The axis of Evil:

The New National Alliance (of Fags Feminists and Freeloaders)

Stromfront(quickly becoming JEWFRONT)



Check out this long standing slander poll demonizing Vnn on FagFront!!Make sure to look at the usernames who voted against Vnn!!!
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=81166

The poll question is slanderous towards Mr. Linder and really shows the true viscious intent concealed beneath their Feminized Platitudes for Peace.

The real question is, why is that poll allowed to be read by all stormfronters, even now, when you type vnn into their search engine.

It is nothing less than offical FagFront Policy to accuse and slander other whites who scream foul at the censorship and pre-screening of posts critical of the current NA leadership fiasco.

Remember, When I registered at Stormfront, I was strict to follow their posting guidelines, only to be eventually banned for my posts on here on Vnn. Jamie Kelso (charles Lindbergh) was so nice till he read a few of my post's on Vnn. That's Hypocrisy and they are acting like Jews!! Wouldn't you agree?

They are accusing Linder of Being a JEW!!
Could this possibly be true??? :confused:

Of course the "IMAGE" of "Kevin Ouw-fwid Thwohm" is what we should all be "thwiving" for. Have you "theen" my penny-loafers Dear???

That and, Of Course, Learning to LOVE all those Wonderful White JEWS out there!! Just Listen to Duke and Taylor, and their most esteemed business associates as they share their love and devotion towards those good Jews that are on our side!!!

[SIZE=3]David Duke: [/SIZE]

"Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I will state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews"

"I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national, and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews."

"The stream beside me will follow its course. So will I."

"It would be wrong to hate or persecute present day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ"
http://www.davidduke.com/supremacism/preface.shtml


[SIZE=3]Tell that to MEL GIBSON!!![/SIZE]

Should we reject intelligent, responsible, respected men like Professor MacDonald, Jared Taylor, Don Black, Kevin Strom, David Duke – and raise up people like Bill White as our standard?

[COLOR=Magenta]--Joseph Morgan[/COLOR]

LOL. Here, the source of Duke's "respectability":

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/graphics/art2/davidduke5.gif

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/davidduke5.html

[QUOTE=The Final Solution]Should we reject intelligent, responsible, respected men like Professor MacDonald, Jared Taylor, Don Black, Kevin Strom, David Duke – and raise up people like Bill White as our standard?

[COLOR=Magenta]--Joseph Morgan[/COLOR]

LOL. Here, the source of Duke's "respectability":



Dude, this is a ridiculous pretense in which to de-fame and criminilize Duke. Duke may have acted like a scoundrel, somewhat when soliciting funds from supporters but this kind of thing is de rigeur in our society. I don't see Pat Robertson going to jail for saying that poor Russian jews are in dier need of funds in order for them to seek refuge in israel from anti-semitism, when it's jews who've pilferred ludicrous amounts of money from Russia. Nor is the rabbi who comes onto late night infomercials being federally prosecuted for explaining the destitute state of homeless jews in israel whilst he urges us to send money a.s.a.p regardless of the billions being sent to israhell from the fed. already. Duke went down for what jews make a living out of. Insider trading is the oldest jewish artform yet it's only clumsy gentiles like Martha Stewart who go down for it. I don't need to sell anyone here on these tenets but don't do the ADL's work for them. Fuck the NA nerds for their hypocrisy but lemmings are lemmings, if the NA or Stormfront can get into some of their heads than good for them.

Shouldn't we all Embrace and Love the KIKE???
[QUOTE=Bleach]Dude, this is a ridiculous pretense in which to de-fame and criminilize Duke. [/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Billy Bob]Shouldn't we all Embrace and Love the KIKE???[/QUOTE]

No we should all HATE the KIKE...dughh!

100 words or less, Just exactly what Justifies Hatred of the Dreaded KIKE???
[QUOTE=Bleach]No we should all HATE the KIKE...dughh![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Billy Bob]100 words or less, Just exactly what Justifies Hatred of the Dreaded KIKE???[/QUOTE]

Egalitarianism has been spearheaded by jews and israel; their state has the identical laws to the nuremberg laws of Third Reich Germany, this is utter hypocrisy worthy of hatred. jews are the only ones aloud to control media in the west or so it seems, what about affirmitive action for media ownership? There's a million reasons to hate kikes.

[QUOTE=Bleach]Egalitarianism has been spearheaded by jews and israel;
You mean they are the ones forcing niggers and mexicans on us??

their state has the identical laws to the nuremberg laws of Third Reich Germany, this is utter hypocrisy worthy of hatred.
You mean they are the real nazis?? the real racists?? the real bigots??

jews are the only ones aloud to control media in the west or so it seems, what about affirmitive action for media ownership?

Media ownership, Government ownership, International Bank ownership.
Just who Exactly owns what??? They say if you Follow the Money, the trail will always lead to an infestation of Filthy Lying Whores!!

There's a million reasons to hate kikes.[/QUOTE]

A Million Reasons might be a little much, but more power to you if you were able to compile and publish that list!! I'm sure we'd all love to read it!!
Perhaps forum members could contribute to the effort???

[SIZE=3]Why do you hate KIKES???[/SIZE]

[QUOTE=Billy Bob]A Million Reasons might be a little much, but more power to you if you were able to compile and publish that list!! I'm sure we'd all love to read it!!
Perhaps forum members could contribute to the effort???

[SIZE=3]Why do you hate KIKES???[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

Yeah, yeah, yeah on all of the above...I'm sure there's around 12 to 14 million reasons to hate kikes...in this world...that we know of.

I was refferring to different reasons why you hate kikes, not how many kikes you hate!

But if you want to count every kike as a reason, fine!!

Perhaps some of us hate all kikes for the same reasons eh??
[QUOTE=Bleach]Yeah, yeah, yeah on all of the above...I'm sure there's around 12 to 14 million reasons to hate kikes...in this world...that we know of.[/QUOTE]

What I hate most about the kikes is that they like to chop off foreskins from helpless babies while they convulse in pain. America is the only white country left who still believes that it's actually a good thing to do. This is because of kike influence. Doctors will recommend it because they will get a $1,000 commission for refering a mother to a snipper, leaving her son mutilated for life. http://www.noharmm.org/

From my understanding the traditional Jewish Circumcission was just a "snip" off of the "end" of the foreskin. The practice that is forced on whites in America today is "Total Foreskin Removal". The kikes themselves don't scar and disfigure themselves to the extreme as they advocate for us whites here in America. This alone can contribute to lower birthrates among whites in the long run. Those who say it's done for your health or because it's more aesthetically appealing are full of KIKE WHORE-SHIT!!

[QUOTE=Palatine Creator]What I hate most about the kikes is that they like to chop off foreskins from helpless babies while they convulse in pain. America is the only white country left who still believes that it's actually a good thing to do. This is because of kike influence. Doctors will recommend it because they will get a $1,000 commission for refering a mother to a snipper, leaving her son mutilated for life. http://www.noharmm.org/[/QUOTE]

[font=Arial][size=5]CIRCUMCISION: THEN AND NOW

[/size]By: James E. Peron, Ed.D.[/font]

Milah: Symbolic Circumcision of Covenant
The original Biblical circumcision of Abraham's time was a relatively minor ritual circumcision procedure in which only the redundant end of the foreskin extending beyond the tip of the glans was removed. This was called "Milah". It is from this term that the Jewish Religious Covenant circumcision ritual Bris Milah or Brith Milah got its name.

Following "Milah", a penis so circumcised would still contain a considerable portion of the foreskin and the penis would have continued to go through its natural development since most of the foreskin would have remained intact. Protection of the glans would still have occurred. The foreskin would not be stripped back off the glans and would naturally separate from the glans gradually as the child matures, much as it would had the child not been circumcised. The sensitive frenulum would not have been disturbed or moved, and the foreskin remaining would continue to cover and protect a substantial portion of the glans, especially when flaccid, and the glans would appear as uncircumcised. There would be minimal loss of sensitivity or intended protection.

This type circumcision continued throughout the ages and during the time of Christ. The circumcision of Christ would have been this type circumcision as referred to in the bible. Indeed, biblical reference to circumcision is strictly this form of circumcision. It continued into the New Testament. It has been argued that Michelangelo's David should show David as Circumcised. Interestingly, Michelangelo presented David precisely as he should have appeared following an infant "Milah" circumcision. His glans is essentially covered with only the tip of the glans showing.

Changes to the Ritual Circumcision Procedure:
No other feature was added to the religious ritual until about 140 AD when a second step to the ritual circumcision procedure was introduced.

Periah: The laying bare of the glans
After performing "milah", the cutting back of the end of the infant's foreskin, a second step, periah was then performed. Periah consists of tearing and stripping back the remaining inner mucosal lining of the foreskin from the glans and then, by use of a sharp finger nail or implement, removing all of the inner mucosal tissue, including the excising and removal of the frenulum from the underside of the glans. The objective was to insure that no part of the remaining penile skin would rest against the glans corona. If any shreds of the mucosal foreskin tissue remained, or rejoined to the underside of the glans, the child was to be re-circumcised.

This is a much more radical form of circumcision. It was dictated by man, and is not the biblical commanded circumcision rite. [Italics mine] Its introduction has a bizarre history. The rabbinate sought to put an end to the practice of youths desiring to appear uncircumcised by stretching the remainding foreskin for social economic benefits and for sports competitions. By introducing the painful and debilitating "Periah" they would obliterate the foreskin completely such that proper circumcised Jew could not disguise "the seal of the covenant". From this point in Jewish history, the male's glans is directly affected by the circumcision procedure, and the denuded glans and traumatized infant will heal with considerable nerve damage and loss of sensitivity. Again, it is important to note that this is not the Covenant circumcision of Abraham defined in the Bible. [Italics mine]

Metzitzeh: (Mezzizza/Mizizah) The sucking of blood from the wound
During the Talmudic period (500-625 A.D.), a third step was added to the Orthodox circumcision ritual. It was not universally adopted by all Jewish groups, but became a practice of the more Orthodox groups. This third step was called "Metzitzah". During "Metzitzah", the mohel takes the now badly bleeding penis into his mouth and sucks the blood from the wounded pant. This was most probably adopted to collapse the major blood vessels to stem bleeding and to extract any induced bacteria from the wound and blood system. In effect, it often introduced infection, such as tuberculosis and venereal diseases, with very serious and tragic consequence, as reported throughout history. More modern day mohels use a glass tube placed over the infant's penis for suction of the blood when performing metzitzah. In many Jewish ritual circumcisions this step of Metzitzah has been eliminated.

The introduction of Routine Infant Circumcision:
Routine Infant Circumcision was introduced during the late 1800's and throughout the 1900's on the pretext that it offered health and hygiene benefits, would stop the habit of masturbation, and proffered an endless list of presumed cures for a variety of ailments and diseases. As mother's opted to use physicians to give birth in hospitals or clinics, rather than using a midwife for home birth, the practice of routine circumcision of male infants blossomed and became nearly universal.

As one would expect, many of those experienced in the procedure were Jewish physicians and mohels. They taught new physicians to perform the surgical procedure as was practiced by Jewish ritual circumcision procedures. This meant that most infants underwent a fairly radical complete form of circumcision. What was performed was the Jewish "Milah" followed by "Periah", with most if not all of the foreskin being removed and the frenulum either severely damaged or completely removed. This remains the routine infant circumcision procedure to this day. Many males throughout these past decades have suffered the lasting physical, psychological, and sexual dysfunctional consequences of routine circumcision, which they did not choose.

[size=2]*Mr. Peron is a medical research writer, educator lecturer, and founder of the Childbirth Education Foundation. He has devoted over thirty years researching the subject of routine infant circumcision. He is regarded internationally as an authority on this subject. He has written extensively for major childbirth, childcare, and parenting publications on this and other newborn care and parenting issues.[/size]

Additional free information regarding routine infant circumcision and the simple and proper care of the "natural" uncircumcised infant and young child is available by contacting the Childbirth Education Foundation, P.O. Box 251, Oxford, PA 19363. Phone (717) 529-2561 or send E-mail with your request to:
[color=#0000ff]jpncef@aol.com[/color] (jpncef@aol.com)

You expect corruption from Jews and from TV evangelists whose religious faith runs no deeper than their camera makeup. You already know that such people are hucksters, and therefore their only victims are fools, from whom the money is soon parted.

Duke, however, is one of us. He is expected not to be corrupt.

When a nigger hires a whore, you merely recognize the customary moral laxitude of niggers. You've seen it. You know about it. Niggers are niggers.

When a White preacher is caught with a whore, it's another matter entirely. Here you have a man whose genetic heritage should have put him above whore-hopping, and on top of that he is, as a moral leader obliged to set a good example, sworn to abjure the services of whores.

The point is, we do have different standards for different kinds of people. If the charges against Duke are true, then he has let fall a standard that he was meant to uphold.

Not only is he a KIKE-LOVER, he's a Whore-Monger as well. What?? no wife and children???? He just fucks Filthy Lying Whores all the time??? No wonder he loves KIKES!!

Do you think he goes for those $5.00 hookers that are so frequently used in Tiajuana on the Mexican Border Near San Diego or do you think he shells out the big bucks for those Fancy exotic hookers. $5000-$10,000 per fuck isn't too much to ask from his supporters. A man does have his needs you know!!!
[QUOTE=Jenab]You expect corruption from Jews and from TV evangelists whose religious faith runs no deeper than their camera makeup. You already know that such people are hucksters, and therefore their only victims are fools, from whom the money is soon parted.

Duke, however, is one of us. He is expected not to be corrupt.

When a nigger hires a whore, you merely recognize the customary moral laxitude of niggers. You've seen it. You know about it. Niggers are niggers.

When a White preacher is caught with a whore, it's another matter entirely. Here you have a man whose genetic heritage should have put him above whore-hopping, and on top of that he is, as a moral leader obliged to set a good example, sworn to abjure the services of whores.

The point is, we do have different standards for different kinds of people. If the charges against Duke are true, then he has let fall a standard that he was meant to uphold.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Bleach]Dude, this is a ridiculous pretense in which to de-fame and criminilize Duke.[/QUOTE]

What "criminalized" Duke was his own criminal conduct, directed not at ZOG but at his own White "supporters," and if you flip to the next page of that link you will see what appears to be Duke's own signature by which he admits he's a criminal.

Duke went down for what jews make a living out of. Insider trading is the oldest jewish artform yet it's only clumsy gentiles like Martha Stewart who go down for it.

Not sure about this. First, many kikes have vacationed at Club Fed for securities fraud: jewliani got Milken, Boesky, Siegel and Levine back in the '80's, and one vermin Sam Waksal (CEO of the same firm Martha got mixed up in) is there right now. Also, in all those cases I think the kikes used their own money (perhaps on margin, perhaps "corporate funds") to place the illegal trades. I am unaware of any case in which a kike pled poverty by mass mailing and used the "charitable" receipts for gambling, whether of the casino or the Wall St. variety. It may well be that this case will now inspire some really ambitious kike to try Duke's scam on a characteristically larger scale. And Duke could then write a third volume whining that the dishonest kike "supremacist" didn't split the profits with him.

the government allegations were never tested because duke copped a plea. probably the trial would have exposed him to further embarrassment. but we speculate. I am willing to take the government's allegations against duke with a grain of salt. there are aspects of the story that are not necessarily criminal. if the contributions were gifts, why should he have included them in his income? a gift is not included in gross income sec 105. that simple.

now, you can call him plasticman and say he lied to his supporters and that may be true. but I don't think anybody but duke or another WN of prominence would get that kind of persecution. and the fact whackydick barrett swore out an affidavit against duke should subject him to permanent opprobrium.

one interesting development now however is the convergence of duke and NA. I am looking forward to Mr Metzger's comment on that one.

remember this: anybody who has spent a spell inside may be permanently compromised. no better place for the government to recruit future infilts than jail.

[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]the government allegations were never tested because duke copped a plea. probably the trial would have exposed him to further embarrassment. but we speculate. I am willing to take the government's allegations against duke with a grain of salt. there are aspects of the story that are not necessarily criminal. if the contributions were gifts, why should he have included them in his income? a gift is not included in gross income sec 105. that simple. [/QUOTE]

Hmmm, not real sure about that one, AE. It's my understanding of the tax code that 60 grand and under can be taken as a gift. Anything over and above that must be counted as income.

Maybe someone with more experience than I can weigh in on this.

[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]now, you can call him plasticman and say he lied to his supporters and that may be true.[/QUOTE]

You can. I call him a swindler who signed a statement admitting to a federal crime called "mail fraud," whose victims were neither ZOG nor "jewish supremacists" but ordinary White folk.

but I don't think anybody but duke or another WN of prominence would get that kind of persecution

And according to the Dershowitzim, Pollard would be out long ago but for the wrath of self-hater Cap the Knife. And Gusinsky, Berezhovsky, Khodorovsky, etc. are innocent victims of Tsar Putin. World's second oldest profession: persecutee.

I prefer Baretta: if you can't do the time don't do the crime. And Robert Blake now surely knows whereof he speaks.

Here, "parse" the unimpeachable Don Black's apologia for Duke:

http://www.stormfront.org/david_duke/persecution.html

Note the not-so-subtle obfuscation in which he conflates the tax evasion charge with fraud and money-laundering to prey on anti-IRS sentiment. Only problem, the specific anti-swindling law says nothing of taxes:

Sec. 1341. - Frauds and swindles

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, or to sell, dispose of, loan, exchange, alter, give away, distribute, supply, or furnish or procure for unlawful use any counterfeit or spurious coin, obligation, security, or other article, or anything represented to be or intimated or held out to be such counterfeit or spurious article, for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by any private or commercial interstate carrier, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail or such carrier according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. If the violation affects a financial institution, such person shall be fined not more than $1,000,000 or imprisoned not more than 30 years, or both.

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1341.html

I'm not going to try and defend the guy on the mail fraud charges, but section 102(a) of the IRC says "gross income does not include the value of any property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance."

If you weigh his deeds in the Balance,

and if that is your pragmatic approach

to defending the morality of our leaders,

then perhaps the good he has done

outweighs the bad he has done.

I would hope to see higher standards

From our future leaders.

Do you Disagree with Duke's Love of the Good Jews?

How about slightly modifying your Vnn slogan to

[SIZE=5]"SOME JEWS, JUST RIGHT!!"[/SIZE]

"Excellent letter, although I disagree on Duke. I see no evidence he swindled anybody, and I haven't heard anybody but corrupt ZOGcrats claim otherwise. The things he has given the White race far outweigh anything negative he's done, even if every penny ever donated him were spent on wine, women and song. But as you say, the problems in WN kick in when the Petty-"positive" axis acts like jews in condemning others for what its own members are guiltier of than anybody. NA's leadership really acts more and more like a bunch of California liberals: totalitarian suppression of all criticism, while smearing the good name and motives of others." From READER MAIL 4-20


[QUOTE=Billy Bob]The axis of Evil:

The New National Alliance (of Fags Feminists and Freeloaders)

Stromfront(quickly becoming JEWFRONT)



Check out this long standing slander poll demonizing Vnn on FagFront!!Make sure to look at the usernames who voted against Vnn!!!
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=81166

They are accusing Linder of Being a JEW!!
Could this possibly be true??? :confused:

Of course the "IMAGE" of "Kevin Ouw-fwid Thwohm" is what we should all be "thwiving" for. Have you "theen" my penny-loafers Dear???

That and, Of Course, Learning to LOVE all those Wonderful White JEWS out there!! Just Listen to Duke and Taylor, and their most esteemed business associates as they share their love and devotion towards those good Jews that are on our side!!!

[SIZE=3]David Duke: [/SIZE]

"Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I will state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews"

"I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national, and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews."

"The stream beside me will follow its course. So will I."

"It would be wrong to hate or persecute present day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ"
http://www.davidduke.com/supremacism/preface.shtml


[SIZE=3]Tell that to MEL GIBSON!!![/SIZE][/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=Antiochus Epiphanes]I'm not going to try and defend the guy on the mail fraud charges, but section 102(a) of the IRC says "gross income does not include the value of any property acquired by gift, bequest, devise, or inheritance."[/QUOTE]

Very true. But there is an odd and incomplete reference on the first page of the document I posted to a "Schedule C," which reports profit or loss for a trade or business. So, and I can only guess due to the paucity of information, IRS may have somehow been claiming that Duke's funds solicitations which he used for investment purposes were actually not gifts but gross receipts of an investment business, the net profit of which would be includable in taxable income. Ironically, if what he received were gifts as Black asserts, there could be a gift tax imposed on the donors (not Duke!), subject to an indexed $10,000 exclusion, and computed at the estate and not income tax rate. All strewn throughout here (FUCK ZOG for this alone):

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/stB.html

[QUOTE=Billy Bob]Do you Disagree with Duke's Love of the Good Jews?[/QUOTE]

Unlike Duke, who dedicated a book to a kike, and NggDrasil, who likes kikes so long as they share his politics, I've never met a "good jew," and going out to search for one is not one of my priorities at this time. Meanwhile, I'll stick with Rich Brooks' bottom line here:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/lettersOct-Nov03/111503brooksgoodjew.htm

I see no evidence he swindled anybody, and I haven't heard anybody but corrupt ZOGcrats claim otherwise.

Uh, Duke's signed admission of guilt for mail fraud claims otherwise.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showpost.php?p=1008799&postcount=131
I have spent an entire day on the phone with the people who are rescuing our April 24th patriot gathering from cancellation. I cannot thank these patriots enough. Our event has been severely damaged, but thank goodness we have battlers like Mark Weber, Harvey Taylor, Marc Lemire, Paul Fromm, Elena Haskins, Drahomir, Lisa, David Pringle, Kevin Alfred Strom, Ken Usher and others I should mention who have spent all of today putting together a replacement for the cancelled event.

I wonder why he fails to mention the Gleebster or the Black and Duke suck-poops??

Is the National Alliance finally starting to figure out that Gleeb is a liability?

[QUOTE=The Final Solution]Unlike Duke, who dedicated a book to a kike, and NggDrasil, who likes kikes so long as they share his politics, I've never met a "good jew," and going out to search for one is not one of my priorities at this time. Meanwhile, I'll stick with Rich Brooks' bottom line here:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/lettersOct-Nov03/111503brooksgoodjew.htm



Uh, Duke's signed admission of guilt for mail fraud claims otherwise.[/QUOTE]

"Maybe simple is best when all is said and done, and the only "good jew" truly is a dead one."

I have yet to meet that ever elusive "Good KIKE" myself.

Must just be co-incidental

that the Jews I have met

all reveal themselves to be

[SIZE=3]Filthy Lying Whores!![/SIZE]

[QUOTE=The Final Solution]Unlike Duke, who dedicated a book to a kike, and NggDrasil, who likes kikes so long as they share his politics, I've never met a "good jew," and going out to search for one is not one of my priorities at this time. Meanwhile, I'll stick with Rich Brooks' bottom line here:

http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/lettersOct-Nov03/111503brooksgoodjew.htm



Uh, Duke's signed admission of guilt for mail fraud claims otherwise.[/QUOTE]

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=81166
"I can tell you that the Kevin MacDonalds, the Jared Taylors, the Don Blacks, the David Dukes, and the Kevin Stroms will attact our folk in dramatically increasing numbers."

These Filthy Fags certainly appear to be Attacking our Folk are they not? Notice how they ban any members who question any of the Fag Five's slanderous accusations!

[QUOTE=Billy Bob]The axis of Evil:

The New National Alliance (of Fags Feminists and Freeloaders)

Stromfront(quickly becoming JEWFRONT)



Check out this long standing slander poll demonizing Vnn on FagFront!!Make sure to look at the usernames who voted against Vnn!!!
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=81166

The poll question is slanderous towards Mr. Linder and really shows the true viscious intent concealed beneath their Feminized Platitudes for Peace.

The real question is, why is that poll allowed to be read by all stormfronters, even now, when you type vnn into their search engine.

It is nothing less than offical FagFront Policy to accuse and slander other whites who scream foul at the censorship and pre-screening of posts critical of the current NA leadership fiasco.

Remember, When I registered at Stormfront, I was strict to follow their posting guidelines, only to be eventually banned for my posts on here on Vnn. Jamie Kelso (charles Lindbergh) was so nice till he read a few of my post's on Vnn. That's Hypocrisy and they are acting like Jews!! Wouldn't you agree?

They are accusing Linder of Being a JEW!!
Could this possibly be true??? :confused:

Of course the "IMAGE" of "Kevin Ouw-fwid Thwohm" is what we should all be "thwiving" for. Have you "theen" my penny-loafers Dear???

That and, Of Course, Learning to LOVE all those Wonderful White JEWS out there!! Just Listen to Duke and Taylor, and their most esteemed business associates as they share their love and devotion towards those good Jews that are on our side!!!

[SIZE=3]David Duke: [/SIZE]

"Due to the overwhelming power of the media to distort what I say and write, I will state emphatically here and now that I do not oppose all Jews"

"I see the value of all people preserving their cultural, national, and even genetic heritage. All peoples have the right to preserve their unique identities, including Jews."

"The stream beside me will follow its course. So will I."

"It would be wrong to hate or persecute present day Jews because of the role of Jewish leaders in the crucifixion of Jesus Christ"
http://www.davidduke.com/supremacism/preface.shtml


[SIZE=3]Tell that to MEL GIBSON!!![/SIZE][/QUOTE]

Duke names the Jew constantly. Listen to the European American Conference. Only good - for now, at least - can come from where he's headed. Everything has its place, like Glenn Miller says - both 'above ground,'/mainstream and underground/cutting edge.

All politicians are whores who say what their constituencies want to hear. Duke is no different. We're supposed to contribute to his "cause" because he wrote a couple of books about the truth of jewish supremacy and power. He'll never gain office and even if he does there's not a single fucking thing he can do to help white racists. He's a whore. His claim to fame is that he ran for office on a racial platform and Zog attacked him for it. Now he puts his hand out and asks for contributions because he spent 15 months in the "American gulag" and we're supposed to feel his pain and partake of his infinite suffering. Besides he's a Christian if I'm right and Christians worship a dead jew and his demon father Yahweh the jew god. Pious fucking dolts. Those self righteous Christians make me sick with their shit about everyone being equal and all comers being welcome to pray in the house of the jew god and be sure to throw a little something in when the plate goes around ya fucks since God who created the universe always has money troubles. And look at his photos. He looks like a he dropped the soap once to often at the gulag and Bubba took advantage of his poop shoot. Nancy boy with frosted locks. He is a politician and politicians are whores. Fuck Duke and fuck Stormfront. The more they go mainstream the more they turn into zog whores who toe the line for mainstream appeal.

Hello,

I will read this at length at a more leisurely hour.

I will say that I will also contact John Tyndall about the issues involved.
JT is the ONLY nationalist leader that will allow his opinion on the web. That is a fact !

JT did not sign the NOP. He is not a BNP official anyway.


The Griffin BNP have NOT signed that agreement either . For the answer, ask Mr. Griffin why.

John Tyndall disagrees with, in anyway, that 'so called ' party leaders are exempt from criticism. No one is beyond criticism. All modern businesses want criticism so that they can 'iron out' problems.