Long ago there has been a talk in the Movement on the necessity of framing our ideas in terms of reference, acceptable to those Whites, who are unable or unwilling to hear frank talk on the jewish roots of our current problems, without diluting the efficacy of our message. I have completed the work on such terms of reference, which I call Democratic-Republican synthesis, and will present them to respected VNN readers in a series of four articles, starting from tomorrow.

The democratic poison, or what is democracy

Democracy – it is when two wolves and a lamb
are voting on what will be for breakfast

Benjamin Franklin

Democracy is deadly for the United States of America. Now everyone understands it: those who admit it openly, and those, who keep silence about, and even those who protect American democracy, because they make money out of it. The results of the 20th century, the democratic century, was the destruction of American economy, growing poverty of the population, bloody ethnic strife, weakness of the state and army, mass corruption and criminality. American democrats justify this by the shortcomings of the former rulers, and boldly state, that after the creation of perfect democratic machine all these shortcomings will disappear, or will decrease to the acceptable level. But is it really so? To answer this question, we need to find out what democracy is and where it leads.

So, what is democracy? According to Plato democracy (Greek demos cratos or mob rule) is an unlimited power of the mob to do whatever pleases the mob, for example declare homosexuality normal, allow abortions or to declare the political views of the people it does not like a criminal offence. Under modern conditions, democracy, based on equality, is the power of uneducated crowd (formed by average men and women denied education, family and property by the economic, social and ethnic elites), rules by economic, social and ethnic elites, manipulating it in their interests through mass media and manipulations of the electoral process. The will of economic, social and ethnic elites is implemented through talentless democratic politicians, devoid of any principles, and de-facto irremovable bureaucrats, whose carrier and public standing is dependent upon the opinion of the elites.

The modern democracy appeared in the 2nd half of the 20th century, when the ruling elites understood, that through democracy it is easier to hold to power and rob the uneducated crowd, looking for entertainment and dependent upon the democratic welfare state. Democrat is always searching for a “victim” - a particular class or a social group, for the “protection of rights” of whom he establishes the double standard that allows him to prevent the raise of non-democratic competitors and rob non-democrats of their property. His desire to enrich himself at the expense of the developing countries the democrat covers up by claiming the status of “defender of the human rights”, and his desire to enrich himself at the expense of the weaker members of the society the democrat covers up by claiming to be in favor of “free-market capitalism”. Democrat always talk about “civil rights” and “free elections”, but creates a state, where power is controlled by a small rich social-ethnic elites, while most citizens are prevented from participating political decision-making through manipulation of the electoral process. When this lie is outed, the democrats attempt to slender their opponents by declaring them supporters of a totalitarian ideology and persecuting them through government repressive apparatus. That’s why democracy always leads to either communism or fascism – political movements, that can effectively spring out through the violent democratic persecutions and offer a valid, though sad alternative. As sir Alex Tattler said: “Democracy cannot be a permanent form of government and is often changed into a tyranny, because it leads from a republican prosperity to egoism, from egoism to complacency, from complacency to mediocrity, from mediocrity to apathy, from apathy to dependence upon a state, and from dependence upon a state to tyranny”. Thus it is necessary to write both “democrat” and “democracy” in brackets – there is always a great difference between what a democrat says and to what his advice leads. Democracy – it is always lies, double standard and manipulation of the electoral process and public opinion.

The part of modern democracy is the concept of democratic values. To them belong:

1) Ecumenism in religion – which is a form of paganism, that bows down before earth, trees and animals. The part of ecumenism is the so-called “green movement”, in particularly the movement for protection of “animal rights”, “conservation” movement, the movement for limitation of emissions of gases and chemical substances into the earth atmosphere, etc. Based on pseudo-scientific research and findings, either non-supported or discarded by serious researchers, ecumenism is used by economic, social and ethnic elites in order to root out religion, ending economic growth and transformation of 50% of the territory of the earth into a giant park, with no attention to economic and social costs this project entails. Especially strong the ecumenists hate nuclear energy, chemical industry and the growing of genetically modified crops – the braches of 21 century economy;

2) Democracy in politics – the rule of uneducated crowd – average men and women, who are denied education, family and property by the economic, social and ethnic elites – which is manipulated by economic, social and ethnic elites, which manipulate it in their interest through mass media and manipulation of the electoral process;

3) Multiculturism in social life – while declaring formal equality of various ethnic groups and equal value of their cultures and states for the historical development of humanity, multiculturism is used by economic, social and ethnic elites in order to mix out and destroy their national traditions and cultural diversity – for the people devoid of national traditions and culture are easier to be ruled. In addition, multiculturism is used against developing countries through attraction of the most talented and able citizens of the developing countries to the developed countries, where they are ruthlessly exploited in exchange to a small potion of the normal salary, paid to the citizens of developed countries. This simultaneously slows down the rate of economic growth in developing countries and increases unemployment rate in developed countries while enriching economic, social and ethnic elites;

4) Globalization in economics – declaring refusal of instruments of national custom policy (establishment of tariffs and quotas) and national currency policy (fixing of exchange rate of national currency) the nation-state denies itself the instruments of intervention and stabilization of economic situation inside the country in favor of different international organizations, that are not controlled by the nation-state and implement the will of economic, social and ethnic elites while serving as the feeding-trough for de-fact irremovable and irresponsible international bureaucrats;

5) Feminism in family life – it preaches the “liberation of women” (woman’s higher education, woman’s work outside of family home and preschool for woman’s young kids), “women rights” (a “right” to abortion, or more correctly child-murder, no-fault divorce at will, sexual promiscuity and perversions). Feminism is used by economic, social and ethnic elites in order to decrease fertility and to destroy their most able competitors (feminism attempts to create a conflict between a man and a woman, which decreases the number of stable families and the average number of children in the family, e.g. the it’s the smartest women, who are more likely to follow “women rights” doctrine). Also economic, social and ethnic elites enrich themselves through lower labor costs (while the inflow of women into the labor market decreases average wages), incomes from prostitution and pornography (that appear due to the propaganda of “women rights”, and attacks against the public morale);

6) Humanistic education in education. The overall goal of humanistic education is, first and foremost, modification of the thinking and behavior of students through their indoctrination in accordance with the principles of democracy and democratic values. Humanistic education does not teach a student to analyze facts, in order to form his own opinion on the described phenomenon, but teaches him to accept as prima facie true democratic opinions, that correspond to the subjectively determined democratic criteria, established on the basis of feelings and emotions about the phenomenon. Also, instead of the knowledge about the phenomenon, humanistic profs try, first of all, to instill into their students democratic ideology, in particular to destroy the absolute standards of Good and evil (Good is everything that creates, supports and prolongs human life, bad is that, that does not do it) and replace them with the democratic relative standards of good and evil (good is what the society likes at the moment, bad is what the society does not like). As the result, the qualified teachers and professors leave education and the level of education is constantly going down, which however is precisely what economic, social and ethnic elites want, for the less educated is a man, the easier he can be manipulated through mass media and the electoral process. When the young men face reality, which is absolutely different from its description in the humanistic coursebooks, it ignites cynicism, which is deadly for the public life;

7) Postmodernism in art includes so called modern music – a cacophony of dissonant sounds and so called modern art – daub made of circles and squares, points and lines, ugly sculptures, etc in the High Culture and so-called hip-hop in mass culture, than includes a) graffiti – the destruction of property b) rap- non-European music, under which it is difficult for the European to dance, which burdens the normal socializing and interaction of the European boy and European girl and break-dance (rave) – that leads to injuries and requires the intake of drugs in order to be bale to dance c) parties at clubs – centers of crimes, rapes and drugs d) tattoos – that lead to blood infections and the destruction of beauty of human body. In High literature postmodernism is represented by non-sense and pornography akin in books, written by vonnegut, in mass literature it is represented by erotic and love novels. Promotion of post-modernism is undertaken by economic, social and ethnic elites in order to destroy the European cultural ideal, which inspires people to independent thinking, development and joy through work and great achievements, to promote democratic values and to make money out of postmodernist “artworks”.

In order to silence dissent there exists a democratic censorship – so-called “political correctness” and “hate crimes”, according to which the critics of democratic values, especially those of multiculturism are declared criminals. The dissidents are thrown in jails or murdered by intelligent agencies, as Dutch politician Pim Fortein, and German politician Jurgen Mellemann. Democrats also try to illegally prohibit the possession and bearing of personal arms - one of the derivative natural rights, because the man who has a gun can effectively protect his rights and fight democracy.

The ideological basis of democracy are Rousseau's ideas - equality, the will of majority and public interest. Equality is understood by the democrats as both the equality of opportunities and equality of outcomes in all spheres of social and even family life, which is impossible in reality, economically ineffective and as the example of the soviet union demonstrated, is dangerous for the state, for it leads to the growing social inequalities (the power of the democratic state is used not to directly help the poor, but to abstractly equalize the people and social groups - a policy that leads to nowhere), conflicts and cynicism. The will of majority is understood as the right of majority to do whatever pleases them, e.g. to declare homosexualism normal behavior, allow abortions and declare views it does not like a criminal offense or even murder outright its advocates (as once the democrats murdered Socrates in Athens, Cicero in Rome and Dantone in France). The will of the majority is reflected in the public opinion, formed on the basis of emotions, which prevents making of effective, experience-based rational decisions and in the democratic electoral process, which results in weak and talentless democratic "leaders"-politicians, devoid of any principle and unable to effectively implement the will of their voters into real life. The concept of public interest entails that the government is not created first and foremost to defend a man from fraud and cohesion as well as to protect his natural rights, but in order to achieve the so-called "public interest", formulated by unknown persons, which leads to the bureaucratic state - unstoppable centralization of all power and the desire of the government to control all spheres of public life, absence of effective control over particular bureaucrats and their abuses of power, state persecutions and state terror against its own citizens - the example of such a country is the modern United States of America. Democracy also destroys the social infrastructure - the networks of invisible ties within families, local communities and voluntary associations, and decreases the quality of human resources because of insufficient investment in its creation and development, which a little bit improves the economic situation in the nation-state at the beginning of democratization, but then results in significantly lower rate of economic growth and eventually significant deterioration of economic situation. in the nation-state in question.

It's obvious that the murderous nature of modern democracy and democratic values is unacceptable for the majority of the people. Therefore in order to deceive and manipulate them economic, social and ethnic elites use the democratic political process, which includes a number of stages:

1. There appears a new democratic idea.
2. Then this idea is declared good by the lying democratic mass media, because this idea is new.
3. Then the refusal of the older effective and well-tested behavior, evolutionary developed over time as a response to external environmental stimulus, is stimulated in favor to the new, democratic, and usually ineffective behavior.
4. In order to artificially support the spreading of the democratic idea are used positive stimuli, in particular democratic propaganda.
5. In order to destroy the opposition to the democratic idea negative stimuli are used, in particular the creation of the new "hate crimes".

The main argument the democrats worldwide use is the history of development of the Western countries. These democrats, who did not study the history, political theory and political economy in the proper way - through reading of primary sources - confuse the beautiful heritage of the 19th century Western republics, due to which the West still enjoys the current prosperity with the consequences of democratic poison, which is destroying the public moral and public life throughout the West the whole 2nd half of the 20th century. Thus the democrats false claim, that it is democracy that created all this abundance, while in fact everywhere where democracy has appeared it led to the collapse of civilization and tyranny: in the Ancient Greece after the repeal of the Solon laws democracy lead to the rule of oligarchs and tyrants; in the Ancient Rome, after the repeal of the republican laws of the 12 tables it led to genocide and proscriptions of emperors, as well as mass murder and torture of Christians; in 1789 France - the ideological ancestor of the modern democracy where the democratic ideas were first formed in "The declaration of rights of man and citizen" and other numerous French constitutions - the formation of democracy led to the dictatorship of robespierre and the jacobin terror, which resulted in enormous amount of victims in France. The nature of democracy was well-known to the Founding Fathers of the American Republic: in the constitution of the U. S. there is no such word as "democracy", and in political theory textbook, which was used in the state universities of the United States the following definition of democracy was given: "Democracy - the rule of the masses. Legitimacy is acquired through meetings or other forms of direct expression of public will. It leads to mob rule. The relation to the property rights is akin the communist one: absence of respect to property rights. The relation to legislation: the will majority regulates all spheres of public life, no matter whether it is based on through study of the issue or on desire, prejudice or impulse. Leads to demagoguery, double standards, public dissatisfaction, instability and anarchy". The Great Men treated democracy even worse:

"Democracy does not exist for a long time - it wastes, exhausts and destroys itself. There was never a democracy that didn't kill itself"

Samuel Adams, the participant of the U. S. Constitutional Convention

"The American form of government is the republic. The true freedom does not exist either under despotism or excesses of democracy"

Alexander Hamilton, Secretary of the Treasury

"Democracy always leads to conflicts and instability, but never provides for the security of the citizens or their property. Usually it is very short at life, and very bloody at death"

James Madison, one of the authors of the U. S. Constitution

"Between republic and democracy there is the same difference as between order and chaos"

John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States

"Democracy is the rule of mobs, tempted by newspaper editors"

Ralph Waldo Emerson

"Democracy - it's the rule of the wishes of the mob, or to be exact ambitions and vices of its leaders. The Founding Fathers of our constitution created a republic, which is more different from a democracy, than a democracy is different from despotism "

Fischer Aims, U. S. Congressman

"I have been always sure, that democracy sooner or late will destroy freedom, or civilization, or both"

Thomas Macaulay, British Statesman

"Democracy - it's the tyranny of majority, or more exact, the majority party, which through fraud or cohesion is manipulating the electoral process"

Lord Acton

"The peoples, that accept democracy, yield its deadly fruits: enormous growth of public expenses; wars, inspired by the wishes of the mob, and not by intellect; unfavourable conditions of peace, threatening national interests and national sovereignty, lower housing prices and fewer civil rights. People grow tired of democratic politicians, coming in place of statesmen"

Benjamin Disraeli, British Statesman

"The acceptance of democracy by all European nations is deadly for the proper governorship, freedom, law, order, respect of authority and religion, and at the end will lead to chaos, out of which will appear the worldwide tyranny"

The Duke of Northumberland

Thus it is obvious, that modern democracy is nothing, but a dangerous mirage, that leads to millions of unnecessary victims, destruction and desolation of the United States of America.

fdtwainth@2006

The republican medicine or what is the republic

The republic is the best form
of government, if you can keep it
Benjamin Franklin

History and political theory offers a society, seeking a way to coordinate effort of its members, in order to meet challenges it faces, a number of effective forms of government. One of such forms of government, the most efficient yet requiring constant protection from both bona fide and de dolo malo “improvers” is the republic.

So, what is the republic? In political theory the republic [lat. rex publica or the commonwealth] entails the harmonic combination and balancing of three political elements, discovered by Plato – people, aristocracy and king (in contrast with modern democracy where the role of the people is nominally increased, but de facto limited), which is achieved through republican principles:

1) the principle of federalism – organization of the state as a federalized republic, that includes regions and districts as its parts;
2) the principle of defined rights – all state rights are defined and fixed in constitutions of the republic, regions and districts, and all rights that are not enumerated in the constitutions belong to citizens;
3) the principle of checks and balances – while the primacy of the legislative branch is formally acknowledged (and president or governor does not hold a veto power in relation to the laws of legislature), the state powers are divided vertically and horizontally, so that different state organs check, balance and control each other (in contrast with modern democracy, where the equality of state powers is formally acknowledged, while de facto the role of executive branch is increased);
4) the principle of electoral census – acquiring citizenship is not automatic, but subject to completion a one-year state military or civil service and passing a citizenship exam, voting registration is not automatic, but subject to payment of a proportionate poll tax, sufficient to cover expenses on a election, a citizen is willing to vote at;
5) the principle of judicial restraint – the courts do not have a monopoly on interpretation of a constitution;
6) the principle of non-direct election – of the president (elected by the electoral college in conformity with the people’s will expressed in a prior states’ referenda on the candidates) and the senate (senators are elected by the regional assemblies);
7) the principle of people’s representation – requiring the existence of two-chambers and one-chamber legislature respectively on republican and regional level, that represent the interests of citizens;
8) the principle of permanent majority – requiring the vote of a simple majority of legislators or citizens to elect executive officials, the vote of a qualified (2/3) majority of legislators to adopt laws, and the vote of a qualified (2/3) majority of citizens in case of major state issues (something that the citizens of the U. S. and EU countries are currently denied).

In modern conditions the republic is a strong nation-state, which provides for fast economic development, respects the national and cultural traditions of the state-forming people and protects the political and economic rights of its citizens. The republic is based upon a dictum, that fundamental people’s rights are not and cannot be the result of some rational plan (“public agreement” in Rousseau’s terms), but are the result of a slow organic historical development by trials and errors, in terms of Edmund Burke. The republic rejects the haughty democratic doctrine of some “universal values”, further expressed in concepts of universal “human rights” and allegedly universal mechanism of “protection of human rights” – “modern democracy”. The “modern democracy” doctrine in turn serves to justify manipulations that global economic, social and ethnic elites undertake through mass media and the electoral process in order to stay in power in the developed countries and to meddle into the internal affairs of the developing countries to control and pillage their natural, financial and human resources for the benefit of the elites. In a strong nation-state, the republic, every citizen can influence the political decision-making process or try to win elections, and no one asks him whether he is a democrat or not. Towards developing countries the republic establishes a common standard of judgment – the protection of fundamental rights (Life, Liberty, Property and the Pursuit of Happiness) of the people, who live there, and is looking whether the situation there is improving or not. If the situation is improving, as in Chile of General Pinochet, the republic protects such developing countries from the ventures of democratic thieves, who want to become rich at the expense of the population of developing countries under the guise of “protection of human rights” or “promotion of democracy”. In a republican view, the effective methods of protection of people’s rights are developed through slow organic development by trials and errors, while taking into account national and cultural traditions, and not created through some universal rational plan. While the fundamental people’s rights are absolute, the mechanism of their realization and protection depends on historically conditioned national and cultural peculiarities of each nation-state, and no state should impose its mechanism of protection (e.g. modern democracy) on the other state. As George Washington said: “Mind your own business, do not interfere into other people’s conflicts, the reasons of which you can never fully understand, lead by example of your behavior, not through force or fraud, develop business relationships with everyone who is ready to accept your friendship”. The important republican principles is also neutrality – refusal of aggressive war; non-participation in international organizations, associations and unions, while at the same time being open to cooperation with all countries on a bi-lateral basis; priority of national legislation over international law.

The past of the republican political system is the concept of republican values. To them belong:

1) Religion and morals in a religious sphere – which entails a service to God in one’s place in the society; love and fulfillment of God’s word, in particular self-restraint and self-improvement; conduct of a godly life, in particular care and support of a family, relatives and other people. The absolute moral value for a republican is human life, and moral is what creates, supports and prolongs human life;

2) The republic in a political sphere – the strong nation state, which provides for the fast economic development, respects national and cultural traditions of the state-forming people and protects the political and economic rights of its citizens;

3) Nationalism (love to one’s people and respect of the national ways of behavior and thinking, reflected in national traditions, culture and language) and patriotism (love to one’s land and state) in public life. Based on the concept of state-forming people (the people that is the largest at a particular nation-state, that has created the nation-state and has invested its labor and resources into its development for generations and whose existence is connected to the existence of that nation-state) that is formed primarily by blood (3 of 4 grandparents belonging to the state-forming people), and secondary by soil (incorporation of representatives of the common civilization, legally residing in that nation-state for a at least five years and fulfilling electoral census requirements) nationalism has developed effective principles of organization and direction of the society for the general welfare of all its residents;

4) Free enterprise in economy. Free enterprise, conceived in the 18th century and full developed in the 19th century, provide for the genuine freedom of economic action for each man without usury and monopolism, characteristic of the colonial capitalism of the beginning of the 20th century, or excessive corruption, government regulation and disrespect of property rights, characteristic of the globalistic capitalism of the end of the 20th century, which in turn, as stated by economic science and supported by the experiences of historic development of nation-states, allows for fast elimination of absolute poverty and reduction of absolute poverty among the large masses of people. The most effective modern form of free enterprise is the national-social market economy. The peculiar trait of the national-social market economy which differentiates it from the ordinary market economy is the in-built system of effective redistribution of wealth, which is created by the market mechanism. As economic research demonstrates through the state for its effective functioning cannot be redistributed more than 30% of GDP and the direct government expenditures cannot exceed 15% of GDP, thus the difference should be transferred to People Support Fund in form of an additional (15%) tax on the rich. From People Support Fund should be supported, professionally trained and credited the businesses of the poor, which would allow for justice in economic sphere, understood as the maxim, that every man should survive and get its share of the created wealth, which leads to the absence of significant social conflicts and prosperity of everyone residing at the territory of the republic. The nation state also assist in creating and supporting new strategic industries, creates economic infrastructure and provides it with different kinds of resources – the preconditions of fast economic growth and development. The social market economic should also be nation-oriented, which means non-participation in international economic organizations (as WTO) and conduct of independent tariff and currency policies in the national interests;

5) Family values in family life – traditional family roles of husband and wife (man works, woman rears the children); large family (6 and more children); live of a few generations of extended family under one roof with mutual support and care; abstaining from adultery, divorce, mixed-race marriage; control of parents over upbringing, education, medical treatment, values and discipline of their children; moral-strengthening family leisure; homeschool education;

6) Classical education in education. The goal of classical education is ideology-neutral transformation of knowledge and methodology of acquiring knowledge. Classical education teaches a man to differentiate between his views on the subject of discourse and objective facts concerning the subject of discourse. The man who received a classical education would not be affected by the propaganda of “modern democracy” and “market reforms”, which aim at people’s feelings, but would take a look on the whole collection facts, and not only on a selected few presented by the democratic media. It’s interesting that for the democratic media “objective” does not mean neutral, e.g. representing the whole specter of views on the subjects: now only those views are presented that correspond to pre-established “democratic” criteria. Therefore the information, presented by the democratic media, is not reliable under the laws of classical logics, even though they repeatedly deny it, and it is difficult to find the Truth even comparing different news sources. Classical education teaches a man to think rationally e.g. in accordance with the laws of logics, correctly and respectfully conduct a discourse. Classical education also gives student knowledge on the roots of the European civilization through careful study of Greek and Roman civilization. Such a student knows well different types of conflicts, ways of their resolution and consequences of such ways for “nothing is new under the Sun”. He is also well learned in theories and instruments of ruling a country or a local commonwealth, which makes him a well prepared citizen and patriot, who can enjoy and extend Freedom, for the amount of Freedom in the state is directly proportionate to preparedness and learnedness of its citizens. The feelings of the man, who received a classical education are ennobled by the classical culture, therefore cynicism is much less common in a republic. Such a man comes to the sphere of human action be it economy, law, statesmanship, science, ready and able rationally explore world around him and bring into it something particularly his, new, which makes this world better and different. Such a man however is difficult to manipulate, because he knows the difference between feelings and facts, his head is full of knowledge, not ideology, and for him the modern democracy (or more exactly mob rule) has never been an ideal political system. Therefore the world of the 19th century, where classical education was much more widespread, was freer, richer (15% of the poor vs. 30% nowadays) and better. However the elites don’t like such kind of education: because it is difficult, much more difficult to rule over educated, independent, hard-working people who received classical education than over uneducated people seeking pleasures and depending upon a state, who received a humanistic education; thus it is more and more difficult to find a classical educator or educational institution. Unfortunately, only a few people today have a classical education. Classical education is not free from its disadvantages, e.g. some of the youth become restless nihilists and atheists, but overall classical education and modern universalistic or humanistic education create human resources of strikingly different qualities;

7) Academism in arts includes classical music and classical art in the High Culture, and people’s or country music and rock-music in mass culture. In High Literature academism is represented by the classical literature, in mass literature by detective stories. Academism promotes the European Ideal of Beauty (the beauty of the man’s and woman’s body, strength of spirit, beauty of nature, describes the Creator’s deeds and great historical events), inspires men to independent rational thinking and development through hard work and great achievements, identifies the deficiencies of the state, economic and public structure and help to rectify them.

The moral basis for the republic is the ideas of John Locke: justice understood as the single standard of protection of natural and derivative-natural rights, administration of justice, and electoral census (in contrast with the democratic equality, that implies that all men are equal in every sphere of human activity and thus should forcefully equalized by the state without regard to their national and cultural backgrounds, abilities and results); the system of natural rights – defined rights, among which are Life, Liberty, Property and the Pursuit of Happiness are given by God, and man cannot take natural rights or derivative natural rights (the rights that describe the content of natural rights and are largely enumerated in the first 10 Amendments to the U. S. Constitution) away. Only in limited number of cases, when these rights are realized with significant damage upon the corresponding rights of other people or public morals, can the mechanism of realization of natural or derivative natural rights (but not natural or derivative natural rights themselves) be limited and such limitation are thoroughly checked by the courts in accordance with the strict scrutiny standard. As John Locke wrote: “A man has defined rights that he obtains not from the state. And a man cannot be denied these rights by the expressed will of the majority or by the decree of the conqueror. The idea that the expressed will of the majority, nor matter how large, establishes what is right or just is as absurd and unacceptable as the idea that what is right or just is established by the edict of the ruler. As the ancient Greeks were seeking the situation where the people and its rulers were subject to the same laws they established, the man slowly and painfully learns that there exist constant and objectively existing laws, which neither rulers nor peoples can change: they can only obey them. The state is just the convenient tool that exists due to the respect towards the Law of the Lord and the natural rights of the people residing therein, granted to them by the Creator of men and universe”. Therefore, the strong nation state – the republic is the mortal enemy of any kind of tyranny or totalitarianism in all of its forms, be it despotism - unlimited rule of one man, or oligarchy – unlimited rule of a group of man, or democracy – unlimited rule of the majority of men. The concept of the rule of law, characteristic of the republican political system, entails that the state is run through adoption of written, unchangeable, strict but just laws, which are based on objective facts and do not contradict to the Law of the Lord and natural rights of men, who reside on the territory of the republic, but instead take their national and cultural traditions into account. Republican laws are obeyed both by common men and rulers. Republican laws are mainly aimed at the protection of the people from external (from other countries, their resident organizations and citizens) and internal (committed by the organizations and citizens of the republic) fraud and coercion. In republic there also exists the concept of the public morale – which protects the national and cultural traditions of the state-forming people, in particular bans child murder (“abortions”), sexual perversions, cloning, forced euthanasia, forced medical treatment, drugs, prostitution, public insults, libel, pornography and calls to violence, limits extra-marriage affairs, divorce, drinking and smoking, strives for the high moral principles of public officials and common men, residing on the territory of the republic (in contrast with modern democracy, where the concept of public morale is destroyed). In order to protect public morale in the republic exist the system of religious courts, which imposes fines and corporal punishment as the punishment for breaking public morale – the more serious cases are transferred into the courts of general jurisdiction. In the republic there exist no censorship, and all points of view are discussed freely, no matter how wild, strange and unusual are they. The protection of public moral and the absence of censorship allow the republic to create the high-quality social infrastructure – the networks of invisible ties in families, local commonwealth and non-government organizations as well as large amounts of high-quality human resources, because the people undertake the necessary capital investment in order to improve their lives while having no need to worry about excessive democratic taxation and persecutions, while refraining from destructive behavior. All this allows the republic to provide for fats economic growth and economic development. However in the republican prosperity there is its main weakness – the prosperous population of the republic wish to weaken the strict republican competition and therefore is less willing to protect the republic and republican values from different democratic “improvers” and “human rights” and “quality” “activists”, who use such slogans in order to make money. Therefore the republican should be ever vigilant and strictly counteract all such democratic attempts through effective propaganda and law enforcement.

In order to make political decisions in the republic there exist the republican political process, which include a number of stages:

1. There appears a new republican idea, the source of which can be each citizen or organization of the republic.
2. It is determined the administrative level, at which it should be reviewed.
3. Mass media, legislatures and citizens thoroughly discuss its effectiveness, efficiency and correspondence to the state rights at appropriate administrative level and to the natural and derivative natural rights of men.
4. The new republican idea is integrated in the context of the old tried effective behavior, worked out in response to the external stimulus. If a new idea does not give significant visible advantages it is rejected.
5. If there exists the resistance towards the new republican idea, the views of the resisters are carefully and fully listened to. In case, that the appropriate administrative level lacks the power to accept a new or a new idea contradicts the natural or derivative natural rights of man, new idea is immediately rejected, otherwise a reasonably long period of time is given for people, whose interests are touched by the new idea, to effectively change their behavior.

History clearly demonstrates that everywhere where the republic was instituted, it brought peace, prosperity, wealth and happiness with it. In Ancient Greece of the 6 century BC the creation of the republic by Solon led to the unprecedented prosperity of Athens and the whole Greece under Pericles in the mid 5th century BC; in Ancient Rome the creation of the republic in the 5th century BC led to destruction of most enemies of Rome, including the mighty Cartage and to thriving Roman economy, culture and arts. What is interesting that the ancient thinkers understood well the difference between the republic and democracy. For example Roman statesman Cicero, who understood the nature of democracy well, wrote: “Without checks and balances of the republic, the king becomes a despot, aristocracy turns into oligarchy, democracy leads to mob rule, chaos and dictatorship”, agreeing with other Roman statesman Seneca, who wrote that “democracy is bloodier than wars and tyrants”. Cicero also understood the nature of a democrat: “Under democracy the rules is also an unreasonable and unprincipled man, who obtains the support of the people by giving them riches taken from other people”. The creation of the American republic- the moral predecessor of the modern republic, where republican ideals were written into the Declaration of Independence and the second Constitution of the United States of America (where democracy is not mentioned at all, yet the republic and all regions (states) are guaranteed the republican form of government) made the United States in 120 years by the beginning of the 20th century the leader of the world with the highest living standards, population grown by 40 times and territory grown by 5 times. In modern world the examples of such strong nation-states - the republics are Singapore, Malaysia, Ireland and Switzerland. As their development experiences demonstrate, in the republic without democracy the state is getting stronger, and people are getting richer.

Thus only in the republic the United States can find the way out of crises and the sure bedrock for prosperity. Even more, the republic creates pre-conditions for increase of American territory over the whole North American continent, which many Americans want, because under the republic there can be created and selected human resources in necessary quantity and with necessary quality.

fdtwainth@2006