world temperatures, was the fastest-growing cause of strain.

The only consequence of an article like this ,
Whites will have fewer children and browns will continue to reproduce like insects . Same as the '70's when Paul Erlich wrote The Population Bomb . Only Whites pay attention to PC drivel like this , browns ignore it.

I wouldn't call this PC drivel. But your assessment of who listens is correct.

Makes me wonder, with this massive mexican invasion, where the hell are all of the environmentalists?

Makes me wonder, with this massive mexican invasion, where the hell are all of the environmentalists?

Yeah, the environment will take a hit with all the extra sewage that needs to handled, the increase in garbage and the basic need to consume.

Makes me wonder, with this massive mexican invasion, where the hell are all of the environmentalists?

They have been bought off . The biggest contributor to the Sierra Club is a jew, David Gelbaum . He has specifically said that the Sierra Club won't receive another penny if they oppose immigration .

I wouldn't call this PC drivel. But your assessment of who listens is correct.

I say PC drivel in that it doesn't address the most obvious problem , overpopulation of non-whites . The least desireable breed the most . In India Hindu women who have more than 10 children are given honor and awards .
Yes sir , just what India needs , more people .:rolleyes:

I say PC drivel in that it doesn't address the most obvious problem , overpopulation of non-whites . The least desireable breed the most . In India Hindu women who have more than 10 children are given honor and awards .
Yes sir , just what India needs , more people .:rolleyes:

The planet could never sustain more than one billion people in the long run. The Earth's population remained constant at that level during the middle ages on hand and tool farming and we will return to that level (not very peacefully, mind you) when oil production inevitably declines.

The optimist in me likes to see the following scenario played out, global oil production declines by 5% within the next 5-10 years, economic collapse occurs, ZOG can no longer function, a massive backlash by whites against Niggers and race traitors ensues.

African overpopulation will take a huge hit, their growth in numbers has been caused by foreign aid and fertilizer-based agriculture ("green" revolution). Coons were sparsely overpopulated and they will experience a 90% die off from starvation and tribal warfare.

If the planet must eventually return to 1 billion people again, I hope that at least half of them will be White.

The planet could never sustain more than one billion people in the long run. The Earth's population remained constant at that level during the middle ages on hand and tool farming and we will return to that level (not very peacefully, mind you) when oil production inevitably declines.


You are ignoring the agrarian revolution of the 1700's and the even more significant 'green revolution' of the 1950's . Yields are several 100 times what they were in the middle ages . yes , we can maintain those yields , even without oil .

( if oil is exhausted , it can be replaced with coal and there is plenty of coal )

You are ignoring the agrarian revolution of the 1700's and the even more significant 'green revolution' of the 1950's . Yields are several 100 times what they were in the middle ages . yes , we can maintain those yields , even without oil .

( if oil is exhausted , it can be replaced with coal and there is plenty of coal )

One only need to look at the world's population in the 19th century when coal was the primary source of energy and the world's population will be forced to take a major cull back to that level.

Reverting back to coal is most certainly a step backwards.

I look forward to massive economic collapse and millions of useless niggers dying because whitey is too busy tending to his private gardens.

One only need to look at the world's population in the 19th century when coal was the primary source of energy and the world's population will be forced to take a major cull back to that level.


Again , you are going back before the green revolution of the '50's .

Be careful what you wish for , you may get it .

Again , you are going back before the green revolution of the '50's .

Be careful what you wish for , you may get it .

I'm hoping for it, for one. Take a trip to New York City some time, and then ask yourself if you don't hope for a massive multi-billion human die-off.

I'm hoping for it, for one. Take a trip to New York City some time, and then ask yourself if you don't hope for a massive multi-billion human die-off.
A flood would be nice too. Say, isn't NYC supposed to be the first to submerge due to global warming? I think I'll go drive my Hummer for a bit...

Again , you are going back before the green revolution of the '50's .

Be careful what you wish for , you may get it .

The green revolution has created billions of useless eaters who wouldn't otherwise be here. It's time for a major cull, anyhow. Percentage wise, Niggers will fare a lot worse than Whites.

I'm not going to cry much when the shit hits the fucken fan. Hurricane Katrina pretty much proved for all to see how Niggers react during a crisis.

I've been saying for some time if the world was just whites and mongols we'd be fine. Our populations are already in decline. Its the savage 80 iq rest of the world that is about 4 billion strong and breeding like insects.

The only consequence of an article like this ,
Whites will have fewer children and browns will continue to reproduce like insects . Same as the '70's when Paul Erlich wrote The Population Bomb . Only Whites pay attention to PC drivel like this , browns ignore it.

Yes I keep telling whites who say they won't have kids to save the earth.. you realize some mud man is going to have 5 kids anyway, then those kids will have 5 kids.

Instead we need modern man to have a higher birthrate then savage man. If anyone is truly worried about overpopulation they can send money to family planning groups in the third world. For every non-white not born, that is probably 50 acres of land that can be left to nature.

Yes I keep telling whites who say they won't have kids to save the earth.. you realize some mud man is going to have 5 kids anyway, then those kids will have 5 kids.




HAHAHAHA , 5 ???? That would only happen if he died before 23 . More on the order of 8 to 12 . Like insects , they breed .

The green revolution has created billions of useless eaters who wouldn't otherwise be here.


The fools altruism of the White Man strikes again .

HOw do you know that Whites won't be fools again and reduce their own food supplies in order to feed the 'less fortunate' . Where are Warren Buffet's and Bill Gate's great fortunes going ? ( Hint ; a place with very few Whites . )

I say PC drivel in that it doesn't address the most obvious problem , overpopulation of non-whites . The least desireable breed the most . In India Hindu women who have more than 10 children are given honor and awards .
Yes sir , just what India needs , more people .:rolleyes:

Bingo!!! You nailed it as usual, ItZ It's all about the muds, and their ridiculous breeding.

http://www.dieoff.org/

This link should knock all the naysayers, on their asses. We are gonna destroy this planet, no question about it.