Our lame Opposition Board member Keystone, what does he dream about at night?

Mr Rogers and fluffy bunnies.
Our lame Opposition Board member Keystone, what does he dream about at night?

Honeslty I haven't been reading his posts, over what exactly does he disagree with us?. White nationalism or just plain white racialism is a huge tent with multifarious amounts of philosophies and ideologies. Wasn't he a racislist when he first came, what happened?

I had an epiphany. This is what did it:

http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html

I rejected WN after reading that. Much to the amusement of my esteemed hosts. It's okay, though.


Keystone

What the hell does that have to do with White nationalism or racialism in general?, you don't have to be a "Fascist" to be racially conscious( whats so bad about "Fascism" anyway?). Honestly you sound like a fucking mindless robotic drone, I suggest you do some reading on race science, biological groups and history ( how old are you anyway, 16?). Racialism trancends politics, I have influcences all over the political spectrum (so do many other racialists), but race is something that doesn't change or can be "deconstructed" for social engineers. Honestly do you not have eyes to see what is going on in the larger sense in Europe and america? it's not hard to see if you look closely and think. Race is not something that can be "decontructed", or altered to be "unimportant and trivial", people are hardwired to protect and defend their own biological kin (whites have a low degree of Ethnocentrism). You can't just universalize socieites and change their racial and cultural character at the drop of the dime and de-racialize all Ethnic europeans if you have a realistic view of human nature and behvior ( mostly view of eternal group conflict and clashing, tribalism, etc). Honestly, you need to dissociate White racialism with bygone failed political movements. The reason I got into racialism in the first place is because I really thought that racial identity and conflict were very important aspects to human life (speaking objectively), and to future events in the world. Try to think whats going to happen when America and Europe become racially fragmented, drowning in sea of alien third cultures unable to protect it's own unique genetic and cultural heritage. If I were to make diagram showing all of the ideolgies that have come over white peoples ( with regard to race) all over the world since 1945 ( maybe before), they all have one thing in common: racial altrusim. That is the single common denominater to all ideolgies, philosophies, governmental policies, immigration policies, and thoughts regarded to de-racialize whites all have this in common. They preach for whites in America and europe to give up the ideology of race and it's interests and become racially universlized into a hephoge of racial aliens and cultures. So now tell me why is being racially altruistic and morally universal good for European people in a world were group competion and consciouncess is the norm????. To be honest anti-racialists just don't make any sense, I don't need to justify racialism anymore, Keystone what is the virtue in Racial Alturism and dispossesion ???. Even so what is the goal of Multiracialism?, to ruin all unique people's biological and cultural endowments to march after a useless abstraction called the "human race".

Think about it..........

Yeah but Keystone likes to have BBQ's with his nigger friends and so that must mean that not all blacks are bad! The guy is half anti/half racialist. He switches back and forth.

Really? I suppose anyone with an opinion is opinionated. How were Hitler's opinions bunk?
Please explain.
By the same token you could call Hitler's theories opinionated bunk as well, couldn't you?

He was hardly a "scholar".

Eco's little essay connected enough of the dots on the motives behind Fascism/ WN to cause me to do some study and in the end reject it.


Keystone

It's the U-Boat, of course.

I come from a long line of seamen.

Or did you mean semen?

diablo

Well, yeah...?????????

Vlad suggested Eco's essay wasn't a scholarly work which is true. Still made a helluva impression on me.

Hitler's opinions weren't scholarly either. He was a politician and idealogue.. That's all I meant.

I'm not a Hitler devotee. I've just started Mein Kampf ( published in an ominous looking black-covered trade paperback), but from just being alive I've been made aware of some of his theories such as Aryan supremacy and jew scapegoating that turned out to be spurious.

Our opinions will always differ, I suppose. That's the human condition sometimes.


Keystone

Keystone, are you an Aryan? Didn't you say before that you are German?

I'm not a Hitler devotee. I've just started Mein Kampf ( published in an ominous looking black-covered trade paperback), but from just being alive I've been made aware of some of his theories such as Aryan supremacy and jew scapegoating that turned out to be spurious.

You've got the Ralph Mannheim translation. Lucky you - you get to read Abe Foxman's "unbiased" intro. And no, you have'nt been made "aware" of his theories, you're aware of what ol' Zoggy tells you his theories were. Read the book - then tell us how "spurious" they are.

Ciao.

I read uncles book in the local libary awhile back it was printed in 1938 and the cover was a big nazi flag. And even back then it had a Hitler bad intro go figure.I believe this was the cover on the 1st edition -